I HATE CLUBBING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (517 of them)
I am honestly confounded as to people who genuinely, honestly believe that "hipster" clique culture is as bad as most other youth tribes - I mean, it's just not. It may not be perfect or anything, but I mean... (maybe I just know the wrong (ie, right) hipsters).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:22 (twenty years ago) link

My understanding of the word "dandy" is more along the lines of what we now call a "metrosexual". I guess "dandy" has shifted meaning. Can a woman now be a dandy?

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:23 (twenty years ago) link

(I'm not sure anyone would really argue about whether to fuck the cover! With the possible exception of, y'know, hipster-haters and dandies.)

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:25 (twenty years ago) link

(And obviously I'm not saying that hipsters are better people or anything, I'm just saying that since tribe-membership DOES homogenize (which is a totally valid but not-for-everyone reason to spurn it entirely) what hipsters are homogenized into seems /reasonably/ close to what eg. ILXORS are homogenized into, and (largely unrelatedly)reasonably close to sympatheticish. Maybe.)

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:32 (twenty years ago) link

xpost

So in the hipster-hating world view, if you try to anticipate the crest of a trend, you're suspicious. But if you give it up and just go "oxo-culture", you're narrow-minded. But if you go Dandy, you're flamboyant (read: gay) - so what choices are left?

When I was younger, my friends and I dressed the same and I chose friends based more or less on whether they looked cool to me. I'm glad I grew up. This gets too confining. There are such great conversationalists with poor fashion sense. You miss out on too much if you're concerned about whether you and your friends look "right".

Some days I dress like a hipster, some days I don't. I suppose if a hipster-hater saw me one day, they'd make assumptions about who I am that they wouldn't make if they saw me the next day. Really it just has to do with which of my clothes are in the laundry.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:36 (twenty years ago) link

Greg, it's that closeness that causes the prejudice of tiny differences to magnify.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

*nod Dan*, that Nabisofreud thing about the narcissism of small differences should be in the FAQ or something.

(Thanks for calling me Greg btw! I am hoping that people will magically catch on to this without me having to aid the process in any way).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:43 (twenty years ago) link

I have no idea what oxo-culture means. I don't even know what I was semi-drunkenly trying to type. Perhaps exo-culture? I haven't the foggiest clue.

Of course a Dandy can be a woman, don't be so narrow minded and sexist! Words mean what we say they mean, not what the Victorians who dreamed them up thought they meant!

Different people dress provocatively or flamboyantly or as Display for many different reasons. I'm interested in the reasons, not in what they wear.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:15 (twenty years ago) link

That's fine and perfectly valid. It's also perfectly fine and valid to be interested in what they're wearing. And it's valid but not particularly fine for both sides to roll their eyes at each other and toss denigrations back and forth.

The problem with a truly egalitarian world view is that everyone you want to insult is perfectly justified in insulting you back. I may have to become a fascist; then I can verbally crush people underneath my bootheels without being a hypocrite. (Yes, I'm rambling now.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:21 (twenty years ago) link

You need more donuts.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

I am an oxo-moron. Ha ha.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

Oxo-culture is an incredible term though! It conjures up all these ace images of Bovril and Oxo-cube ads from the fifties, with 2.4 gleaming children, etc.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:41 (twenty years ago) link

It's not fear of being "dumped" or shunned, it's the awful sickening realisation that your newfound friends within the subculture are as conformist, cliqueish and narrow-minded as the oxo-culture you rejected in the first place. It's not fear of being shunned, it's "Holy, shit, we really don't have the same values at all, just the same haircuts."

But this makes no sense! It's just some theoretical situation whereby one hipster hangs out with only those similar to himself/herself, or something. Like hipsterism begats empty hipsterism or something.

Also this "Fuck the cover; read what's actually in the book." stuff just is further cliché in this sort of argument. What if one is interested in the cover? Where does the human cover end and the person begin? There is no exact science.

