Has ILE become too pally?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (408 of them)
amateurist, i simply adore you.

di smith (lucylurex), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:16 (twenty years ago) link

why do you have to have physically met someone in order to show genuine sympathy towards them?

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:18 (twenty years ago) link

The key word is "effusions."

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:20 (twenty years ago) link

So you're saying emotions can only be genuine if they're shown sparingly?

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:25 (twenty years ago) link

amateurist, i love you more than life itself.

di smith (lucylurex), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link

did i mention that you're really great and you should move to new zealand right now?

di smith (lucylurex), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link

amateurist why do you even hang around ile then?

jess (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 19 July 2003 04:48 (twenty years ago) link

Because that sort of thing represents only a tiny fraction of what gets posted!

Incidentally Jess I didn't have you in mind as one of the people who seems unnaturally effusive and enthusiastic.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 05:06 (twenty years ago) link

Don't I have the right to be bothered by certain qualities evidenced in some ILE posts, without abandoning the board altogether? Certainly you have voiced your problems with certain threads/posts/posters before, Jess.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 05:06 (twenty years ago) link

I'm not trying to censure anyone. I just thought I would be honest in responding to this thread's central question.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link

So you'd like it better if everyone remained detached and interacted w/one another solely on an intellectual level? You're such a stereotypical man!

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 05:16 (twenty years ago) link

(gathers flintstones)

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 05:16 (twenty years ago) link

Amateurist, I know exactly what you mean and I'm sure lots of other people feel the same way. Look how many don't post those kind of huggles posts.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 19 July 2003 11:40 (twenty years ago) link

amt speaks for 'us' N.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 19 July 2003 11:57 (twenty years ago) link

We are the silent majority and our voice will not be heard.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 19 July 2003 11:58 (twenty years ago) link

Sociopaths are the new meme.

Larcole (Nicole), Saturday, 19 July 2003 11:59 (twenty years ago) link

i don't think it's any secret, when there's at least 10 of them almost guaranteed per certain type of thread they do lose their meaning. it's like a signal response sometimes, motion censor almost.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:00 (twenty years ago) link

haha on font 'Cochin' in italics the 'h' in heard looks like a 'b'.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:06 (twenty years ago) link

the 'posts that made you laugh out loud' threads may be the apex of annoying pallyness for many people here then. personally (and seeing it was I who started that whole thing) I enjoy them a lot, even tho much of the time the comments posted are not that funny out of their correct context - but still interesting to read for me. I also notice certain posters have embraced those threads and dominate them both as quoters and quotees. I can see this annoying other people for reasons ranging from jealousy to genuine belief it is un-necessary (especially as those threads are huge and slow down some people) but their volume and regularity would seem to indicate they are appreciated by the majority of people on this board, despite the fact certain individuals (like, the funniest people on ILE) do dominate the threads.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

additionally, I was attracted to ILE for two reasons - 1) to engage in discussion and argument about all kinds of subjects large or small with a broad range of people, just as you would ideally do face to face with people in life and 2) to actually make some more friends, or pals if you will, who are like-minded in certain ways....therefore the nature of my posts is fairly well balanced between these two motives.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:10 (twenty years ago) link

It doesn't indicate that they're enjoyed by the majority of people on the board at all! You said yourself that they are dominated by certain posters as quoters as well as quotees.

I have an ambivalent attitude to those threads. I rarely laugh at what's posted there, partly because it's about context (threads are always funnier if one sees them as they build anyway - there's a strange element of timing, despite the message board format) and partly just cause people have crappy senses of humour. Yet, I can't stop myself pasting stuff there from time to time. It's a weird compulsion. And I always read it in the hope of an ego boost.

I do find it hard to believe that people are sticking to the 'laugh out loud' criterion most of the time.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:17 (twenty years ago) link

I don't know if it's just me but I seldom laugh out loud at anything, and not because I'm miserable either, I just think "that's funny". The thread is a kind of ego boost thing I guess, I've never pasted anything on it I don't think, I just would be too lazy I suppose. I don't know why people do either, I guess there is something personal being said by what you paste yourself.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:24 (twenty years ago) link

The thread is a kind of ego boost thing I guess, I've never pasted anything on it I don't think, I just would be too lazy I suppose. I don't know why people do either, I guess there is something personal being said by what you paste yourself.

