greenpoint is pretty much all zone b at best it seems
― mookieproof, Sunday, 28 August 2011 05:30 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/nyregion/in-private-bloomberg-backs-christine-quinn-as-successor.html
― iatee, Monday, 29 August 2011 19:06 (thirteen years ago) link
morbs siren
http://wonkette.com/454037/mayor-bloomberg-on-wall-street-protests-we-need-to-help-the-banks
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Friday, 30 September 2011 17:43 (twelve years ago) link
WHAT THE FUCK, GUY?
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2011/11/3971362/bloomberg-plain-and-simple-congress-caused-mortgage-crisis-not-banks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 November 2011 17:48 (twelve years ago) link
Taibbi parses that crap, and how Bloomsmug has thrived:
Bloomberg’s main attraction as a politician has been his ability to stick closely to a holy trinity of basic PR principles: bang heavily on black crime, embrace social issues dear to white progressives, and in the remaining working hours give your pals on Wall Street (who can raise any money you need, if you run out of your own) whatever they want.
He understands that as long as you keep muggers and pimps out of the shopping areas in the Upper West Side, and make sure to sound the right notes on abortion, stem-cell research, global warming, and the like, you can believably play the role of the wisecracking, good-guy-billionaire Belle of the Ball for the same crowd that twenty years ago would have been feting Ed Koch.
...the condescension levels here are unbelievable, his air of aristocratic superiority almost breathtaking to behold. Listen to Bloomberg paternally conceding in one breath that it is certainly nice that some struggling people now have homes ("I'm not saying I'm sure that was terrible policy, because a lot of those people who got homes still have them and they wouldn't have gotten them without that"), just before chiding us with the next that there are sometimes negative consequences to doing something that sounds like goodness, like giving people a place of their own to live....
Well, you know what, Mike Bloomberg? FUCK YOU. People are not protesting for their own entertainment, you asshole. They’re protesting because millions of people were robbed, by your best friends incidentally, and they want their money back. And you’re not everybody’s Dad, so stop acting like you are.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/mike-bloombergs-marie-antoinette-moment-20111103
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 November 2011 20:24 (twelve years ago) link
I hate this guy so much.
― Mordy, Thursday, 3 November 2011 20:25 (twelve years ago) link
4 morbs
http://gothamist.com/2012/01/26/mayor_bloombergs_should_never_start.php
― iatee, Thursday, 26 January 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago) link
I can sense 4llyz4y fuming, in every sense of the word
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2012/04/5728546/bloomberg-not-trying-end-smoking-he-says
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 April 2012 17:47 (twelve years ago) link
mad with nanny power
http://www.ny1.com/content/news_beats/political_news/162170/mayor-bloomberg-seeks-ban-on-large-sugary-drinks-in-city-eateries
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 May 2012 11:45 (twelve years ago) link
what do we think about this? i'm kind of OK with it tbh
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago) link
re-elect bloomberg
― fapper don (J0rdan S.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago) link
in Chicago
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago) link
we already have one
― fapper don (J0rdan S.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago) link
I'm ok with calling people pigs for ordering 20 oz sodas but not making their sale illegal.
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:28 (twelve years ago) link
The people or the sodas?
― Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:30 (twelve years ago) link
Lady Bracknell: Well, both, if necessary, I presume!
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago) link
John Cole's response
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:43 (twelve years ago) link
FANTASTIC ad juxtaposition on that post
― fapper don (J0rdan S.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:44 (twelve years ago) link
Bloomberg does know that two 16 ounce cokes equals one 32 ounce supersized coke, right? So what is to stop people from ordering two beverages instead of one?
costs more, for one thing
And why are fruit juices exempt? Does he not realize how much sugar is in your average over the counter orange juice and apple juice- my goodness, they are worse than soda, because with a soda you know you are getting a gut bomb. With fruit juices, you may thing you are drinking healthfully, but you are getting the same amount of sugar as if you were guzzling coke.
all calories aren't created equal - fruit juices are much more nutritious on a per-calorie basis
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:53 (twelve years ago) link
I heard him say this morning, literally, "we want to make you go to another cup."
btw Big Gulps are still allowable, I understand, bcz 7-11s aren't considered restaurants.
