Your 2008 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7250 of them)
I dont think he would escape the primaries with such an 'anti-family values' personal life and being pro-choice.

The pro-choice thing, OK. But, in case no one noticed, Republicans only attack a lack of "family values" when the perps are Democrats.

L'Histoire d'Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link

FWIW, hte breakdown on party giving by financial-services PACs:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/sector.asp?txt=F01&cycle=2004

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't know what to think about Pawlenty. Potentially too young/green, but I'm not sure that matters anymore.

Individual contributions are capped at $2,000.

to candidates, yes. to committees, it goes up to $25K.

VCs "vouching" for someone (whatever that means) is substantive how?

I don't know, necessarily. But Fineman seemed to think it important somehow.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Fineman seemed to think it important somehow

That's because Fineman is an idiot.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:17 (nineteen years ago) link

institutional giving also isn't a particularly reliable way of gauging political inclination - lots of people give to both sides, and give more to who they think will win

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:18 (nineteen years ago) link

lots of people give to both sides, and give more to who they think will win

The institutional breakouts display the same tendency. It's classic risk arbitrage.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Potentially too young/green, but I'm not sure that matters anymore.

It's probably a plus, since the longer the politician's career, the longer they've had to dabble in shady dealings.

L'Histoire d'Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link

George Grizzard also played John Adams, and I'm sure a few GOP candidates will be reintroducing the Alien & Sedition Acts.

I predict a newly high non-turnout for '08. Imagine something like Frist v Bayh ... zzzzzzzzzzzz!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 June 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't be deceived by any Tom Vilsack noises. The placement of the Iowa Caucus insures that no Iowan will ever establish the kind of early momentum a small-state candidate needs.

brianiac (briania), Friday, 3 June 2005 18:19 (nineteen years ago) link

VCs do not at all function as a tipping point for the presidential elections. Finestein is merely clinging to the idea that big business isn't uniformly repulsed by Democrat politics. He's right about that.

McCain will never get the nomination. Bet everything you can on that. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if he didn't even make it to primary season. The guy has way too many political enemies--the gambit that Dems or some other shadow organization can conspiratorially get McCain deep into the race simply isn't realistic. McCain could pull a Perot but nobody thinks he has that kind of juice anymore.

George Allen has no prayer and would never make it to primary season. Same with Guiliani.

Frist is a very, very long shot--not really a compelling beauty pageant contestant, he's a Senator, his leadership of the Senate has been average.

Hillary is a very real candidate, now more than ever. She's charmed a lot of people with her little spells and voodoo dolls in the past five years.

don weiner (don weiner), Friday, 3 June 2005 19:08 (nineteen years ago) link

(is conspiratorially a word or did I make that up?)

don weiner (don weiner), Friday, 3 June 2005 19:12 (nineteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
I'm really starting to like the idea of Harry Reid. Small-town Westerner. Difficult to challenge on ideology (moderate but in the leadership), secularity (Mormon), culture wars (personally anti-abortion), patriotism/toughness (was a Capitol police officer and Vegas gambling commissioner), family/lifestyle (15 grandchildren), and obviously not culturally elite (was once a miner). How great is this interview?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 19 June 2005 21:47 (eighteen years ago) link

I wonder who don thinks *has* a shot at the GOP nom.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 19 June 2005 22:17 (eighteen years ago) link

clinton is going to run, and she has a large chance to win--she stays on message, she gets voters that other people dont, and she has a charisma that speaks well, going hawkish and building her foriegn policy resume is wise.

anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 19 June 2005 22:37 (eighteen years ago) link

she definitely has a chance to win. a "large" chance is overboard. no one has a large chance except maybe McCain. and she is more of a known quantity than anyone else, which may work in her favor.

however, I think it's all about risk-aversion. picking her brings great strengths, but great risks. and i see no reason to take those risks if we have equally good candidates who present fewer of them. and I think we have a few of those.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 19 June 2005 23:38 (eighteen years ago) link

someone at dailykos proposed Schweitzer-Clark. that sounds pretty good to me.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 June 2005 14:40 (eighteen years ago) link

does harry reid still have a beard? or has he shaved?

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 20 June 2005 14:52 (eighteen years ago) link

clinton is going to run, and she has a large chance to win

This is just not true at all. There isn't a woman out there on the political scene who has a large chance of winning the Presidency because the US is not prepared to make a woman the Commander in Cheif of the Armed Forces.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 June 2005 14:55 (eighteen years ago) link

There isn't a woman out there on the political scene who has a large chance of winning the Presidency because the US is not prepared to elevate a woman who challenges traditional sex roles. See also abortion and gay marriage.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 June 2005 14:56 (eighteen years ago) link

As far as Harry Reid goes, I don't think a Mormon really has a shot at winning a nation-wide race either.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:00 (eighteen years ago) link

why not?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I just think that a lot of people are very suspicious of Mormonism.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:01 (eighteen years ago) link

There isn't a mormon out there on the political scene who has a large chance of winning the Presidency because the US is not prepared to make a mormon the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:02 (eighteen years ago) link

There isn't a Democrat out there on the political scene who has a large chance of winning the Presidency because the US is not prepared to make a mormon the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

(Okay, okay. I kid, I kid.)

