Can someone explain Ayn Rand to me?!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (619 of them)
http://www.ghu.ca/tb/index.htm

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 15 December 2003 06:06 (twenty years ago) link

Um...wha?

Prude (Prude), Monday, 15 December 2003 06:20 (twenty years ago) link

in defense of ayn rand, part of what she writes is acceptable and good to hear, like not giving up your dreams and not thinking that your happiness depends solely on other people. it's nice to read her books even if what she says seems crazy because her youthful ideals survived for her entire life. i think that's sweet but maybe i just haven't suffered enough to want to give up MY childhood ideals about the world being good. (let's not get into her cult and all, please. or her weird crazinesses. i'm not trying to defend everything about her, just saying there's something there that attracts people and it's not just arrogance.)

ok, for books to read, i like we the living because it was from a point when she wasn't like "raawr compassion is evil", and atlas shrugged because it has a random pirate.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 15 December 2003 08:46 (twenty years ago) link

Nicely put, Silyl.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 15 December 2003 08:52 (twenty years ago) link

Can we all do a telepathic hivemind wish for her to DIE?

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:36 (twenty years ago) link

...

It worked!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:46 (twenty years ago) link

I remember when I was in high school, some Ayn Rand Society type thing was doing a competition offering a huge cash prize (can't remember how much, like $1000 or something) to the high school student who wrote the best essay on The Fountainhead. My 11th Grade English teacher really tried to push me into entering. I got about 5 pages into The Fountainhead and decided it was the worst rubbish I'd read in a long time, and pulled out of the competition. Wow, I'm sure glad that I did!

HRH Queen Kate (kate), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:49 (twenty years ago) link

G'bless the IMDB:

Had a longtime amphetamine prescription for "weight control"; it is believed that this may have influenced some of her later behavior and decision-making.

Does anyone know what the latter is a reference to? I'm having a Monday Morning, and could do with stories of Objectivists inviting Ayn to fancy dinners, and her doing the hokey-cokey on the table.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:54 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I think that's the one I tried to read. Is that the one about the railroads? I attempted to read it as a teenager and couldn't get past the shitty shitty writing.

NA (Nick A.), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:56 (twenty years ago) link

I thought the Fountainhead was about bad architecture, but I can't remember. It was more than 15 years ago, after all.

HRH Queen Kate (kate), Monday, 15 December 2003 12:57 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but Neil Peart's Rad.....

If I want to read fiction by swivel-eyed maniacs, I'll stick w/Wyndham Lewis, thx. One of the few times I actually got scared on teh intarweb was when I looked at this deranged robotick rand fansite, and got the ph34r. What if these people find out I'm looking at their site? Can they find me, and hunt my ass down? It was like the pod-people in "...er argc, that film. The one where people come out of pods, and take over. Anyway, I suppose her whole life story & stuff in kind of interesting, but her followers - ick. God help us all if this thread gets googled pt 217.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:04 (twenty years ago) link

Please write me some Ayn Rand porn.

(and of course let me know if anyone googles for "Ayn Rand porn")

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:16 (twenty years ago) link

I remember when I was in high school, some Ayn Rand Society type thing was doing a competition offering a huge cash prize (can't remember how much, like $1000 or something) to the high school student who wrote the best essay on The Fountainhead. My 11th Grade English teacher really tried to push me into entering. I got about 5 pages into The Fountainhead and decided it was the worst rubbish I'd read in a long time, and pulled out of the competition. Wow, I'm sure glad that I did!

Kate, we had this at our school too! Even though I thought a lot of the ideas in the book were pretty repulsive I entered anyway because I was desperate for money -- I wasn't exactly surprised I didn't win because it was torture just writing the essay.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:44 (twenty years ago) link

God, the brainwashing of desperate high school students for cash... it really just repulses me.

HRH Queen Kate (kate), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:46 (twenty years ago) link

We had that, too.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

I thought the brainwashing happened regardless of the money.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 14:23 (twenty years ago) link

If need someone to explain Ayn Rand to you then you don't deserve to understand. At least that's what she might say.

