I've had people say it's a hardening, actually ~ US presidential election 2016 part 9/11 never forget

also hey look, it's policy: http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/hillary-clinton-policy-agenda

the reddit story really just points to 'in the matter of email security Clinton was not receiving competent advice', it's not really adding anything

Virtual reality Facebook billionaire bankrolled anti-Hillary meme club: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/22/palmer-luckey-the-facebook-billionaire-secretly-funding-trump-s-meme-machine.html

https://assets.vrfocus.com/uploads/2015/08/palmer_time_cover-1.jpg

that was a 22 year old on the cover of that issue? figured that dude was 12

figured he was dead

I somehow missed that FB bought that stupid company for two fucking billion dollars.

Lmao

NBC/WSJ poll, candidate favorability among undecided in two-way race: Clinton 13% positive, 64% negative; Trump 5% positive, 81% negative

the debate really is going to go "lol i'm not u, i win" eh

I want to know what percent of people are positive about both candidates.

"I am 75% positive that HIllary is a candidate"

A negative times a negative is a positive, so I guess they both win?

Oculus and dude from Minecraft prove that neckbeards gonna neckbeard no matter what.

Rick Ross 4 prez

Self-made
You just affiliated

why would you allow anyone to take that picture of you and then print it

Some ugly fallout for Facebook on /r/oculus. HTC Vive it is, I guess.

so does this reddit email deletion things have legs or nah? i can't tell if it's legit or not but if it is it...kinda is bad, right?

to me it seems less like she's doing something shady and more like the State dept's IT staff not knowing what the hell they are doing. i think those email headers are supposed to be deleted anyway for FOIA requests.

congress is after that pagliani guy hard as fuck. they tried to have him come in and plead the fifth for the cameras and he refused.

yeah I'm inclined to believe this guy is less a criminal and more someone who just wasn't very great at his job.

of course the House is going to go after this. they're desperate. don't forget how thoroughly Republicans embarrassed themselves during the hearing over Comey's investigation

Hillary's righteousness stinks of such bullshit. She does not wear it well. She does wear wisdom and experience well, and works best when she is not over compensating (shouting) and trying to shove it down our throats. She's so defensive it's like she's constantly trying to be better than the other guy, when all she has to do is try to act like herself, because she *is* better than the other guy. Less of this topping Trump with policy, or numbers, or toughness. Trump is not about specifics. She just needs to stress repeatedly that he is a total shithead and disaster and hammer again and again at his failings as a businessman and as a human being.

yea I kinda agree which is why it's weird to see it. though on the other hand she really can't win at these things. she's not a naturally gifted speaker the way Obama, Trump, or her husband were. luckily she's always been good on the debate stage so hopefully that'll help peoples perceptions of her.

also lol @ Hillary's team giving a front row debate seat to Mark Cuban. say what you will but their troll game is strong.

do we really need to know the results of of every single new poll

"George W. Bush set a great example for Republican candidates, as do many Republicans in Texas who seem far more comfortable with Hispanic voters and Hispanic culture," Ayres said, adding, "George Bush spoke a version of Spanish, kind of like he spoke a version of English."

lol

I normally find John Judis excruciating but this seems pretty on the mark. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/--100769

indeed. I wish she'd stop talking about Trump for a while. I think we all kinda get it at this point.

http://i.imgur.com/Wb5pF1r.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtCysOVWYAAtl2m.jpg

bombings + police protest = everyone wins!

agreed. the more I think about it, the high point of her entire campaign was the convention, which was notable primarily for its optimism and even patriotism. I think she needs to focus on getting people excited or at least motivated to vote for her, because there are a lot of people who've been turned off by Trump who are just going to either vote for Johnson or abstain altogether.

yeah nothin like "USA" chants to make me realize the Dems are my party

I'm with my labor-organizer friend's options: to Mexico if Trump wins, to Canada if HRC.

question - why was obama's performance vs romney in the first 2012 debate criticized so much? i've been reading a little about debate prep and that debate performance keeps getting mentioned as a type of thing clinton needs to avoid

i could watch clips of course but thought id ask

You can't even leave this thread, what makes you think you can leave the country? xp

He looked down at the podium.

do we really need to know the results of of every single new poll

― esempiu (crüt), Friday, September 23, 2016 8:20 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

no and we also don't need every 538 update

https://twitter.com/DavMicRot/status/778543535545053184

xpost Iirc he carried himself like he didn't really want to be there. Which to be fair ...

sorry frogbs did you say above that trump was a gifted public speaker

I think he is!

