Interstellar: Nolan, McConaughey

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (576 of them)

saw this in imax last night, liked it a lot more than i expected to but it definitely suffers from the classic nolan syndrome of being exciting while you're watching it and then falling apart under later examination.

how long is it supposed to be between matt and his daughter finding the lazarus station and then him jetting off into space? seems like it basically happens overnight.

poor casey affleck tho - his dad returns to civilisation after 100 years in space and he doesn't even ask how his son is doing before he fucks off again? that's cold, man.

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 09:25 (nine years ago) link

The ending was hilariously dumb even by nolan's and this film's standards. "Oh btw that scientist is still stuck on that planet, you should prob go rescue her since apparently none of us give a fuck"

Fairly peng (wins), Friday, 14 November 2014 10:59 (nine years ago) link

yeah, it was really odd. murph is so old and infirm that she's advised against making the trip to see cooper near saturn, but she does it anyway. then when she arrives she sees her dad for the first time in decades, says hi for 30 seconds, then she's like 'cool, good talk, now go away so i can die with my kids around me'. for a movie which posits the idea that love is the strongest force in the universe it's awfully cavalier about actual human realtionships.

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 11:16 (nine years ago) link

he doesnt really 'do' relationships though, does he?

the whole thing is better if you avoid the dialogue/plot/premise and just focus on the visuals/sound. he should have made a silent space movie really. a sci-fi the artist.

StillAdvance, Friday, 14 November 2014 12:08 (nine years ago) link

anyway, nolan is just too smart to care about things like relationships like other directors might. hes brainier than namby pamby families and stuff.

StillAdvance, Friday, 14 November 2014 12:09 (nine years ago) link

jessica chastain is astonishingly beautiful, mcconaheyhey is looking pretty leathery lately.

astonishing how he kept that farmer's tan after 2 years in space

Abstinence Hawk (frogbs), Friday, 14 November 2014 12:39 (nine years ago) link

no atmospheric protection from those UV rays out there!

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 14 November 2014 12:50 (nine years ago) link

anyway, nolan is just too smart to care about things like relationships like other directors might. hes brainier than namby pamby families and stuff.

i thought the scene where cooper returns to the endeavour to find the backlog of messages from his son was legit moving, which made the robotic rending feel even weirder. although i guess it's telling that mconaughey does all the work there - going from joy to heartbroken sobbing without saying a word.

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 13:06 (nine years ago) link

astonishing how he kept that farmer's tan after 2 years in space

tbf he was in stasis for most of that time. i wonder how long cooper's whole experience lasted for him subjectively? it can't have been more than a few weeks tops, right?

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 13:08 (nine years ago) link

self-xp er, i meant 'robotic ending' rather than 'robotic rending' there. still, some scenes of TARS tearing shit up would have been more than welcome. <3 u TARS

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 13:19 (nine years ago) link

Oh man the pathetic robot banter in this was so fucking weeeeak, how about you nerds raise ur stfu levels to 100% cause this shit wasn't funny the 1st twenty times

I bet that's what Jonathan and Christopher Nolan sound like when they talk to each other

Fairly peng (wins), Friday, 14 November 2014 13:25 (nine years ago) link

enh, i've got to give them some credit for designing a robot that didn't look like anything i'd seen on screen before, even if it was a transformer version of the 2001 monolith with aspirations towards standup comedy

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 13:43 (nine years ago) link

although i guess you could say that TARS is the natural endpoint of the nolans' tendency to make their characters featureless slabs

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 14 November 2014 13:47 (nine years ago) link

tbf he was in stasis for most of that time.

in the future, space travelers will put their kids into stasis and then revive them when they return, so they won't miss out on attending all their ball games. kids will put their pets into stasis and revive them months later, just as a joke to confuse them. housewives will put leftovers into stasis instead of a refrigerator. laid off workers will be put in stasis to save on unemployment benefits. the possibilities are endless!

oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:02 (nine years ago) link

Oh lord, this movie. aaaaaaagghhhh

Pict in a blanket (WilliamC), Sunday, 16 November 2014 02:28 (nine years ago) link

otm

this was like Armageddon minus hamminess and hokiness (or, the good parts), plus some self-serious "gravitas"; and then a Shyamalan ending tacked on. (that the 3rd act was the best is troublesome). it really sucked.

i have seen the future and oh my god it is very white except for one guy!

carot tard (rip van wanko), Sunday, 16 November 2014 02:53 (nine years ago) link

Loved it, in deep. IMAX non 70mm. Gripping, tearful, intense. Well acted. Realistic even though it's not. Great robots. Love was the message. Mixed with a bit of science, but more important was mixing the love WITH the science. Don't forget the love bit. Too much hardnosed objective science goals(Dr Mann) you got yourself a problem Houston. In the end love was the deciding factor, and that is really cool. Love saved the planet. Wow though.

