30s films are usually edited pretty briskly, so it's not simply a matter of using up a reel of film shooting an integral theatrical performance. "montage" doesn't mean soviet montage necessarily--just, y'know, editing bits of film together. all hollywood films are edited together from master shots, medium shots (plan american etc.), and occasionally inserts/close ups at a rate of i dunno one shot every 10-12 seconds. (nowadays it's more like every 5 seconds but we're talking about the 1930s)
i think this is pretty important: "filmed theater" isn't really as simple as that, the fact of it being filmed and edited together in the conventional way transforms the way the story is being told. perhaps the "meaning" is ultimately the same, but i'm not sure that's true or if it even matters so much.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:12 (nineteen years ago) link
to get "filmed theater" you need to go back to 1895-1910 or so, like the original version of the "wizard of oz" which is basically "selected scenes from the stage play of 'the wizard of oz'"--but as i noted above the spatial aspect of film is such that a stage performance is NECESSARILY transformed if it is to be "faithfully" captured on film. those early films that don't bother with such a transformation are often incomprehensible and usually dismissed as "primtive" (that's another hill of beans or whatever).
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― Aimless (Aimless), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:20 (nineteen years ago) link
some "fixed setup" films do sort of selfconsciously evoke a "theatrical" quality, or even overtly beg comparison to theater: oliveira, etc.--or to "primitive" cinema (angelopoulos). and certain kinds of framing (even outside the context of a long-take style) can evoke theater, "performance" too with fruitful results. but lots of fixed-setup films really don't evoke theater at all. it's impossible to imagine hou or jia films as anything but cinema--the natural settings, natural lighting, etc. are absolutely critical.
anyway yeah so i think cinema can do a lot with "theatricality" and i don't think calling a film "theatrical" is a very convincing slur (unless you're writing in 1905, maybe).
i'm repeating myself and possibly not making sense.\
XPOST
s1ocki, i didn't find aimless's post dismissive. anyways i'm not a film student or anything. i'm not sure about agree/disagree--i don't think i dismissed aimless's post or embraced it fully. i just sort of responded to it.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:22 (nineteen years ago) link
!!
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 24 October 2004 19:27 (nineteen years ago) link
Seen anything else? New Yorkers, Albee's Seascape?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:25 (eighteen years ago) link
that's probably it, coupled with the world's general philistinism. I wuv the theatre and wish i went to it more often. The last thing I saw was a monster production of Titus Andronicus before Christmas.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:36 (eighteen years ago) link
We need a rolling Theatre S/D thread really, but as you all say, nobody cares.
― Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:47 (eighteen years ago) link
xp i care
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:47 (eighteen years ago) link
Yes, but why? (I'm not being flippant.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:48 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 15:51 (eighteen years ago) link
speaking of revivals, though, when I was in LA, I took my grandmother to one of the Reprise! shows, which had great original choreography and housed in a small enough theatre (at UCLA) that the amplification (live orchestra) wasn't overbearing. one of the leads, Tami Tappan Damiano, was moderately impressive too. they also do one-weekend shows with some medium-sized Hollywood types (when I was there - Working, with among others Camryn Manheim).
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:12 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:24 (eighteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:25 (eighteen years ago) link
I basically prefer fringier theatre... partly this is the indie kid in me, but I think also that fringy theatre is more true to what the theatre is all about. It's still more expensive than I'd like it to be... why can't they just replace all actors with cheaper non-unionised Eastern Europeans?
The thing I hate most about the theatre is that in general you have to book in advance and can't just show up on whim to things like you can with other things.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:26 (eighteen years ago) link
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:27 (eighteen years ago) link
when i say "beyond realism" i mean it in the most mundane way that you might not find interesting at all, that's cool. for example, in film a table is always a table but in the theatre that exact same table could be a table, a bed, an autopsy slab, a raft, a shelter, or any number of things. e.g. a Robert Lepage play i saw where a washing machine doubles up as a space ship (not as ridiculous as it sounds). there are any number of things you can "only do in the theatre" whereas the public perception is that theatre is limited in some way, compared to film. i think it's the opposite. this needs lots of examples & i don't have the time to go into it now but i'll come back to it later.
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:33 (eighteen years ago) link
theres a bunch of interesting stuff on in london, and here in the provinces we've got "the romans in britain" next month in sheffield, dario fo's "mistero buffo" in april, and in leeds the trinidadian "three sisters" at the WYP, which i was reading about the other day.
I love the crucible, but the last thing i saw there was a hmmmm version of "much ado about nothing"
saw the history boys too in sheffield which was excellent, although i thought the set was a bit showy.
i dont understand going to the theatre in london, from what my parents go through it seems as though you have to book tickets a year in advance or something?!?!! up here i just turn up generally.
mind you, that yforward planning allowed me to see the full 9 hours of "coast of utopia" at the national which was pretty fucking special, if a bit harsh on yr ass
― ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:39 (eighteen years ago) link
ok - i think the the table thing is an example of something that opens out wider possibilites for theatre, i dont mean it just like "props in the theatre can be many different things and that's why it's important" but as i said i'll give more examples later.
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― ng-unit, Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:06 (eighteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:18 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:21 (eighteen years ago) link
realism SuXoR.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:43 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:49 (eighteen years ago) link
the point for me would be the same as that for going to London in the first place
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago) link
― ng-unit, Wednesday, 4 January 2006 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link
it's at the national, right? they keep back a certain number of tickets for every performance and sell them for a tenner (i think) on the day. the seats could be anywhere. they start selling them at 10am iirc, the only time i did it i got there for about 8, was the third person in the queue, spent a pleasant couple of hours reading, chatting and peoplewatching and got a front row seat (not as great as it sounds as the stage is at head-height) for the philip pullman/archbish rowan 'platform' debate (that wasn't a tenner actually, it was £3 or something. anyway it was brilliant). so er, yeah, if you get up early you can get a ticket.
― emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 18:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 18:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 18:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― ng-unit, Wednesday, 4 January 2006 18:48 (eighteen years ago) link