Matrix Revolutions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (490 of them)
you know, I agree with Chaki. However, I've never seen any of the Matrix movies, because I saw "Bound" first and it was SO FUCKING BAD.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:21 (eighteen years ago) link

i'm really mad at myself for watching this. i should have rented 'domino' instead.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:30 (eighteen years ago) link

I like the second two more and more as we move further away from the knee-jerk hype-panning that characterized the criticism around the time of their respective releases. The first Matrix was so self-contained and essentially didn't need a sequel. The second two are overly self-referential (and didn't provide any more pop-post-modern illumination via Baudrillard), but I'm beginning to see more in them as time goes on.

i'm from hollywood, Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:49 (eighteen years ago) link

you would think that, though.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:26 (eighteen years ago) link

i liked bound! and i still (probably) like the first one, it had some neat movie ideas. that were not exploited at all in 2 and 3 mind.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:55 (eighteen years ago) link

considering the first film had action scenes that were pretty tight in editing and relatively economical, it was amazing how bludgeoning the next two films were, style-wise

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:59 (eighteen years ago) link

totally! and stuff like escaping thru the telephone, neat cinematic stuff like that, is not even used in the sequels

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:00 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah this movie's pretty dire

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:38 (eighteen years ago) link

i just remember the subplot with the crusty old general and that kid who took over his walker-robot thing and then shot open the gate and said, "believe..."

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah! my god, and one of the cheesiest "council of elders" or whatever in a sci-fi movie ever

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:44 (eighteen years ago) link

i guess we're supposed to believe in neo half-assing it and selling out humanity for some michael collins-esque "pax machina"

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago) link

yeah, a truce with colonel sanders ain't no truce at all if you ask me

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:47 (eighteen years ago) link

which reminds me, why wasn't there a tie-in with KFC for this movie?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:48 (eighteen years ago) link

KFC declined in favor of the equilibrium account

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:50 (eighteen years ago) link

matrix 4: protocols of the elders of zion

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 04:09 (eighteen years ago) link

I didn't consider him "Colonel Sanders" so much as "Not Donald Sutherland"

also, best description of the elders group goes to a friend who called them "Dreadlocked Starfleet Command"

kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 11 March 2006 08:13 (eighteen years ago) link

i still really like Reloaded a lot

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 10:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Reloaded had some good elements to it, but I recall that most of the plot stuff I had a "It'll be explained in the last one, you'll see" attitude to. And of course it wasn't. At some point I'll watch Reloaded to see whether it can be salvaged. I really really don't think I'll be sitting through Revolutions again.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 11 March 2006 13:24 (eighteen years ago) link

I haven't seen 2 or 3

why aren't they called 2 and 3, though? stupid names

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 13:38 (eighteen years ago) link

reloaded is the only one worth watching. so over the top, so ridiculous.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 14:22 (eighteen years ago) link

why aren't they called 2 and 3, though? stupid names

oh it doesn't matter.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:08 (eighteen years ago) link

isn't 2 just our heroes going from one long-winded bore to another?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

if blade trinity were called blade 3 I might want to see it and blade 2

I would like die hard: with a vengeance more if it were called die hard 3: die hard with a vengeance or something

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:28 (eighteen years ago) link

i won't see a sequel unless it's using Roman numerals

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:33 (eighteen years ago) link

altho i'd wish they'd get a move on with the prequels to Phase IV

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

rocky VI?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

i fell asleep halfway through the second one, woke up at the end, felt no need to ever rent it or see it again to fill in the holes. nice bellucci though.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link

I saw this film when it came out. It was probably worth it for the 10 seconds of hott BDSM goths - but that was the best thing about it.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Saturday, 11 March 2006 17:20 (eighteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Finally saw this last night. I liked the 2nd one though toward the end it got confusing as I don't think I was invested enough in the storyline. This was just boring, like the dull space battles from the new Star Wars but stretched out to an hour and inter-cut with stuff that was in the other movies. Perhaps the plot of this movie isn't as confusing as it seems to me, but it felt like every time a major character was going to drop a plot bomb they went into cliche Matrix-talk. "What do I need to do?" "You know, you've always known." This isn't philosophical, it's bad writing.

Also, yeah, the guy with the attitude that likes to cuts himself, let's leave him in the same room with a disabled Neo, and have him watched over by one doctor lady. Also let's get the Master Control Program from Tron except make him look like a baby. How come Neo can't bring Trinity back from the dead again, if Neo got taken over by Smith in the first movie would the world have ended like it does here, and what were all the mechs doing in that inter-dimensional vortex from the end of Howard the Duck?

Only reason to see this film are those amazing breasts.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:52 (fifteen years ago) link

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly. i would rather have had a couple more movies completely within the matrix program, with neo and the rest kind of working undercover like a viral program, instead of this leather fetish rave fighting bullshit. and considering how "smart" this movies were supposed to be, the last two are so, so stupid.

i did see v for vendetta in the end, it was good, i suppose.

speed racer was better than revolutions, btw.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:01 (fifteen years ago) link

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly.

seriously! being plugged into the matrix seems like a pretty sweet deal.

