scorsese is one of those guys where the famous official classics are the good ones and the minor 'overlooked gems' that everyone makes a big deal about preferring to the famous ones turn out to be overlooked for a reason.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 16 February 2009 23:19 (fifteen years ago) link
like what?
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 23:20 (fifteen years ago) link
well, i mean after hours isn't bad but saying it's better than goodfellas or taxi driver just seems crazy to me.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 16 February 2009 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link
it's neither bad nor overlooked imho
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 23:26 (fifteen years ago) link
No way is this better than back to the future or jaws! Sorry not my favorite then.
― ryan, Monday, 16 February 2009 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link
I mean it lacks a shark for christ's sake!
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:00 (fifteen years ago) link
not my favorite scorcese film and hence not my favorite film of all time (I don't know what is, but it isn't this)
― akm, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:00 (fifteen years ago) link
sorry goodfellas is not my favorite movie of all time :(
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link
And certainly there's a lot to be said against the shocking violence --> cue up beloved pop song M.O. of the movie. (honestly I have no idea how often that actually happens but it seems to be my enduring impression of the movie.)
It does float along painlessly but it's never burrowed its way into my imagination because I hate the people it's about, it resembles my life in no respect, it has nothing (like a giant maneating shark) that seems to bubble up from my subconscious. And I'm kinda tired of that breezy editing style.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:08 (fifteen years ago) link
i can see how you might tire of really skilled and artful editing
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link
never got it. preferred casino. find it hard to empathise/get into most scorsese flicks or de niro leads.
― Redknapp out (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:17 (fifteen years ago) link
Well I agree it's artful and skillful and that the the movie is a masterpiece of it's type. It's slick and entertaining as hell. But eventually I feel like it's neither a nihilistic sensationalistic gangsta movie nor does it really seem to say anything about these people that strikes me as insightful. The interest of the movie, its reason for being, seems to be the vicarious thrill we get observing these people on the margin. Thats more thrilling for some than others. It makes me a bit queasy.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:18 (fifteen years ago) link
you really don't think goodfellas doesn't offer a perspective on gangsters & organized crime that is insightful to say the least? esp at the time it came out. i mean who else showed the details, teh working joe element of that lifestyle, the attraction, the petty politics like that, with that sense of realism?
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:20 (fifteen years ago) link
Yes you have a valid point there.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:21 (fifteen years ago) link
i mean, i dig it if it's not your thing, esp as subject matter goes, but to dismiss it as un-insightful and merely 'breezily' edited is to miss out on a lot imo
xp
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:21 (fifteen years ago) link
Henry Hill: All they got from Paulie was protection from other guys looking to rip them off. That's what it's all about. That's what the FBI could never understand - that what Paulie and the organization offer is protection for the kinds of guys who can't go to the cops. They're like the police department for wiseguys.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:22 (fifteen years ago) link
I think I preferred the sopranos because you could often detect an almost shocking amount of contempt and venom towards the characters. Maybe I'm being puritanical tho.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link
ya think?
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link
It's an excellent film for sure, but I like a whole load of other movies better than it.
― Pashmina, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:30 (fifteen years ago) link
just a little tho! Look, I suppose relative to the world the movie inhabits these are interesting and rich characters with a fascinating and complex set of internal ethics. But you've got to want to enter that world to enjoy the movie. I recognize it's genre too and as such uses genre to explore America, comraderie, business, etc...
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:34 (fifteen years ago) link
Xpost
i've been meaning to rewatch After Hours (it's prob been 10 years), partially based on Alex in NYC's lavish praise for it on ILX, but it really bugged the shit out of me when I saw it the first 1 (or 2?) times. And not in a good or interesting way.
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:37 (fifteen years ago) link
It's not very good; most of the movie is like being trapped with five or six "SNL" skits that run on. John Heard and Linda Fiorentiono are the only ones who registered.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:39 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't know I don't think Goodfellas has any brave robots so it probably isn't my favorite movie.
Actually in the director's cut Morrie the wig salesman guy is a robot. But he isn't very brave.
― Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:40 (fifteen years ago) link
yes OTM Alfred
― now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:42 (fifteen years ago) link
Actually, if any film counts as a "shallow masterpiece," to quote Pauline Kael on Citizen Kane, it's Goodfellas. I'm willing to acknowledge how much fun this is, without noting the faint stirrings of conscience in Henry Hill. The Departed clearly shows the limits of shallow casting and writing, though.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:44 (fifteen years ago) link
im trying to avoid running any moralistic arguments against the movie to rationalize why i dont think it's all that....and mostly failing. but it does remind me why i preferred Godfather 2 to 1: because you can read against 2's pretensions to grand tragedy and decide that it's really about michael being a lonely petty little shit.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:47 (fifteen years ago) link
If the young Ray Liotta, fresh off Something Wild, had been cast in The Departed instead of Leo, the conflicts would have been more interesting...but that's another thread.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 00:54 (fifteen years ago) link
....and another movie.
goodfellas is just scarface for honkys
― straightola, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 10:46 (fifteen years ago) link
OK, I'll say it:
Tuomas, if you like "King of Comedy", you'll enjoy "Goodfellas".
― Mark G, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 10:50 (fifteen years ago) link
I expect "some other movie" to win this poll, but I'm curious what the over/under is gonna be.
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link
this was a great idea for a poll btw
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:45 (fifteen years ago) link
...WHATEVER happens.
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:44 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I'm gonna guess maybe 20, 25% go for Goodfellas.
― Ringtone bisexual bible shower (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link
I mean, I voted other, but it may be third behind 12 Angry Men and Heathers.
My guess is 10% or less, Goodfellas.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link
If they ever make a movie called 12 Angry Heathers, I may have to change my vote.
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link
some other movie: dazed and confused
― caek, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.burgerworldchronicles.com/domo/goodfellas_painting.jpg
― eman, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link
one dog goes one way the other dog goes the other way and this guys sayin whadda ya want from me
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago) link
Gonna watch this tonight, btw.
― Ringtone bisexual bible shower (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link
Three Kings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wtf did they even watch it.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago) link
wrong thread! sorry.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:57 (fifteen years ago) link
nice head of white hair
― Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link
i kinda love that painting.
― ryan, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:00 (fifteen years ago) link
dis Mama S actually do the painting?
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link
i think so
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link
i like goodfellas, but it's not weird/geeky enough to be a favorite (no outerspace monsters, no "artistic" pornography, no creepy dream sequences, no all-dwarf casting, no animation, no nine-minute static shots, no relentless zombie holocaust, no klaus kinski, no homemade WTF charm, no fourth wall in tatters, no pretentious art nonsense, etc.)
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:06 (fifteen years ago) link
uh dude it definitely breaks 4th wall
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 February 2009 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link