My problem was the lack of environmental message in a film about a destroyed earth, or the lack of blaming humans for the dustbowl earth. He obviously had no interest in blaming humans for anything or questioning whther we deserved to have another planet to destroy. So it was chosen thou "blight" that killed our food. Why? Is Nolan a corporate shill? Did he cave into the RW in declaring environmental destruction as a political theme and decide as usual to leave his film apolitic?

And why did he put the message in the room to go to NASA base in the first place?

Raccoon Tanuki, Sunday, 16 November 2014 13:08 (nine years ago) link

In the end love was the deciding factor, and that is really cool. Love saved the planet.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6WBtefrY4Ss/UaQJwuXSDdI/AAAAAAAABNo/F64QUKI0sf4/s1600/Brazil_Capa_Topo.png

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 November 2014 14:29 (nine years ago) link

why did they need a rocket to get off earth at the start if they had space planes for the other planets?

caek, Sunday, 16 November 2014 14:49 (nine years ago) link

Let's be real for a sec

This is another C Nolan conservative crusade.

Raccoon Tanuki, Sunday, 16 November 2014 15:44 (nine years ago) link

are you for real?

I dunno. (amateurist), Sunday, 16 November 2014 23:31 (nine years ago) link

Well many of the scientists in it were willing to put human lives at risk and lie in order to prove a point. Michael Caine gambled with multiple lives in order to prove something he knew was false, and Matt Damon is willing to kill everyone to save his own skin. Only McConaughey's spiritual farmer can navigate the nth dimension.

It's interesting that they use Morse code to bridge the gap between dimensions. It is a binary system. Maybe they never went to space and this is just a fable about technology and how it is changing our perception of time through what we reveal through it. 21st Century Evangleist New Wave Mysticism.

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 17 November 2014 03:55 (nine years ago) link

I really liked the trippy bookcase effects, it reminded me of no-clip mode in Doom.

©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 17 November 2014 03:56 (nine years ago) link

The movie reminds me of Iain Banks's cranky diatripe against SF dabblers: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/may/13/iain-banks-science-fiction-genre

It seems amazed that it includes TRAVELING TO PLANETS IN A SPACESHIP and TIME TRAVEL omg

abanana, Monday, 17 November 2014 04:04 (nine years ago) link

(Also, did anyone else who saw it have trouble making out at least a third of the dialogue? The mixing was atrocious at my screening.)

This has become a widely-reported problem.

Nolan chose The Hollywood Reporter as the outlet to respond to the reported Interstellar sound problems:

“I’ve always loved films that approach sound in an impressionistic way and that is an unusual approach for a mainstream blockbuster, but I feel it’s the right approach for this experiential film,” the director said. “Many of the filmmakers I’ve admired over the years have used sound in bold and adventurous ways. I don’t agree with the idea that you can only achieve clarity through dialogue. Clarity of story, clarity of emotions—I try to achieve that in a very layered way using all the different things at my disposal—picture and sound.”

Well that certainly sounds like any points in the film where dialogue can’t be heard was intentional. He continues:

“Usually I visit six or seven theaters. I like to hear it out where people are going to see it, not just in the cocoon of the dub stage. That is something I have done for years, because everything we are doing is intended to communicate something to the audience,” he said. “The theaters I have been at have been doing a terrific job in terms of presenting the film in the way I intended. “Broadly, speaking there is no question when you mix a film in an unconventional way as this, you’re bound to catch some people off guard, but hopefully people can appreciate the experience for what it’s intended to be.”

Among the specific theaters Nolan visited and check were the TCL Chinese IMAX and Arclight Cinerama Dome in Los Angeles as well as the AMC Lincoln Square IMAX in New York. More Nolan:

“We made carefully considered creative decisions,” Nolan said. “There are particular moments in this film where I decided to use dialogue as a sound effect, so sometimes it’s mixed slightly underneath the other sound effects or in the other sound effects to emphasize how loud the surrounding noise is. It’s not that nobody has ever done these things before, but it’s a little unconventional for a Hollywood movie.”

Your Ribs are My Ladder, Monday, 17 November 2014 14:47 (nine years ago) link

On a straight-up visual, visceral level, I dug the stuff on the water planet. Those mammoth waves gave me a little burst of real-life anxiety & adrenaline and I perked up for a spell.

I can't remember the specifics of what made me think this, but does the time-relativity stuff mean that McConaughey is supposed to be 31-years-old when he first leaves Earth?

