ASK TREESHIP whats your favorite gilmore girls episode

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (559 of them)

because it's the only message board that matters™

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:34 (nine years ago) link

and when the hourglass has run out, the hourglass of temporality, when the noise of secular life has grown silent and its restless and ineffectual activism has come to an end, when everything around you is still, as it is in eternity--then eternity asks you and every individual in these millions and millions only one thing: whether you have posted to ilx, or not.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:34 (nine years ago) link

no way to verify this but i guessed kierkegaard and then i googled it and it was kierkegaard

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:36 (nine years ago) link

felt excited about that victory because i had to skip quizzo tonight

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:39 (nine years ago) link

last time i went the only answer i successfully contributed was "kalashnikov" and i was like :/

difficult listening hour, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:43 (nine years ago) link

Treeship,

What would be your first action as mod?

It was great to see you again,

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:44 (nine years ago) link

i sometimes pretend to be on 77 to keep posters guessing, but i'm not actually in there ;_;

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:52 (nine years ago) link

oh. that is a poll i started a few weeks ago titled "unban all banned posters (at midnight on halloween)". poll closes soon.

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:54 (nine years ago) link

so i would do that but i would also ban the other mods in a move that my enemies will call a coup but my allies will call a revolution from above. after that only history can say.

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:55 (nine years ago) link

can one mod really ban another? what checks and balances do we have in place?

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:58 (nine years ago) link

oh i don't know. are the mods unbannable? that's kind of disturbing if true.

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:59 (nine years ago) link

i flagged my post for moderation so maybe we will find out

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:01 (nine years ago) link

i think i will possibly be banned for doing that

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:03 (nine years ago) link

under this administration, it's likely. especially after you disregarded waterface's request for discretion.

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:12 (nine years ago) link

treeship do you think youre a good ilx poster?

≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:13 (nine years ago) link

what's your issue with me, lamp?

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:13 (nine years ago) link

i dont understand you and am curious

≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:17 (nine years ago) link

what don't you understand?

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:18 (nine years ago) link

why you post so much to ilx, what you get out of it, what youre 'about'

≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:51 (nine years ago) link

tbf i probably shouldve read the early part of this thread before asking

≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:52 (nine years ago) link

about the amount that i post, i am a compulsive procrastinator in graduate school and i think the amount of time i spend both posting to ilx and talking to people on gchat and facebook chat is dysfunctional.

but i like many of the people here and the discussions are more interesting than most other places i've found on the internet.

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:55 (nine years ago) link

do you like that hozier song?

dylannn, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:59 (nine years ago) link

what are the next most interesting places you have found on the internet

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Friday, 17 October 2014 02:00 (nine years ago) link

treeship what grad program are you in?

≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 02:09 (nine years ago) link

dylannn: yes, very much. a bit self-pitying, but in the way that i can be so i relate. "take me to church" is the one you are talking about right?

nakh: i don't know. lots of things. i like that blog "the charnel house."

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 02:11 (nine years ago) link

lamp: i'm just doing a one year masters of education program that involves certification as a high school english teacher. i've dabbled in literature grad classes but never officially enrolled in a program and ultimately decided not to pursue a phd... for now

Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 02:12 (nine years ago) link

trís ive never read anything by rawls or rorty or any of those centre ground american humanities mavens, do you think people should read their books?

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link

rorty is awesome

Mordy, Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link

contingency, irony + solidarity is worth reading

Mordy, Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link

just in terms of general edification?

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:48 (nine years ago) link

do people read these books apart from in universities

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:48 (nine years ago) link

trying to remember what the book the person was reading in that excellent scene in the sopranos where he is sitting reading while listening to second viennese school piano music and is told by his wife that the crime he witnessed was mafia related and then they freak out

think it might have been rawls or rorty

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:51 (nine years ago) link

also trís how would you feel if a very erudite and patrician socially and fiscally conservative yankee sort of poster joined ilx

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:13 (nine years ago) link

question #1.) only read rorty, and only contingency, irony, and solidarity. the best part of that book is the chapter on nabokov.

question #2.) i think that sounds sweet. there's too much homogeneity of opinion here. guy like that would probably force people to question and refine their perspectives, ultimately strengthening them.

Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:20 (nine years ago) link

even if that poster were to have some rather difficult views about gender, race and so forth? what if they revealed themselves to have donated $15,000 to pro life campaign groups in the last year?

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:24 (nine years ago) link

you tell a guy something in confidence

local eire man (darraghmac), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:28 (nine years ago) link

idk i'm w/ marcuse we shd be intolerant of intolerance imo

clouds, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:29 (nine years ago) link

yeah, this person presumably would exist whether he posted to ilx or not. if he poses his views in interesting, provocative ways i think that could be useful and who knows maybe he would change his views or soften them

Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:31 (nine years ago) link

if he was an abusive, obtuse dick then he would just ruin threads and get banned. but you said he was erudite

Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:32 (nine years ago) link

yes, erudite, and haughty

from new england

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:33 (nine years ago) link

what's his name

龜✊ (wins), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:35 (nine years ago) link

lowell

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:36 (nine years ago) link

he would describe himself as a 'reluctant schopenhauerian pessimist' on ilx, though not on his twitter biography because he would have left twitter after deciding that microblogging was 'inimical to proper reflection'

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:36 (nine years ago) link

what's his middle name?

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:40 (nine years ago) link

How would he react to people playfully abbreviating his name to "lol"

Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:01 (nine years ago) link

just would not reply to any post that did not substantially engage his own arguments

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:07 (nine years ago) link

he would have a low threshold for caustically insincere nihilistic irony

the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:08 (nine years ago) link

a lowell threshold

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 22:42 (nine years ago) link

a 'I got friends in lowell places' dn

I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 22:43 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.