Matrix Revolutions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (490 of them)
I fear!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1145502.jpg

NA (Nick A.), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:47 (twenty years ago) link

Just loved the graphic (as found on another board's Revolutions thread) and had to post it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 10 November 2003 21:51 (twenty years ago) link

It is pretty great. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Having finally seen this movie, I have come to the conclusion that I am better at noticing details in movies than most people, because I keep thinking that anyone who still had questions as to what was going on by the end of it really wasn't paying attention.

- The Smiths did take out Seraph and Sati; the Smith who confronted The Oracle in her apartment was the Smithized Sati, much like the Smith who confronted Neo was the Smithized Oracle.

- The robots intentionally grimmed up the atmosphere to make life inimical to the free humans. This was mentioned in the first movie, IIRC.

- The rules defining the Matrix are different now; anyone who wants to leave and go to Zion can do so; the people in the Matrix are being given the choice. Likewise, the programs with "no purpose" which would normally have been deleted, like Sati, are now free to exist within the Matrix.

- The end of the Neo/Smith fight: Neo lets himself get absorbed by the Smiths. Neo is jacked into the Matrix via the Source of the robot city. As soon as he gets absorbed, the robot city sends a gigantic fuck-off power surge through his body. NeoSmith blows up. However, NeoSmith is also insanely fuckoff powerful and takes all of the Smiths with him (most likely due to the "opposites attract"/"balance the equation" thing, with an allusion to the symmetry of Neo creates/Smith destroys shown back in the first movie). All of the programs infected by Smith are freed, presumably along with all of the people.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 16:43 (twenty years ago) link

but why is Sati lying on the sidewalk when Smithworld is undone? if she had been Smithed she would not be there at all no?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 16:59 (twenty years ago) link

also what are the machines doing with Neo's body at the end? it looked like he was being revived, perhaps just as a program?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:00 (twenty years ago) link

but why is Sati lying on the sidewalk when Smithworld is undone?

Why was the Oracle lying in the pit at the end of the Smith explosion? Becasue the Smith infection had been driven from her.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:02 (twenty years ago) link

Also, is it particularly important what the machines were going to do with Neo's body at the end?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:03 (twenty years ago) link

Why was the Oracle lying in the pit at the end of the Smith explosion? Becasue the Smith infection had been driven from her.

woah i hadn't even noticed this and i watched chunks of it last night (divx download)!

Also, is it particularly important what the machines were going to do with Neo's body at the end?

potentially yes

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:05 (twenty years ago) link

It's the Christ/Arthur/god-knows-what-else motif of the body of the legendary figure being taken away to a mysterious and unknown place, where he is kept from the brink of death until he rises again (also alluded to in the Oracle saying that they'd see Neo again some time).

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 17:39 (twenty years ago) link

yeh, she 'suspected so' - but what of the hero Smith?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:55 (twenty years ago) link

The films are not meant to be hermetic.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 18:03 (twenty years ago) link

- The robots intentionally grimmed up the atmosphere to make life inimical to the free humans. This was mentioned in the first movie, IIRC.

I thought it was the other way around - the human scientists caused the permanent could to destroy the solar energy of the computers.

I can't remember enough, but I think the only recognizable things we see after the Smithplosion are programs - it's not entirely clear that there are any humans left ("there are levels of survival that we are comfortable with").

I'm basically bitter about the whole thing because I feel complicit - I did a lot of cheerleading of the "it's only half a movie" sort after Reloaded, and in fact I got bad bad warmovie instead.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:04 (twenty years ago) link

the machines maintained the damage the humans did to the Earth/sky as it didn't affect them too much

it seems that only programs can be retrieved after Smithery and not humans in the Matrix.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:12 (twenty years ago) link

It did affect them. That is when they came up with the whole podded human living out life in matrix thing.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:15 (twenty years ago) link

i'm probably missing something glaringly obvious but when an agent takes over a human that means that human is gone in the Matrix, but are still alive in their pod? can they be placed back in the Matrix if an agent is occupying their space? what about Smith, no longer an agent?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:18 (twenty years ago) link

It was clear from the first one during the "Dodge this" scene that Agents temporarily take over a representation of a body in the Matrix. They're essentially commandeering a body and putting its consciousness on pause. So if an Agent takes over a person in the Matrix and the Agent is "killed", then they become the original body again, only that the original person is dead.

