A thread for JUSTIFIED, a TV show on FX starring Timothy Olyphant

this show generally doesnt leave much room for interpretation but that part is a lil fuzzy is all

"Meanwhile, Limehouse hears of what happened, and confronts his assistant, who reveals he gave up Boyd's Oxy clinic to get hit by Tanner. He accepts his mistake and offers his life to Limehouse, who refuses to let him off that easy, and tells his henchman that he will be right on the front line to watch what he started."

it was at the end of episode 6

great lapels btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhDlDEyYwHo

Limehouse didn't ever want the kind of heat that Errol was itching to bring, that has always been the push/pull between them from their early appearances -- Errol always had the 'young guy' approach and Limehouse likes to play in the background under the radar.

it was at the end of episode 6

― boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:29 PM (13 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes i recall that, i beielve both of us have mentioned like twice in the last few minutes, now point out to me which part of that summery says that limehouse is planning on ostracizing him from nobels holler

my god forks vegi girl ty for explaining the things ive already mentioned, its super helpful, yr insight is sterling

errol says kill me, limehouse says naw you're gonna serve and see this through to the end. there's very little likelihood that he's gonna let a man like that continue on in his employ once the service is complete. that he was gonna get kakked or booted out of the fold seemed straightforward to me and was an ongoing mirror of the babyhead ostracism i thought.
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m25of9oq6Y1qzakpfo3_r1_250.gif

wouldn't feel the need to explain if you didn't keep saying it wasn't clear when it seemed clear to me

youll have to point out the part upthread where u predicted that

I don't know what's left to explain? sorry lagoon

http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1zi73lsv71qa71fyo4_250.gif

i guess my question was did i miss something there, because the reveal felt like another plot twist, and you guys are saying no, i guess that scene just felt a lil out of character for the show, like it was a reveal but not particularly offering any new info

I don't know what's left to explain? sorry lagoon

― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:34 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

you didnt explain anything in the first place!

not new info, but valuable insight into Limehouse's character and a great little grace note of sadness for him.

you missed something there

do you ever stop being the worst

was just gonna ask you

good one!

yeah I don't think you missed anything. My feeling was that they just made it seem like a more important thing than it really was?

I get what you were asking now though

you sure are froggy lately icey

yr pottery is hideous

WELL! *flounces off*

if only

good one!

u didnt actually flounce off

u realize we're both kinda just fucking the thread up now

see u on the high ground

feel free to stop at any time

can you guys just make out so we can go back to talking about hats and guns again?

i know how rewarding you find encouraging forks love life but that is really just beyond the pale

goggins showed up as a voice in a recent ep of unsupervised
get the impression FX guys like to reuse their own; charlie day did the same

i fwiw i dont think limehouses sidekicks fate was preordained, had he pulled off the bank set up hes prob back in the fold, giving him one last chance

yeah maybe. but he'll never want to do things limehouse's way so if it wasn't this it'd be the next thing.

idk hed managed to stick around there his whole life so far, wouldve been more in keeping w/the general theatrics of the show to have him do one big last betrayal that forced limeshouses hand, but then i guess he wouldve had to kill him

limehouse is introduced to the story as a man who does not brook failure or gross insubordination; it's intrinsic to the character

when were introduced to him he says that hell kill anyone who crosses him twice, but then he just lets guy go, which reveals limehouse to be a big ol softy who does in fact brook failure and insubordination, so the scene from this week is more as gukbe says abt character rather than plot development, which is what i was asking abt

he doesn't "just lets guy go"; he gives dude who fucked up a choice: unquestioning servitude with the promise of death if he fucks up or a brand and a clean slate. not sure how you get big ol softy out of that.
why character v plot development is a concern is beyond me

he lets the sidekick go when hes fucked up repeatedly

why character v plot development is a concern is beyond me

― boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, April 11, 2012 2:41 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

obvs

talking to or with you is such a waste of time

feel free to never talk to me again

if I ask if you need a hug will that make it worse y/n

maybe if u guys just kept yr weirdo passive agressive stuff on the threads specifically dedicated to propping up forks ego thatd be best

sounds like an n

figures

well. jeez.

i liked this season a lot.

i had the same question about limehouse/errols at the end and so did my wife fwiw.

but i think what forks says makes sense, though it wasn't all that clear to me.

either way, the mags season will probably always be the best, but damn this season was a whole hell of a lot of fun.

it's just amazing casting, pretty much every character they bring on is great.

i didn't know this wasn't popular, that bums me out. :(

i like how they keep the previous seasons' bad guys around

like the way they use wynn duffy, who was such a scary creep in previous seasons, to make new dude seem even creepier is so great

i love him just standing around watching blondie all season