New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (16745 of them)

lol bld, I have had an iPhone for 4 years; iPhone 4 was the first one actually worth owning (the previous ones I had were free)

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:15 (twelve years ago) link

the 3g was a pile of shit imo

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:16 (twelve years ago) link

3gs was the shit, yo.

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:18 (twelve years ago) link

bld i hear you but the idea of upgrading every year for $400 is what is ridiculous to me, not the $99 intro price or whatever i paid for my 3G. i only upgraded to 3GS because my 3G died.

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:27 (twelve years ago) link

^^^

I have a friend with far too much disposable income and a vicious "me first" impulse who has purchased upon initial release an original iPhone, a 3G, a 3GS, a 4, an iPad, an iPad 2, a Mac Book Pro and a Mac Book Air. I am certain he will be ordering a 4S at midnight on Friday.

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:31 (twelve years ago) link

So when are you putting the scheme into place to corrupt him into leaving you all his money before he mysteriously dies?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

"there will be an appropriate response"

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

upgrading every year never seemed defensible when you had to lock yourself into a brand new 2 year contract every time. now that they sell unlocked iphones, it's marginally more defensible.

(╯°□°)╯︵ mode squad) (dayo), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:35 (twelve years ago) link

Still odd unless you want to play bleeding-edge games or are sight-impaired

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:37 (twelve years ago) link

or you look in your pockets and scream "OMG MONEY MUST SPEND"

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:38 (twelve years ago) link

Just read a report on the iphone 4s that said "it's no iphone 5"

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:48 (twelve years ago) link

"this phone that's not called an 'iphone 5', it's nothing like a phone that doesn't exist"

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:49 (twelve years ago) link

dunno if it's iphone5 or the budget model but apple is definitely working on something with more psp-like screen dimensions, if that's the theoretical phone you'd rather have.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:57 (twelve years ago) link

why do i have to wait until oct. 14 to buy the cheaper iphone 4?

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:08 (twelve years ago) link

i'm most pissed that the case producers always concentrate their best efforts on the *newest* model. like i got my ipad 1 less than a year ago and all i see now are accessories for ipad 2 ...

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:10 (twelve years ago) link

first world problems

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:10 (twelve years ago) link

yeah and I can't get a screen for my ipod classic

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:12 (twelve years ago) link

or an armband

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:15 (twelve years ago) link

If they changed the screen size, they'd have to either have a lower number of pixels per inch, or seriously fuck with the app development landscape! I can't believe people were just like "oh yeah, larger screen, no brainer"

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 01:57 (twelve years ago) link

i have an iphone 3G, i am ready to upgrade

― max, Tuesday, October 4, 2011 7:25 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark

balls, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 02:53 (twelve years ago) link

I dropped my iPhone 4 the other week, if I hadn't I wouldn't be upgrading.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 02:54 (twelve years ago) link

If you're prepared to sign a new two year contract every year you can generally sell your old phone for the price of the new one (worked fine for me in the US the last few years). Of course then you decide to move abroad and have to buy out your contract, and that's when it gets a little painful.

toby, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 05:27 (twelve years ago) link

to a lesser extent, that's the case with most Apple products - resale covers the Mac Tax if you're someone who upgrades constantly.

I sold a first-generation unibody Macbook (not pro) for $600 for my dad recently - good luck finding someone who'll pay $600 for a 3-year old 13" PC laptop.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 05:46 (twelve years ago) link

ja, i know plenty of people who upgrade every year. unless you're in a contract (which has been easy to avoid in a lot of countries since launch), it's no more expensive than upgrading less often, because the resale value of apple stuff is so high.

caek, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 08:54 (twelve years ago) link

so still not talking and surfing at the same time on verizon (or sprint)?

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2394164,00.asp#fbid=EJVw6I3isWR

that blows, I want to dump AT&T but I've found myself occasionally needing this feature, and the thuoght of verizon or sprint being slower data-wise doesn't fill me with hope. but AT&T fucking sucks in the bay area most of the time.

akm, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 17:54 (twelve years ago) link

ya but at&t sucks soooo much

max, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 17:56 (twelve years ago) link

i want to know what the sprint plan will look like

max, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 17:56 (twelve years ago) link

AT&T has decent service here, glad I'm in an area where they felt the need to install towers but it's still reasonably sparsely populated

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:25 (twelve years ago) link

wonder if the dual antennae will improve coverage or just transfer speed.

lukas, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:31 (twelve years ago) link

Isn't one for GSM and one for CDMA?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:33 (twelve years ago) link

Apple says "...iPhone 4S is the first phone to intelligently switch between two antennas to send and receive" so it seems like a different issue.

lukas, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:45 (twelve years ago) link

no, xp. they are now "world phones" i.e. they have both cdma and gsm chipsets. or at least the ones sold in the US will.

caek, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:56 (twelve years ago) link

oh sorry i misunderstood ignore me

caek, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:57 (twelve years ago) link

non-iphone, new mac advice needed: i've been using a G4 for 6 years now and just threw money down on a 2011 mac mini. what've i been missing? broad, i know, but what're people's fav new shits to do on a mac from the past few years?

shaane, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:57 (twelve years ago) link

Run Windows, amirite?

schwantz, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 19:03 (twelve years ago) link

iTerm 2, Solarized color scheme. If you uh, use the command line.

ilx user 'silby' (silby), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 19:15 (twelve years ago) link

silby, I am thinking you are my people

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:20 (twelve years ago) link

s'what the internet is for!

ilx user 'silby' (silby), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:24 (twelve years ago) link

also: pr0n

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:29 (twelve years ago) link

I'm in the same boat as shaane and my question is: which gestures in lion have you turned off? which are awesome?

