This is the thread about job searching.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (211 of them)

then once the first lightbulb breaks, you'd drop the second (third, fourth, etc.) bulb on descending floors until it withstands the impact.

(*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・)   °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 12 February 2009 02:15 (fifteen years ago) link

let me see if this makes sense, here are the floors of the building.

100
98
95
90
84
77
69
60
50
39
27
14

okay, starting at the bottom you'd drop the first bulb and if it breaks, then you'd descend a floor and then drop the next bulb and repeat until the bulb withstands the impact.

the maximum # of drops = 14. the minimum = 1.

(*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・)   °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 12 February 2009 02:18 (fifteen years ago) link

....HIRED!

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Thursday, 12 February 2009 03:30 (fifteen years ago) link

See I still don't think I get it, but this is why I always failed maths and will never work for google ;_;

one art, please (Trayce), Thursday, 12 February 2009 03:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually a friend of mine was going for a google job - 2 by-phone interviews here in aus, then flew over for final interview(s?) at their HQ, very gruelling all up.

Still didnt get the job.

one art, please (Trayce), Thursday, 12 February 2009 03:40 (fifteen years ago) link

And he's *good* at what he does (*nix geek, writes a column on linux for a big PC mag )

one art, please (Trayce), Thursday, 12 February 2009 03:41 (fifteen years ago) link

nicely done shasta!! so for posterity then in akm's problem:

10
19
27
34
40
45
49
50

max attempts =10

Lamp, Thursday, 12 February 2009 04:13 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

I got two bits of news today that gave me a sliver of hope:

1) I applied for a statistician job with the Dept. of Energy and my application was forwarded to the SME (subject matter expert, apparently), which means I at least passed the basic qualifications for the job. This is step 1 out of 102000392, because now the SME decides whose applications get passed on to the "decider", but hey, it's something.

2) Random dude at E.P.A. emailed me directly today, saying he likes my resume and wants to talk to me about "several positions here in Washington, D.C."

Pro: I MIGHT GET A JOB...
Con: in Washington, D.C.
Pro: But shit man, times are rough, I really need a job..
Con: in Washington, D.C., fuck.

I f'd up the word rear (Z S), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 22:06 (fifteen years ago) link

RE: #1, I've been talking trash about the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the section of the Dept. of Energy that gathers energy statistics, for years now. And now I could potentially be working for them and using their shitty models. In my nerdy dreams I think about getting in there and gradually making their projections more accurate and useful, but in my nerdy daily life I would probably become a total stooge. Fuck, man.

I f'd up the word rear (Z S), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

DC rocks, dude. Seriously. It would take you approx. 24 hours to find somewhere you would like, regardless of what that is.

Good luck with the job leads.

Baffleck!!!! (B.L.A.M.), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 22:24 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

What is a good website for searching for IT jobs in London?

I tried jobsite.co.uk but that's "down for maintenance"
monster.co.uk doesn't appear to let you search by salary (wtf??)

apart from that I only know jobserve.co.uk - anyone know any good ones, IT-specific or otherwise?

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 15:49 (thirteen years ago) link

fish4jobs?

Born too beguiled (DavidM), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 16:12 (thirteen years ago) link

ooh I haven't tried them, ta

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 16:15 (thirteen years ago) link

hmm either their website doesn't work very well in Firefox or just doesn't work very well because whenever I click on a job it takes me to a blank page...

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 16:20 (thirteen years ago) link

reed.co.uk

ninjas and lasers and gold and (snoball), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 16:25 (thirteen years ago) link

three years pass...

it's great when you're job searching and you get an HR mail from someone who has filled out the fields on their mail client lastname resources, firstname human, because then in your inbox you suddenly get a response from a human for once, at least it looks that way, at first

j., Tuesday, 20 May 2014 21:37 (ten years ago) link

this thing where HR sites (mostly universities ime) have you upload a CV, then it makes you fill out ALL THE SHIT THAT'S ON YOUR CV in forms spread over 500 pages, then you copy/paste your carefully formatted cover letter into a text field, then you submit it, then you never hear anything ever, it makes me so mad

adam, Tuesday, 20 May 2014 21:58 (ten years ago) link

one place sent me a go-fuck-yourself email and then apparently added me to their promotional mailing list and spam me now

adam, Tuesday, 20 May 2014 22:00 (ten years ago) link

the 'paste it into a text field' part is the worst

actually no it's any application which asks you to answer an open-ended question and gives you a little undersized box to put your answer in—you're evidently expected to write more than fits in the box, but how much more??!?

j., Tuesday, 20 May 2014 22:22 (ten years ago) link

So fucking bummed out today. I found a job listing at a rather large corporation to get into their architecure/building department, something I was super excited about. As a bonus, my cousin worked for them and was more than happy to help me out as much as possible.

So I spent the past 6 days just furiously updating my resume and editing it (with the input of quite a few people) over and over again, and crafting a new cover letter. It was a bigger chore than usual, since my resume was previously really specialized to target "architecture" jobs and I needed to really redo a lot of work on it. So I finally get it finished over the weekend and I go to complete the process this morning.

