Magic: The Gathering C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10014 of them)

also is populate even gonna be viable? I mean it'd have to appear in dm almost at the same rate as it does in rtr, no?

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:44 (eleven years ago) link

dragon's maze is going to slow the format way the fuck down just by virtue of not getting 3 packs of the same color combos. unless something weird/unexpected happens, i'd expect 3-color decks to become the default, so you'll end up with 2 RTR guilds and 1 gatecrash guild, or vice versa

as for populate all you really need is 1 or 2 common token-makers in DGM and it should be fine. gatecrash is a bit light on tokens but there's at least Knight Watch which is an obvious plant for full block in addition to being a battalion-enabler (very clever)

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:58 (eleven years ago) link

Populate an army of frog lizards

Moodles, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:03 (eleven years ago) link

i cant wait for the ogre slumlord + pack rat combo

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:05 (eleven years ago) link

also if that's really what the format is supposed to look like then it actually makes sense to run back some of the fan-favorite removals from old ravnica block (lightning helix, putrefy, mortify, etc) since they promote splashing and help combat fast starts better than the existing removal in the block. i don't know if they'd actually put lightning helix and boros charm in the same standard format though, that seems kind of insane, but whenever someone asks 'why isn't card X from old ravnica reprinted' the wotc people always give a 'the block isn't over yet...' answer.

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:06 (eleven years ago) link

I noticed that on Rosewater's blog too! They tend to go a little nuts on the 3rd sets sometimes (see also Apocalypse and Future Sight) and I would expect this to be no different.

My feeling now is that full set drafts pretty much will force you into three colors. Boros/Rakdos may become a thing but you're still in three colors and therefore your deck should stumble a bit out of the gate. I guess it remains to be seen. U/G/R with Frostburn Weirds, Lobber Crews, and Evolve seems pretty damn tight.

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:24 (eleven years ago) link

yeah izzet w/ evolve and gatecrash's tempo stuff, gruul charm could be effective

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

plus bloodrushing for your teleportal/bluster turn

hmm I look forward 2 this deck

iatee, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:28 (eleven years ago) link

5th dawn and alara reborn are some more examples of nutty 3rd sets. saviors of kamigawa too, but that was in a bad way (hey, let's make the 3rd set mechanic reward you for not actually playing your cards! cool idea)

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:36 (eleven years ago) link

i'm already anticipating the full set draft to be amazing. kinda strange how 6 out of the last 7 draft formats have all been single-set (M12, INN, AVR, M13, RTR, GTC)

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:46 (eleven years ago) link

also if you play MTGO it's a good reason to pick up some cheap RTR packs since they're pretty low right now

I actually cashed in a bunch of junk for Gatecrash packs, they were selling at 3.19 last I saw

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:47 (eleven years ago) link

the new redemption policy is going to suppress gatecrash prices a bit, probably still worth it at under 3.3 though

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:58 (eleven years ago) link

new redemption policy?

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:59 (eleven years ago) link

its $25 handling costs to redeem a set now instead of $5

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:00 (eleven years ago) link

which means fewer sets redeemed which means slight bump upwards in paper prices and downwards in MTGO prices

ciderpress, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:02 (eleven years ago) link

i dont think it'll make a dent in paper prices but it definitely drives MTGO prices down 10% or so. so packs are cheaper but the cards you open sell for less and ultimately the 2 tix/draft fee is the same. so it's a net negative

frogbs, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:08 (eleven years ago) link

ok right - we even discussed this upthread

they always charged an additional $30 for sets redemption if you live in canada so i've never actually bothered to redeem anything

kill yuppies (Lamp), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:22 (eleven years ago) link

the $30 is per order. my friend who plays a lot of MTGO just accumulates sets and redeems them all in one fell swoop. i shipped him my digital DKA cards and he included the set in his order. should be getting from him p soon 8-)

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Thursday, 14 February 2013 08:29 (eleven years ago) link

yo cider is this your naya deck here? think you made the big time B-)

http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/pr/234

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Thursday, 14 February 2013 08:40 (eleven years ago) link

Good job dude!

Moodles, Thursday, 14 February 2013 13:14 (eleven years ago) link

yep that's me

credit for the deck goes to the guys from goodgamery forums though, i just tweaked a few cards and ran with it

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 14:30 (eleven years ago) link

lol I didn't know that Emmissary was human, that's nuts

frogbs, Thursday, 14 February 2013 14:41 (eleven years ago) link

my picks for the fantasy pro tour facebook app thing:

Planeswalker: Domri Rade (might change to Jace Memory Adept at last minute)
Large Creature: Thragtusk
Medium Creature: Restoration Angel
Small Creature: Snapcaster Mage
Instant: Azorius Charm
Sorcery: Pillar of Flame
Enchantment: Blind Obedience
Artifact: Rakdos Keyrune (no clue on this one really, they're all bad)
Nonbasic Land: Sacred Foundry
Gatecrash card: Sacred Foundry

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 18:59 (eleven years ago) link

i basically just took w/e cards overlapped the most with jund and naya decks:

