http://37.media.tumblr.com/4c1aedbd5f1e87d1415bb8912907a122/tumblr_moajjpHWGS1s9dnijo1_500.gif
― pplains, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:12 (ten years ago) link
that's no muppet. that's george w. bush, looking for the third-term that was promised to him.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:13 (ten years ago) link
Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic
I see what GG is going for here, but it seems hard to deny that there is going to be a tidal wave of actually misogynistic opposition to HRC when she's nominated, and it's going to dwarf any opposition to her based on "she likes bankers and war too much"
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:14 (ten years ago) link
there's going to be a three-tiered opposition: (a) she's an establishment elitist, too cozy with bankers; (b) Benghazi!, Worse than Watergate!©; (c) an ugly campaign resuscitating every scandal mentioned during the 90s.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:17 (ten years ago) link
on the other hand, she is a semi-charismatic monster, so maybe it's best if rand paul is president.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:18 (ten years ago) link
(b) Benghazi!, Worse than Watergate!©; (c) an ugly campaign resuscitating every scandal mentioned during the 90s.
probably prefer benghazi to 90's scanal mania all things considered
― Clay, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:19 (ten years ago) link
you're getting both, for months and months. so settle in; it's going to be a bumpy ride.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 04:21 (ten years ago) link
(that's my 50s starlet imitation. been working on it all week)
can we turn off the internet for the 18 months leading up to the 2016 election?
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 05:21 (ten years ago) link
http://macenstein.com/default/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/photo-5-640x426.png
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 09:00 (ten years ago) link
can we turn off the internet for the 18 months leading up to the 2016 election?― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, May 13, 2014
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, May 13, 2014
http://perpetuallite.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/hell-no.gif
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 11:24 (ten years ago) link
― Clay, Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:19 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
what, you don't miss discussions of how HRC had Vince Foster killed?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 14:40 (ten years ago) link
not just vince foster!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 14:48 (ten years ago) link
maybe, like, 100 -- 300 of the clinton's political enemies. you got to get deep, deep into the underground to get the real info.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 14:49 (ten years ago) link
http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/13/politics/rove-clinton-criticism/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
keep it classy, karl
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 22:16 (ten years ago) link
the first comment is the obvious one, but it bears repeating:
Karl Rove is an expert in diagnosing brain damage. He spent so many years so close to George W.
― espring (amateurist), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 22:17 (ten years ago) link
why a Bernie Sanders candidacy would not accomplish a single solitary thing
http://www.salon.com/2014/06/03/no_bernie_sanders_should_not_run_for_president_why_his_challenge_would_achieve_little/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:34 (ten years ago) link
pore pore pitiful me
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/10/5796396/only-a-rich-person-could-go-as-broke-as-hillary-clinton
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:32 (ten years ago) link
Her quotes that were linked in there are really clueless.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:41 (ten years ago) link
Bill worked really hard
we had to buy houses
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:43 (ten years ago) link
Watching her with Diane Sawyer I relieved the nightmare. So weird I'm already feeling nostalgia for late '07-era Obama's stentorian platitudes.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:47 (ten years ago) link
In essence, the result of that 2008 near tie vote was that Obama got to go first with the understanding that Clinton would automatically get the nomination 8 years later. What this means is that (barring unforeseen circumstances)there will have been no left wing challenge in presidential races for 16 years and I think that suits the Party and its rich donors just fine. They hate primaries. And since they will have had 16 uninterrupted years of preferred policy, even as the voters get to feel the inspiration of the two historic firsts, why would anyone rock the boat?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com.br/2014/06/that-marriage-of-convenience-was.html
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:51 (ten years ago) link
Progressives might have been able to leverage that fierce competition in 2008 but they got caught up in the emotion just like everyone else...
shame on u alfred
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 19:54 (ten years ago) link
I would never use "leverage" as a verb
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:06 (ten years ago) link
is there a precedent for a totally uncontested nomination like this?