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link

Seriously though both Reid and Clinton and Clark and Edwards are all probably better candidates than anyone the Dems have put up since oh 1960 (Clinton I excluded.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link

if you think evangelicals dislike non-christians, just wait until you hear what they have to say about mormons! truth be told, i dunno if i could vote for a mormon, either.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:16 (eighteen years ago) link

I would be amazed if Americans voted a woman into the Presidency. Pleasantly amazed but amazed nonetheless. (You fuckers.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Well if Dem candidates are counting on getting a lot of evangelical votes they are in trouble anyway.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't know if Obama will be ready to run in 2008 (probably not, I'd guess), but with his ideas and his ability to describe them in rhetoric like this, he will be a solid contender when he's ready:

Knox College, Commencement Address - June 5, 2005

o. nate (onate), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Our local elected Mormon, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR), is relatively moderate and sane.

Casuistry (Chris P), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:22 (eighteen years ago) link

i agree, alex, it's just that in many baptist, presbyterian, methodist, lutheran and non-denominational christian churches, they show this psuedo-documentary explaining how mormonism is a crazy/scary cult. i saw this. many friends of mine who rarely went to church have seen this. and i guarantee you that the moment a reid campaign began to take off, gop donors would send these videos out to registered users en masse.

and even tho this doc is a hatchet job, i still believe mormonism to be batshit.

and as has been discussed many times before, it is far more likely that the first woman or minority president would be a republican.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:25 (eighteen years ago) link

"I would be amazed if Americans voted a woman into the Presidency. Pleasantly amazed but amazed nonetheless. (You fuckers.)"

I would be surprised too, but I was surprised she won the Senate seat and I am consistently surprised by her rising level of approval in nationwide polling. She's very high-profile and is heavily associated with a period in history that I think people are becoming to remember more and more fondly. I have no idea what the next four years will bring, but at this point I wouldn't say she has any less of a chance than anyone else I can think of at this point.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:28 (eighteen years ago) link

i clearly know nothing about what other Xians think of Mormons. and there are definitely evangelicals who are potential democratic voters. but my perception is that our problems in the religion sphere have more to do with the perceived secularism/urbanity, etc. i mentioned upthread. thus, it would seem not to matter what religion someone is (cf Lieberman) as long as they really have one. would our losses among evangelicals be too great a risk to face given this opposing current?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:32 (eighteen years ago) link

i think that just about ALL religions are batshit-crazy (including my own). but we all know that already, and some are batshit-crazier than others.

i have nothing against voting for a mormon -- or a woman -- for president. but i'm not the target demographic here.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I would be surprised too, but I was surprised she won the Senate seat and I am consistently surprised by her rising level of approval in nationwide polling.

you wouldn't be so surprised if you lived in or around NY and saw what a total PUTZ rick lazio (her 2000 GOP opponent) was.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link

Hahaha yes well the NY Republican party surprised me too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 20 June 2005 15:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Some observations.

I don't think Hillary will run in 2008 unless she thinks that the Dems require someone to fall on a sword to save the party from extinction. She has a prestigious senate seat she can safely keep and she will stick to it like glue. 2012 is a better bet for her than 2008. That's my sense of it anyway.

Second, the Senate in general is a horrible stepping-off point for a presidential run - about as bad as being vice president. Governors tend to capture the presidency. I'd look for a Democratic governor from the border south or lower midwest to get the Dem nomination.

General Clark's run is over. By 2008 the Iraq war will be a sick horrid ache, but the voters won't be clamoring for a military man to step in and win the war for us. It will be clear by then that all we can do is grit our teeth, dig in or clear out. As a political campaigner, Clark was not able to connect with the public. All he had was an impeccable resume to flash at them.

Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 20 June 2005 16:47 (eighteen years ago) link

I still like to think that Wes Clark is more Eisenhower than Sargent Shriver, but Aimless may have a point there.

In the twentieth century, only one current senator was elected president. No congressmen at all were elected.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 20 June 2005 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link

The mantra for the 2008 election will be:

"CHEAPER OIL"

The oil price bugaboo is going to get worse.

Whoever can manage to convince most Americans that his/her election will result in oil prices decreasing will have a huge advantage, even if the U.S. becomes a theocracy in the process.

Most people will deal with the church invading their rights if it means they pay less at the pump when they make their double 90 minute commute from Pleasant Faraway Suburb Heights to city center and back every day.

donut e-goo (donut), Monday, 20 June 2005 16:59 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm really happy this isn't the Your 2008 Presidential Candidate Speculum Fight Thread

donut e-goo (donut), Monday, 20 June 2005 17:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I wonder who don thinks *has* a shot at the GOP nom.

heh. It's a lot easier noting those who don't. Plus, I'm pretty repulsed by the party as a whole so it's hard to get enthusiastic about even wondering who might be on the ticket.

