"Hipster" as pejorative.

what about them?

http://www.zoilus.com/rsz_cg0455riddle.jpg

http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/79/hipster.html

christ

SOMEONE didnt get invited to the gallery opening!!!!

omg, i am only a few paragraphs in and...wow

Gavin McInnes, one of the founders of Vice, who recently left the magazine, is considered to be one of hipsterdom’s primary architects.

“If only we carried rocks instead of cameras, we’d look like revolutionaries.”

no momus no credibility

Hipster Dom

& adbusters has the temerity to subtitle their march issue 'the reconquest of cool'

explain to me adbuster

Is that a Thomas Frank ref?

http://www.whsmith.co.uk/Images/Products%5C226%5C260%5C9780226260129_m_f.jpg

Punks wear their tattered threads and studded leather jackets with honor, priding themselves on their innovative and cheap methods of self-expression and rebellion. B-boys and b-girls announce themselves to anyone within earshot with baggy gear and boomboxes

what?

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51KVR30YH1L._SL500_AA240_.jpg

explain to me adbuster

-- deej, Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:59 PM

if you're familiar with 'buy nothing day' which is supposed to grind the capitalist consumer system to a halt, i believe they are the ones behind that

haha oh man i just decided to go look at momus's blog

We don't like how they make their great kids great

The Vice Guide to North Korea is a 14-episode account -- made at some risk to the journalists -- of a heavily-guarded journey through North Korea. I found it fascinating, but I did notice some dubious ideology creeping in, especially in Episode 12, A Schoolchildren's Palace, billed as "meeting the country's creepily over-talented future generation".

Here Shane Smith edged towards that journalistic-political cliché I call the "we don't like how they treat their women / children" school. Basically, the idea behind this move is that in any given culture, men are responsible for the ideology, and women and children are helpless victims and hostages. The implication is that, although the men are a lost cause, the women and children could be captured and brought to some other culture, where they'd be much happier.

This "much happier", in Smith's account of North Korean children, involves being a lot less motivated and talented. "One of the most fun-slash-sad times," Smith says in Episode 12, "was to see the best-of-the-best school in Pyongyang." After showing some child prodigies playing musical instruments larger than themselves, Smith decides that "it's so sad because these great kids are learning and learning for the state". But what's wrong with learning -- to exceptionally high standards -- for the state, and at the expense of the state? Are these children really to be pitied? Mightn't they be -- as well as "great kids" -- fervently ideological admirers of Kim Jong Il, believers in North Korea's superiority over South Korea, and convinced that their "creepy talents" could only have been advanced so far in the particular system they were born into?

jesus, i have my own personal issues with feeling bummed-out as what i see as a somewhat nihilstic streak which runs throughout much of "youth culture" nowadays, but talk about some absurd lazy-ass writing

#1 conversational turnoff for me these days when meeting chicks is when they start talking about 'hipsters' zzzzzzzz

happens far too often

It...does?

The half-built condos tower above us like foreboding monoliths of our yuppie futures

wow

has the writer of this article ever actually spoken with actual human beings before? also, i half-suspect that most of the quotes in the article are completely made-up

It...does?

-- Laurel, Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:07 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

It .... does. yes.

“You’re not some club kid in New York in the nineties. This shit is so hipster!”

“He’s 17 and he lives for the scene!”

who honest-to-god really talks like this??

The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes are symbols and icons of working or revolutionary classes that have been appropriated by hipsterdom and drained of meaning.

"I'm going back to the bar, do you want anything?"
"Yeah, get me another PBR, I've almost drained this one of all its meaning."

I don't know. Who talks about hipsters at all? I mean, like, out?

xp hee hee

Doug Haddow

Name:
Doug Haddow
Network:
Shell Oil

lol

american apparel v-necks are symbols of the 'revolutionary class'?

working or revolutionary classes
that's a damn big OR there

I don't know. Who talks about hipsters at all? I mean, like, out?

actually, i totally know people who complain about "hipsters", but i think they are just being lazy in how they encounter and conceptualize other people

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2086/2078024815_2fa68fb9b8.jpghttp://www.catbirdseat.org/catbirdseat/bingo.jpghttp://i34.tinypic.com/v8ly86.jpg

I thought V-necks were symbols of not wanting your undershirt to show.

you'd think a shirt made by a company that uses sweatshops would have more working class cache than an AA shirt

i went to a party with a friend of mine once and as soon as we entered this one girl who lived there squealed at him, "a hipster!" and just physically dragged him off to her bedroom for an hour.

Oh I'm totally lazy. It just seems like a...boring kind of thing that's been done to death, maybe? I mean I guess apart from maybe an eye-roll at the Pratt brats across the bar or something.

Laurel otm! now, rollerderby girls… I FUCKING HATE THEM!!

i think people just like to project douchebaggery onto others and "hipsters" are the easiest target nowadays, like "yuppies" were in the '80s.

rollerderby vs kickball

can't wait for the blipster bingo remix of "lookin' boy"