Your Ribs are My Ladder, Monday, 17 November 2014 14:50 (nine years ago) link

i think it was stated (indirectly) that he was ~33 years old in the first part of the film.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:12 (nine years ago) link

still think that having the music drown out the dying professor revealing a major plot point was probably a bad decision

Abstinence Hawk (frogbs), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:21 (nine years ago) link

The planets were the good bit of the film at least visually although the scenes of mild peril were the usual cack-handed idiocy. Will dr brand stop pissing about looking at debris quick enough to save random dude who is standing like a meter away from the ship yelling at her? Let's fucking hope not, if he doesn't realise that he can yell from inside the ship he's too stupid to be an astronaut even in this universe

Seriously don't get why ppl who were like properly angry at Prometheus are rating this, it may even be dumber

Fairly peng (wins), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:42 (nine years ago) link

plus, if it really was 7 years for every hour, the data would effectively only be a couple hours old at that point. you'd think they would know that and maybe not risk everything to save it.

Abstinence Hawk (frogbs), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link

I'm glad I saw the flick. If nothing else, it's one of these things that makes me wanna just say to people: "So, did you dig this? Well, check out this cool movie called 'Moon'..."

Delbert Gravy (kingfish), Monday, 17 November 2014 19:05 (nine years ago) link

how is everyone still rating this a contender for best picture

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 17 November 2014 21:50 (nine years ago) link

so I hated Prometheus and all the "this is stupider than Prometheus" talk makes me :(

Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 21:51 (nine years ago) link

if yer talking Oscars it's bcz 1) they suck and 2) since they went to up to 10 nominees, they 'honor' gigantic expensive pieces of box-office horseshit as a POPPPPPPULIST gesture. xp

things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 November 2014 21:53 (nine years ago) link

see also Hobbits Jumping on a Bed as Best Picture

things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 November 2014 21:54 (nine years ago) link

Wasn't one of the big motivating factors for the switch from 5 nominees to 10 or whatever that fanboys got all pissy when The Dark Knight didn't get a Best Pic nod in '08?

MaudAddam (cryptosicko), Monday, 17 November 2014 21:56 (nine years ago) link

they typically stop thinking about honoring those specific MAINSTREAM TRASH!!!! FUCK SCHOOL!!! movies after rotten tomatoes and the public brand "disappointment" on it

and none of the hobbit movies have been nominated

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 17 November 2014 21:59 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, get your Oscar strawmen straight.

Eric H., Monday, 17 November 2014 22:13 (nine years ago) link

I'm talking about Best Picture winner LOTR: Return of the Bling, which had hobbits jumping on a bed as the faggiest of its baker's dozen endings, fools

things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 November 2014 22:31 (nine years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6yQ8BLSncc

abanana, Monday, 17 November 2014 22:37 (nine years ago) link

but that was years before the BP extension and doesn't its winning imply that it wasn't a token populist gesture but the academy is actually the hilrod2016cademy? i'm working on it

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 17 November 2014 22:45 (nine years ago) link

also every BP winner of the past decade wld've benefited from hobbits jumping on a bed

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 17 November 2014 22:46 (nine years ago) link

imagine the Tower of Sauron roaring with dismay when Colin Firth learns to talk in The King's Speech.

guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 November 2014 22:56 (nine years ago) link

I don’t agree with the idea that you can only achieve clarity through dialogue. Clarity of story, clarity of emotions—I try to achieve that in a very layered way using all the different things at my disposal—picture and sound.

whoa

difficult listening hour, Monday, 17 November 2014 23:00 (nine years ago) link

Wasn't Dark Knight Rises known for those audio issues? Some people said Bane was difficult to hear and it got sorted out for later screenings and for DVD.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 17 November 2014 23:57 (nine years ago) link

audio issues: everything i heard was crappy

a long time ago he used to be rem (soda), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 00:00 (nine years ago) link

I didn't have any problems with the audio.

abanana, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 00:04 (nine years ago) link

resident pleb reporting in: i enjoyed the movie well enough. i thought the acting was pretty good (even in spite of poor dialogue in places) and i thought it handled the science pretty well up to the point where science fails to explain things, i.e. before any of the black hole ingress.

one thing i particularly liked was the idea of mcconaughey-as-bridge, between the higher dimensional beings and present day earth, to "translate" time. the canonical example used to broadly explain the simplification achieved with many modern unification theories (namely that if you keep adding dimensions into the mix the math collapses down into pretty closed forms) is of a 2D world in which any person who can perceive in 3 dimensions is effectively god, because he can immediately grasp the totality of the 2D reality and reconcile all of its physical phenomena. the spin the movie takes is that while, yes, the science may compactify to clarity for an nth dimensional perception, something is in fact lost in the generality. in this case that something is the way that a 3D being perceives time which seems irrelevant/trivial to the higher dimensional form, but is critical in this instance to the survival of humans on earth. the whole thing might fall apart under much further scrutiny, but it was an interesting concept that i hadn't seen employed in sci-fi previously.

this things i believe (art), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 00:15 (nine years ago) link

a logical trajectory for Palmer Joss.. i found this well-watchable compared to Inception, which feels ultra-boggy/sloggy despite its interesting concept.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 01:19 (nine years ago) link

Nolan should just claim everything wrong or bad was on purpose, just to make you think.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 01:57 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.