ugh i regret linking to d3s3r3t n3ws. fuck those idiots.
― administrator galina (Matt P), Thursday, 7 February 2013 23:15 (eleven years ago) link
That's a Mormon thing, isn't it?
― The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Friday, 8 February 2013 00:19 (eleven years ago) link
http://gawker.com/5986014/mississippi-newspaper-owner-lets-homophobic-readers-have-it-after-they-cancel-subscriptions-over-coverage-of-historic-same+sex-wedding
http://jimromenesko.com/2013/02/21/paper-gets-support-after-being-blasted/
Latter link via WilliamC
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2013 21:29 (eleven years ago) link
http://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/7c10d5030cbb5d61d05ffe5d537ac188/tumblr_miwe32wT1s1qa0uujo1_500.jpg
― mookieproof, Friday, 1 March 2013 21:35 (eleven years ago) link
brilliant
― fueled by satanism, violence, and sodomy (elmo argonaut), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:04 (eleven years ago) link
silent generation is silent, except when adam and steve want to marry, or when fish in rice is an option
― book itchy (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:27 (eleven years ago) link
fuck those salmon-eating savages
― book itchy (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:28 (eleven years ago) link
also, who the fuck 'approves' of the marriage of two people they don't even know? how is approval even a factor in that scenario?
― book itchy (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:29 (eleven years ago) link
'do you approve of marjorie and rhonda being married''no''do you know marjorie?''no''do you know rhonda?''no''would you like ginger or wasabi?''no'
― book itchy (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:33 (eleven years ago) link
i'm having gay tuna for lunch, just to piss these people off
― book itchy (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:35 (eleven years ago) link
I'm Mitt Romney and I approved this marriage
― Donkamole Marvin (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 1 March 2013 22:40 (eleven years ago) link
More like Shit Romney and he albacored this maki.
― Zero Dark 33⅓: The Final Insult (Eric H.), Saturday, 2 March 2013 00:25 (eleven years ago) link
four hours and no cunnilingus joke?
― the 'dirty sprite' is implied (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 2 March 2013 04:46 (eleven years ago) link
beneath these cunning linguists
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 2 March 2013 14:09 (eleven years ago) link
Richard Socarides: Why Clinton signed DOMA.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/03/why-clinton-signed-the-defense-of-marriage-act.html
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 March 2013 20:40 (eleven years ago) link
I look forward to Clinton's apologies for the Telecommunications Act, failing to sign the Kyoto Protocol, etc.
― Donkamole Marvin (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 March 2013 20:46 (eleven years ago) link
Socarides' piece is basically "Bubba was scared... of BOB DOLE"
― Donkamole Marvin (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 March 2013 20:53 (eleven years ago) link
There's a certain toe-sucking bounty hunter that helped secure Clinton's election, and he's not mentioned.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 March 2013 21:00 (eleven years ago) link
that's the weirdest description of Ross Perot I've ever heard
― Donkamole Marvin (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 March 2013 21:03 (eleven years ago) link
Dick Morris, iirc
― jaymc, Friday, 8 March 2013 21:36 (eleven years ago) link
i haven't done any proposing iirc but in the aftermath of a very scary car accident my bf & i have decided to have durable power of attorney & health care proxy papers drawn up.
― fueled by satanism, violence, and sodomy (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 March 2013 22:06 (eleven years ago) link
Baby steps
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/15/politics/portman-gay-marriage/index.html
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 14:29 (eleven years ago) link
Order66 thinker • 23 minutes ago −
Homosexuality is just as deviant and perverted, now, as it was when Portman was too busy to have a catch with his boy. That has not changed. The laws of nature have not changed. Holding homosexual relationships in the same regard as heterosexual relationships - establishing some twisted and rationalized form of parity - is just as ridiculous as it has ever been. Marriage is and always will be defined as one man and one woman, regardless the extent to which we let or encourage various pretenders play house.
The coward surrendered, plain and simple. Next up is his daughter getting knocked up and Portman joining NARAL as a result.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 15 March 2013 14:50 (eleven years ago) link
Brian Brown just trolls comment sections now?
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 14:56 (eleven years ago) link
I hate humanity.I have hope for humanity.I hate humanity.I have hope for humanity.repeat
― I Don't Wanna Be Dissed (By Anyone But You) (WilliamC), Friday, 15 March 2013 14:57 (eleven years ago) link
Well given that there's time to go I AM going to like the increasing frustration of those kinds of folks realizing that they're losing both major parties now, the GOP way more slowly obv. but...
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/03/14/cpac_diary_showdown_on_gay_street.html
(I saw photos from the other panel -- barely anyone there.)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 15:14 (eleven years ago) link
Because what, ultimately, are the straight marriage irredentists going to do anyway -- form a third party? Good luck with that.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 15:15 (eleven years ago) link
Anyway I liked Yglesias on this via Twitter:
Did Rob Portman used to think that gay people didn’t have dads?
