batshit rightwing cartoons: 2012 and imaginary romney presidency years edition

As usual Asay completely misses the point

if we were to correctly apply the truth to his illustration there, the US would be a 2,000lb sumo wrestler with more trainers than opposing fighters.

Current aircraft carriers by country:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/carriers-2012.gif

That's not even trying to be funny.

There's going to be a lot of right wings there. DOYOUSEE?

Why would you own a gun if you think 'guns must be confiscated'?

Yeah, she's obviously meant to be a "hypocritical progressive", but that's so much of a straw man that it may actually be a giant wicker man about to be set afire.

Newspaper scandalously publishing a link to her Facebook profile, happened alot in communist Russia.

Is latest trend. Is wery exciting.

Exposing Elmer Fudd to the eyes of the world is not a noble mission, imo.

Article is thing we do not have in Hhrussia.

Convinced Day by Day is written by a chatbot connected only to the conservative blogoshpere.

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca011113dBP20130108114542.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb0110cd20130110030934.jpg

seriously fuck these people

― Mr. Que, Thursday, September 3, 2009 4:29 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

every other BSRWC, btw, is running variants on something about Al Gore cutting a deal with Al-Jazeera, apparently the nation's major headline issue in conservaland

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gmc10631220130109104800.jpg

er

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gmc10631220130109104800.jpg

annnnnd by the way, i think i smell the future lazy cartoonist liberal shorthand, say goodbye to peace signs and stink lines:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb0109cd20130107091923.jpg

do well-off low-information voters wear hats branded by political campaigns though

oh, they will be wearing obama-logo hats for the next forty years

haha, "now it's" paedophilia, BUT WAIT! this innocent pasttime beloved of liberals could soon lead to ... beastality!! c'mon guys paedophilia is way worse than beastiality.

Yeah, abusing kids is totally the beginning of a slippery slope.

lol at the hungover horse

Drunk Horse's "Adult Situations" playing on their stereo no doubt.

:D

Chuck Asay is secretly PETA

the grim reaper totally plays cup-and-ball with the skull trophy when nobody's around

Jokes on the liberals. That's 333,964 we can't have sex with.

Ha ha!

not sure if this has been linked itt yet but it is relevant

http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/

that is fantastic.

http://agoodcartoon.tumblr.com/post/38634910173/credit-to-sa-forum-member-melaneus

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/Foden20130115-Newsflu20130115025930.jpg

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gv011213dAPR20130112034511.jpg

took me a while to interpret this, thinking this was a cop and there was some complex statement being made about how the government is robbing cops of the power to fight back with all this non-lethal defensive stuff...but actually it's about everyday citizens "needing" all this gear to protect them from all the bullets flying around? which sounds like a good argument for gun control but i don't think it is.

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/bg011413dAPR20130114094514.jpg

this feels like it's going for a really old-school political cartoonist vibe, with the stiff presentation and damning quote

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/Foden20130112-Obama%20177420130111044319.jpg

...he would have been a much more competent policy-setter for England than mad King George?

yeah, king hussein obama comes off pretty good there imo

lmao is his servant Icelandic?
fucking Sigur ros coming 4 ur gunz, america

Guns do make the best shields, it's true.

Not really a "right-wing political cartoon," but close enough - this appeared in the Wall Street Journal in an article on tax changes in the "fiscal cliff" bill:

http://static1.firedoglake.com/29/files/2013/01/Screen-Shot-2013-01-15-at-11.58.52-AM.png

As this blogger points out, Yes, in that comic, every single one of those families makes a six figure income, the lowest being $180 thousand, and yet because of the new tax hikes imposed by Obama, they all appear as though he ran over the family dog.

The median household income in the U.S. between 2007-2011 was $52,762, but the American people are all supposed to shed tears for those that make between three to twelve times as much?

Aw they look so sad.

All those taxes going up to support the black people in the top-right, WSJ knows what's up.

It's not easy being a single parent of two children with only $260,000 coming in - and that's before taxes! Those goddamn food stamps don't buy diapers.

lmfao bottom right fam is like %1ers as rendered by dorothrea lange
mother, father, how will we travail Williams sonoma now?
son, we're not going to Williams Sonoma anymore
*porsche cayenne pulls up to kohl's*
*mother chokes back sobs as her children wail in agony*

thanks wsj for helping me to better understand from what vantage point some people view the world

top left single mom, now having to cut back on live-in nanny expenses, cheese of the month clubs, and renting instead of buying porn

also wtf all these rich ppl and they can't afford decent hair, ppl who have not learned how to live imo, they all lookalike theyve been playing capture the flag for nine days and then got dressed for church dirctory portraits

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v478/n7370/images/478450a-i1.0.jpg

Also please note that the only people in the graphic not getting a tax increase are black. WSJ really knows their target audience.

median household income for a single parent is $16,500 FYI

wonder what median household income for a single parent with a WSJ sub is tho

Lower than it should be thanks to Obama

the whole objective of that graphic is to portray the injustice and gross indignity of increasing marginal tax rates

of course you can only illustrate that injury by making up imaginary households that are all have incomes affected by marginal tax rate increases

$180k investment income, yes, that sounds reasonable