Which stylesheet do you use? (because I want to know and because polls need testing too, perhaps)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (177 of them)

I'll cop to choosing blueski if for no other reason than all the other stylesheets' fonts are too big.

Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I like only having to hit page down once on the New Answers page.

Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link

press ctrl-minus

›̊-‸‷̅‸-- (ledge), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:18 (fifteen years ago) link

No, blueski.css will do fine, thx.

Eric H., Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link

kenan's font is small too

genital grinder (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:33 (fifteen years ago) link

I wish keith.css didn't use Verdana, but otherwise that get's my vote now.

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:34 (fifteen years ago) link

God, I hate Verdana. I should stop typing.

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:34 (fifteen years ago) link

The problem with the fact that you can count on only about 10 fonts existing on all computers is that they're all pretty well shopworn by now. E.g., there are (to my knowledge) 4 sans-serif fonts you can count on being available to any graphical web-display device:

  • Arial
  • Verdana
  • Trebuchet MS
  • Lucida Sans
Only Arial and Lucida Sans are "guaranteed" Unicode -- ILX is UTF-8 -- and only Trebuchet MS isn't entirely stale to my eyes. A better way to handle fonts in CSS styles is to describe them abstractly: serif, sans-serif, monospace, etc., and let the user himself judge how tiresome these 4 fonts have become to him by allowing him the freedom to change them in his prefs. Sure, you'll wind up with Times New Roman doing work on computers where it should be Georgia, but if the user doesn't notice it, why should the web designer care?

==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:57 (fifteen years ago) link

TNR is shit on screens anyway.

You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 14 September 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link

TNR is shit on screens anyway.

-- (stet), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I seem to recall that the next version of Firefox will contain dynamic font technology. (Does anyone remember Truedoc?) I suppose that might shake up the snowglobe a bit.

==つ~~~(o)(o) (libcrypt), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link

xp to libcrypt. Sure, I realize all too well that typographical options on the web are limited, Times sucks, Verdana is a screen font, the Typography unit at Microsoft is surprisingly sophisticated and well-funded for a company with such poor corporate taste, Eric Gill slept with his daughter and his dog, etc., etc., but I still hate Verdana.

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

xp, there's an IE version too: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/07/21/font-embedding-on-the-web.aspx

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:09 (fifteen years ago) link

I love Verdana but it is growing a bit tired.

You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Does old.css's win tell us something about some vague inherent conservatism or fear/dislike of change? Or is it simply the most useable/readable one of the bunch? Do new members also pick old.css when they experiment with their preferences?

StanM, Monday, 15 September 2008 07:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I expected the default one would win.

StanM, Monday, 15 September 2008 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually, black Times against a white background doesn't exactly scream out to the rest of the office that you're posting to message boards all day. It could be a Word document for all they know.

(xpost)

sensual harrassment (naus), Monday, 15 September 2008 07:12 (fifteen years ago) link

old.css is great because it's simpler and wittier.

You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 07:55 (fifteen years ago) link

do this poll again after my new one drops, it could get DOUBLE the votes

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:11 (fifteen years ago) link

which thread was the list of css classes on?

›̊-‸‷̅‸-- (ledge), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Boards page, ILX Styles link near the bottom.

You touched me officer, sorry (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 15 September 2008 10:24 (fifteen years ago) link

coming soon: caek.css

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Will caek.css drop SCIENCE on us? Coz ifso, that's the one I'm going for. (Though I want assurances it will not generate tiny black holes in my operating system.)

The Lesser of Two Weevils (Masonic Boom), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link

the background image will be the hubble deep field and all text will be at 6x10^-36 pt.

Convert your pencil into a large pole (caek), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Yesss!!!!

(Can all posts by killfiled members be shown being sucked into supermassive black hole at centre of galaxy, please?)

The Lesser of Two Weevils (Masonic Boom), Monday, 15 September 2008 12:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I would like to add my vote for Kenan's style sheet although I missed this actual poll. It's so sleek and minimalist. Brings a level of class to Ilx I didn't think possible.

Hated like a city cop (Susan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Thank you, though I can't take credit for the minimalist part. That's pretty much enforced by the html, and rightly so.

so glitchy (kenan), Monday, 15 September 2008 13:44 (fifteen years ago) link

old.css should be the default - its ilx's trademark

― update prefs (ice crӕm), Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:44 PM (5 days ago)

(´・ω・)つ(・(・ (am0n), Monday, 15 September 2008 14:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah making old.css the default seems sensible.

Matt DC, Monday, 15 September 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

it's really really easy to change it tho... i wonder if noobs would naturally drift to old.css. it might be worth keeping the default as is for some sort of experiment there (ymmv re worth of course)

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Monday, 15 September 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Um, what just happened?

jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link

new blueski.css is available now, rewritten for the new code

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:22 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess that's what happened. I'm not sure how I feel about it.

jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link

it's awesome :)

i could make the line between each post fainter maybe

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually, I'm fine with that. It's the New Answers page that I feel unsure about. Like there's too much space between each thread title, maybe? It might just be something I'll get used to, though.

jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

It is really good. Nice one.

Keith, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh and thanks for sorting it out.

Keith, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:41 (fifteen years ago) link

i approve of new blueski.css. some text is a little bit small for my eyes is my only grumble.

old.css should be deleted to force these luddites to get with the times, man

for mash get Smash (Roberto Spiralli), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

shut the fuck up you fucking cunt

Jonathan Williams, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

oh snap

Jonathan Williams, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't think you are Jonathan Williams, are you?

for mash get Smash (Roberto Spiralli), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Whoa, quotes in light blue is awesome!

jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:46 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry it took so long keef

jaymc, that did occur to me but i do think it makes it a little bit clearer overall

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I think I'll be OK. Good work, Steve.

jaymc, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

also the square bullets look weird, varying heights somehow. fiddling with the gap between thread titles might fix that i dunno.

Aare-Reuss Böögg (blueski), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

If there was a version of keith.css that used serif fonts, I'd use that. READABILITY!!!

Radiant Flowering Crab (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 17:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, I stuck a keith2 (and a style3) there that have the fonts removed, so they will pick up whatever font your browser is set to use.

Keith, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 18:12 (fifteen years ago) link

SWEEEEET, thanks!

Radiant Flowering Crab (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 18:15 (fifteen years ago) link

oh yeh style3 ftw

-- (stet), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, that's the one right thurr.

Radiant Flowering Crab (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 18:21 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.