http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/31/zombie-patriot-act-will-keep-u-s-spying-even-if-the-original-dies.html
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 June 2015 12:18 (nine years ago) link
yup
there's no way the spy agencies just stop, even if they couldn't stretch the interpretation of any law to their ends.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Monday, 1 June 2015 12:32 (nine years ago) link
for that reason i tend to think of the entire surveillance apparatus as essentially treasonous
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Monday, 1 June 2015 12:33 (nine years ago) link
Pretty sure there is a lot of money in gathering and collecting this information, not just on the NSA side but for the content providers as well. We'll be subsidizing some form of Verizon's customer database for permanent from now on.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 1 June 2015 15:54 (nine years ago) link
no kidding.. thats the whole thrust of the new Hooray Freedom Act(tm). basically outsource the data hosting to third parties who will charge a hefty fucking fee for the privilege. and the metadata (lol yeah right only that) of every call in the world is probably quite a bit of data to store..
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 1 June 2015 17:09 (nine years ago) link
as usual Charlie Savage is indispensable:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/01/us/a-gap-in-surveillance-but-ways-around-it.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 June 2015 17:14 (nine years ago) link
i feel like if the US gov ever tried to use NSA data to blackmail a US activist, and said activist told the NYT, that would be a huge story - even w/ prolific data collection, isn't a free press always the best bulwark against the abuse of that information?
― Mordy, Monday, 1 June 2015 17:18 (nine years ago) link
it's way more likely that the story would appear in The Guardian first
― DJP, Monday, 1 June 2015 17:26 (nine years ago) link
Mordy's friend Greenwald would write it.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 June 2015 17:28 (nine years ago) link
wherever, the west doesn't lack for media who would love to run that kind of blockbuster story.
― Mordy, Monday, 1 June 2015 17:30 (nine years ago) link
Dem advisor Greenberg on trying to win back white, working class voters. He's done his surveys and is sure he knows the answer. Sorta
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/junejulyaugust_2015/features/the_average_joes_proviso055824.php?page=all
Yet they are only ready to listen when they think that Democrats understand their deeply held belief that politics has been corrupted and government has failed. Championing reform of government and the political process is the price of admission with these voters. These white working-class and downscale voters are acutely conscious of the growing role of big money in politics and of a government that works for the 1 percent, not them.
It is possible that their cynicism about government is grounded in a fundamental individualism and long-standing American skepticism about intrusive government. And it also may be rooted in a race-conscious aversion to government spending that they believe fosters dependency and idleness—the principal critique of today’s conservative Republicans. If that is the prevailing dynamic, no appeal, no matter how compelling, would bring increased support for government activism.
Yet the white working-class and downscale voters in our surveys do support major parts of a progressive, activist agenda, particularly when a Democratic candidate boldly attacks the role of money and special interests dominating government and aggressively promotes reforms to ensure that average citizens get both their say and their money’s worth. These findings came out of innovative research conducted in partnership with Page Gardner’s Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund and David Donnelly’s Every Voice.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:16 (nine years ago) link
Occupy didn't accomplish much but I am glad that "1%" meme has become so thoroughly ingrained in political discourse
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 15:18 (nine years ago) link
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/hoyer-dems-need-to-ease-off-the-trade-attacks-on-fellow-dems-118550.html
fuckin weasel
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 18:24 (nine years ago) link
so the House bill passed - aside from the declassification of certain court decisions I'm unclear about which NSA powers have been rescinded. Are the NSA required to go to court to get records now, is that the deal? Seems like a good thing.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:00 (nine years ago) link
or at least better than how it was
It's on the telecom companies now, not the NSA.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:00 (nine years ago) link
well telecom companies can't have me murdered without a trial so that seems like a net win
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:02 (nine years ago) link
but they will surely hand over their records, right?
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:03 (nine years ago) link
I'm sure they will, but having an extra layer of judicial review can't be a bad thing
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:04 (nine years ago) link
will it go to that court that approves 99.8% of requests?
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:05 (nine years ago) link
@RepPeteKingToday's Senate NSA vote is a victory for America, for freedom over ignorance and defeat for ISIS, Edward Snowden & Rand Paul
McConnell: USA Freedom Act is "a resounding victory for those who are currently plotting against our homeland."
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:09 (nine years ago) link
I assume so, but if that court's decisions are now public then that means pressure can be applied, rulings can be contested(?) etc.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:11 (nine years ago) link
Freedom of the Press Foundation:
While the bill has many significant flaws, the USA Freedom Act vote is also historic: it’s the first time since the 1970s that Congress has indicated its intention to restrict the vast powers of intelligence agencies like the NSA, rather than exponentially expand them. It also shows the power that investigative journalism and brave whistleblowing can have on even the most entrenched government interests. Two years ago, debating these modest changes would’ve been unthinkable, and it is absolutely a vindication for Edward Snowden.
Unfortunately, the bill is also woefully inadequate and largely symbolic, and Congress would’ve been better off letting Section 215 of the Patriot Act expire permanently. The USA Freedom Act supposedly bans bulk collection of phone records or any other private records, and we certainly hope it actually does. But its provisions are vague and confusing, leading many legal experts to believe they could be re-interpreted in secret—by NSA lawyers with a history of warping the common definitions of ordinary words beyond recognition—and could lead the FISA court to continue to allow the NSA to collect large quantities of Americans’ data in secret. (The administration will shamefully now re-start the phone program that expired on Monday for six months, as allowed under the new law's "transition" period.)