For me, it's just because I have read something I think is pretty funny. There is no connection to me and I'm not trying to boost anyone's ego. No evil Machia-pally-ian scheme behind it at all.

Larcole (Nicole), Saturday, 19 July 2003 12:27 (twenty years ago) link

i find myself laughing out loud quite often when i read full threads. that is something i'm grateful to ilx for. it might take some time to get the injokes and know each poster's sense of humour, but i definitely love the conversational side of this board, and hence the jokes (even the bad ones!).

joan vich (joan vich), Saturday, 19 July 2003 13:10 (twenty years ago) link

the existence of the Jokes You've Already Seen Anyway If You've Been Reading The Board threads isn't making all the other threads any funnier. on the other hand it surely isn't making them any less funny.

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 19 July 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link

but you can't read ALL the threads, can you?
sometimes you find funny bits on the 'posts that made you laugh...' threads.

joan vich (joan vich), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

I think I may be one of the ones who can seem effusive in affection and sympathy to others, to some people. Some of the time I am sympathising with someone I know to varying degrees (I posted something sympathetic an hour or so back to someone I've regarded as among my dearest friends for over twenty years!), and sometimes it's to someone I've never met. But I choose my words pretty carefully, and don't say things I don't mean. I was posting some very fond words to someone I've never met earlier, but they are entirely meant and sincerely felt - it's someone who, through ILX, emails and IM I feel is a friend, and I feel very fond of her and she is going through a rotten time. I realise some people will think it odd to form attachments to people you've not met, but I see nothing wrong with it - and it has happened to me, however I theorise about it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:06 (twenty years ago) link

It doesn't indicate that they're enjoyed by the majority of people on the board at all!

maybe not but then they are HUGE threads, and while some do dominate there is still a wide range of people both quoting and being quoted on there - and nobody has really complained about it (because they'll just get accused of hating fun).

the 'laugh out loud' threads i dunno - you either like that sort of thing or you dont- i guess i love it. i didnt want it to be just about backslapping, ego-stroking cliqueyness, but i dont really see the harm in that anyway if thats what people want to do. i suppose some people approach a thread like that and they wont laugh at anything on there because often people will not laugh at something when they've been forewarned that its absolutely hilarious.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:28 (twenty years ago) link

I only get on the funny thread when I'm not trying to be funny, stop laughing at me!

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:42 (twenty years ago) link

HA-ha

JuliaA (j_bdules), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:46 (twenty years ago) link

It seems to me to trivialize those sentiments.

it seems that way to me, too, but then I have to sit back and realize that these other people ARE NOT ME, and have v. different emotional lives and may mean exactly what they say when they do that effusive ILXor love thing.

I have serious issues with strong emotions and other people probably don't. That's my problem, not theirs. I know exactly where Amateurist is coming from but at the same time I like to think I know where the other side is coming from as well

(obv I do not, to be honest)

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:51 (twenty years ago) link

Somehow my Nelson closing tag didn't show.

In terms of people being supportive and that seeming trivial...there may be some insincerity on these boards, but it seems that very many of these sentiments are real. Especially with the more prolific posters, you get to know people a bit from their posts, and become fond of some of them. And it sucks to see anyone hurt.

JuliaA (j_bdules), Saturday, 19 July 2003 14:57 (twenty years ago) link

the honesty and sincerity surprises me a lot at times. an example being someone feeling the need to post about how they're feeling relating to something quite deep and personal...and receiving all the right comments in return, from people they know and from people they don't know so well at all. you could be cynical about all that but i think there's a genuine sense of love and concern around which is re-assuring. revealing so much about yourself on a public msg board as cathartic exercise is obviously not for everybody tho.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 19 July 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