Planeswalker: Garruk Relentless
Large Creature: Thragtusk
Medium Creature: Huntmaster of the Fells
Small Creature: Avacyn's Pilgrim
Instant: Searing Spear
Sorcery: Pillar of Flame
Enchantment: Detention Sphere
Artifact: Grafdigger's Cage
Nonbasic Land: Stomping Ground
Gatecrash card: Stomping Ground

kill yuppies (Lamp), Thursday, 14 February 2013 20:17 (eleven years ago) link

relentless is kind of a hedge against some potential bug/rouge strategies over domri/big garruk. detention sphere is probably wrong - i had forgotten about blind obedience/thought it was bad but its just playable in more decks than d-sphere is and thus probably a better card. i suppose that makes rancor a better choice as well but i did want to hedge away from only green-based creature strategies. i think cage is a better choice than keyrunes for the same reason. i may be underestimating the # of blue decks but i think azorious charm is a really bad choice - probably worse than boros charm and maybe sel charm?

kill yuppies (Lamp), Thursday, 14 February 2013 20:24 (eleven years ago) link

i've played garruk relentless in a lot of decks both in this format and the last one and he's always kind of sucked. i don't really understand it since he's got everything you want on a planeswalker

azorius charm is a 4-of in both the control decks and the tempo decks, and i'm expecting the latter (UWR specifically) to be the go-to deck for a lot of PT level players.

ciderpress, Thursday, 14 February 2013 21:07 (eleven years ago) link

I didnt know extort triggered off Ciphered copies of spells. So the 1/2 bat is actually quite good in Dimir.

frogbs, Friday, 15 February 2013 15:02 (eleven years ago) link

the 1/2 bat is quite good in any black deck! i really like him in dimir though, cuz he also serves as a good man to evade through cipher spells if you're lacking a good rogue.

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Friday, 15 February 2013 19:10 (eleven years ago) link

it's good that that card and the Syndic are both good in the other guild too b/c when Orzhov totally loads up on cheap extort guys it really, really blows (for the opponent)

frogbs, Friday, 15 February 2013 19:42 (eleven years ago) link

pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

kill yuppies (Lamp), Friday, 15 February 2013 22:07 (eleven years ago) link

^^ misplaced post all-star

kill yuppies (Lamp), Friday, 15 February 2013 22:08 (eleven years ago) link

kill screen falls under the "pitchfork is dumb" umbrella right? cuz among their all-star lineup of steaming turds they put out this questionable magic the gathering piece

http://killscreendaily.com/articles/its-your-move/

cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Saturday, 16 February 2013 00:37 (eleven years ago) link

Boros Reckoner up to 25, holy shit

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 15:19 (eleven years ago) link

I played my Jund deck for the first time at my LGS last night and ended up going 2-2. Saw lots of variants on Boros decks. Boros Reckoner wasn't a very big deal for me, but Boros Charm was a real pain. Also, and I got vexed by Vexing Devils. I'm finding that I need more answers to fast red-heavy decks with lots of burn.

The biggest challenge I had was with my mana base. For starters, I need to be more willing to mulligan. But I've decided that I'm also running too many Rootbound Crags and Woodland Cemeteries, when I'm trying to play cards like Arbor Elf and Flinthoof Boar who need actual Forests and Mountains. So I pared those back in exchange for another Blood Crypt and more basics.

Here's the updated deck:
2 Deathrite Shaman
3 Arbor Elf
2 Experiment One
3 Flinthoof Boar
4 Strangleroot Geist
4 Dreg Mangler
2 Ghor-Clan Rampager
2 Deadbridge Goliath
2 Desecration Demon
1 Wrecking Ogre

2 Vraska The Unseen
1 Domri Rade

2 Searing Spear
4 Dreadbore
3 Rancor

4 Overgrown Tomb
2 Woodland Cemetary
4 Blood Crypt
2 Rootbound Crag
2 Stomping Ground
7 Forest
1 Mountain
1 Swamp

Sideboard:
1 Abrupt Decay
1 Ultimate Price
1 Rancor
2 Golgari Charm
1 Gruul Charm
1 Rakdos Charm
1 Tragic Slip
2 Pit Fight
2 Ulvenwald Tracker
2 Skullcrack
1 Arbor Elf

Here's a few changes I'm considering:
Sideboard Deathrite Shaman and replace with 2 more Experiment Ones.
Sideboard a couple Dreadbore for Tragic Slip and Abrupt Decay.
Scavenge was a non-factor and Desecration Demon was surprisingly strong, so I'm considering dropping Deadbridge Goliath completely and going 4-of with the Demon.
I'll eventually add more Stomping Grounds if I can get a couple more copies.

I'd love to get some constructive feedback on this. What are your thoughts? I'm open to making changes although I'm a bit restricted in terms of money, so Thundermaw Hellkite will have to stay out.

Moodles, Saturday, 16 February 2013 17:07 (eleven years ago) link

you know, Corpsejack Menace might be pretty neat in that deck

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 17:29 (eleven years ago) link

Corpsejack Menace was in my G/B version of this deck, but then I dropped it. When Corpsejack Menace enters the battlefield does it put 2 counters on Experiment One? I think the answer's yes. Also, does it double up counters on the Geist? Not so sure about this one...