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 15 December 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

If Ayn Rand is 'objective', then why is she all creepy and Aryan-worshipping?

When I was in college, my roommate dated a Randian goth who called his band "We the Living".

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

Randian goth

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 15 December 2003 15:41 (twenty years ago) link

ts 'we, the living' vs 'they live, we sleep'.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 15 December 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link

Also, has anyone read Two girls, fat and thin? IME a lot of Randians are not over-achievers - they're people with self-esteem issues. I've known quite a few, and none of them were pillars of the community or successes in business. It gives people whose lives are NOT under control the illusion of complete control (if I just work a little bit harder, I can reach those grapes ...) I guess for some people, there is a psychological appeal to thinking that your "failures" are 100% your fault - at least you're not a "victim".

I hate to generalize, but Objectivism seems to appeal to mousy women and geeky men, NOT "alpha" men and women.

This is not so much a philosophy as it is a cult .

x-post : I know, "Randian goth" - it's just ridiculous.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 15:50 (twenty years ago) link

Kerry about as OTM as anyone could ever be wrt Randites and Objectivists.

Ricardo (RickyT), Monday, 15 December 2003 15:51 (twenty years ago) link

The boy I dated who was really into getting pegged had a Rand character's name as his AIM handle, he was very proud of it. That is all.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 15 December 2003 16:36 (twenty years ago) link

my favourite anecdote about her is that she broke into the film industry by hanging around outside studios. One day Cecil B De Mille was driving by, liked what he saw, and had her get into his car for a short trip. Next thing she was on the payroll as a screenwriter.

Hokey Cokey.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 15 December 2003 17:54 (twenty years ago) link

The best way to "explain" Ayn Rand is to read one of her dreadfully boring books. "Atlas Shrugged" is rather novel but so fucking tedious you cannot even imagine until you read it. Rand reminds me of L.R. Hubbard or Chomsky in that she inspires extremists to take on her dogmatic views.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

Chomsky is not dogmatic, fer chrissakes, he's an anarchist, and I would guess that his readership is less "extreme" than he is.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 18:36 (twenty years ago) link

Apparently she's the basis for a character in Thomas Pynchon's "V" - and it might be that "Crying of Lot 49" is an intentional inversion of "Atlas Shrugged" (not least in ratio of textual bulk to actual quality)

Neil Willett (Neil Willett), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:11 (twenty years ago) link

Anarchists can be as dogmatic as Catholics.

fletrejet, Monday, 15 December 2003 19:13 (twenty years ago) link

Anybody can be as dogmatic as Catholics.
It's up to everyone to sort it all out using critical thinking.

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:23 (twenty years ago) link

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=dogmatic

What fletrejet said.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 19:25 (twenty years ago) link

My, what a convincing argument. Thanks. Being a stupid brainwashed lefty, I've never used a dictionary before.

The point is that Rand and Hubbard were cultists. So what's your argument that there is a similar Chomsky cult? Especially when the people I know who tell me to read such-and-such by Chomsky are usually plain old liberals? Obviously if he's "dogmatic", it's not working too well.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:31 (twenty years ago) link

I'll see your crappy web site and raise you the O-E-feckin-D.

Dogma : n. 1. That which is held as an opinion; a belief, principle, tenet; esp. a tenet or doctrine authoritatively laid down by a particular church, sect, or school of thought;

i.e., go with me or burn in (ideological) hell.

...so who's your guru, Don? Or are you too cool for that?

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:36 (twenty years ago) link

I will grant you, Kerry, that Chomsky doesn't have quite the mindless cult following of the likes of Rand or Hubbard, but "Chomsky is not dogmatic, fer chrissakes, he's an anarchist" was just an invitation.

fletrejet, Monday, 15 December 2003 19:45 (twenty years ago) link

that essay competition is national, the prize is $10,000, and i didn't want to bother rereading the fountainhead so i didn't do it. (i read it once but man some of the most hateable characters in all of literature are in it.)

