New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (16745 of them)

i wouldn't be surprised if the ipod goes out with just a press release (or perhaps even nothing!), but man, that'd be something

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:13 (ten years ago) link

i think killing all the ipods would be a deal. people were writing goodbyes to it a few months ago, weren't they? and apple hasn't even killed it yet. but when they do, perhaps they'd take the step of doing so on stage.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:15 (ten years ago) link

if they kill the ipod, but keep the ipod touch, they will have killed a product but not a product line!

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:17 (ten years ago) link

yes, that is true. (if by "ipod" you mean classic, nano, and shuffle. or any one or combination of those)

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:23 (ten years ago) link

anything that plays music and does apps w/o being a phone or tablet is an ipod

gbx, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:35 (ten years ago) link

There are many business applications for iPod Touch which, although not very lucrative, would represent Apple nodding in the direction of business and education (as it always does) if the Touch were to stay in the lineup.

fields of salmon, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:41 (ten years ago) link

they've only killed products, not major product lines, since the return of steve jobs

Since the return of SJ they've killed the Newton, Printers and Cameras product lines.

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:45 (ten years ago) link

rip LaserWriter

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:46 (ten years ago) link

haha ya i thought you meant since jobs' death

basically the most famous thing steve jobs did was shut down almost all of their product lines!

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:47 (ten years ago) link

jesus christ guys that was in what, 1997? when he was changing around the company?

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:48 (ten years ago) link

since then, what? nothing!

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:48 (ten years ago) link

that doesn't make your statement any more correct

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:48 (ten years ago) link

i mean, that wasn't his apple. that was the apple of sculley, spindler, and amelio. none of that shit existed beyond 1998 or so.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:48 (ten years ago) link

you have no idea what you're talking about.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:48 (ten years ago) link

"he killed his predecessor's product lines!" is not "he killed his own product lines!"

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:49 (ten years ago) link

that was cleanup shit. not worth mentioning. killing the ipod would be a totally different deal.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:49 (ten years ago) link

you CLEARLY have no idea what you're talking about because you said steve jobs didnt kill off any product lines since his return and that was the first thing he did

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:49 (ten years ago) link

what is buying Beats if not "changing around the company"? Maybe Tim has the long knives ready.

(I don't think they'll kill the iPod, fwiw. Maybe the classic, yep)

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:49 (ten years ago) link

basically the most famous thing steve jobs did was shut down almost all of their product lines!

this is insane

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:50 (ten years ago) link

no one thinks that except for you

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:50 (ten years ago) link

unless you mean in the context of 1997, which, fine, an argument could be made there

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:50 (ten years ago) link

Regarding hardware, Steve decided to start from scratch and base the whole strategy on a simple matrix. Apple would drop its 20+ product lines and make just four great products: a consumer desktop, a consumer notebook, a pro desktop and a pro notebook.

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:50 (ten years ago) link

yes, indeed he did that

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:51 (ten years ago) link

i was not thinking of that when i made my statement. if we're going to include that stuff, then you're right.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:51 (ten years ago) link

but it's not something they've done since

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:51 (ten years ago) link

and it's not something they've done to his own product lines

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:52 (ten years ago) link

what about the cube

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:53 (ten years ago) link

or the ROKR

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:53 (ten years ago) link

that's a product, not a line, and i already addressed that upthread in addition to the ipod mini and ipod hifi

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:54 (ten years ago) link

products! products!

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:54 (ten years ago) link

of course they've killed products!

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:54 (ten years ago) link

and it's not something they've done to his own product lines

This might get semantic, but I kinda think the G4 Cube counts. He presented it as a whole new product line at the time - a fifth to complement the four, equal to PowerBook, Power Mac, iBook and iMac.

This was before the iPod, so it's not really right to say that "Mac" was the product line then - the whole company was only "Mac" at that point.

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:54 (ten years ago) link

i said as much!

ipod mini, which was replaced. cube, which was not. hifi, which was a failed experiment. macbook, which was replaced with the air.

― markers, Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:11 AM

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:54 (ten years ago) link

the cube was a mac

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:55 (ten years ago) link

look at apple's website: ipod, ipad, mac, iphone

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:55 (ten years ago) link

i keep forgetting what argument you're trying to make here. the ipod classic is not a product but a product line unto itself? but the cube and ROKR aren't?

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:55 (ten years ago) link

it was a new type of mac, but not a new line. it was like the shuffle or nano

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:55 (ten years ago) link

i keep forgetting what argument you're trying to make here. the ipod classic is not a product but a product line unto itself? but the cube and ROKR aren't?

― socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:55 AM

the first two are products. the rokr is a weird case.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:56 (ten years ago) link

post-cleanup, apple has not killed a major product line.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:56 (ten years ago) link

i'll add that clarification, because you two are right that he did clean house, and i wasn't thinking of that

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:57 (ten years ago) link

look at apple's website: ipod, ipad, mac, iphone

you mean Store iReview iTools iCards QuickTime?
https://web.archive.org/web/20001018025839/http://www.apple.com/

the first two are products. the rokr is a weird case.

Wait, what are you saying? They've killed products, they can kill the iPod Classic, right? iPod name is going to live on for the Touch for some time I reckon

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:57 (ten years ago) link

wtf was iReview btw?

stet, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:58 (ten years ago) link

again, look at how apple structures its website: ipod, mac, iphone, and ipad are top line. all ipods go under ipod, all macs under mac, etc. apple tv doesn't get top level billing because it's traditionally been a "hobby," but now it at least gets that on their online store, and tim cook has even said something like "it's becoming increasingly hard to call it a hobby" or whatever

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:59 (ten years ago) link

stet, the website as it exists now

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:59 (ten years ago) link

not old versions.

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:59 (ten years ago) link

i have no idea what the fuck ireview is

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:00 (ten years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IReview

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:01 (ten years ago) link

ya but what is the point you are trying to make here about the ipod classic

socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:01 (ten years ago) link

lol thank you for bringing this little piece of apple history to our attention. i had no idea

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:01 (ten years ago) link

ya but what is the point you are trying to make here about the ipod classic

― socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:01 AM

did i have one? if i did i don't remember

markers, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:02 (ten years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.