The issue with forks' posts was never about him relating his experiences. It was about the multiple times he explicitly stated that because of his experiences other people should feel the same way that he does about life.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:42 (eleven years ago) link
Forks was making the "it gets better" statement which doesn't work for me but he shouldn't be castigated for thinking it might work
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:45 (eleven years ago) link
if "becuz of my experiences other people should feel the way i feel about life" = "life is ultimately meaningful and worthwhile and beautiful in some way at the core" than yeah i'll rep for that
― EVERYONE COOKING SCMABLED EGGS,CHEESE WITH TOASTER!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:45 (eleven years ago) link
am gonna push the button, using the lo-tec equivalent offered by a nail gun, if the collective response to forks' "there are wonderful things in life!" post is people interrogating his ability to assess them & getting at him for appreciating them w/o appropriate deference to others' conditions. the solipsism of "i can't believe you people don't think this" is sometimes a necessary part of the single-minded capacity of being able to appreciate things, imo.
― *buffs lens* (schlump), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:46 (eleven years ago) link
also lolz forever on that tokyo jungle post A+i mostly play at 4 in the morning
― EVERYONE COOKING SCMABLED EGGS,CHEESE WITH TOASTER!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:47 (eleven years ago) link
there u are conflating 'life' as in individual phenomenological lived experience and 'life' in some gloopily pantheistic 'the tree of-' sense
― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:47 (eleven years ago) link
The fact that you're asking or reading or answering or entertaining this question says to me that you haven't given yourself over completely to the idea of nonexistence, which indicates at least a glimmer of hopefulness.
― Old Lunch, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:48 (eleven years ago) link
guys, every fucking day is a gift and it's insane to me that any of you think nothing is preferable to EVERYTHING
Every day is a gift = rendered as statement of fact, and anyone who diverges is "insane".
trust me when i tell you that anybody who's privileged enough to have the time/tech/education to be contributing on this thread can find a level of joy in life that improves on "let's press a button and make it all go away" even if it requires medication/therapy/disappointment and sadness to achieve
TRUST ME THIS IS TRUE. SO TRUE AND NO OTHER OPINIONS MAY DIVERGE. YOU PRIVILEGED TWAT.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:49 (eleven years ago) link
ugh
― flopson, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:50 (eleven years ago) link
After all, and I think this argument might be beyond me, but in admitting to others that you would accept a consequence-free elimination-of-self, that could also be interpreted as a negation of another's state of happiness. Logic being that "I do not accept that my happinesses or yours make life worth living" and "I do not accept a human's capacity for life-changes, or that these changes could create a positive effect on their outlook", it's an enormously provocative statement, imo
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:50 (eleven years ago) link
it's a major underpinning of a lot of ethics that life is sacred/gift/beauty/etc, i don't think forks articulating that idea is so controversial.
― Mordy, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:51 (eleven years ago) link
every day is a grift
― gesange der yuengling (crüt), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:52 (eleven years ago) link
ethics is vacuous
― www.toilet-guru.com (silby), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:53 (eleven years ago) link
it's p funny to see the habitual ilx flav dismissive/reductive argument in service of "no, life is NOT worth living!"
― flopson, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:53 (eleven years ago) link
every daaaaay is a winding roaaa-d!(...i get a little bit closer!)
but to what?
..."to feeling fine"
*thinks*
― Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:54 (eleven years ago) link
I would love to write a letter to my 11 year old self with a list of books to read not read
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, October 12, 2012 10:56 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:54 (eleven years ago) link
"life is worth living" is a statement with a lot to unpack. Worth what? To who? Living how? How can we be sure?
― www.toilet-guru.com (silby), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:55 (eleven years ago) link
Furthermore, and this might not be the case everywhere, but isn't the desire toward self-elimination considered a treatable illness?
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:55 (eleven years ago) link
I'm on a kick the last couple weeks where I'm pretending I'm still in college and that I'm an asshole philosophy student
every day is a gif
― kinder, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:55 (eleven years ago) link
Lol as Z S
― flamboyant goon tie included, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:56 (eleven years ago) link
― www.toilet-guru.com (silby), Friday, October 12, 2012 1:55 PM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
pack that shit back up & liveitup, homie
― flopson, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:56 (eleven years ago) link
I guess part of the issue is that it sucks to see that ilxors who have provided me with happiness via hilarious/insightful posts don't find joy in their own lives/existence. And that's part of why I think it's sort of important to mention suicide in this thread. ILX has experienced that loss as a community, and many of us have lost friends either to suicide, or the de facto suicide of personal neglect, or a tragic accident, or whatever. It isn't a hypothetical situation, and it doesn't come with a button. So while this thread is an interesting intellectual exercise, it's hard not so see it as a red flag, and while forks may have come off a little braggy, I think what he's really saying is "come have fun with me in New York! Don't press the button!"