Maria (Maria), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:52 (twenty years ago) link

At least Chomsky's admirer's/followers/whatever don't have a name for themselves like "Objectivists" or "Scientologists". Plus, Chomsky differs from both of them in being a pioneer of an established academic field, linguistics.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 15 December 2003 19:55 (twenty years ago) link

You totally missed my point, then, fletrejet - there is a second half to that sentence. I think people read Chomsky for the foreign policy stuff, not because they share his anarchism. "Dogma" implies a system of thought - Objectivism peddles certain conclusions about human nature and requires that its followers accept them.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 20:06 (twenty years ago) link

...and Catholics aren't necessarily "dogmatic" either.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 20:08 (twenty years ago) link

My Kerry, you sure are testy.

We can go 'round and around with the definition of "dogmatic", but near as I can tell, it wasn't out of line for me to use it in this context. More importantly, you spun my words to your own context--rather than ask for clarification, you simply started making assumptions. To wit, I posted that Rand reminds me of Hubbard and Chomsky in the way she inspires extremists. I didn't assert that Chomsky was a cultist or that followers of his intellect were. If it's guilt by association, that's not my fault. That's your reflexive defensiveness. Just because Chomsky's followers don't have some cult-like name for themselves doesn't mean that they don't come off as dogmatic. That's kind of my whole point. You're just annoyed that someone could put Rand and Chomsky in the same sentence together.

Oh, and why do I suddenly need some sort of guru? Is that a requirement for my existence? Why am I too cool if I don't have one? To be honest, I'd probably put my parent's name, or maybe my wife in that spot if you want to pin me down that badly.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 20:13 (twenty years ago) link

It's not 'defensiveness'. It's my annoyance at your elision of any distinctions between the three. I don't agree with all conservatives or libertarians - that doesn't mean that I think they're all 'dogmatists'. It depends on whether they insist on complete acceptance of an ideological program. There's a distinction between admiration and what you call 'dogma'. Chomsky's 'followers' in fact have a far greater range of opinion than Objectivists.

I don't own a single Chomsky book, as a matter of fact - I'm too lowbrow for that, so let's stick to logical arguments and not speculation, please, as long as we're all trying to appear as independent-minded as possible.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 20:42 (twenty years ago) link

There's some good answers up there. I like hearing stuff like that because the kind of shit Ayn Rand writes gets way too much credit for having any value at all. You should be worried Alan Greenspan's a fan. I'm happy that Scientology was brought up, I was going to mention it. Ayn Rand's Objectivism is like Scientology because it's obvious bullshit with cult popularity, that would be ignored, except it caters to a specific cult of wealthy/privileged people who have the power to promote it in mainstream culture and politics.

I don't think Chomsky is a good comparison. I also dislike Chomsky's writing and think he's very obscurantist. He hashes his shit around to make it assume more relevance that it really has, and uses big words to make it sound like better ideas than it really is. If he could start from a solid, basic thesis, and also write it well, I would like him more. I like him best when he's interviewed by other people. The way he hashes shit around, I think you could call it facile, and also call Scientology and Objectivism facile, but I wouldn't call it dogmatic.

Ayn Rand's Objectivism is a facile, rationalizing cover for market-Nazism. Wealth-supremacy would also be a good term for it. The basic idea is that wealth should be the basic measure of everything, and all culture and politics should be oriented towards getting wealth and controlled by the wealthy. Ignoring of course, that there's a such thing as a cost of living, and that there can be no egalitarianism without a level playing field for how people make their living. Objectivism pretends that there's no such thing as coercion in the labor market, so all wealth distribution is meritocratic. It pretends to be egalitarian through "free trade."

For an example if how ridiculous that is, Ayn Rand supported child factory labor by saying "at least they aren't dead" and that laissez-faire capitalism gives people freedom by raising living standards, as if there wasn't such a thing as the Great Depression. She also hated there being a minimum wage. I wouldn't be surprised if she hated that there was such a thing as weekends, overtime, and retirement, too.