I just hate this sense of GROUNDING about the "fuck the cover" attitude. The sense of attempting to pull some people back to a certain level.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

There is no practical difference between the cover and the book. That is my point when I say "Fuck the cover". You are agreeing with me but objecting to my terminology.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:45 (twenty years ago) link

No, it's not a theoretical situation at all. I used to hang out with a gang of kids who vaguely called themselves "hipsters" - we all wore black clothes, listened to alternative music, had punky haircuts. I thought "Wow, I've finally found a place where I can be accepted for who I am, rather than being judged by the clothes that I wear." Wow, was I disillusioned of that idea pretty quickly. I don't speak from theory, I speak from my own life's experience.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:49 (twenty years ago) link

If there's no practical difference why say "fuck the cover" and thus draw a distinction.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:53 (twenty years ago) link

It's kinda cool and interesting that all this developed from an I Hate Clubbing thread, actually - one of the things I found really revelatory when I started going to raves and stuff was just how liberating nobody caring how you danced could feel. That nobody was judging you on it. The last time I was in a real, first-post-of-this-thread-type club, a bouncer walked up to me and said, really menacingly, "don't dance like that". I left pretty soon after.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:58 (twenty years ago) link

Because everyone is always going on about the cover! Who cares? It's all a part of who you are; how you decide where "the cover" ends, anyway? It's a false distinction.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 19:19 (twenty years ago) link

(Dan startlingly on the money about everyone deciding where the cover ends and the book starts for themselves, I was sorta thinking this and failing to formulate it in words).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

But you can put an exciting sci-fi novel cover on a phone book and it's still just a phone book on the inside isn't it? Sometimes a cover is just a cover.

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:12 (twenty years ago) link

It's a phone book that has decided it'd like a sci-fi cover, though! That definitly makes a difference.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:14 (twenty years ago) link

It'd be better than some of the sci-fi novels I've read anyway.

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:15 (twenty years ago) link

Of course a Dandy can be a woman, don't be so narrow minded and sexist!

I was just asking! Trying to catch up on your lingo. I've not heard it used this way until now.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

It's kinda cool and interesting that all this developed from an I Hate Clubbing thread, actually - one of the things I found really revelatory when I started going to raves and stuff was just how liberating nobody caring how you danced could feel. That nobody was judging you on it. The last time I was in a real, first-post-of-this-thread-type club, a bouncer walked up to me and said, really menacingly, "don't dance like that". I left pretty soon after.

This is IT. I didn't think I liked dancing or dance music at all until I went to a rave. Obviously drugs had a help in that, but I feel that going to raves in the UK is a much nicer experience than going to a club. This is basically down to the fact there's a lot less surface and a lot more feeling. People wear their shitest gear to go raving and yet their best clobber to go clubbing. I feel uncomfortable in clubs because I'm constantly worried about the image I'm giving off. I get that thing where you think everyone's looking at you and judging you by your clothes and the way you walk and how much gel is in your hair. You certainly don't get this at a rave because no-one gives a flying fuckslash what you're wearing. Just so long as you're a decent, friendly person. I tried to explain this to a girlfriend who had never been raving before and was pretty much anti drugs. The only argument she came up with was "but the music's shit and it's full of hippies". That's about the time I realised we weren't meant to be.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 21:59 (twenty years ago) link

Was she unwilling to come along and check it out just once?

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 22:08 (twenty years ago) link

DL, come to Brighton next Saturday!

Yeah, you're totally spot-on. It's like the drugs power these scenes of acceptance that would be totally amazing even if you weren't on drugs. Universal impotence = no cockwaving, maybe? (The squatter scene is my favourite version of this, actually, 'cos it's got this brilliant dynamic between people who squat because their father is a Tory MP and doesn't understand them, maaan, and people who squat because they don't have houses). I love how you can tell what subcultures people were into before rave from the dancing style they bring to it, all these 120bpm versions of metal, indie, pop, jarvis-cocker-does-cruel-imitation-of-rachel-stevens-pastiche (may just be me).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:23 (twenty years ago) link

Well, when we first met she said she was interested in trying ecstasy. Later on she decided that she never wanted to try it, which was fair enough and then even later she would tell me off for smoking pot on the weekends, even if it wasn't in front of her. So no, she wasn't interested in going to a rave. Also festivals were beneath her because they are "disgusting and dirty". Anyway, this is all off topic since this thread is about hipsters.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:28 (twenty years ago) link

Dude, this thread isn't about hipsters, it's about morphing pictures of your face onto things, have you read it?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:35 (twenty years ago) link

I love how you can tell what subcultures people were into before rave from the dancing style they bring to it, all these 120bpm versions of metal, indie, pop, jarvis-cocker-does-cruel-imitation-of-rachel-stevens-pastiche (may just be me).

Hahahahahah! YEh, all my metal friends do weird punching-circle dances when they go to raves, like a friendly but more ballistic style of moshing.

