She is auto-skip for me, like Shouts & Murmurs when not by Jack Handey
― my jaw left (Hurting 2), Monday, 27 October 2014 14:34 (nine years ago) link
Marx ($2092.99) is a writer ($45.00) I don't get, either. She ($543.22) is not terribly funny or perceptive ($670.00). I ($0.98) don't really get what she was trying to say with the service animal ($100.00) piece.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:39 (nine years ago) link
Great article about the whole gluten free trend
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/03/grain
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:46 (nine years ago) link
i still cant tell if "on and off the avenue" is supposed to be satirical or not
― socki (s1ocki), Monday, 27 October 2014 16:57 (nine years ago) link
gluten piece is fire
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:42 (nine years ago) link
cannot wait to share it to facebook tomorrow
lol i LOVED the emotional support animal piece
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 28 October 2014 04:21 (nine years ago) link
thought it was meh written but as someone who dealt all summer with people trying to bring their dogs into a public space where no dogs are allowed with mega-entitled "i don't have the paperwork on me but just look at the sign on his jacket" arguments, i wanna frame it and hang it over my mantle
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:12 (nine years ago) link
yeah agreed with that
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:13 (nine years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/percy-jackson-problem
Rebecca Mead sounds like a jerk. What kind of jerk parent withholds a book from their kid?
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:17 (nine years ago) link
link to emotional support animal piece?
― I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 15:56 (nine years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/10/20/pets-allowed
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:02 (nine years ago) link
Wow, Rebecca Mead, what a dick. You should read a Captain Underpants book some time to calibrate the low-bar alternative to Percy Jackson, which itself plays second fiddle to Harry Potter, because once kids read Harry Potter they want to read more, and unfortunately very little is as good as Harry Potter. If Mead or other snob parents think they will successfully fob on their dog-eared copy of "Moby Dick" they read as a kid (sure they did), she should think again.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:09 (nine years ago) link
Kids books about Greek Mythology? How could they possibly lead children to actual literature?
― you walk on the street, grab the rock (President Keyes), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:16 (nine years ago) link
What if the strenuous accessibility of “Percy Jackson’s Greek Gods” proves so alluring to young readers that it seduces them in the opposite direction from that which Gaiman’s words presuppose—away from an engagement with more immediately difficult incarnations of the classics, Greek and otherwise? What if instead of urging them on to more challenging adventures on other, potentially perilous literary shores, it makes young readers hungry only for more of the palatable same?
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:07 (nine years ago) link
couldn't get through the pet piece, what an unbearable style p-marx has
― socki (s1ocki), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:38 (nine years ago) link
I dunno I really like the idea of walking around DC with my emotional support alpaca.
― mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:33 (nine years ago) link
($4388)
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:36 (nine years ago) link
i didnt finished it either (yet) but agree that carrying a turkey around with you for emotional support is very funny
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:46 (nine years ago) link
http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ServiceAnimals11-690.jpg
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:47 (nine years ago) link
do people do that dumb shit outside of major cities? can you get away with a support llama in topeka?
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:49 (nine years ago) link
xxxpost - Captain Underpants books are funny, entertaining and better written and constructed than a lot of the garbage that adults read. Their author Dav Pilkey does a lot to get kids into reading, drawing and creating their own media. There are some truly appalling books out there for children though. Captain Underpants is a bad example to choose because they're actually pretty good.
― everything, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:10 (nine years ago) link
That gluten article seems like it's trying to have its cake and eat it too. On the one hand it displays a lot of skepticism to the idea that gluten-free diets help most people who go one them, but on the other hand it uses a lot of innuendo and loaded descriptions of adding gluten to bread to suggest it may have some nefarious effects.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 01:55 (nine years ago) link
I think it implied that there are lots of reasons to be wary of lots of things, gluten among them, but that the anti-gluten people were anti-gluten for many of the wrong reasons, or at least for totally unproven reasons. Like, it does acknowledge that there has been an increase in celiac, for example, but it stresses that nobody knows why, and that people (overwhelmingly not celiacs) self-diagnosing are going down a slippery slope of assumptions. A la anti-vax folks, or anti-GMO folks. Its OK to be suspicious, but acting with no basis other than gut (hah) instinct is an irresponsible reaction.
xpost I've been very lucky that both of my kids are advanced readers, so they pretty much skipped Captain Underpants, a series that I understood was written to appeal to a really broad (in every sense) strata of readers, from the non-reader or barely reader to early readers to (a common target) reluctant readers. What little I've seen of them seemed pretty LCD, the book equivalent of Twinkies (food for reluctant eaters?).