Has ILE become too pally? Well sometimes it seems like the board should really be called We Love Ourselves, but given that there's no set topic on ILE you have to go with the conversational ebbs and flows... so, whatever. The palliness on ILM bugs me more, because I see ILE as being for "fucking around" and ILM being for braney music talk. They both have their place, but I don't always want my chocolate to get into my peanut butter. That's just a preference; I'm not lobbying for ILM to become a solemn, humorless think tank. But I wish some of the more frequent posters could get their notch on the statscock by actually talking about MUSIC, for a change.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 19 July 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link

haha JBR in between brainy music talk and palling around you've basically nailed why I only ever read ILM like once a month

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 19 July 2003 15:52 (twenty years ago) link

(also whenever I go there I end up spending wads of money shortly afterwards and that's not always a good thing)

Millar (Millar), Saturday, 19 July 2003 15:53 (twenty years ago) link

That's surely the best compliment ILM could receive, Tom!

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 18:14 (twenty years ago) link

Not necessarily, because I want him to give his money to me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 19 July 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

Millar OTM in his last paragraph-long post.

It seems to me that the issue at hand stems simply from the fact that people are different from one another. Some people are not tolerant of this and would prefer if everyone posted as they themselves would post. Some people are not sociable, jokey types and reading sociable, jokey posts may grate on them. They don't feel genuine concern or empathy for other people, besides a select few loved ones, and assume that those who show concern and empathy freely must be faking it.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 18:44 (twenty years ago) link

That's a total misrepresentation of my point of view, but oh well.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 18:59 (twenty years ago) link

Well then explain your point of view

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:03 (twenty years ago) link

I don't appreciate your calling me intolerant.

Concern and empathy aren't really my pet peeves, as these can be and are in many different ways--it's excessive flattery and effusive sentiment that doesn't seem to have much basis. The sort of thing Jody alludes to when she calls ILE "We Love Us."

I know a woman, she's a friend of my mother's, and at get-togethers she inevitably gives a toast in which she rambles on and on about how much she loves everyone, how special everyone is, how beautiful and smart and etc.. Most people are rather embarrassed for her, for her toasts seems to be less about actually loving anyone (although I'm sure it is not *dishonest* per se) as her needing to feel a part of something, soak in emotion. (Said person all attends funerals of people she hardly knows and cries profusely, and calls up dying friends 10 times a day to see if she can "help," over the objections of said friend's husband.)

Does it not belittle certain feelings and thoughts if you go around expressing them in the most enthusiastic terms willy-nilly? Also does every thought and emotion have to be expressed in the most enthusiastic, hyperbolic terms?

You're right though that I probably prefer less expression of "feelings" (in the overt, explicit sense) than many. It's a cornerstone of my personality, and yet I don't think it makes me "unemotional"--quite the contrary.

From my first post here I said only that I myself "balk" at these effusions, not that anyone was being insincere or dishonest ("faking it"), nor that anyone should have to stop them on my behalf.

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:17 (twenty years ago) link

Whoops. Correction:

Concern and empathy aren't really my pet peeves, as these can be and are EXPRESSED in many different ways

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:18 (twenty years ago) link

I know a woman, she's a friend of my mother's, and at get-togethers she inevitably gives a toast in which she rambles on and on about how much she loves everyone, how special everyone is, how beautiful and smart and etc..

This sounds like me at 5am Sunday morning at Glastonbury.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:19 (twenty years ago) link

--it's excessive flattery and effusive sentiment that doesn't seem to have much basis.

And how are you determining what is excessive?
I call bullshit on your economy of emotions, but, to each his own.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:20 (twenty years ago) link

"Bullshit"?

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

TS: Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing vs. An Affair to Remember

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:22 (twenty years ago) link

Oops do you actually read my posts or do you simply object to them a priori?

amateurist (amateurist), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:23 (twenty years ago) link

I am enjoying seeing someone with don'temailmebitch@hotmail.com as their email address stick up for internet community spirit.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:23 (twenty years ago) link

yes, i read your posts. what makes you think i didn't? I mean, I sort of agree w/what you said, I just don't think your RL example was reflective of what happens on ILE.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 19 July 2003 19:25 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.