Buttload of Faith: the 2016 Presidential Primary Thread (Pt 2)

This is an interesting arm of the Clinton campaign, something called "The Briefing" which has its own Youtube channel and its own Facebook page (with only 14,000 likes). I wonder who these videos are aimed at?

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRyE0W-DFgBlfd111fts6tQ

Sorry, meant to link specifically to this video:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRyE0W-DFgBlfd111fts6tQ

xxposts

^Much ado about nothing imo. Trump's hair is mildly amusing, occasionally mesmerizing, that's all. Come to think of it, I found Ted Kennedy's hair way more "offensive."

see also https://twitter.com/TheBriefing2016/status/690276384032321538

(did they really mean to make israel that shape?)

wow those are some miserable tweets

JFC this is nuts: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2016-01-20/what-kind-of-man-spends-millions-to-elect-ted-cruz-

All cynicism aside, it's so scary that there is a group of such profoundly stupid people with so much money!

xp Those tweets remind me of when Reagan showed a map purportedly demonstrating how the Sandinistas were a stone's throw from Brownsville TX.

schwantz fyi that link didn't work for me ("404 page not found")

Try this link

Looks like dashes at the end of a URL don't get parsed correctly?

Thanks, that worked. The network of obsessives described by that article seems like something Pynchon might have conjured.

Literally spending millions on warehouses full of jars of pee!

In other news, this is pretty great.

And this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIZW5trdE5o

i don't want to overinterpret the results of one very limited study, but if these findings hold i feel like they could be relevant to the trajectory of american democracy:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/humans-arent-as-cooperative-as-we-thought-but-make-up-for-it-via-stupidity/

it's not like stupidity in America or the human race is a new thing

also, reading some news this morning, and I'm seriously wondering if Bernie is pulling Clinton to the left, seems just as likely he'll push her to the right

this "pushing" shit is fiction now and forever, rhetoric aside

DNC and Rodham just admitting her 'progressivism' is 0% convincing

dude c'mon. why do you keep calling her "rodham," it's like a weird version of when righties were doing the "barack HUSSEIN obama" thing. her name's clinton, whether you hate her or not at least call her by her name.

Barry Soetoro

never forget
http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/gT0AAOSwBadTqPMz/s-l300.jpg

just like cutting her meal-ticket antifeminist factor

also u mighjt wanna consider the Bess Truman "It took me 20 years to get him to say 'manure'" factor.

Anyway my time is better spent on more important matters like a DHless National League. Ta!

(I do think 'Rodham' celebrates the return of the Goldwater Girl within her that is roaring back now as it hasn't in a half century)

I think it celebrates what a sexist fool you are

iron my shirt

no tickee no Hillary

my last two November prez votes btw

2012: Jill Stein
2008: Cynthia McKinney

but enough about me, thx for all the fish

Did you guys see this:
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/21/1472974/-It-turns-out-Donald-Trump-s-father-was-the-racist-landlord-Woody-Guthrie-hated

yeah that's an amazing connection

speaking of amazing connections with racists

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/690562515500032000

our next president has retweeted a message from "WhiteGenocideTM"

one for the "Is Trump a Fascist" thread

this is a good summary of trumpism imo

http://theweek.com/articles/599577/how-obscure-adviser-pat-buchanan-predicted-wild-trump-campaign-1996

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZVul9QWcAQ1Yjr.jpg

laffer? i barely know her

are those effective or marginal tax rates

I refuse to read articles

xp to self: the writer is a trad-conservative himself, mind you

Plenty of others have noticed the parallels between Pat Buchanan and Donald Trump. Some have seen that Trump is attracting the "radical middle" social base and taking on the Caesarist, almost Latin American-style populism that Francis recommended. Buchanan was recently asked about why Trump was having all the success that he did not enjoy, when he is running on so many of the issues Buchanan did 20 years ago. Buchanan said that it was because the returns are in on the policies he criticized 20 years ago. All of this is true.

The Trump phenomenon does seem to be sui generis. There are not squadrons of Trumpistas in the Republican Congress. And his celebrity persona, his extremely unusual and independent financial power, his felicity for not just recognizing but channeling the grievances of his supporters is unmatched. It's hard to imagine anyone else rebuilding his coalition of Middle American radicals and fringier, race-obsessed "alt-right" nationalists.

some have seen

Has anybody brought up that the Hillary campaign font is terrible

Trump called it very low energy iirc

"sans serif fonts are for LOSERS"

While it may lose her some single-issue voters in the primaries, she retains the option of pivoting to Papyrus during the general election.

Though really Mistral was the hot display typeface of the late 80s/early 90s, Hillary's headbandy heyday.

someone plz plz photoshop Hilz on the Mistrial cover

"The Hillary font is very bad, very bad. First thing I do when I'm president, that font is outta here!"

"We're gonna get the absolute BEST typographers in here, have them bring in some really classy modernist semi-grotesques. It'll be great. You're gonna get tired of how much our typefaces win."

ha this is similar to what i was saying about this primary but says you should vote for clinton anyway

http://bottlemagazine.com/2016/01/19/on-hillary-and-bernie/

good piece until the last couple sentences.

That piece is so dumb. Pls. explain how Hillary is "better at politics."

yeah those are the sentences I'm referring to!

some otherwise smart people conveniently seem to be taking bernie's campaign promises at face value, and are under the impression that a president bernie is going to be the equivalent of house republicans. i'd say it was naive if it weren't so transparently dishonest