I would love more than anything for Hillary to get pushed by the left by somebody/something - because she is actually susceptible to pressure - but I don't know where it's going to come from. probably nowhere.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:19 (ten years ago) link
Taft.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:23 (ten years ago) link
she is actually susceptible to pressure
I must've missed this. Anyway, pressure is off once the presidency starts and you can chuck everything you said in the campaign, as BHO has illustrated.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:23 (ten years ago) link
I would love more than anything for Hillary to get pushed by the left off a cliff
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:26 (ten years ago) link
Hillary's political m.o. is basically "if that is the way the winds are blowing, let no one say I don't also blow"
First term presidents are susceptible to financial pressure/lobbyists (gotta get re-elected!), second termers aren't susceptible to any pressure beyond the threat of impeachment.
xp
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:27 (ten years ago) link
and they're usually hamstrung by the opposing party and their own party's re-election schemes; nothing much ever happens in 2nd terms except on the unpredictable foreign policy front
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:28 (ten years ago) link
it's still only 2014, i'm assuming there will likely be some kind of challenger?
― marcos, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:30 (ten years ago) link
Hard to imagine -- even that crazed socialist Bill deBlasio is trying to arrange the coronation for Brooklyn.
I'm hoping for any kind of surprise to unleash that leaden Rodham spontaneity.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:37 (ten years ago) link
no money = no challenger
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 20:48 (ten years ago) link
hillary already has challengers announced and more likely but 2016 for dems looks like an old style gop coronation. 2016 for repubs looks like an old style dem clusterfuck.
edwards was the progressive candidate in 08, seem to recall a good number of fools who bought his war on poverty come to jesus, ignored that previously in his political career (where he'd been exposed as a lightweight already) he'd been a true blue dlc type who wanted to make the democratic party more 'business friendly'. he tried to play kingmaker (it was assumed among other things he wanted attorney general) but other flaws in the man ultimately made him as irrelevant and powerless as the progressive grass roots (he was already as vain).
― balls, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:00 (ten years ago) link
idk anybody on the left that ever took Edwards seriously
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:36 (ten years ago) link
Watching her with Diane Sawyer I relieved the nightmare.― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)
Had the same problem. Before I had any feelings about anybody else, I unequivocally didn't want her to win in 2008. In the six years since, with her largely of out of view, that fingernails-on-a-blackboard antipathy has faded. The first time she let loose with one of her Amy Poehler guffaws in the Sawyer interview, it flared up.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:46 (ten years ago) link
a good number of fools who bought his war on poverty come to jesus, ignored that previously in his political career (where he'd been exposed as a lightweight already) ...
up to here u could be talkin bout the sainted Bobby Kennedy
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:14 (ten years ago) link
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/06/hillary-clinton-vs-russ-feingold-a-wake-up-call-for-democrats/372553/
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:43 (ten years ago) link
I would totally vote for Russ but let's be serious
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:49 (ten years ago) link
So depressing that we are fucking sleepwalking toward a HRC nomination.
― schwantz, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:04 (ten years ago) link
hi!
http://usatelections.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/afp-e-faces-12-clintons.jpg?w=1200
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:06 (ten years ago) link
i'd prefer a nominee further to the left, but not sure another democratic candidate would win (maybe warren).
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:08 (ten years ago) link
Warren shouldn't run tho, she is needed in the Senate
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:08 (ten years ago) link
i agree (at least this election cycle).
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:09 (ten years ago) link
feel like people push her because she's the only alternative to Hillary that trumps her "I'll be the First Lady President" angle (which admittedly is going to be just as much of a factor, if not moreso, than Barack's "First Black President" appeal)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:10 (ten years ago) link
also because she's (in her own, understated way) a magnetic candidate, with the potential to be totally presidential. she's maybe a little too fiery and blunt now, but that's partly what i like about her.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:11 (ten years ago) link
in a weird way I don't know any women who are enthusiastic about Hillary the way people were enthusiastic about Obama. there's this sort of measured acknowledgment that on her merits she is not really that great.... but
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:22 (ten years ago) link
I knew plenty in 2008. Now? Notsomuch.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:25 (ten years ago) link
my mom is so excited for president hillary
― Mordy, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:29 (ten years ago) link
how is Warren more fiery and blunt than any man?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 23:55 (ten years ago) link