What's happening in Brighton? I'd really like to go but I'm not very rich and I want to lay off getting rat-arsed again until Glastonbury. Tell me next time something's on and I'll definitely turn up.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:37 (twenty years ago) link

The circle punching dance is amazing! It's like they have a big lump of putty in their hand that they're squashing really flat.

Brighton is this big outdoor party, it sounds awesome, I'm pretty excited about it. I only know one person who's going, so I'll get the details off them tomorrow or something...

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:55 (twenty years ago) link

hangon, this isn't the Glade festival is it?

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:00 (twenty years ago) link

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3647/heresdoggy.jpg

Heeeeeeeere's DOGGY!

don (don), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

Nah, I am going to Glade though! I'm sharing a tent with these four gorgeous fashionista girls, somehow, I kinda can't wait.

xpost: HAHAHAHAHA

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:04 (twenty years ago) link

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/971/cometodoggy.jpg

Come To Doggy

don (don), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago) link

JESUS CHRIST! AARGH! I really do have a freakish face! I'm not sure I can look at those! Nice one though!

greg: you lucky bastard. my friend told me about Glade and I think he wants to go. Well, so do I but I really have to save money before my bank manager puts me in thumbtacks and makes me be the Queen's personal rickshaw monkey for not paying back my overdraft. I'm quite pissed off about not going to either of those.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:41 (twenty years ago) link

F: I'm really worried about it! I've never done any drugs, really.
G: F____, you do coke all the time.
F: That's different though!

Couldn't you sell your time-travelling memoirs, D?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:58 (twenty years ago) link

I'm quite pissed off about not going to either of those.

um, I meant Brighton and the Glade, not thumbtacks and rickshaws.

Anyway, onwards and upwards.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 01:03 (twenty years ago) link

No, I don't count coke as a proper drug. It's like, "Here, have some of this- it's really great, it makes you shout at people about money". Coke isn't a drug-user's drug. It's for dicks. Maybe I sound like a dick for saying it, but it's true.


Couldn't you sell your time-travelling memoirs, D?

No, because Goebbels brainwashed me in 1940 so I'd forget everything.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 01:26 (twenty years ago) link

dog latin correct re: raves. nearly always a strange and interesting mix of people at raves. a sense of who the hell are all these people, that seem to be coming from loads of different milieus

charltonlido (gareth), Sunday, 13 June 2004 07:01 (twenty years ago) link

[didn't read massive load of posts]

BOOM-TS-TS-BOOM-TS-BOOM-TS-etc.-rpt.-ad-naseum-til-passout-ono-rnadom-couch

wasted (nickalicious), Sunday, 13 June 2004 07:20 (twenty years ago) link

Haha, yeah let's have a thread about clubs vs. raves it will go on forever and will eventually subsume ILX entirely.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 13 June 2004 07:25 (twenty years ago) link

I ran into this thread late - so is it OK for me to hate on suburbanites (basically LA-area B&T'ers) who come into my town, take up our parking spaces, and fuck up our beach? k thanks

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 14 June 2004 07:44 (twenty years ago) link

the cover of a book can be appreciated for being a good cover i.e. a striking, inspiring design and image. however, the actual book content could be not at all to your tastes or even fit a general perception of crapness. but hey, it had a nice cover. does that count for anything? that's up to you and your valuation system.

this is also true of people. and perhaps the hipster critics are commenting based on their past experiences - finding the book covers to be a front for a crap book all too often.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:11 (twenty years ago) link

I don't think the people/book thing stands up. It just doesn't make sense. I mean, at all!

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:12 (twenty years ago) link

does to me. in that people are often judged by how they look, irrespective of the possibility that their image does not really reflect their personality, perhaps intentionally, perhaps mistakenly. but judged they remain, and as you pointed out upthread image is important in conveying a message about you, no? why doesn't it make sense? do you not consider mark and co's opinion to be understandable if not reasonable?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:37 (twenty years ago) link

You can tell loads about people *and* books from how they look obv.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:38 (twenty years ago) link

maybe but how accurate it is is another matter, which is my point

stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:40 (twenty years ago) link

I just think it's not the right analogy. I need to think about why, beyond "books are something which are in shelves in my room, people are not", if that's not adequate enough in itself.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:41 (twenty years ago) link

oh you were like that with the Mcdonalds/pop music argument as well two years ago. i don't know why you need to be so pragmatic about it dude other than a resentment of cliches - which i understand and share to an extent.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:47 (twenty years ago) link

cliches are cliches because they are true

stevem (blueski), Monday, 14 June 2004 10:48 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.