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 02:07 (nine years ago) link
Notes from the Underpants
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 02:11 (nine years ago) link
One thing I will definitely agree with that gluten article about is that "100% whole wheat" bread should never be soft and fluffy and if it is, that's a sign that something has gone horribly wrong. I buy whole wheat bread that doesn't have added gluten and the flavor is much better and the texture is like what whole wheat bread should be.
― o. nate, Thursday, 30 October 2014 00:55 (nine years ago) link
Question about what I like about the New Yorker's restaurant reviews: I think it's that they are usually reviews of the atmosphere (other patrons, servers' remarks, decor) as much as, if not more so, than the food.
― jaymc, Thursday, 30 October 2014 05:02 (nine years ago) link
due to brevity those restaurant reviews integrate the atmosphere into food description. most longer reviews insert a few paragraphs about the room and crowd before the food comes and i'm like "please bring the first course, what's taking so long, how bout a drink etc"
― Pontius Pilates (m coleman), Thursday, 30 October 2014 10:40 (nine years ago) link
That gluten article seems like it's trying to have its cake and eat it too.
well done
― Pontius Pilates (m coleman), Thursday, 30 October 2014 10:41 (nine years ago) link
There are a couple of allusions to the dangers of going gluten-free for no reason in there, but iirc all that was mentioned was the concern of consuming too much bad for you stuff thinking it good for you or, more extreme, gradually excluding all food from your diet until I guess you die? Neither of which seem like dangers unique to going gluten-free. GF is of course largely bullshit, like most self-diagnosed dietary stuff, but the article does concede that something is going on, and some of the folks interviewed insist they feel better GF. So ultimately, what's the harm? It's not like people going GF reduced our herd immunity to gluten.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 October 2014 13:44 (nine years ago) link
I think the point was that in lieu of gluten they are typically jacking up one of the three other "seller" components—salt, sugar, or refined carbs (which turns to sugar)—all of which in excess are more dangerous than gluten is to the average non-celiac, gluten-insensitive eater.
― Hadrian VIII, Thursday, 30 October 2014 14:41 (nine years ago) link
So ultimately, what's the harm?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:44 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
um they will talk to you about it
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 October 2014 15:00 (nine years ago) link
OTM
― resulting post (rogermexico.), Thursday, 30 October 2014 16:49 (nine years ago) link
cosign
― difficult-difficult lemon-difficult (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:24 (nine years ago) link
^^^
― ornamental cabbage (James Morrison), Thursday, 30 October 2014 23:39 (nine years ago) link
other thing is that people who believe that garbage are also likely to be people who believe all sorts of other garbage
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 31 October 2014 04:21 (nine years ago) link
i mean the people i know who have gone gluten free (and who don't actually have any particular sensitivity) are among the stupidest, most gullible people i know
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 31 October 2014 04:22 (nine years ago) link
why do you know stupid people
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Friday, 31 October 2014 04:26 (nine years ago) link
i am related to some of them :(
― I dunno. (amateurist), Saturday, 1 November 2014 22:12 (nine years ago) link
I know one otherwise-normal guy who was way ahead of the curve re: gluten (and went from 120 pounds soaking wet to a normal weight when he eliminated it) but everyone else is definitely down with Ron Paul, Crossfit, essential oils, hatred of GMOs and most of them think Jesus got his six-pack via avoidance of bread.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 1 November 2014 22:18 (nine years ago) link
he gained weight going gluten-free?
― socki (s1ocki), Sunday, 2 November 2014 05:31 (nine years ago) link
one of the effects of gluten intolerance is diarrhea so that's not shocking
― k3vin k., Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:55 (nine years ago) link
maybe "soaking wet" is a phone autocorrecting "overweight"?
― toby, Sunday, 2 November 2014 16:51 (nine years ago) link
i bet they got a ~ton~ of letters on the marx service animal article
interesting that 1 pts out that 16 states have passed laws defining the misrepresentation of a service animal as a crime -- then the next letter, the women confesses to exactly that
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 13:25 (nine years ago) link
Amazing: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/17/crystal-ball-3
― Ratt in Mi Kitchen (Neil S), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 15:52 (nine years ago) link
xpost They did print three letters re: the Marx piece, which usually implies a deluge.
I liked the Alex Ross Beethoven piece a lot, about how he's been deified into shorthand but really should be praised in deeper detail to justify as well as promote his genius.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 16:29 (nine years ago) link
They could've labeled that as a Shouts & Murmurs and I would've been none the wiser.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 16:50 (nine years ago) link
'everyone should be talking about HoMo'
this guy is a fuckin' treasure
― bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 16:59 (nine years ago) link
/Amazing: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/17/crystal-ball-3/They could've labeled that as a Shouts & Murmurs and I would've been none the wiser.
― tobo73, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 18:01 (nine years ago) link
article about this fuckin _modern farmer_ magazine lady is hilarious http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/10/read-reap
― adam, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 18:11 (nine years ago) link