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 15:23 (eleven years ago) link
Portman's reversal makes him the only Senate Republican to back gay marriage.
rmde
― his girlfriend was all 'ugh and he wears a solar backpack' (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 March 2013 15:52 (eleven years ago) link
is that actually true, because if so that's ludicrous
― Darth Icky (DJP), Friday, 15 March 2013 15:54 (eleven years ago) link
Totally true.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 15:57 (eleven years ago) link
(Sadly, obv, but totally true.)
how many of them support interracial marriage
― Darth Icky (DJP), Friday, 15 March 2013 15:58 (eleven years ago) link
my congresswoman is the only Republican in the House who does.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 15 March 2013 15:59 (eleven years ago) link
Sensenbrenner probably thinks the entire populace of the United States are white males.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 March 2013 16:03 (eleven years ago) link
100 bucks says will portman is a libertarian
― k3vin k., Friday, 15 March 2013 18:30 (eleven years ago) link
i thought about turning gay when my dad wouldn't play catch with me, but i decided i'd really piss him off and be liberal instead.
― not even obama can help u (Hunt3r), Friday, 15 March 2013 18:39 (eleven years ago) link
Homosexuality is just as deviant and perverted, now, as it was when Portman was too busy to have a catch with his boy. That has not changed. The laws of nature have not changed.
this 'order66' character knows how easily a cock slips into a bum, right
― badg horror stories (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 15 March 2013 21:40 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1NVw7xnIMY4
― his girlfriend was all 'ugh and he wears a solar backpack' (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 March 2013 21:41 (eleven years ago) link
Boehner told Raddatz that he could not envision a situation where his views would shift on same-sex marriage - even if one of his children came out as gay.
"Rob's a great friend and a long-time ally. And I appreciate that he's decided to change his views on this," Boehner said. "I believe that marriage is the union of one man and one woman…It's- it's what I grew up with. It's what I believe. It's what my church teaches me. And I can't imagine that position would ever change."
― his girlfriend was all 'ugh and he wears a solar backpack' (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 March 2013 23:09 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/03/charles-murrays-gay-marriage-surprise.html
chief phrenologist tells the right to give up on gay marriage and abortion
― goole, Monday, 18 March 2013 15:08 (eleven years ago) link
that fucking dude
― Darth Icky (DJP), Monday, 18 March 2013 15:13 (eleven years ago) link
Mayer misspelled Jonathan Rauch's name, surprisingly.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 March 2013 15:16 (eleven years ago) link
haha, stopped clock moment for real
― cunnilingus ah um (The Reverend), Monday, 18 March 2013 16:56 (eleven years ago) link
But since then, Murray said, “we have acquired a number of gay and lesbian friends,” and to what he jokingly called his “dismay” as a “confident” social scientist, he learned he’d been wrong. He’d been especially influenced by the pro-gay-marriage arguments made by Jonathan Rausch, an openly gay writer for the National Journal and the Atlantic. Further, Murray said, he had discovered that the gay couples he knew with children were not just responsible parents; they were “excruciatingly responsible parents.”
'like jeez ease up a bit'
― j., Tuesday, 19 March 2013 02:46 (eleven years ago) link
more reality-based than Ratzinger?
Argentina was on the verge of approving gay marriage, and the Roman Catholic Church was desperate to stop that from happening. It would lead tens of thousands of its followers in protest on the streets of Buenos Aires and publicly condemn the proposed law, a direct threat to church teaching, as the work of the devil.
But behind the scenes, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who led the public charge against the measure, spoke out in a heated meeting of bishops in 2010 and advocated a highly unorthodox solution: that the church in Argentina support the idea of civil unions for gay couples....
Faced with the near certain passage of the gay marriage bill, Cardinal Bergoglio offered the civil union compromise as the “lesser of two evils,” said Sergio Rubin, his authorized biographer. “He wagered on a position of greater dialogue with society.”
In the end, though, a majority of the bishops voted to overrule him, his only such loss in his six-year tenure as head of Argentina’s bishops’ conference. But throughout the contentious political debate, he acted as both the public face of the opposition to the law and as a bridge-builder, sometimes reaching out to his critics.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/20/world/americas/pope-francis-old-colleagues-recall-pragmatic-streak.html
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:54 (eleven years ago) link
You'd think a bunch of young closeted right-wingers wouldn't have been so open about their needs:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/us/politics/young-opponents-of-gay-marriage-remain-undaunted.html
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 22:02 (eleven years ago) link
“In redefining marriage to include same-sex couples, what you’re doing is you’re excluding the norm of sexual complementarity,” said Mr. Anderson, the Heritage Foundation fellow. “Once you exclude that norm, the three other norms — which are monogamy, sexual exclusivity and permanency — become optional as well.”
this is like white-belt rhetorical judo. the three other norms aren't norms at all in any legal sense...but let's just pretend they are for a sec, because why not
― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:21 (eleven years ago) link
because he has shit-all argument otherwise
― Esteban Buttiérrez (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:40 (eleven years ago) link
I find it fascinating how all these people are like ten years younger than I am but look like they're already in their mid 40s
― joygoat, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:50 (eleven years ago) link