I would assume that Smith found a way to permanently control multiple bodies, but that he was simply removed from the system w/o killing everyone. Doesn't make much sense to have that big city at the end with everyone dead in it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 18:22 (twenty years ago) link

i'm probably missing something glaringly obvious but when an agent takes over a human that means that human is gone in the Matrix, but are still alive in their pod?

I don't think this was ever explained. As was why Neo and his cronies had no trouble offing a ton of guards and cops, therefore killing a bunch of enslaved humans. (I think I have reached my maximum level of geeking out.)

bnw (bnw), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:31 (twenty years ago) link

As was why Neo and his cronies had no trouble offing a ton of guards and cops, therefore killing a bunch of enslaved humans.

I read an article (NYTimes, I think), that likened their mindset regarding the killing of innocent enslaved humans to that of terrorists.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:11 (twenty years ago) link

They were certainly very fundamentalist in their views in the same way that extreme groups are cast in the media ("If you are not with us, you are against us").

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:26 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
Saw this at the weekend at the Imax. Nice 3D trailer in advance.

As for the film...

1) Was giggling at the end. Thought I got it. Explained to mate what my theory was. He looked perplexed. Realised that any film where i have to decide whether it was good or awful isn't actually that good.

2) I reckon this was a bit of an Apocalypse Now for the brothers W. There's a great story in Reloaded and revolutions - How neo does some shit to save Zion. You could ice a lot of the rest for director's Acid Cut on DVD and still be left with a 2 hr 30 minute film that kicked major league ass. For starters, the chase seen from 2 and the battle scenes from 3 are magnificent. They should have done what they did first time - realise that kung-fu. intelligent cgi, chicks in pvc with guns and cod-philosophy make a decent movie. Instead, they gone all Lucas and actually start to believe this shite and take it seriously with equally poor results.

3) I realised that what i like about 1 was the aesthetic of the matrix; it had a similar 'any city' feel to it like 'Se7en' but had this really cool dislocated timeframe through the TV screens being 1950s stylee, offices being late 80s etc. That was all left behind as all scenes in the Matrix became darkened and night-set, especially in 3.

4) At the start of 3, we're told that Merv is a kick-ass dude. Yet he promptly disappears from the film. How does he stop the Architect getting him? Does Smith get him? What / who is he? Help!

5) Ditto Oracle. She was dead. Then she's not. What's going on? Help. Please.

6) What happened in the end? Was the machine god the architect?

Some films use ambiguity well; but they combine the ambiguity to certain key moments which determine the discussion of the film and its reception by the audience. This film wasn't ambiguous; it was fucking incomprehensible. It wasn't art-house. it was a major blockbusting big-budget kick-ass movie. I shouldn't leave a film with so many questions about what actually happened before my eyes. I want to ponder the implications of what's happened, not wonder what on earth just happened before my eyes. I'm still wondering.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 12 January 2004 01:35 (twenty years ago) link

I am of the 'big clumsy robot fighting is boring as fuck' school and thought this was a really bafflingly shit film, though I really liked the scene where they briefly go above the clouds and see the sky. If Trinity hadn't gone 'BEAUTIFUL!' and ruined the atmosphere it'd've been better.

Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Monday, 12 January 2004 01:54 (twenty years ago) link

dave, Merv is a rebel program who acquires and uses assets in order to remain out of The Architect/Machine God's control - those assets being information and pawns/treasures such as Neo. we don't know what happens to him but it doesn't really matter.

The Oracle was Smithed but returned to her previous state when A/MG reversed Smith's meddling of the Matrix.

Architect is the manifestation of the Machine God within The Matrix only, so they seem to be one and the same thing.

as time goes by even the most ardently naive defenders of this kind of stuff think of 1000 ways it could've been better. we definitely need a new franchise that combines action with intelligent, non-cliched sci-fi ideologies - 35% Matrix, 65% K Dick/Herbert/M Banks/Gibson...you can now do absolutely anything with special effects technology so with the novelty of that wearing off it would be great to see more cerebral, adult-orientated (not meaning violence or sex particularly) plots and concepts executed with more artistic integrity - again The Animatrix does hint at this with marvellous glimpses in 'Beyond' and 'Matriculated' especially.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 11:45 (twenty years ago) link

But it has Belluci's perfect breasts.