As for Harry Reid, Yancey's right--many Christians have HUGE problems with the Mormons. I grew up in a small town that was very pious and I was indoctrinated that the Mormon Church is a cult. That's not an outside opinion of Christians at all. I realize that the Mormons have glossed their views with a mantra of "strong family" and "values" and all the other rhetorical niceness, but the soft underbelly of the Church is ripe for exposure. I mean, Reid's got some nice things on his resume, but he's not a force of personality, his religion is a zealous force, and he's a Senator whose ability to raise money is pretty much an unknown. So I'd say he's a long shot despite looking decent on paper.

don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 20 June 2005 18:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Colin Powell for President and Barack Obama for Vice President (Okay, so Powell would have to switch parties first, but what would he have to lose? It would be best if he were running against Condoleezza Rice and race and gender were both put into perspective. Both Powell and Obama have incredible integrity but I think different kinds, which complement each other.)

youn, Thursday, 23 June 2005 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link

i think a lot of christians have plenty of negative opinions of mormons theologically, but i think most christians would agree that mormons typically come off as a pretty conservative crowd that sticks to their moral guns. if you're looking for a president you can count on to put his reputation on the line for the culture of life, a mormon will do just fine. on other hand, if you believe that america is God's nation and that the leader speaks for God... then a heretic stands no chance. you'd almost sooner elect a muslim.

i could see how different crowds could read that differently. say the moderate republicans like reid and put him in, then the typical conservative christina justification will ignore the second idea and concentrate on the political check boxes bein appropriately checked. but yeah, if it's down to a dead heat between him and some good ole baptist boy, well...
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 23 June 2005 17:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Does Joe Biden have rocks in his head? The plagiarizing sen (D-Credit Card Companies) will be '08's Lieberman.

>Both Powell and Obama have incredible integrity<

That's hilarious. You do remember the UN slideshow? And Obama's voting record has been fairly New Democrat-as-usual:

http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/05/whats-happened-to-barack-obama.html


"Obama's second vote as a U.S. Senator was in support of confirming Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State. He also voted to confirm John Negroponte as Director of National Intelligence, despite Negroponte's involvement in Iran-Contra and other situations that clearly raise questions about his ethics and discretion. Obama also voted for a bill to limit citizens rights to seek legal redress against abusive corporations. During the bankruptcy debate, he helped vote down a Democratic amendment to cap the abusive interest rates credit card companies could charge...Obama cast a key procedural vote in support of President Bush's right-wing judges."

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 23 June 2005 17:55 (eighteen years ago) link

my post above is completely retarded. wow. why did i have a brain fart and think reid was a gop dude? har. sorry. glad to carry on the tradition of uninformed political discussion on the interwebs.
m.

msp (mspa), Friday, 24 June 2005 04:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Harry Reid gets even more interesting. Note the Hillary comments.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 7 July 2005 17:05 (eighteen years ago) link

"...but [Hillary] still has a few ties to Arkansas. I think she is the person to beat, but that doesn’t necessarily mean she is the best candidate.”

I honestly don't see Hillary winning Arkansas away from a Republican male candidate. And trying to keep Buffalo's C-130's away from Little Rock Air Force Base certainly didn't help her any with Arkansas voters. (It did help with New York voters, though, and that's really all that she needs to worry about.)

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:09 (eighteen years ago) link

one month passes...
Woodward's really pushing this Cheney stuff

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 10 August 2005 14:58 (eighteen years ago) link

that's a dream match up, the republicans know they'd be hanging themselves if they nominated cheney.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 10 August 2005 15:20 (eighteen years ago) link

i was also otm in 06 but only about the major issue of the election, not the candidates

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 22 October 2008 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

TOMBOT would like to point out

the valves of houston (gbx), Wednesday, 22 October 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

well if we're slapping ourselves on the back then for the record I was OTM all over this fucking thread - about Hillary, about McCain, about Obama, lolz even about Biden:

Biden as VP would be a disaster, I think - who would want a VP that tries to hog the media limelight by continually putting his foot in his mouth?

― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, February 1, 2007 7:20 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Biden is not running for VP. quite possibly Secretary of State, but not VP.

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, February 1, 2007 7:30 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 22 October 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link

and you were right about Biden's hyperactive foot!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 22 October 2008 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't have time to read this - was I OTM?

(Biden wasn't running for VP btw)

gabbneb, Thursday, 23 October 2008 07:19 (fifteen years ago) link

seven years pass...

slapping selves on back dept

Does Joe Biden have rocks in his head? The plagiarizing sen (D-Credit Card Companies) will be '08's Lieberman.

>Both Powell and Obama have incredible integrity<

That's hilarious. You do remember the UN slideshow? And Obama's voting record has been fairly New Democrat-as-usual:

http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/05/whats-happened-to-barack-obama.html

"Obama's second vote as a U.S. Senator was in support of confirming Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State. He also voted to confirm John Negroponte as Director of National Intelligence, despite Negroponte's involvement in Iran-Contra and other situations that clearly raise questions about his ethics and discretion. Obama also voted for a bill to limit citizens rights to seek legal redress against abusive corporations. During the bankruptcy debate, he helped vote down a Democratic amendment to cap the abusive interest rates credit card companies could charge...Obama cast a key procedural vote in support of President Bush's right-wing judges."

― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:55 PM (10 years ago)

skateboards are the new combover (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 17:53 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.