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:57 (eleven years ago) link
in admitting to others that you would accept a consequence-free elimination-of-self, that could also be interpreted as a negation of another's state of happiness. Logic being that "I do not accept that my happinesses or yours make life worth living" and "I do not accept a human's capacity for life-changes, or that these changes could create a positive effect on their outlook", it's an enormously provocative statement, imo
That isn't a logical inference, that's an emotional response. I do not accept that my happinesses or yours makes my life worth living, but I never said shit about whether it makes your own life worth living.
Most ethics is bunk. And I never said that forks' posts were "controversial". I am saying that they're limiting, and an imposition of his own ideals onto others.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:57 (eleven years ago) link
it's impossible to state an opinion without imposing your ideals upon others
― The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Friday, 12 October 2012 17:58 (eleven years ago) link
Actually, it isn't.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:58 (eleven years ago) link
the way you spit things ppl say back at them you would think it was tho
― flopson, Friday, 12 October 2012 17:59 (eleven years ago) link
FTR, I wasn't castigating forks at all before. I'm always happy for anyone who's legitimately able to find happiness and meaning in life. But like some dude said, the externalities of one's life sometime have an unfortunate lack of consonance with the shit going on in one's head. And although a lot of people would surely disagree, I feel pretty strongly that the value and beauty of life is a perspective rather than a universal truth.
― Old Lunch, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:00 (eleven years ago) link
What, the way I use verbatim evidence to support my claims? Oh shit, sorry man, I didn't realise I was supposed to talk ill-informed bollocks instead.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:01 (eleven years ago) link
ethics as first philosophy
― plax (ico), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:01 (eleven years ago) link
emil.y, you may be miserable, but you are also hilarious.
― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:04 (eleven years ago) link
life is grotesque. push the button.
― Nhex, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:05 (eleven years ago) link
i don't want to push it now, but i'd like to have the option in the future
― these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:06 (eleven years ago) link
emil.y, the act of describing an opinion or viewpoint to someone and making them understand it is, by definition, imposing your viewpoint upon someone else. I do not think it is actually possible to communicate an idea or understand other people's points of view without this type of imposition, therefore I do not see it as an exclusively negative process.
― The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:08 (eleven years ago) link
WCC pitching "the button" as a new concept to a home electronics firm, using this thread to collect market data. pie chart shows two thirds of consumers open to installing some kind of button, depending on ease of use, cost efficiency, attractive design.
― *buffs lens* (schlump), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:09 (eleven years ago) link
xp em. eh no i mean just acting like some guy making a posi post relating trying to relate his own history of happiness/depression to that of a community he is a part of is an "imposition of his own ideals onto others", seems so needlessly defensive & such a generic & universally applicable accusation that dan's post makes sense itc
― flopson, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:10 (eleven years ago) link
DJP, I think your interpretation of 'imposing' here is misleading. One would imagine that a discussion wherein one proffered an opinion to one's conversational partner would be more accurately described as an 'exchange' or a 'proffering' of ideas, or even a 'negotiation'. An imposition is a much more forceful process.
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:12 (eleven years ago) link
btw, emily totally otm
― Nhex, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:13 (eleven years ago) link
got to say that if 'being told how to feel' or similar was a particular bugbear of mine then I would probably have tried to give a thread with a title like this a wide berth
― it's the Suede/Denim secret police/they have come for your 90s niece (DJ Mencap), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:15 (eleven years ago) link
What about a button, or machine, that when you enter it, you play out the rest of our life in a virtual state where everything plays out in the most positive possible way. You wouldn't even realise it wasn't real and you were guaranteed that everything in your life were to pan out in utter bliss. Would you do it?
― where is el airoporto? (dog latin), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:17 (eleven years ago) link
Sorry about structure of that sentence, typin on the phone
― where is el airoporto? (dog latin), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:18 (eleven years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience_machine
― emil.y, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:19 (eleven years ago) link
, in which dog latin reflects on his extended bluray session of millennial sci-fi flicks
― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:20 (eleven years ago) link
DJP, I think your interpretation of 'imposing' here is misleading. One would imagine that a discussion wherein one proffered an opinion to one's conversational partner would be more accurately described as an 'exchange' or a 'proffering' of ideas, or even a 'negotiation'. An imposition is a much more forceful process
Yes and no. All of the actions you're describing are differing degrees of the same process, governed by both parties' expectations going into the conversation, and those degrees are affected as much by perception as they are intent.
― The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:21 (eleven years ago) link
Well it's not supposed to be an original concept, but hey
― where is el airoporto? (dog latin), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link
things are p rad, gonna keep exisiting
― Lamp, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link
xxxp or American Dad episodes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vacation_Goo
― Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:22 (eleven years ago) link
It's days like this I wish Banaka would show up
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:23 (eleven years ago) link
Maybe this button should just put have the power to put you on stand-by for just 6 months with no consequences, rather than cease to exist altogether. There's experiences I'd rather have not been round for (such as practically the whole of 1995), but not worth giving up the rest of my life to avoid.
― Bob Six, Friday, 12 October 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link
I most definitely would push the button. When, is the question.
― The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Friday, 12 October 2012 18:25 (eleven years ago) link