First grotesque anal grafted stills for Tom Six's HUMAN CENTIPEDE (Fright Fest 2009 thread)

the sequel should be "human centipedes on a plane."

― fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, May 5, 2010 6:25 PM (9 months ago) Bookmark

^

*self edits awesome geometry joke*

Dammit I was gonna go to the pub and now I'm torn

― Nulty By Nature (Noodle Vague), Friday, 4 March 2011 05:37 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dude don't give it away

lol

The BBFC has rejected the sexually violent, and potentially obscene DVD, The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) This means that it cannot be legally supplied anywhere in the UK. The decision was taken by the Director, David Cooke and the Presidential Team of Sir Quentin Thomas, Alison Hastings and Gerard Lemos.

The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) is a sequel to the film The Human Centipede (First Sequence), which was classified ‘18’ uncut for cinema and DVD release by the BBFC in 2010. The first film dealt with a mad doctor who sews together three kidnapped people in order to produce the ‘human centipede’of the title. Although the concept of the film was undoubtedly tasteless and disgusting it was a relatively traditional and conventional horror film and the Board concluded that it was not in breach of our Guidelines at ‘18’. This new work, The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence), tells the story of a man who becomes sexually obsessed with a DVD recording of the first film and who imagines putting the ‘centipede’ idea into practice. Unlike the first film, the sequel presents graphic images of sexual violence, forced defecation, and mutilation, and the viewer is invited to witness events from the perspective of the protagonist. Whereas in the first film the ‘centipede’ idea is presented as a revolting medical experiment, with the focus on whether the victims will be able to escape, this sequel presents the ‘centipede’ idea as the object of the protagonist’s depraved sexual fantasy.

David Cooke and pals need a good centipeding imo

surprising, after the first one you'd think they'd want to follow it through to the end

y'know, I didn't think the first one was terrible, but I think I'll skip this one.

I actually liked the first one but yeah. I'll skip the sequel, too. Blech

censorship is a bad thing, kids

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lgo8occocB1qfdv4ko1_250.gif

The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence), tells the story of a man who becomes sexually obsessed with a DVD recording of the first film

based on a true story

btw now I see what he meant by "the first film is my little pony compared to the sequel" but seriously, jesus christ

I mean I'm hardly the sort to call for the banning of something I've never seen but I'm having trouble just reconciling the description of this

censor more things, we tried the censor-nothing approach and it got us Human Centipede

saw the first, loved the opening act (just for dieter laser as dr. heiter), but hated the rest.

no interest in the sequel.

My favorite act was the middle segment.

isnt it really more like cojoined twins than a centipede??

cojoned twins

imagine the casting pitch for this

"hey, we need you to get naked and wrap your laughing gear around someone's arsehole while someone else's face is strapped to your bum while a guy in a trucker hat sits back and watches you while he masturbates, but it's not a porno, oh and we need you to be like that for 12 weeks"

In all seriousness I gotta wonder how this script got pitched to the actors involved. "Yeah so for the better part of the film your mouth is going to be 'surgically attached' to Leslie's anus (don't worry we'll put a pad there or something) and Jim's mouth will be attached to your anus. Great concept, right? Obv you won't have a lot of dialogue for that part of the movie."

― Alex in SF, Friday, August 28, 2009 4:25 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ahahaha

so exactly that plus the bit about the feller wanking

and the barbed-wire raping

id rather watch parks and recreation

i don't really wanna watch this but now i'm not allowed to watch it i sort of wanna watch it. also the first one wasn't all that but if we can't have horror flicks setting reprehensible new lows in bad taste and nihilism every now and then then what's the point?

i'd rather watch parks and recreation anything else

c'mon, it could be another Commitments.

From James Mitchell's BBFC link upthread:

The principal focus of The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) is the sexual arousal of the central character at both the idea and the spectacle of the total degradation, humiliation, mutilation, torture, and murder of his naked victims. Examples of this include a scene early in the film in which he masturbates whilst he watches a DVD of the original Human Centipede film, with sandpaper wrapped around his penis, and a sequence later in the film in which he becomes aroused at the sight of the members of the ‘centipede’ being forced to defecate into one another’s mouths, culminating in sight of the man wrapping barbed wire around his penis and raping the woman at the rear of the ‘centipede’.

what if he did another sequel that was just someone else watching THC2 and doing the same thing, but with a baby in the room

Pedestrian thought: If it didn't get banned we wouldn't have even known it had got made, probably.

Yeah he wants publicity by getting it banned all over the place, that much is clear. Why else would he soak investors' money into something that's so comprehensively in breach of p much every classification office everywhere?

anyone who thinks that THIS is too much should read the synopsis of "A Serbian Film"

that said this is definitely the SECOND most depraved film I can think of, and yes I strangely want to see it

I was just about to say "obv dude saw/read about 'A Serbian Film'"

part of me wonders if this was the plan all along? the first one was not really a bad movie, but it's not really shocking or anything past the original concept, even kind of boring, and I felt like Six had more talent than what he displayed in the movie. right from the start he was saying things like "wait till you see the sequel"

well... yeah, clearly THIS is the movie dude really wanted to make

I think it is perfectly legitimate to question whether it is actually worth watching

things i have now read: summaries of 'a serbian film', 'grotesque', 'martyrs'

feeling a little less glad to be alive, basically, for the effort

what other shock movies are there that transcend the horror genre

off the top of my head I would say salo and sweet movie are two I know but I don't know how they compare to serbian film

things i have now read: summaries of 'a serbian film', 'grotesque', 'martyrs'

feeling a little less glad to be alive, basically, for the effort

yeah that is precisely why I mostly avoid modern horror movies; I thought the plot synopsis of Audition was too far, and this shit stampedes WAAAAAY past that line

all the people I know who went and saw serbian film are huge passolini fans

okay just read about "Sweet Movie" and... what the hell

poop will never not be gross

sweet movie is actually not bad at all except when they go into the documentary mode of studying that commune

the director was saying that his entire crew almost mutiny'd because the people in that commune were so intense

Haha after reading about all these movies, its kind of hilarious to see this re: Martyrs:

A US remake from the producers of Twilight is in the works.

Salo isn't half as bad as its reputation imo, and I don't think Pasolini's main aim was to gross out the kids.

Salo is a pretty funny movie come on now

if anything it makes all the horrible shit the fascists do look totally mundane/boring

I was about to say that it was boring yeah