I don't think this worked for me on a Lynchian level or otherwise. There were some groovy audiovisual things going on but not enough to keep me interested. With Lynch I'm always glued to my seat, scared to tear my face away. This is another in a seemingly endless line of recent indie movies channeling identity crisis via a washed-out couple in their mid-30s babbling vacant words at each other in the middle of a kitchen. It really lagged about a third of the way through, a deliberately confusing montage of temporal and spatial displacement that nevertheless felt a bit like a trope we've seen before. I didn't hate the movie, but it wasn't Primer.
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 14:59 (ten years ago) link
a washed-out couple in their mid-30s babbling vacant words at each other in the middle of a kitchen
my life
― festival culture (Jordan), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:02 (ten years ago) link
channeling identity crisis via a washed-out couple in their mid-30s babbling vacant words at each other in the middle of a kitchen.
I've been trying to find time to watch that last Miranda July movie for two months.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:05 (ten years ago) link
Haha, that's the other one I was talking about. I never want to see a film that does that again.
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:10 (ten years ago) link
Whatever kept July from impersonating her g-d dying cat.
― midnight outdoor nude frolic up north goes south (Eric H.), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:13 (ten years ago) link
Two movies are not "an endless line" ... but did you mean the couples are washed-out or washed-up?
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:14 (ten years ago) link
(I guess I prefer vacant babble to Primer, tho.)
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:18 (ten years ago) link
xpost both. i dunno, i feel like i've seen a lot of this detached soft-focus 'what is it all about? what are you talking about? wait-whuh.... who am I?' kind of stuff a bunch of times before. maybe directors be having a personality crisis or something but i find it a pretty boring way to convey arty dissociation.
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:20 (ten years ago) link
maybe just absorb the film instead of analyzing constantly, it's not something you necessarily have to think deeply about
― beautifully, unapologetically plastic (mh), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:27 (ten years ago) link
it's just music goddamn it!
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
hehe, but what i'm saying here is it didn't really pull off that 'just sit back and enjoy the ride' feeling for me (as i get with Lynch and some other directors of that kind) because bits of it were either tedious or done-before or just overly confusing.
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:34 (ten years ago) link
your connection with your spirit pig is strained
― beautifully, unapologetically plastic (mh), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 15:38 (ten years ago) link
The worm has control.
― Untt (La Lechera), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 16:09 (ten years ago) link
Jainism but with worm/spirit pig duology
― i too went to college (silby), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 19:07 (ten years ago) link
fuk, I meant zoroastrianism, whatever
― i too went to college (silby), Tuesday, 8 October 2013 19:11 (ten years ago) link
I liked almost everything about it, tho I did watch it in 20-30 minute sprints. would def watch a tv series shot in this style.
glad to see somebody posted that carruth doesn't see the sampler as the antagonist. my takeaway was that the thief was the bad guy and the sampler was some sort of surreptitious healer, but reading some other posts on the thread I thought maybe I was mistaken. guess I should go read some interviews and crackpot internet theories.
― a hard dom is good to find (Edward III), Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:41 (ten years ago) link
follow your spirit pig where it leads you
― Untt (La Lechera), Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:43 (ten years ago) link
I hope he makes upstream color II electric pigaloo
― a hard dom is good to find (Edward III), Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:49 (ten years ago) link
neon pigaloo
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/197/529174900_40c23dd968_o.jpg
― Untt (La Lechera), Wednesday, 16 October 2013 20:01 (ten years ago) link
Apparently no one has linked this, re "open" and "closed" movies:
http://chicagosburning.tumblr.com/post/50869565487/cb-195-sorry-were-closed-come-in-were-open
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 November 2013 22:44 (ten years ago) link
I am not understanding the comparisons with Lynch, at all.
― Van Horn Street, Saturday, 30 November 2013 06:32 (ten years ago) link
The Thief is the devil and The Sampler is God - compassionate and showing us things as they are / sound like. The Thief sticks the worms of weakness into us - psychosis or substance abuse - but if we turn to The Sampler he can get it out. But The Sampler is part of the problem, as he is part of the cycle, which is extraneous to Man, so once we realize that - but accepting the self-help wisdom of Walden - we have to kill The Sampler to get rid of The Thief, before we can become on with the pigs.
It's all some sort of Randian bullshit, in other words.
― Frederik B, Monday, 3 February 2014 20:29 (ten years ago) link
wut
― j., Tuesday, 4 February 2014 04:47 (ten years ago) link
Just watched this, liked it a lot. I particularly liked that it seemed allergic to explication/explanation. No voiceover, no "aha" explanation, plenty of loose threads, plenty of potential ways to understand the linkages between the various characters but no overt parsing as far as heroes/villains or even passive victims/active agents, even though there are parts that draw upon lots of genres and emotional frameworks. It was refreshing. I can see how it might bug the crap out of some people but I really liked its weird restraint.