Leee Majors (Leee), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:51 (twenty years ago) link

Leee OTM.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:18 (twenty years ago) link

Finally saw this at the budget tonight. Since I was expecting it to completely suck, I was very pleasantly surprised that it was a perfectly decent movie with similar strengths and weaknesses to the last one.

However, no one on this thread mentioned the bit in the initial pan across the goth club where one of the dancers pulls his dance partner's breasts out of her corset by the nipples, WTF?!

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 January 2004 04:06 (twenty years ago) link

two years pass...
i'm probably overstating things just a little bit, but this is quite possibly the worst film i have ever seen

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:00 (eighteen years ago) link

so fucking rough.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:02 (eighteen years ago) link

i mean... the second one is pretty abominable too. could that be worse?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:02 (eighteen years ago) link

no way, it had the car chase and more belluci

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:03 (eighteen years ago) link

and an exploding cyber-vagina

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:04 (eighteen years ago) link

i hated the second one so much i waited until last night to finally check this out. i have never seen a film that i wished i hadn't seen more than this one.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:05 (eighteen years ago) link

which one had the rave?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:06 (eighteen years ago) link

The second one.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:06 (eighteen years ago) link

boring, loud, obnoxious, anticlimactic. i read a review that called it "a whimper disguised as a bang", that was pretty OTM but not harsh enough. also: that line towards the end where "the oracle" says, 'i don't think we've seen the last of neo' made me want to break my TV.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:07 (eighteen years ago) link

ALL 3 MOVIES SUCK. THESE GUYS CANT MAKE MOVIES FOR SHIT. BOUND WAS HORRIBLE TOO. V FOR VENDETTA LOOKS LIKE A STINKER. IF ITS GOOD ILL EAT MY HAT.

chaki (chaki), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:09 (eighteen years ago) link

i think i'm going to sell my dvd of the first 'matrix' now. and there's no way in hell i'm going to see 'v for vendetta' now. fuck these guys.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:11 (eighteen years ago) link

i was planning to watch it again in a few hours after finally buying the DVD.

i will probably agree more with gear than myself two years ago...

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, this is truly the worst movie ever. Even the fight scenes suck - oooh, look here's Neo facing off against a million evil guys... but who cares, since we know they don't really die or mean anything, and we know that Neo can't die. Real martial arts action movie are bad enough, this was unbearable.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:19 (eighteen years ago) link

you know, I agree with Chaki. However, I've never seen any of the Matrix movies, because I saw "Bound" first and it was SO FUCKING BAD.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:21 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm really mad at myself for watching this. i should have rented 'domino' instead.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:30 (eighteen years ago) link

I like the second two more and more as we move further away from the knee-jerk hype-panning that characterized the criticism around the time of their respective releases. The first Matrix was so self-contained and essentially didn't need a sequel. The second two are overly self-referential (and didn't provide any more pop-post-modern illumination via Baudrillard), but I'm beginning to see more in them as time goes on.

i'm from hollywood, Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:49 (eighteen years ago) link

you would think that, though.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:26 (eighteen years ago) link

i liked bound! and i still (probably) like the first one, it had some neat movie ideas. that were not exploited at all in 2 and 3 mind.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:55 (eighteen years ago) link

considering the first film had action scenes that were pretty tight in editing and relatively economical, it was amazing how bludgeoning the next two films were, style-wise

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:59 (eighteen years ago) link

totally! and stuff like escaping thru the telephone, neat cinematic stuff like that, is not even used in the sequels

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:00 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah this movie's pretty dire

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:38 (eighteen years ago) link

i just remember the subplot with the crusty old general and that kid who took over his walker-robot thing and then shot open the gate and said, "believe..."

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah! my god, and one of the cheesiest "council of elders" or whatever in a sci-fi movie ever

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:44 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.