― Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 17 July 2004 07:12 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www1.umn.edu/umnnews/img/assets/4243/ex_040616_roman_warrior.jpg
I guess it doesn't look anything like the one that momus posted. I was remembering it darker and smoother.
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 17 July 2004 07:15 (nineteen years ago) link
I agree with Dog Latin, C-Man and JW working in tandem was the last thing I wanted to witness too.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 11:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― Markelby (Mark C), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:55 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.fatchicksinpartyhats.com
― Vansi, Saturday, 17 July 2004 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link
Calum's made several good points here, though I can't take issue about the double standards for ass-patting/pinching among strangers in public. Women are much less likely to be potential physical threat to men than vice versa.
Also, there are examples of non-leggy supermodel types who've become sex symbols. Christina Ricci is one. Janeane Garafolo is another. And in the softcore b-movie universe possibly the most popular actress going right now is the very curvy, "regular girl with a pretty face" Misty Mundae.
― She's the Sherrif, Saturday, 17 July 2004 17:39 (nineteen years ago) link
You may be right, but it's all a question of chicken or egg, meaning that "many women" wouldn't say such things if they hadn't learned (implicitly or explicitly) how a women "should" look from childhood on. That of course doesn't make mean comments any more acceptable.
Yeah, I agree that there are a lot of double standards. For example, I've noticed that in certain "enlightened" leftist/indie/whatever circles (at least here in Finland) there isn't that much pressure for women to be thin, but there are such pressures for men. Most of my female friends don't have that a big issue with their weight, but I know several guys who do. Male anorexia has been getting more common, a good friend of mine used to suffer from it.
However, I think sometimes drawing attention to such doudle standards isn't done only out of genuine concern, but also as a sort of a backlash against feminist thought. At times I feel like this about C-Man's comments. I'm not saying these aren't serious problems; it is true that issues like women's violence towards men or weight pressures on guys have been pretty much invisible until the last few years, because such things aren't supposed to happen to men. However, an argument like: "Yeah, everyone talks about women's issues, but how about the pressures on men, no one pays attention to that!" can be used to muddle the truth. Yes, men suffer from gender-related pressures and expectations too, and attention should be paid to that, but that doesn't change the fact that such problems are a hundred times worse for women.
(Sorry, this wasn't directed against you, just clearing my thoughts.)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link
I think Christina Ricci is an attractive girl too. Women, like men, come in all shapes and sizes (I'm judging obesity here which I don't think many men or women find attractive. Ricci is still slim, I would say...) although in my experience I have found women to be as judgemental as men.
Anyway, as long as rich, ugly/ old men like Hugh Hefner dance around with 7 slim young girlfriends can anyone really take many of the comments here seriously? I don't see 7 six packed men running around with a 70 year old millionaire.
― C-Man (C-Man), Saturday, 17 July 2004 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link
and try making a woman jealous of another woman. the first thing most of them will say against the other woman is that she's fat or ugly.
men don't care what other men think. at least not about looks. if we aren't interested in sleeping with you then we don't care what you think of our appearance.
the way i see it:most women = brutally insecure about their looks. especially the MOST attractive ones, oddly enough.
most men = completely in love with themselves, maybe delusionally so.
if women are competitive with each other over attrativeness, men are competitive with each other over money.
― mmmmm, Saturday, 17 July 2004 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link
Also, while you may have a point, you're making generalisations too. You should always be wary of talking of "women" or "men", as if what you're saying applies to all members of a certain gender.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link
who's going to save the world from being saved by mark c?
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 17 July 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link
etc...
you got this from TV
― fff, Saturday, 17 July 2004 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 17 July 2004 23:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 17 July 2004 23:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 18 July 2004 08:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 18 July 2004 10:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 18 July 2004 13:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― ken c (ken c), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:19 (nineteen years ago) link
I think huge bums are a turn off in a girl.
― C-Man (C-Man), Sunday, 18 July 2004 15:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― the neurotic awakening of sir mixalot (blueski), Sunday, 18 July 2004 18:10 (nineteen years ago) link
Like that's going to help at ALL!!!!!@!@!
http://www.sweetnlow.com/images/home/prod_packets.gif
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:26 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:39 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.rosiesamfrodo.com/users/grate/legolas.jpg
― I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:41 (nineteen years ago) link
But C-Man, you seem to expect some kind of appplause for stating this before us, ad fricken nauseum, like you're keening for some approval of your pret a porter masculinity...
― stevie (stevie), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:52 (nineteen years ago) link
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:53 (nineteen years ago) link
was this violent vic, or just a guy named vic?
― That one guy that quit, Friday, 6 July 2007 13:43 (sixteen years ago) link
Too early for Calum
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 13:45 (sixteen years ago) link
Great thread.
― Dom Passantino, Saturday, 13 October 2007 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link