As mentioned above, its one of those online standardized things that makes you basically recreate your entire resume from scratch. Fine. Annoying, but fine. But it also had the added bonus of really specific questions about the job scope and qualifications for which you have to answer 'Yes' or 'No'. 99% of the questions were no problem, but there was one that was worded in such a weird, specific way that I couldn't answer 'Yes' and be truthful and there was no place or field for which I could explain or offer any nuance. I figured I'd rather be truthful and answer 'No'. I'm definitely qualified for what they are asking for with the question, just not in the super specific way they asked it. My resume and cover letter both cover how I can meet this qualification, quite easily, in another way. So I clicked 'No' and moved on, wrapped up the whole process about 30 minutes later.

Twenty-two minutes(!) after I click submit and get the confirmation email, I get the automated rejection letter. Based on what I've since researched, I can almost guarantee that it was because I clicked that 'No'. There is no possible way a human being even saw my resume and cover letter in that short of a time. Just infuriating that I was rejected by a fucking machine without any opportunity to explain the nuance or other factors involved. These automated application things are so stupid. I'm feeling crushed about losing the job, but also completely deflated after all that effort and I couldn't even get a human being to lay eyes on my resume.

Holding out slight hope that my cousin passing my resume to the hiring manager directly might improve my odds.

djenter the dragon? (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 2 June 2014 18:23 (ten years ago) link

I think it will improve your odds. That story is exactly why those systems are bullshit for this kind of job.

22 minutes. Ugh.

carl agatha, Monday, 2 June 2014 18:41 (ten years ago) link

Yeah, it's maddening.

djenter the dragon? (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 2 June 2014 19:15 (ten years ago) link

Wait - if you got rejected automatically and nobody even saw it

then whats to stop you doing it again and clicking yes this time?

anvil, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 04:02 (ten years ago) link

22 minutes is harsh, I though a 2 hr turnaround was brutal.

I feel like half the battle is getting past taleo/the HR department and getting a resume into the hands of the hiring manager. When I was hiring, I had to cut the the HR department out of screening resumes because they were dumping too many promising ones.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 04:08 (ten years ago) link

Interview tomorrow morning 10am. Somewhat nerve-wracked.

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 06:18 (ten years ago) link

It's easier when you're in a job but this time I've been quite chilled about the fact that I will just fire out applications and very few of them will even get acknowledgements let alone interest.

Where I do get rejections, I think 22 mins is a pretty long time these days - my best is 6 minutes.

My favourite recent one was when an agency contacted me with a targeted email saying "this is an opportunity you're a good match for and we think you should apply. I did, and got rejected after 14 minutes. I then emailed the recruiter asking why that happened, since they had approached me in the first place, and never even got a response.

I've discovered a new thing recently - I applied for a job and got what looked like an automated email saying "congratulations! our client wants you to apply on their website - please follow this secure link". Which, security concerns notwithstanding, I did to find... another recruiter. So that's two levels of automatic sifting for a job I wasn't really that bothered about but was exceptionally handy for home.

Daniwa, guys! Daniwa! (aldo), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:31 (ten years ago) link

automatic/human-drone HR firewalling is totally a thing, if you can do it at all i think you ought to be literally seeding your resume with the keywords used in the original statement of requirements, no one with any judgment capable of drawing natural inferences about what you say is going to be reading the thing

and given what i'm seeing happen to some resumes i upload into 'auto-fill' slots for jobs with additional forms to complete online, maybe you want to chill on the formatting and make the resume content appear as dumbly as possible so the shittier auto-readers don't miss anything.

i put my junk on a lot of more mercenary jobhunt sites recently and just yesterday i got a call from some recruiter trying to place me in a mortgage services phone sales job ('we see you have a car loan as well as a mortgage…'). where are the recruiters trying to place me in actual shit?!

the other day i made it to the second-interview stage for a crummy job i didn't really want, and i had a couple of promising prospects lining up, which i would have had to dump the first job to take anyway, so i made an ACTUAL DECISION and passed on the second interview. it felt pretty good! a rare chance to seem like something was up to me.

j., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:47 (ten years ago) link

xposts

really sorry to hear that jon. :(

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:58 (ten years ago) link

Just had a call from a recruiter who has sifted me in for one job and asking whether it was OK to put me forward for another three he has on his books but I "might not have seen". I had seen them, but know 100% I don't have the full advertised criteria so would have been sifted out if I'd applied for them. And considering they're for more money, I'm more than happy for him to.

Daniwa, guys! Daniwa! (aldo), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 16:07 (ten years ago) link

Good luck with yr interview, Elvis.

I'm pretty much at the point with this where I just want to stop looking and stop interviewing and stop going through all this garbage. I am just really frazzled and fatigued and burned out and don't want to come up with any more answers about "where I see myself in 3 years."