The ultra-secret FISA court, a Kafkaesque nightmare for civil liberties, also gets to keep many of its worst features, with just minor changes around the edges. Such an anathema to democracy should be dismantled entirely.
https://freedom.press/blog/2015/06/our-statement-congress-passing-usa-freedom-act-nsa-reform-bill
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:14 (nine years ago) link
But its provisions are vague and confusing, leading many legal experts to believe they could be re-interpreted in secret—by NSA lawyers with a history of warping the common definitions of ordinary words beyond recognition—and could lead the FISA court to continue to allow the NSA to collect large quantities of Americans’ data in secret.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/John-Yoo.jpg
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:18 (nine years ago) link
ahhh that chump
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:19 (nine years ago) link
Unfortunately, the bill is also woefully inadequate and largely symbolic, and Congress would’ve been better off letting Section 215 of the Patriot Act expire permanently. The USA Freedom Act supposedly bans bulk collection of phone records or any other private records, and we certainly hope it actually does. But its provisions are vague and confusing, leading many legal experts to believe they could be re-interpreted in secret—by NSA lawyers with a history of warping the common definitions of ordinary words beyond recognition—and could lead the FISA court to continue to allow the NSA to collect large quantities of Americans’ data in secret.
this is classic "good as the enemy of perfect" and while there is basis for their concerns it seems like the more successful rhetorical tack to take would be to build on this bill's passage and the forces behind it to ensure that the concerns enumerated do not come to pass
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:21 (nine years ago) link
That's how I regard it.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:26 (nine years ago) link
i assume this is what will happen, but at least now if they are found out (thanks to some snowden jr.?) it will be clearer that they are going against the spirit of a bill passed by congress.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:39 (nine years ago) link
that's not a lot to be thankful for, though. but until more people in this country get mad about this stuff and actually vote out their politicians for this issue we're not going to see much changing. c'est la vie...
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:40 (nine years ago) link
not to be a total downer cynic but oliver north was going against the spirit and letter of a bill passed by congress, and somehow became a national hero.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:42 (nine years ago) link
to be fair, he's a hero to a minority of folks. most people know him as a criminal.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:42 (nine years ago) link
i mean sgt. calley was a hero to some, also.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:43 (nine years ago) link
but he never meant shit to me, etc.
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:45 (nine years ago) link
most people know him as a criminal.
most people know him as that guy with shows on the history channel, I expect
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:52 (nine years ago) link
what show is that? "great traitors in history"?
― he quipped with heat (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 June 2015 22:56 (nine years ago) link
oh I guess it's on Fox
"War Stories with Oliver North"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:00 (nine years ago) link
the "Fox Business Network" to be precise
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:01 (nine years ago) link
i'm skeptical because i assume that requests to spy on americans will continue to disappear into the FISA black box, because there are neverending methods to be kafkaesque, but have to admit this warms my heart and encourages me that it's a step in the right direction
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:36 (nine years ago) link
i hate a lot of politicians, but he's one of the select few where my brain just automatically replaces certain words with their opposite and it always makes more sense
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 2 June 2015 23:37 (nine years ago) link
trust me, i was there, and there was considerable "populist love" for North right after his testimony
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 03:57 (nine years ago) link
and yes i'm sure Prez Hil and/or Walker/Jeb and the Republican Congress will dismantle the security state, hope i live to see it
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 June 2015 03:59 (nine years ago) link
that didn't take long
Denny is so going to jail
― Οὖτις, Friday, 5 June 2015 15:48 (nine years ago) link
ugh
the tide is shifting on fast track--they're trying to put it to a vote friday.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 10 June 2015 18:23 (nine years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHKX8L1UkAAHA0x.jpg
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:28 (nine years ago) link
wow that image was a lot bigger than I thought!
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:29 (nine years ago) link
beware men with cherub's curls
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:34 (nine years ago) link
so mooching is the biggest scandal we got on him, eh
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:37 (nine years ago) link
Diane Rehm: Senator, you have dual citizenship with Israel.Bernie Sanders: Well, no I do not have dual citizenship with Israel. I'm an American. I don't know where that question came from. I am an American citizen, and I have visited Israel on a couple of occasions. No, I'm an American citizen, period.[Diane] Rehm: I understand from a list we have gotten that you were on that list.Sanders: No.Rehm: Forgive me if that is—Sanders: That's some of the nonsense that goes on in the internet. But that is absolutely not true.Rehm: Interesting. Are there members of Congress who do have dual citizenship or is that part of the fable?Sanders: I honestly don't know but I have read that on the internet. You know, my dad came to this country from Poland at the age of 17 without a nickel in his pocket. He loved this country. I am, you know, I got offended a little bit by that comment, and I know it's been on the internet. I am obviously an American citizen and I do not have any dual citizenship.
Bernie Sanders: Well, no I do not have dual citizenship with Israel. I'm an American. I don't know where that question came from. I am an American citizen, and I have visited Israel on a couple of occasions. No, I'm an American citizen, period.
[Diane] Rehm: I understand from a list we have gotten that you were on that list.
Sanders: No.
Rehm: Forgive me if that is—
Sanders: That's some of the nonsense that goes on in the internet. But that is absolutely not true.
Rehm: Interesting. Are there members of Congress who do have dual citizenship or is that part of the fable?
Sanders: I honestly don't know but I have read that on the internet. You know, my dad came to this country from Poland at the age of 17 without a nickel in his pocket. He loved this country. I am, you know, I got offended a little bit by that comment, and I know it's been on the internet. I am obviously an American citizen and I do not have any dual citizenship.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:41 (nine years ago) link
npr apparently has a "list."
and it never will be missed
― the increasing costive borborygmi (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:46 (nine years ago) link