― the tune was space, Thursday, 6 February 2014 06:19 (ten years ago) link
This picture made me think of this movie:http://37.media.tumblr.com/0b43db2a4357a88ae7ccd464f4b65c50/tumblr_n3fwe2FcGZ1r4dx5zo1_500.jpg
― Dan I., Wednesday, 7 May 2014 22:30 (ten years ago) link
:D
― imago, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 22:31 (ten years ago) link
Barnyard productionz
― Dan I., Wednesday, 7 May 2014 22:31 (ten years ago) link
http://https%3A//farm4.staticflickr.com/3922/14916512806_d9a43b179a.jpg
― JacobSanders, Saturday, 16 August 2014 21:24 (nine years ago) link
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/150x100q90/745/gGyG5M.jpg
― JacobSanders, Saturday, 16 August 2014 21:31 (nine years ago) link
I'd been looking forward to seeing this movie for so long, but I wanted to wait until the right night to watch it, which was tonight. Wow, what a neat movie. I even managed to go in totally blind, which might have made it even better. Or at least more compelling. Don't get the upthread comparison to Lynch at all. I thought it was like a cross between Cronenberg and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 17 August 2014 04:06 (nine years ago) link
http://variety.com/2015/film/news/anne-hathaway-keanu-reeves-daniel-radcliffe-modern-ocean-1201632722/
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 13:09 (eight years ago) link
not sure what it says about me that the prospect of a film about shipping routes has me very excited
― ogmor, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 13:42 (eight years ago) link
caught myself thinking "free your spirit pig" again the other day
― μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:37 (eight years ago) link
it sounds a bit mysterious, like is it set in a specific era or what?
― xelab, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:40 (eight years ago) link
Well the modern era of course, but it still could be a period movie
― xelab, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:43 (eight years ago) link
I'm with you ogmor! I'm excited!
― JacobSanders, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:44 (eight years ago) link
Cast looks awful ugh.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:50 (eight years ago) link
having Reeves and Goldblum in the same movie doesn't seem legal
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 16:02 (eight years ago) link
― ogmor, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 5:42 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
same
― pizza rolls are a food that exists (silby), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 16:12 (eight years ago) link
reeves thing isn't that disheartening tbh although perhaps i liked him in john wick more than a fair amount of people
either way, great that carruth got another project off the ground so soon after upstream color (by comparison to the gap between primer and UC, at least), also reminds me that i need to watch upstream color again - haven't since it came out
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 16:18 (eight years ago) link
My wife said upstream color made her feel like she was going crazy. I loved it though. I should watch it again too.
― JacobSanders, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 17:12 (eight years ago) link
Just popped onto his wiki to see what's up, and as far as I can tell ... nothing?
In 2014, Carruth announced a new film, The Modern Ocean, based on international shipping and the lives of those involved. On August 12, 2015, it was reported that the film was in pre-production, and its ensemble cast was announced in November 2015; it will include Anne Hathaway, Keanu Reeves, Tom Holland and Daniel Radcliffe. However, in an interview in 2018, Carruth noted that the film is "not gonna happen anytime soon".
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 February 2019 05:35 (five years ago) link
Why should he hurry
― Norm’s Superego (silby), Thursday, 21 February 2019 06:09 (five years ago) link
Thought it neat that Upstream Color was edited by David Lowery, who also edited his own film A Ghost Story to similar ends.
My only objection watching UC is that the ubitquitous excerpts from to On Walden Pond are way too on the nose.
― The feminine side of (Sanpaku), Thursday, 21 February 2019 06:28 (five years ago) link
Another article I read made it sound like The Modern Ocean is dead as a project and he’s had to move on to other things. Really sucks, would be neat to see what he could do on a big scale.
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Thursday, 21 February 2019 06:37 (five years ago) link
Lotsa whys at work. But I'd say he should hurry to get it done? Because the cast will move on? Because the funding will drop out? Or maybe both happened already and he's on to the next thing. Mostly I just want more movies from him!
Of course I want him to take his time and make movies as singular as his first two, but for practical reasons he seems prone to distractions and delays. Taking small acting gigs, for example, or doing music. It looks like he did the music for the TV version of "The Girlfriend Experience," which I suspect could be Soderbergh's way of throwing him some cash. Looks like he (and Lowery and Amirpour?) also directed some episodes of a nature documentary series? Lowery, for comparison, has made four features since Upstream Color was released, incl. a big-budget Disney movie. The last thing I'd want is for Carruth to be jaded into nothingness, but he also seems like the kind of guy to surprise everyone with a new movie no one knew was coming.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 February 2019 12:55 (five years ago) link
That movie isn't happening and hasn't been happening for a while. He moved on.
― bhad bundy (Simon H.), Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:02 (five years ago) link
(Don't get me wrong, I didn't necessarily want him to make *that* movie, just *a* movie.)
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:25 (five years ago) link
He abandoned a project a significant way in before making Upstream (there's a bit of footage from it in the movie). He really seems to not want to put his name to stuff that's not up to snuff. I'd love another Carruth movie but way more filmmakers should be half as self-critical.
― bhad bundy (Simon H.), Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:28 (five years ago) link
Or independent.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:42 (five years ago) link