Gawker down, and Twitter is being a bit rub/text-only. Hmmm?
― see inlaycard for details (suzy), Saturday, 25 August 2012 17:54 (eleven years ago) link
i blame... ROMNEY!!!
― a bag of andy capp's hot fries (stevie), Saturday, 25 August 2012 17:55 (eleven years ago) link
The latest Anonymous dump (http://pastebin.com/nfVT7b0Z) of 1,000,001 Apple Devices UDIDs made me giggle:
to journalists: no more interviews to anyone till Adrian Chen get featured in the front page of Gawker, a whole day, with a huge picture of him dressing a ballet tutu and shoe on the head, no photoshop. yeah, man. like Keith Alexander. go, go, go. (and there you ll get your desired pageviews number too) Until that happens, this whole statement will be the only thing getting out directly from us. So no tutu, no sources.
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 4 September 2012 06:45 (eleven years ago) link
#GawkersNextArticle
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Saturday, 8 September 2012 23:53 (eleven years ago) link
This is hilarious. http://gawker.com/5943828/13-powerful-images-of-muslim-rage
― gyac, Monday, 17 September 2012 17:56 (eleven years ago) link
I loved that.
― controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Monday, 17 September 2012 18:47 (eleven years ago) link
Ha
#snowrage
― Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Monday, 17 September 2012 18:58 (eleven years ago) link
apparently j0rdan s. wrote pretty much every single story on gawker today
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:10 (eleven years ago) link
That was very nice.
― one bad call from barely losing (Nicole), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:53 (eleven years ago) link
Is Everybody Who Edits Gawker Really This Stupid?
; )
― buzza, Saturday, 20 October 2012 19:48 (eleven years ago) link
superstorm outage?
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 00:43 (eleven years ago) link
Still down!
― Manchild in Beantown (stevie), Wednesday, 31 October 2012 08:26 (eleven years ago) link
"The Vatican Is Really Butthurt About U.S. Citizens Approving Gay Marriage"
such a Gawker headline
― crüt, Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:35 (eleven years ago) link
I say that with love btw.
what the fuck is wrong with this site
http://kotaku.com/5960657/metacritic-refuses-to-pull-negative-review-that-gamespot-admits-was-factually-inaccurate
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:24 (eleven years ago) link
what, gamespot for running a shitty un-fact-checked review, or kotaku for being interested?
thread's about gawker, I think you might want the "wtf is up with metacritic" thread
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:27 (eleven years ago) link
metacritic's terrifying new math
― buzza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:36 (eleven years ago) link
It'd make sense to change their policy, but their policy does make sense -- sites were changing shit all the time, especially on video games, a couple years ago due to pressure. Real question is why gamespot is publishing shitty reviews
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:27 (eleven years ago) link
assume whiney's saying wtf is up with kotaku caring abt that
― just sayin, Thursday, 15 November 2012 07:35 (eleven years ago) link
"We'll continue to follow and update this story as we hear more."
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 07:43 (eleven years ago) link
True, maybe if we stopped talking about meta critic it'd go away
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:44 (eleven years ago) link
The review, scored 60/100 and written by a freelancer named Eric Neigher, had been eviscerated by readers and commenters who pointed out a number of mistakes—for example, the review said the recently-released indie game was $30, when it actually costs $25.
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:46 (eleven years ago) link
:O
― 乒乓, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:46 (eleven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/rUD8O.png
http://i.imgur.com/YHgmy.png
http://i.imgur.com/2IILx.png
aargh too early in the morning to be confronted by this many awful ppl at once
― dell (del), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:09 (eleven years ago) link
2ILX4U.png
― bnw, Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:11 (eleven years ago) link
ha
― dell (del), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:15 (eleven years ago) link
"myles tanzer"http://i.imgur.com/KnbD1.gif
― bnw, Sunday, 2 December 2012 21:39 (eleven years ago) link
http://gawker.com/5967960/how-much-time-would-you-save-if-pepsi-and-chicken-were-combined-into-a-single-chip-flavor
fwiw coca cola chicken wings are pretty good
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 23:46 (eleven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/KZnlF.jpg
http://appetiteforchina.com/recipes/coca-cola-chicken-wings/
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 23:49 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah, they're crazy. Cola ingredients are not really removed from what you'd find in marinades
― mh, Thursday, 13 December 2012 01:39 (eleven years ago) link
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18g5em3mcetgzjpg/original.jpg
― goole, Friday, 1 March 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
wtf gawker, make it a doritos taco ffs - or does uk not have those?
― johnny crunch, Friday, 1 March 2013 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
http://deadspin.com/welcome-to-the-new-deadspin-451606944
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:44 (eleven years ago) link
lol i remember kinja
― mookieproof, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:46 (eleven years ago) link
oh I didnt see ice cube bumped the other gawker thread
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:48 (eleven years ago) link
I think via ilx law priority is passed to the first bumped
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:49 (eleven years ago) link
The new Deadspin layout is the absolute worst.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:00 (eleven years ago) link
agreed
― balls, Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:04 (eleven years ago) link
i think it looks fine, i just love the gawker layout that allows you to read every post w/o having to open new tabs and/or click the back button
― A$AP Rovi (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:12 (eleven years ago) link
also i think it's kinda weird that they made HUGE PHOTOS the emphasis of the new layout but then made it so the photos are covered in black dots
― A$AP Rovi (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:13 (eleven years ago) link
huge photos tiny text blocks is terrible designside-panel w/ other stories was great for navigation, I'm not going to scroll backward in Gawker Media's timeline like some tumblr-using savage
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:16 (eleven years ago) link
i blame sandy
― balls, Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:20 (eleven years ago) link
do we have another thread for other big-blog-hitters?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BGMFFmYCEAAw0Yc.jpg:large
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Friday, 5 April 2013 17:28 (eleven years ago) link
I didn't realize Buzzfeed had original content until recently, I thought it was all just meme aggregations and listicles.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 5 April 2013 19:12 (eleven years ago) link
They (very) occasionally produce a good article or two, it must be by accident.
― rallying against young people who wear hats (Nicole), Friday, 5 April 2013 19:16 (eleven years ago) link
buzzfeed has a really high quality tech section, maybe the best on the internet in terms of intelligent coverage
― max, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:17 (eleven years ago) link
http://kotaku.com got the same makeover
― am0n, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:18 (eleven years ago) link
not that anyone reads that ; )
― am0n, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:20 (eleven years ago) link
yeah buzzfeed is really really good except when it's awful, it's so weird
― caek, Friday, 5 April 2013 20:14 (eleven years ago) link
they are paying writers good $$ too or so i heard
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Friday, 5 April 2013 20:17 (eleven years ago) link