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:46 (twelve years ago) link

updating every year is ridiculous, especially for a company that so values "DESIGN"

like isn't "timelessness" part of "design thinking"?

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 21:02 (twelve years ago) link

i still like the original curved-back design more than the current edged one

max, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 21:04 (twelve years ago) link

xp: Depends entirely on what you're designing, doesn't it? Given the rapid evolution/devaluation still happening in the computer tech sector, it seems this is a turnover curve that ppl will be riding for some time to come; basically, things will slow down when phones/computers stabilize in a pattern similar to the automotive market, and even there you will still have leasehounds who will want to trade in their old model for a new one every three years.

the tax avocado (DJP), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 21:06 (twelve years ago) link

i can't think of any useful engineering exercise where you want to design something that's obsolete in a year

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 21:48 (twelve years ago) link

it's not an engineering exercise, it's a marketing one. Same w/cars.

The big "this is worth me upgrading" changes to cars really only come every 5 or so years, but nonetheless cars get facelifts and changes every year because every year is someone's upgrade year and people who're spending a lot of cash want to feel that they've got something "new" to show for it.

Apple doesn't seem to have realised they're in this position with the phones now too, and they can't fuck about with a two-year cycle, because that means a rotten deal for people upgrading on the down-swing.

EG: You bought the 3Gs when it came out, a year later the iPhone 4 came out and yours looked old and crap.

Finally your two year contract is up, but Apple postpones the update. You don't want to buy a 4 near the end of the cycle, so you wait. New phone arrives, and is just an "s" refresh. That means if you buy it, you'll have barely a year with it before they launch the 5, and you'll be back to carrying an outdated-looking model for a year.

Does the 4s vs 5 matter technically? Not a bit. Does it matter in terms of status signifier? Hugely, and you'd expect Apple to be aware of that.

stet, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:00 (twelve years ago) link

i agree w/ stet, and it amazes me that people aren't more fed up

like ... why a case re-design for the iPad 2? just so that people will buy new cases?

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:05 (twelve years ago) link

I get the ipad 2 redesign – I think Apple/Jobs wanted it to be like that in the first place but just couldn't get the thickness down.

You don't want to buy a 4 near the end of the cycle, so you wait. New phone arrives, and is just an "s" refresh. That means if you buy it, you'll have barely a year with it before they launch the 5, and you'll be back to carrying an outdated-looking model for a year.

I think even the most out-of-touch consumers know that an 18 month old phone design is on its way out, and there are a lot of people who just don't care.

Apple's focus is on the two-year contract victims that queued up like rabid dogs for the 3G and the 4, both in (a) servicing them with a whole new phone every two years and (b) not pissing them off.

Does the 4s vs 5 matter technically? Not a bit. Does it matter in terms of status signifier? Hugely, and you'd expect Apple to be aware of that.

Thing is, if you don't want to be on the industrial design bleeding-edge, you can go out right now and buy a 4s with bleeding-edge innards and a case and screen that have been around long enough for all the kinks to be ironed out. That's a massive selling point for some people.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:18 (twelve years ago) link

i'm not so concerned about that as i am concerned about how long those innards will last

funk master friendly (moonship journey to baja), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:22 (twelve years ago) link

i agree w/ stet, and it amazes me that people aren't more fed up

idg why people feel the need to be fed up. Unless you (not you you, the generic you) bought an iphone last week and had no knowledge of this week's announcement, you still have the product you paid good money for so suck it up.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:25 (twelve years ago) link

I think even the most out-of-touch consumers know that an 18 month old phone design is on its way out, and there are a lot of people who just don't care.

That's what I mean -- in selling the iPhone 4s in the old case they're saying "hey, sign up for a really expensive 2-year contract so you can carry a phone that looks like it's on its way out". That doesn't give people the warm "ooh new shiny" fuzzies that help 'em crack their wallets on a massively overpriced phone.

Apple's focus is on the two-year contract victims that queued up like rabid dogs for the 3G and the 4, both in (a) servicing them with a whole new phone every two years and (b) not pissing them off.

But that means they're equally shafting the two-year contract victims who queued for an OG iPhone and then a 3gs too. Pissing off your super-early adopters doesn't seem wise, either. And they could have avoided it with a new design every 18 months.

That's a massive selling point for some people.

Yeah, but in the grand scheme of ~consumerism~ I think number of "customers who want expensive new shit to look like expensive new shit" >>>>>>> "customers wary of first-gen Apple hardware"

stet, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:27 (twelve years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.