"George W. Bush will be the toast of history."
I wouldn't be so confident in that word choice.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― duke hampshire, Friday, 15 October 2004 15:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:29 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― Smokin' funk by the boxes (kenan), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:32 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:32 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― briania (briania), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― battlin' green eyeshades (Homosexual II), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:10 (nineteen years ago) link
now, if we can bring in all several hundred thousand newly-registered voters, there we go...
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― battlin' green eyeshades (Homosexual II), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― Smokin' funk by the boxes (kenan), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:36 (nineteen years ago) link
I have my doubts because the only other big race this year is our Senate race which Blanche has in the bag. There's a gay marriage proposal on the ballot that will attract Bushies to the polling place like flies to manure.
You never know, though.
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:39 (nineteen years ago) link
Iowa - MissouriMichigan - Ohio, WisconsinMinnesota - Wisconsin, IowaOhio - West VirginiaNevada - ArizonaNew Mexico - Colorado, ArizonaPennsylvania - Ohio, West Virginia, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link
― Smokin' funk by the boxes (kenan), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― seahorse genius (seahorse genius), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link
Only because of Nader!
― Smokin' funk by the boxes (kenan), Friday, 15 October 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link
In Kerry's favor, Nader will not be on the ballot and there are at least 20,000 more newly registered Democrats than Republicans. The economy here has been sh*t. Opposition to the Iraq War was more widespread and better organized in Oregon than many other states. This helps to energize Kerry's base far beyond what Gore could achieve.
In Bush's favor, there is a heavily-backed Chistian-right ballot measure to restrict gay marriage that might pump up the RR turnout. Plus, there will be an unknown number of terrorized voters who will feel more comfortable with a Repubi-Daddy to cling to during the middle of a war.
My gut feeling is that Kerry will take Oregon by between 2% and 3%.
― Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:00 (nineteen years ago) link
this is the thinking here in missouri too. in st. louis we can't keep signs in HQ because demand is so high.
― teeny (teeny), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:21 (nineteen years ago) link
The good news is that this guy doesn't have a shot in hell of winning.
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:39 (nineteen years ago) link
I have to say that I've had this feeling more or less since they found Saddam. I'm not sure how this whole Mary Cheney thing will end up playing out. Something tells me the feigned outrage from the right will end up playing really really badly to the middleroad "undecided," though that "something" could just be my disgust for their disgust. Plus two-and-a-half weeks equals roughly 43,295 more pre-election "events" getting media attention.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― teeny (teeny), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 15 October 2004 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link
I should note that "under-the-radar campaigns" mean different things depending on the party - for Democrats, it's voter registration; for Republicans, it's voter suppression.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 23:18 (nineteen years ago) link
The real tossups are OH, FL, WI, IA, PA, NV, NH and NM
The states Bush can get only if he moves the national needle are MN, MI, ME and maybe NJ
The states Kerry can get only if he moves the national needle are CO, WV and AZ
This is basically how I see things, except I think that, in the absence of a national needle move, the last four tossups above are already or will very soon be in the second category, locked down as Bush or Kerry states .
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 16 October 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― k3rry (dymaxia), Saturday, 16 October 2004 22:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― k3rry (dymaxia), Saturday, 16 October 2004 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link
i hope to god the bastard loses.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 16 October 2004 23:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― keith m (keithmcl), Sunday, 17 October 2004 02:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 October 2004 02:59 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 October 2004 03:00 (nineteen years ago) link
newsweek has him up 6.
...among likely voters, a result they immediately disavowed, given that it showed Bush leading with women and Kerry leading with men. Bush is up by 1 among registered voters in their poll.
kerry is getting desperate,
;-)
reporters kept asking so they could make television ad
LOL
coors will also win
http://www.inventionfactory.com/history/RHAbridg/bb.jpg
and to think i'd missed keith's giardiasic political analysis. it's been so accurate in the past.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 17 October 2004 03:12 (nineteen years ago) link
Andy McCarthy on why the Mary Cheney thing is the GOP 'overplaying the hand'
Jonathan Adler on how Bush's claim to never having made mistakes is being used against him ad-wise
And my personal favorite, an endorsement that Mark Krikorian baldly says is 'not one the White House is likely to trumpet.' It begins "Why I'm voting for this clown" and proceeds to argue bluntly why the author is content to vote GOP while not hiding his contempt for Bush at all, calling him "a spoiled rich kid who wasted his youth partying with his frat-boy buddies and then woke up one morning and decided to become president. I pointed out that his domestic policy has been disastrous and his foreign policy idiotic."
A lovely paragraph:
The question that matters is not who occupies the one job at the top of the executive branch. It's who occupies the thousands of other jobs. If re- elected, Bush is much more likely to name judges who respect the Constitution and believe in limited government -- though he himself certainly doesn't. He is likely to spend less on social programs than Kerry -- though not much less.
You can fight your corner, Keith, without kowtowing to the feeb who is making a lot of your assumptions look ridiculous. You have a shit candidate you're only backing for the reasons this guy says, except at least this guy says it.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 October 2004 03:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 October 2004 03:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 October 2004 03:43 (nineteen years ago) link
Was the 2004 election stolen? by Robert F. Kennedy Jr http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
― Mordy, Wednesday, 21 May 2008 08:52 (sixteen years ago) link
Thank you, Mordy. I read something like this in a bookstore in NYC.
[After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix the election. A review of the available data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004(12) -- more than enough to shift the results of an election decided by 118,601 votes.(13) (See Ohio's Missing Votes) In what may be the single most astounding fact from the election, one in every four Ohio citizens who registered to vote in 2004 showed up at the polls only to discover that they were not listed on the rolls, thanks to GOP efforts to stem the unprecedented flood of Democrats eager to cast ballots.(14) And that doesn’t even take into account the troubling evidence of outright fraud, which indicates that upwards of 80,000 votes for Kerry were counted instead for Bush. That alone is a swing of more than 160,000 votes -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.(15)]
The question that always arises for me is -- if this is true (certainly some will say it isn't), then doesn't it make a nonsense of the whole previous year + of campaigning, fundraising, arguing, debating etc? Why not just call the 2008 election off now and give it to McCain?
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 21 May 2008 08:57 (sixteen years ago) link
[On the evening of the vote, reporters at each of the major networks were briefed by pollsters at 7:54 p.m. Kerry, they were informed, had an insurmountable lead and would win by a rout: at least 309 electoral votes to Bush's 174, with fifty-five too close to call.(28) In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his relationship with President-elect Kerry.(29)]
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 21 May 2008 08:58 (sixteen years ago) link
Well, in part because you can only pull off this kind of fraud if it's reasonably close. Also, because hope is not entirely snuffed out, yet.
― Casuistry, Wednesday, 21 May 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link
lolz so much rong in this thred.
I, for one, was completely otm.
― Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 21 May 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link
Those farm signs were killer.