I think it's kind of wierd someone said she disliked homosexuals. That doesn't seem to fit because Objectivism calls itself "libertarian." (A perversion of classic libertarianism of course because it's anti-egalitarian- it means total liberty for how wealthy people spend their money, like child sex should be legal just because people want to buy it.) Also, on the "objectivism dating service" thread, someone said she was really into kinky sex.

sucka (sucka), Monday, 15 December 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

Objectivism's fundamental principle is something Rand calls "self-interest". Which she links to unfettered capitalism. So there's the fundamental flaw - "self-interest" is not self-apparent. Nor is "reason".

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 21:21 (twenty years ago) link

Again, Kerry, I never said or even implied that there weren't distinctions between the three. I made the point that Hubbard, Rand, and yes, Chomsky cater to an extremist viewpoint. And while it may be colloquial or minorly inaccurate to refer to Chomsky's many writings as that of a prescribed dogma, the guy has many fervent followers. Obviously, the reason I used that word was to be critical of a certain element of his followers, and admittedly, it drives you up the wall that I did that. You don't think there's any comparison between the followers of Chomsky, Hubbard, or Rand but I do: I see the extremist followers of each as dogmatic in their allegiance. That Chomsky has not codified his manifesto, or even written some sort of manifesto really seems a bit beside the point.

Finally, while I regret making any assumptions--in this case, assuming what you would be annoyed about--it seems to me that you were doing quite a bit of assuming yourself, including that little tossed off line about me having a guru or not. I'm glad you confess to being lowbrow anyway. It's a lot more fun down here, as you well know.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 21:34 (twenty years ago) link

Sucka OTM. You summed up everything I dislike about extreme Libertarians and Objectivists.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 15 December 2003 21:41 (twenty years ago) link

In what way is Chomsky an 'extremist'?

Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 15 December 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

Does anyone not consider Chomsky on the far left?


Transcription from a TV interview on 25 Nov 1992

JOHN PILGER: And yet you’re often described as an extremist
CHOMSKY: Sure. I am an extremist. Because a ‘moderate’ is anyone who supports western power, and an extremist is anyone who objects to them.


don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 22:03 (twenty years ago) link

All I meant Don was : surely there are people you admire or "follow" or who have influenced your thinking in some way, and how is this different from people who closely follow some other thinker?

admittedly, it drives you up the wall that I did that.

Apparently, you enjoy "driving (certain) people up the wall", or at least imagining that you do. Maybe it's just because I don't see legions of Chomskyites all over the 'net - it's just not the same author / audience relationship, and I don't find your characterization convincing. If you pursue your thinking to its logical conclusion, than anyone who closely follows a prominent thinker is "dogmatic". It just seems like an anti-intellectual argument at its core.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 22:04 (twenty years ago) link

looks up sarcasm in OED...

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 15 December 2003 22:10 (twenty years ago) link

Clearly, we are disagreeing with the definition of dogmatic. But as to anyone that closely follows a prominent thinker--yes, in fact I would say that is at least somewhat dogmatic, especially if a person is not prone to question the philosophy of that thinker, the thinker's logic, or the thinker's research/conclusions. I'm not really sure why this is anti-intellectual at its core given that the classical, literal meaning of dogma was not what I intended when I used it originally--I felt that was at least somewhat obvious given the context I used the word.

And as for the legions of Rand-ites and Hubbard-ites on the 'net, I don't ever and have never seen them. I didn't run into them in undergrad or grad school either, but I sure as shit knew a lot of people who were familiar with Chomsky. So if it's merely my experience that is guiding my perspective on this, I apologize. I'm sure there are a lot of Objectivists and Scientologists on the Internet but I have not ever run into one.

As for what I enjoy doing or imagining what I enjoy doing, I thought we were going to stop making assumptions. Whatever.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

Why am I not surprised to find you arguing semantics, Don?