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Monday, 8 December 2008 20:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Omar OTM, "Speed Racer" was MUCH better than both sequels.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 December 2008 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly. i would rather have had a couple more movies completely within the matrix program, with neo and the rest kind of working undercover like a viral program, instead of this leather fetish rave fighting bullshit. and considering how "smart" this movies were supposed to be, the last two are so, so stupid.

i did see v for vendetta in the end, it was good, i suppose.

speed racer was better than revolutions, btw.

― omar little, Monday, December 8, 2008 8:01 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's true tho, the whole hook of the first one is that once you know the truth you can learn kung fu instantly and become superman... and travel thru phones and shit. why would you want to set your movie outside of that??

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Because you want to have a crazy rave sequence mayhaps.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link

A boring crazy rave sequence, at that.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:21 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the first matrix was clearly made with no sequel in mind. this wasn't some kind of lord of the rings all-of-one-piece thing.

i think also neo turning into an incredibly uninteresting cipher with no personality in the last two films was also a bad move. yeah lol keanu joeks but in the first he was a really great character and we empathized with his situation. but once he was "the one" there was nothing left for him to discover except...i dunno, greater powers? who gives a shit.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link

"i think the first matrix was clearly made with no sequel in mind."

Would have been nice if they hadn't allowed for the possibility of one then.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:27 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i know but if no sequel came about it could have existed as a single standalone film with no trouble whatsoever. i think they painted themselves into a corner with all the interesting character arcs completely front-loaded into the first film.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:30 (fifteen years ago) link

i think it was obviously made with a sequel in mind, esp with that last shot, but with no clear idea of what would be in that sequel.

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Star Wars (and arguably Empire Strikes Back) are better than any of their sequels because the universe in which the story takes place is being unveiled/explored by the film as much as by the audience. The film is aware that a curtain is being drawn back, that the audience is being taken on a voyage of discovery, and paces itself accordingly. Think how much time both Star Wars and The Matrix spend gathering characters, doling out info in small bites, and ramping things up before all is revealed and the "epic battle" plots kick in -- and how much care they devote to textural variety outside the big action sequences. I'm thinking especially of the scene in The Matrix where Neo first visits the Oracle in her faux Chicago tenement. It's so rich and surprising and realistically detailed. The Wachowskis take time with it, and don't seem primarily concerned with kicking your eyeballs in with wicked awesome shit. There's nothing like it in either of the sequels, which lack any sense of wonder or exploration. Therefore, tedious, boxed-in, unsurprising.

Suggest Ban Permalink (contenderizer), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know, the second one pretty much holds up until Neo finds out the "secret" of the Matrix, at which point it gets kind of retarded.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah I'll basically watch the entire second one and enjoy it up until the trucks hit each other and blow up. The rest is inconsequential

El Tomboto, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:40 (fifteen years ago) link

well i think they weren't planning a sequel to complete this story, is what i meant. they were hedging their bets in both directions. obviously the door was left open. kind of like the first star wars, which could have made sense as a single film too. but i think that particular universe allowed for more possibilities than the matrix series.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:41 (fifteen years ago) link

give me the car chase from reloaded and that's it imo

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:42 (fifteen years ago) link

That car chase is one of the greatest things ever filmed, is the thing.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:42 (fifteen years ago) link

exploding digital vagina scene > car chase

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:44 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know if they clearly meant for a sequel, but I think the first one ends well, similar to Terminator 2's ominous ending where the heroes have won, but the future remains uncertain. Agree with Omar that it could have been a standalone film, and probably should have remained that way.

As inferior as the sequels are, at least there are some fun fight scenes and chases, I guess, especially in the second one. One problem I had was that compared to the first one, all the fights seemed really too "soft". Like in the first one, that scene where Morpheus is getting his ass whooped by Smith before they capture him, there is this wonderfully crunchy moment where his head gets put through a toilet seat. I can't really think of any moments in the second two movies that had that kind of impact, despite all the bullets, flying and zipping around and cascading building collapses - the CG had just gotten far overused.

Nhex, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:46 (fifteen years ago) link

^Wait, what?

Nhex, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I've said this elsewhere but it was really disappointing to me that after adding all this other fairly interesting and exotic stuff to the universe they proceeded to do nothing with it in Revolutions. Hey there's this whole other underworld of rogue apps in the matrix that do weird things outside the bounds of the agents or the humans, but nevermind, we're setting the finale in the boring wasteland where magic doesn't exist.

El Tomboto, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Getting Leigh Brackett to write Empire is the big plus for that film (although this depends on whether you believe she wrote it, I guess.)

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:49 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.