I did a second interview (of a 3 stage process) where I am not even sure I want to go on with the interviewing but can't seem to give myself permission to back out of it. (Elvis, it's the one I was discussing with you.) Like, there are definitely good reasons to take it, and definitely huge reasons not to take it. But I can't even balance them in my mind. I don't know if it's my gut feeling that this is not the job for me (I was beginning to wonder if I would ever get the feeling that a job *was* "for me") or if it's just decision fatigue.

My feeling is kinda... "I guess I would take it, with reservations, if it were offered, because I'm running out of options" but it's one of those interview processes where I have to jump through hoops and make like I really really want it, and sell them on me, and I just feel like a used car salesman where I don't even want to make the sale. Is "well, I can't convince myself that *reason* is a good enough reason not to take the job" really enough of a reason *to* take the job?

(Even assuming I make it to the next round! Which is assuming a lot right now!)

Branwell with an N, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 17:23 (ten years ago) link

OK, so I have an interview for a job I got HR firewalled out of, but I was talking to the agency about a different job and they brought up might be a good fit. We are trying to set the date up but I am pre-warned it will be TWO AND A HALF HOURS. Welp.

Daniwa, guys! Daniwa! (aldo), Thursday, 5 June 2014 15:05 (ten years ago) link

Looking on the company site it lists a number of techniques and/or alternatives to interview that they might use so I think I have an idea where they're going with it and if I'm right then the timing doesn't sound so bad. The interesting thing will be that I am trying to dictate exactly when it is, having turned down their first offer of date and time, which might test how interested they are.

Daniwa, guys! Daniwa! (aldo), Thursday, 5 June 2014 15:07 (ten years ago) link

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/theseventhseal1.jpg

alt. interview procedure

j., Thursday, 5 June 2014 15:16 (ten years ago) link

no, that's the exit interview

an office job is as secure as a Weetabix padlock (snoball), Thursday, 5 June 2014 21:12 (ten years ago) link

"We all liked you a lot. We loved talking to you, but we don't believe you have the depth of knowledge we need for this role"

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 6 June 2014 02:29 (ten years ago) link

blam.gif

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 6 June 2014 02:29 (ten years ago) link

Interview feels like it went OK.

Rabona not glue (aldo), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 14:55 (ten years ago) link

two weeks pass...

They haven't come back to the recruiter with any feedback yet ("company procedures says the interviewers get up to 10 working days to write up and pass their notes to HR") in which time I have had two interviews with a different company, the second of which was this morning and went really well. The fact I'd rather work there too is a bonus.

Rabona not glue (aldo), Tuesday, 1 July 2014 15:19 (nine years ago) link

Y'know, you owe nothing to no one until your name is in ink on a contract. If something better comes along in the meanwhile, grab it. They snoozed, they lose.

That interview up above I talked about, I felt progressively worse and worse about the company, until I finally told the recruiter that I didn't want to pursue it any further. Which felt weird as hell to do, because their reactions to me had been favourable. But I just felt such a burst of relief to say "this doesn't feel right to me."

I took a week off job-hunting just to get my head back in some kind of order (it's so hard not to take all this stuff personally) and it's back to the grind this week. Headhunters are ringing again, so that's something, I guess.

Branwell with an N, Tuesday, 1 July 2014 16:53 (nine years ago) link

hey guys what is a workflo and how do i shot that

j., Wednesday, 2 July 2014 21:16 (nine years ago) link

http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2014/07/13/how-the-other-half-works-an-adventure-in-the-low-status-of-software-engineers/

this is just about the best thing i've ever read about interviewing and job-seeking

j., Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:48 (nine years ago) link

Going into the big city today for two weird interview-not-interview situations. :-/

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:57 (nine years ago) link

The org I worked for (last six years) went out of business yesterday, so I guess I'm on the job hunt now.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 July 2014 22:29 (nine years ago) link

if you're eligible, apply for unemployment IMMEDIATELY! the clock on the availability of $ probably starts right away

j., Wednesday, 16 July 2014 22:35 (nine years ago) link

Thanks j. I did apply this morning.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Wednesday, 16 July 2014 22:43 (nine years ago) link

fucked that one up in the past, myself : /

j., Wednesday, 16 July 2014 22:45 (nine years ago) link

Well, the people I mentioned still haven't come back but idgaf because I will have two formal offers in the next couple of days to choose from.

Rabona not glue (aldo), Thursday, 17 July 2014 08:08 (nine years ago) link

Interview yesterday ended with a 45 minute code test ("don't worry, you only need to get 50% right") that was more esoteric concepts appropriate for a CS class than meat/potatoes code grinding. No interest in any of the code samples I brought with me.

Ended with the Lion/Otter/Golden Retriever/Beaver personality test (http://www.collegeliteracyacademy.com/PERSONALITY_TEST_AND_EXPLANATIONS_8-11.pdf) which was embarrassingly unnerving. Bleah.

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 18 July 2014 03:05 (nine years ago) link

yeah that sure simplifies things to know that my personality is like a random animal a manager is using to obfuscate the different ways he expects me to be subservient and industrious

j., Friday, 18 July 2014 03:09 (nine years ago) link

omg elvis that thing is just

j., Friday, 18 July 2014 03:29 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.