'we' as in comrades, as in 'our friends, hamas' ;-)
― canoon fooder (dog latin), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:07 (eight years ago) link
fair - say instead "the idea that the context of this should be noted"
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:08 (eight years ago) link
you could read like a handful of the last few posts instead of ilx sensible chieftain summarising the thread for me and it'd be quite clear i myself said the context was missed.
that doesn't change the fact that it is quite weird for a male politician to tout quite a bad idea and defend it with "oh some women told me this" and "btw i dunno if this is even right but hey let's talk about it" and not be met with total derision.
i support corbyn but for that to be met itt with a comment that's anti some strawmen who are attacking the comments of another man on sexual harassment against women, a man who's actually running against two women for a position of power, well it does seem pretty confused.
i mean maybe corbyn should be silent about this and let yvette cooper and liz kendall speak?
― doing my Objectives, handling some intense stuff (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:14 (eight years ago) link
Ghost of Thatcher or nothing imo.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:17 (eight years ago) link
it is quite weird for a male politician to tout quite a bad idea and defend it with "oh some women told me this" and "btw i dunno if this is even right but hey let's talk about it" and not be met with total derision
Don't agree with this at all. Why would it merit total derision given it's obviously not a bad idea to the women who suggested it to Corbyn. Men are often called on to raise these issues because women feel they themselves are too readily dismissed (by men) and a wider women-only spaces discussion should occur which this could encourage.
― nashwan, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:21 (eight years ago) link
I'm not really with 'no men' spaces on public transport as a thing (plus perhaps Overground-style unicarriages likely to increase on short distance services anyway) but the derision for even suggesting it is ridic.
― nashwan, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:23 (eight years ago) link
Men are often called on to raise these issues because women feel they themselves are too readily dismissed (by men)
by who?
― doing my Objectives, handling some intense stuff (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:24 (eight years ago) link
lol
― The story of a Romanian (Blandford Forum), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:24 (eight years ago) link
Even if they privately agree they won't mention it for fear of upsetting some disgruntled Tory voter in Derby.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:26 (eight years ago) link
i'm maybe being particularly dense but i can't at all discern what you're getting at lg. for one thing plenty of women think it's not such a bad idea.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:34 (eight years ago) link
It's also an idea that already exists in other cities
― you too could be called a 'Star' by the Compliance Unit (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 15:52 (eight years ago) link
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/26/labour-leadership-election-party-to-check-voting-history-of-new-supporters
But it is understood that people will not be automatically excluded based on how the canvass data says they have voted in the past. It is more likely that a new supporter found to have voted Conservative, Green, Liberal Democrat or for another party would be telephoned by party HQ to check whether they have just changed their political persuasion or are in fact an infiltrator.
check how, exactly?
― soref, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 21:25 (eight years ago) link
'Are you voting for Corbyn or for one of the three Labour candidates?'
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 21:30 (eight years ago) link
what % of the electorate gets canvassed? I never have been. I've never lived anywhere that isn't a pretty rock solid Labour seat though - I guess it's more likely if you live in a marginal?
― soref, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 21:39 (eight years ago) link
Repeat after me: "Margaret Thatcher was a terrible thing to happen"
That'll sort out the Tory infiltrators
― Mark G, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 21:48 (eight years ago) link
what % of the electorate gets canvassed?
i had never been canvassed until this Labour seat since 1945 looked like it would go SNP in May which of course it did.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 22:27 (eight years ago) link
this is the most astonishingly desperate example of elitist, clubby behavior that i can ever remember seeing in british or american politics. you need a hunter s. thompson to tell a story this craven and stupid.
― transparent play for gifs (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 26 August 2015 23:35 (eight years ago) link
One day we'll look back at this and laugh.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 26 August 2015 23:41 (eight years ago) link
These are the salad days.
― Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 27 August 2015 00:01 (eight years ago) link
It will get much worse.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNz_t8bWUAAIAJ3.jpg:large
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Wednesday, 2 September 2015 13:14 (eight years ago) link
"Corbyn's bid to turn Britain into Zimbawe" ftw!