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago) link
but almost as bad with sugar levels
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago) link
xpost
I'm working on a study right now that's examining the effect of sugary drink consumption on kids' weight and it's pretty awful. Not that that's surprising, just saying. Anyway, I fully support this.
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago) link
i'm not familiar with the logistics - though i trust mr. cole is - but i don't see how enforceability is an/the issue, or why that matters. and calling it 'paternalistic' doesn't really appeal to me, but then big-government liberals like me tend to avoid that rhetoric. this seems to pretty much amount to a soda tax
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago) link
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, June 1, 2012 1:55 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, June 1, 2012 1:55 PM (3 minutes ago)
people guzzling 32 ounce orange juices at mcdonalds is a bridge we can cross once we get to it
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago) link
a tax disproportionately on the poor, now there's a switch.
(I don't want them drinking that shit either, but the man's priorities are monomaniacal)
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago) link
sorry, guys, this is where my liberal streak really kicks in (fuck calling it a "libertarianism").
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago) link
Ordinarily I think I'd be totally against something like this but given where I'm working and what on it's sort of hard to be. It's not like someone still can't buy tons of soda but this might deter them or make them think about it even a little bit which can only be a good thing imo.
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago) link
I'm okay with public schools eliminating soft drinks, PSA's during Cartoon Network, and so on, but I don't want a bored tinpot Ms Grundel setting rules. I mean, education does work. Every conservative I know (i.e. my family) no longer keeps Coke or Pepsi products around the house.
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago) link
people can still drink soda guys. just not as much
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:05 (twelve years ago) link
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, June 1, 2012 2:01 PM (3 minutes ago)
this seems better than a straight sugary-drink tax, in that it encourages but doesn't punish moderation. buy a 16 ounce for the same price it always was.
i'm sensitive to regressive taxes like this too, but it's somewhat difficult to avoid when the epidemic you're fighting is so neatly tied to socioeconomic status, as obesity is.
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago) link
where the hell is iatee
― twittering spinster (k3vin k.), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago) link
writing speeches for Larouche.
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:09 (twelve years ago) link
oh c'mon
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago) link
i think this is kinda dumb, definitely paternalistic, probably pointless. and yet... i don't care too much? don't drink ANY soda, how 'bout that. voluntarily, like.
― goole, Friday, 1 June 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago) link
probably says more about the hyperdense center-of-universe politics of NYC than anything else tho
― goole, Friday, 1 June 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago) link
I think my big question here is "why is soda being treated like a life-giving substance that people need in order to survive?"
― that is a weird thing to bring up over lean cuisine (DJP), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago) link
Great, I'm going to NY in September and now I have to triple my soda budget.
― Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago) link
really dunno why anybody drinks anything in a town where finding a bathroom is a soviet experience
― goole, Friday, 1 June 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago) link
Try bumming a cigarette.
― go down on you in a thyatrr (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 June 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago) link
means nothing til they ban bacon too.
― how's life, Friday, 1 June 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago) link
what the hell is a soviet experience?
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Friday, 1 June 2012 21:50 (twelve years ago) link
they made Solzhenitsyn hold it for 20 years
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Friday, 1 June 2012 21:55 (twelve years ago) link
lol
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Friday, 1 June 2012 21:56 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/05/in-defense-of-nanny-bloomberg.html
― the route is ban (k3vin k.), Saturday, 2 June 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago) link
http://bittman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/06/limit-soda-for-kids-sake/?src=tp
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 June 2012 21:51 (twelve years ago) link
fucking idiot doesn't know what his job is
http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/164870/mayor--nyclu-does-not--do-anything--to-end-need-for-stop-and-frisks
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Monday, 16 July 2012 11:35 (twelve years ago) link
Soundbite from Bloomturd yesterday on soda-size hearings: "No one is going to stop this."
And next, alcohol:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/25/bloomberg-alcohol-abuse-city-telephone-survey-new-york_n_1701356.html
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 July 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago) link
I guess I was gone volunteering for larouche the first time this came up but the way I'd suggest thinking bout this is let's say a democratic mayor passed a large-soda ban and bloomberg was being lobbied by a buncha soda giants and was trying to reverse the ban. do you really, honestly believe that you would be supporting that in that context?
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago) link
big gulp-ernment
― am0n, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago) link