because it's the only message board that matters™
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:34 (nine years ago) link
and when the hourglass has run out, the hourglass of temporality, when the noise of secular life has grown silent and its restless and ineffectual activism has come to an end, when everything around you is still, as it is in eternity--then eternity asks you and every individual in these millions and millions only one thing: whether you have posted to ilx, or not.
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:34 (nine years ago) link
no way to verify this but i guessed kierkegaard and then i googled it and it was kierkegaard
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:36 (nine years ago) link
felt excited about that victory because i had to skip quizzo tonight
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:39 (nine years ago) link
last time i went the only answer i successfully contributed was "kalashnikov" and i was like :/
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:43 (nine years ago) link
Treeship,
What would be your first action as mod?
It was great to see you again,
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:44 (nine years ago) link
http://ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=77&threadid=100687
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:49 (nine years ago) link
i sometimes pretend to be on 77 to keep posters guessing, but i'm not actually in there ;_;
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:52 (nine years ago) link
oh. that is a poll i started a few weeks ago titled "unban all banned posters (at midnight on halloween)". poll closes soon.
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:54 (nine years ago) link
so i would do that but i would also ban the other mods in a move that my enemies will call a coup but my allies will call a revolution from above. after that only history can say.
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:55 (nine years ago) link
can one mod really ban another? what checks and balances do we have in place?
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 00:58 (nine years ago) link
oh i don't know. are the mods unbannable? that's kind of disturbing if true.
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 00:59 (nine years ago) link
i flagged my post for moderation so maybe we will find out
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:01 (nine years ago) link
i think i will possibly be banned for doing that
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:03 (nine years ago) link
under this administration, it's likely. especially after you disregarded waterface's request for discretion.
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:12 (nine years ago) link
treeship do you think youre a good ilx poster?
― ≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:13 (nine years ago) link
what's your issue with me, lamp?
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:13 (nine years ago) link
i dont understand you and am curious
― ≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:17 (nine years ago) link
what don't you understand?
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:18 (nine years ago) link
why you post so much to ilx, what you get out of it, what youre 'about'
― ≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:51 (nine years ago) link
tbf i probably shouldve read the early part of this thread before asking
― ≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 01:52 (nine years ago) link
about the amount that i post, i am a compulsive procrastinator in graduate school and i think the amount of time i spend both posting to ilx and talking to people on gchat and facebook chat is dysfunctional.
but i like many of the people here and the discussions are more interesting than most other places i've found on the internet.
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:55 (nine years ago) link
do you like that hozier song?
― dylannn, Friday, 17 October 2014 01:59 (nine years ago) link
what are the next most interesting places you have found on the internet
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Friday, 17 October 2014 02:00 (nine years ago) link
treeship what grad program are you in?
― ≖_≖ (Lamp), Friday, 17 October 2014 02:09 (nine years ago) link
dylannn: yes, very much. a bit self-pitying, but in the way that i can be so i relate. "take me to church" is the one you are talking about right?
nakh: i don't know. lots of things. i like that blog "the charnel house."
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 02:11 (nine years ago) link
lamp: i'm just doing a one year masters of education program that involves certification as a high school english teacher. i've dabbled in literature grad classes but never officially enrolled in a program and ultimately decided not to pursue a phd... for now
― Treeship, Friday, 17 October 2014 02:12 (nine years ago) link
trís ive never read anything by rawls or rorty or any of those centre ground american humanities mavens, do you think people should read their books?
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link
rorty is awesome
― Mordy, Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link
contingency, irony + solidarity is worth reading
just in terms of general edification?
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:48 (nine years ago) link
do people read these books apart from in universities
trying to remember what the book the person was reading in that excellent scene in the sopranos where he is sitting reading while listening to second viennese school piano music and is told by his wife that the crime he witnessed was mafia related and then they freak out
think it might have been rawls or rorty
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 17:51 (nine years ago) link
also trís how would you feel if a very erudite and patrician socially and fiscally conservative yankee sort of poster joined ilx
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:13 (nine years ago) link
question #1.) only read rorty, and only contingency, irony, and solidarity. the best part of that book is the chapter on nabokov.
question #2.) i think that sounds sweet. there's too much homogeneity of opinion here. guy like that would probably force people to question and refine their perspectives, ultimately strengthening them.
― Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:20 (nine years ago) link
even if that poster were to have some rather difficult views about gender, race and so forth? what if they revealed themselves to have donated $15,000 to pro life campaign groups in the last year?
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:24 (nine years ago) link
you tell a guy something in confidence
― local eire man (darraghmac), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:28 (nine years ago) link
idk i'm w/ marcuse we shd be intolerant of intolerance imo
― clouds, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:29 (nine years ago) link
yeah, this person presumably would exist whether he posted to ilx or not. if he poses his views in interesting, provocative ways i think that could be useful and who knows maybe he would change his views or soften them
― Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:31 (nine years ago) link
if he was an abusive, obtuse dick then he would just ruin threads and get banned. but you said he was erudite
― Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:32 (nine years ago) link
yes, erudite, and haughty
from new england
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:33 (nine years ago) link
what's his name
― 龜✊ (wins), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:35 (nine years ago) link
lowell
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:36 (nine years ago) link
he would describe himself as a 'reluctant schopenhauerian pessimist' on ilx, though not on his twitter biography because he would have left twitter after deciding that microblogging was 'inimical to proper reflection'
what's his middle name?
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 20:40 (nine years ago) link
How would he react to people playfully abbreviating his name to "lol"
― Treeship, Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:01 (nine years ago) link
just would not reply to any post that did not substantially engage his own arguments
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:07 (nine years ago) link
he would have a low threshold for caustically insincere nihilistic irony
― the final twilight of all evaluative standpoints (nakhchivan), Sunday, 19 October 2014 21:08 (nine years ago) link
a lowell threshold
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 22:42 (nine years ago) link
a 'I got friends in lowell places' dn
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 19 October 2014 22:43 (nine years ago) link