2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

ban college

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

The same one deez guys are on:

Kathryn Jean Lopez:

An e-mail:

is like the dad in the room, listening to all the b**ching between the
brothers or the daughters, and then simply ends debate with a simple,
authoritative, but not loud statement of who will be punished and sent
to their room. Problem is, in a campaign, you have to be loud
sometimes.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooooool xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

The K-Lo post was about Thompson.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Could do with more pictures on this thread.

http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg187/nick-uptoeleven/hills.jpg

Unfortunately the girl is English, So no she can't. Can't have a donation neither.

Upt0eleven, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

"The Economy" won because that was the closest answer to "monetary policy."

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't worry: Ron Paul will print less money.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

ban Upt0eleven

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

take your lolcats zings back to 6 months ago plz

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

soooooorry

Upt0eleven, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:57 (sixteen years ago) link

btw deej otm about step loving thompson? he accounted for like 2% of the discourse during the debate

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Prediction: Hils will spit pea soup in former toadie Step's direction tonight.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

2%? Did you correct for Ron Paul?

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, get 9/11 truthers out of shot!

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i would like to meet the 261 collegiates who thought fred t. looked presidential tonight

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone wanna elaborate on this richardson/obama thing?

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Flashing red lights on Brian Ross mean he's serious.

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Starting on foreign policy on the Democratic side seems to favor HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.blinne.org/photos/uncategorized/siren.gif

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

That Gibson response to Obama was sorta brilliant.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Exclusive! Must Credit ABCNews Clue Crew!

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

So was the Gibson oh-snap line to Edwards now.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i16.tinypic.com/733dpj4.jpg

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

gj with your escape chars, Diane

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

That Gibson response to Obama was sorta brilliant.

Yeah, for it IS the Bush doctrine. If the Pakistanis opposed Obama's taking Osama out he WOULD violate their sovereignty.

Jeb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/01/06/us/06debate.3374.jpg

Romney and Thompson all "do I have to?"

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Fuck Richardson: he wants a return to Cold War let's-pluck-annoying-leaders-out-of-office, which I guess is the "realism" some Dems want.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

giuliani wanna fuck

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i11.tinypic.com/6jyieqb.gif

Kerm, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

college kids know Thompson loves the reefer

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link

LOLZ at HRC passive-voice usage: "(Osama) was not taken out at the time."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i voted for thompson option because it was closes to "thompson didn't die"

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

He's right, you know. Drug companies aren't the. xxp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Grr at HRC giving a perfectly reasonable response.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Musharraf must be loving this. :/

Rock Hardy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama response shot: "Oh shit, she's making sense."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC's strategy is emerging early: Sound very, very detailed and knowledgeable; a policy wonk, like her husband. This is how her "experience" card might pay dividends for her in a debate v. Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf all three of them are right, if our country is threatened by rogue groups inside a nation that can't control them we absolutely should step in

deej, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf is at people getting mad about obama being 'pro bush doctrine' or whatever

deej, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i agree with deej

J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

and yeah, kind of annoyed by hillary giving the best answer

deej, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The thing Obama said about the Pakistani leadership having to be "legitimate" was kind of frothy. Any legitimate Pakistani leadership, as it currently stands, would be islamistic.

Jeb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

you never drug companies.

gr8080, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

This may be a major advantage for HRC, folks. If Obama stays at the broad, sweeping level, viewers will ask, "Where's the beef?" (substance).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf is at people getting mad about obama being 'pro bush doctrine' or whatever

Well, it's nice to see that you approve of the Bush doctrine.

Jeb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah a little disingenuous because a hypothetical tactical strike is way different than regime change in a sovereign nation.

xxp

petey_carnum, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the word is "islamistical," Jeb.

horseshoe, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL at Gibson posing a question that could have been asked in 1976.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards: "If someone attacke us with a nuclear weapon, they have nuclear capability."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Uhh Bhutto was killed over the Xmas break. How "calm" a response could the Bush administration have hoped for?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 6 January 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.