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 13:25 (eight years ago) link
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/01/labour-jeremy-corbyn-chuka-umunna?CMP=share_btn_tw
chuka umunna hoping that nobody's kept july and august's newspapers
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 14:56 (eight years ago) link
There's a lot of awkward shuffling going on right now. Should be fun.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 15:21 (eight years ago) link
how very modernised of him
― conrad, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 15:34 (eight years ago) link
Craven as it is, he's demonstrated more savvy here than I assumed he was capable of
― tsrobodo, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:16 (eight years ago) link
on one hand sure, but on the other hand when even yr Blairism is a negotiable position of convenience...can't roll my eyes high enough
― MC Whistler (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:22 (eight years ago) link
Well either he himself sees Blairism to be a sham or he's conscious of the fact that most of the electorate do.
Either way between this and the resistance thing with Hunt, he's doing a pretty good job keeping himself relevant whilst hedging hard
― tsrobodo, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:33 (eight years ago) link
I think you are giving him way too much credit, he is just doing what any bland party functionary does when their position becomes under threat - slither into another position and see if they can further themselves from it.
― xelab, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 21:05 (eight years ago) link
Probably and true enough but at this stage he's slithered more effectively than most other Blairites.
― tsrobodo, Thursday, 3 September 2015 01:20 (eight years ago) link
Well, for all that some seem to be considering splitting off like the SDP did, difference was that "Gang of four" were well-known and nobody knows this bunch.
― Mark G, Thursday, 3 September 2015 06:31 (eight years ago) link
Remind me how that SDP thing worked out for all concerned, must have been some success story for people to be considering it again.
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 September 2015 09:41 (eight years ago) link
OK, they got people keen for a bit, they had some initial success, but then faded out.
A bit like Badfinger if they were four other blokes also in the Beatles, with the hits they had on their own, and if they subsequently merged with the Rolling Stones.
― Mark G, Thursday, 3 September 2015 09:51 (eight years ago) link
Oh, and the four who formed the gang all got knighted in the end.
― Mark G, Thursday, 3 September 2015 09:54 (eight years ago) link
Polly Toynbee came out of with barely a scratch on her.
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 September 2015 09:56 (eight years ago) link
out of where?
― Mark G, Thursday, 3 September 2015 10:03 (eight years ago) link
The SDP.
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Thursday, 3 September 2015 10:14 (eight years ago) link
how fair should we be to barely disguised Tories?
― MC Whistler (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 3 September 2015 22:46 (eight years ago) link
Conveyor/Show Trials/Execution sounds pretty fair to me.
― xelab, Thursday, 3 September 2015 22:56 (eight years ago) link
A bit of their own medicine.
― xelab, Thursday, 3 September 2015 23:00 (eight years ago) link
https://mytiarascrooked.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/tumblr_inline_mhd2xf1ym61r71zdp.gif
― MC Whistler (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 3 September 2015 23:01 (eight years ago) link
Jeremy Corbyn scored an overwhelming lead over his rivals during the Sky News Labour debate, according to an unofficial poll of viewers using Sky Pulse.
The numbers are hilarious:
Jeremy Corbyn 80.7% Liz Kendall 8.5%Yvette Cooper 6.1%Andy Burnham 4.7%.
― Fields of Fat Henry (Tom D.), Friday, 4 September 2015 09:56 (eight years ago) link
Some good news for Kendall at last!
― I wear my Redditor loathing with pride (ShariVari), Friday, 4 September 2015 09:58 (eight years ago) link
We all know David Aaranovitch is a massive cunt but he was reaching the heights on Newsnight last night. Complete, utter failure to engage with anything anybody says. The usual bored jaded nonsense.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 4 September 2015 10:06 (eight years ago) link
Burnham has really tanked this campaign hasn't he? Guessing there'll be a big flow of voters from Burnham to Cooper. Corbyn will win, but the result will be a lot closer than people expect.
― Matt DC, Friday, 4 September 2015 12:12 (eight years ago) link
He spent a lot of time talking up the common ground he shared with Corbyn and there was that bollocks about "harnessing this energy" and then he disagreed with all Corbyn's policies apart from on Rail nationalisation.
― xelab, Friday, 4 September 2015 12:28 (eight years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXXJ3NrjplY&sns=em
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 September 2015 14:25 (eight years ago) link
That's what a future PM looks like.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 6 September 2015 14:26 (eight years ago) link
I got an email from John Prescott which started:
Hello comrade! (We can still say that can't we?) I'm going to break the habit of a lifetime and be brief.
― inside, skeletons are always inside, that's obvious. (dowd), Sunday, 6 September 2015 14:40 (eight years ago) link
That's what a future PM looks like
nooooooooooooooooooo
― soref, Sunday, 6 September 2015 14:47 (eight years ago) link