I'm still on the fence about Flinthoof Boar. It has nice versatility, but the need for a Mountain causes a lot of awkwardness. I pretty much always prefer seeing Geist or Dreg Mangler over this. Is there something better that could go in this slot, preferably something aggressive? What about Rakdos Cackler?

Moodles, Saturday, 16 February 2013 17:43 (eleven years ago) link

i think it does put double counters on Geist!

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 18:10 (eleven years ago) link

yeah corpsejack will double evolve counters including the ones it creates by coming into play. it will also double strangleroot's undying counters.

you aren't playing enough mountains for boar to be good. cut it for some other 2-drop (lotleth troll? gyre sage? not sure what)

ciderpress, Saturday, 16 February 2013 19:09 (eleven years ago) link

wow. just played a match (Orzhov vs Orzhov) where I needed to hit 5 lands in a row to lose while my opponent would need 5 spells in a row. and yet....

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 21:00 (eleven years ago) link

orz v orz games are miserable

iatee, Saturday, 16 February 2013 21:05 (eleven years ago) link

nooo shit. we both had 4 extort dudes out one game. but I won that one because one of mine was Crypt Ghast :)

frogbs, Saturday, 16 February 2013 21:08 (eleven years ago) link

lived the dream and went undefeated w/ Dimir. played vs. Boros twice and Boros/Gruul once so lots of real fast paced decks. basically - the draft went pretty well, no real bombs but I think Dimir was pretty open. to survive early - lots of removal. I got Killing Glare and Dimir Charm for starters, but the bulk of it was Devour Flesh + Death's Approach. I got 3 of each - was okay with just Devouring whatever their first creature played was, because that powers up Death's Approach. later in the game you just abuse Cipher. Call of the Nightwing was just a house in this deck, as was Last Thoughts. Only got one Hands of Binding though - took a Dinrova Horror over a second one which is IMO one of the best uncommons in the set so no regrets there. as a whole I'd say I had to get a lot of quality uncommons to make it work - Glare, Charm, Guildmage (which kinda sucked but did what I needed him to), a Keyrune (awesome with cipher), the Horror, Call of the Nightwing, and Wight of Precinct Six (amazing in this deck). only rare was the 2/3 Specter who I never played anyway. the 1/2 Bat, as mentioned above, is amazing in this deck. really all I did was punish anyone who didn't have a real creature-heavy draw and win in the long run, drew that Call nearly every game so that really helped. lots of fun to play too. I think if I open a p1p1 Dinrova Horror I'm goin for it again.

frogbs, Sunday, 17 February 2013 22:11 (eleven years ago) link

btw to everyone who says that Dimir is really bad because other colors take the cards you want - I don't know if that's really true.

frogbs, Sunday, 17 February 2013 22:13 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think they know what cards dimir wants if they're saying that

ciderpress, Sunday, 17 February 2013 23:04 (eleven years ago) link

pulled a foil aurelia, boros reckoner and godless shrine. passed stomping grounds, cause it was in the aurelia pack.

deck ended up being pretty eh despite the first 6 cards. went 2-2 and the deck w/ the wojeks etc won.

aurelia
reckoner
spark trooper
boros charm
holy mantle
truefire paladin
boros keyrune
2 bomber corps
3 massive raid
skynight
syndic
pit fight
towering thunderfist
scorchwalker
nav squad commandos
angelic edict
firefist striker
urbis protector
knight watch
martial glory

iatee, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:10 (eleven years ago) link

def didn't want to run 3 massive raids but the only other cards I had beyond this were furious resistance, debtor's pulpit and shielded passage.

iatee, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:12 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think they know what cards dimir wants if they're saying that

i'd hear this a lot around the time of release. i dunno if people still believe it but yeah there are a lot of cards in this set that only Dimir is going to want. the whole mill strategy = suck argument kinda misses the point which is that milling makes your Death's Approaches turn into Swords to Plowshares and your Wights huge (if you get them - then again that's an uncommon that no other deck should want). the Ciphermill card is the only "pure milling" common if I recall correctly and it's there because it's stupid in multiples.

iatee - what did you lose to? deck seems decent but kinda top-heavy.

frogbs, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:15 (eleven years ago) link

I lost to a good boros deck that wasn't #1 but had the elites and 3/1s and a fairly fast gruul deck. I think I had a good matchup against orz/simic/dimir but a terrible matchup against speed.

iatee, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:19 (eleven years ago) link

been thinking a bit about Gruul lately. has anyone really seriously tried drafting it? it kinda reminds me of Golgari where it's mostly a good splash color - both Boros and Simic can definitely use some of the good Gruul cards, which sucks if you're trying to just go 2-color since other drafters are going to be splashing some of your best cards.

frogbs, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:35 (eleven years ago) link

I never want to go gruul but if you leave yourself open to it, you can have a strong deck if it's open. def think the boros-like gruul is better than the slow big dude gruul. but it does seem like gruul ends up w/ or as a splash more than any other guild.

iatee, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:46 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.