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 15 December 2003 22:29 (twenty years ago) link

Why am I not surprised to find you arguing semantics, Don?

Obviously because everyone around here is so much smarter than me, I've lost the argument, and I must resort to desperation in order to preserve my precious dignity. After all, Chomsky isn't anything like Ayn Rand. He's not extreme in any way, there is not even the slightest amount of dogma to anything he does, none of his followers are dogmatic in any way, and if I didn't have massive self esteem problems I wouldn't end up playing the house asshole on every political thread that I have time to participate in. Sucks to be me.

don weiner, Monday, 15 December 2003 22:37 (twenty years ago) link

You are the only person who's got the reference so far. :-/

he's a really interesting character. not all unsympathetic iirr. (became mildly obsessed when I was abt 20).

Fizzles, Saturday, 14 December 2013 22:48 (ten years ago) link

Half Cornish, you know! Also ginger. Patron saint of talented youths who squandered their vast potential!

Was gonna start a Pick A Bronte: Poll! thread on ILB but, um, apparently this is the ILX Bronte thread:

the Bronte sisters Porn book

Hmmm.

Branwell Bell, Saturday, 14 December 2013 23:08 (ten years ago) link

three weeks pass...

AR and megan mccardle are the two chicks libertarians dig. see, they're not sexist

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:03 (ten years ago) link

oh and veronique de rugy. tax cuts pay for themselves

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:04 (ten years ago) link

http://www.arpanetdialogues.net/vol-iv/

Mordy , Friday, 10 January 2014 21:56 (ten years ago) link

I am surprised to be in such a conversation. It feels like a deliberate test.

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:59 (ten years ago) link

It's not real.

everything, Friday, 10 January 2014 22:04 (ten years ago) link

nothing is real but john galt

reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 22:12 (ten years ago) link

two months pass...

well known, from wikipedia:

Rand underwent surgery for lung cancer in 1974 after decades of heavy smoking.[88] In 1976, she retired from writing her newsletter and, despite her initial objections, was persuaded to allow Evva Pryor, a consultant from her attorney's office, to sign her up for Social Security and Medicare.[89] During the late 1970s her activities within the Objectivist movement declined, especially after the death of her husband on November 9, 1979.[90] One of her final projects was work on a never-completed television adaptation of Atlas Shrugged.[91]

Rand died of heart failure on March 6, 1982, at her home in New York City,[92] and was interred in the Kensico Cemetery, Valhalla, New York.[93] Rand's funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers, including Alan Greenspan. A six-foot floral arrangement in the shape of a dollar sign was placed near her casket

question: you would think that she, of all people, would have the motivation to not accept social security or medicare. so she must have been broke? i always just assumed she was rich because she wrote best selling books and traveled widely and hung out with a bunch of rich assholes. did she really whittle away her life savings so much that she had to accept help from the evil altruistic govt?

Karl Malone, Friday, 14 March 2014 22:34 (ten years ago) link

A six-foot floral arrangement in the shape of a dollar sign was placed near her casket

gangsta

A broke ass person memorialized by a giant dollar sign floral arrangement vs a richass mofo with a giant floral cross in a church, we live in a crazy place

actually high comedy (Hunt3r), Friday, 14 March 2014 23:08 (ten years ago) link

Rand's funeral was attended by some of her prominent followers, including Alan Greenspan

gangsta

http://www.internetweekly.org/images/alan_greenspan_poster.jpg

Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 14 March 2014 23:12 (ten years ago) link

Needs a Sgt. Pepper parody

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 14 March 2014 23:24 (ten years ago) link

one year passes...
two years pass...

http://billmoyers.com/story/media-morality-neighbors-cow/

neal gabler otm

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 16 December 2017 17:40 (six years ago) link

one year passes...

would crosspost to bitcoins thread if I could find it

Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Wednesday, 13 February 2019 05:20 (five years ago) link

john galton

adam the (abanana), Wednesday, 13 February 2019 05:29 (five years ago) link

five months pass...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.