2012 Obama was just weirdly low-energy in that 1st debate, it seemed like he had been up for 36 hours or something. Was kinda like watching your favorite basketball team come out totally flat and jog up and down the court, like...I still love you but you're better than this

agreed. the more I think about it, the high point of her entire campaign was the convention, which was notable primarily for its optimism and even patriotism. I think she needs to focus on getting people excited or at least motivated to vote for her, because there are a lot of people who've been turned off by Trump who are just going to either vote for Johnson or abstain altogether.

absolutely, trying to scare people into voting for you is not a great strategy. that survey that showed the two candidates incredibly high unfavorable rating among independents is something they should pay attention to, since I'd be willing to bet that most of the people who hate both candidates would still feel a hell of a lot better with Clinton than Trump, you just gotta make SOME overtures to them other than "get a load of the other guy". In fact attacking Trump on policy at all is difficult since he doesn't really have any and his defense will always be some version of "I never said that". The convention had the right message and given that it gave her a huge bounce I'd think they would return to that in the coming weeks.

538 is a mess. their model's volatility suggests more to me that it's a flawed model than that the race has really been so volatile. i'm sure things are moving but that graph is ridiculous looking.

this is probably a good ad? i have a bad sense of these things

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/779288660067823616

interesting piece from mike konczal about trump's policy (no scare quotes)

https://medium.com/@rortybomb/trump-is-actually-full-of-policy-f8bfdb6389e8#.8bj3j5svz

I've been worried about this from the start, that Trump is so beyond the pale nuts that how do you even run against that? It's like having an opponent that insists the sky is green. Do you then have to campaign that, no, the sky is in fact blue, because you can see it, and it is blue? Do you campaign that your opponent is an idiot? What if millions of people agree with him that the sky is green?

As always, brings to mind an apt Mr. Show sketch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP4yX2rkpBc

same guy, in vox, about "new liberal economics"

http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/9/15/12923528/liberal-economics-great-recession-policy-clinton

xp

538 is a mess. their model's volatility suggests more to me that it's a flawed model than that the race has really been so volatile. i'm sure things are moving but that graph is ridiculous looking.

― Mordy, Friday, September 23, 2016 11:44 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the predictwise guy (who to clear strikes me as nuts) suspects that they've built in too much covariance, i.e. they're assuming too strong a correlation between states. that means that states without much polling move a lot in response to other state polls, which makes the overall swings in both directions enormous.

that would explain how they ended up saying things like trump had a 25% chance in NJ at the end of july despite there being literally no polling there in july. if that kind of thing happened in every unpolled state, you would get huge swings in their prediction of the national race, in both directions.

btw, for those expecting a debate beatdown, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but iirc Sarah Palin did not come off as totally inept against Biden, and that may be as close to this year's clash of idiocy and experience as we're going to get.

the danger for trump imo is not that he's made to look stupid, it's that he says something unscripted and appalling in response to a zinger

the atmosphere is gonna be a lot more toxic this time around. kinda getting an unstoppable-object-vs-immovable-wall feeling about this one

Which one is which?

the danger for trump imo is not that he's made to look stupid, it's that he says something unscripted and appalling in response to a zinger

eh I think both are dangerous for him

his "appalling" zingers won't hurt him that much will they? will it have to be worse than "blood coming out of her whatever?"

on the other hand if he comes off as someone who obviously has no clue what he's talking about that'll hurt a lot of his soft support

That's totally down to whether you're watching with red lenses or blue lenses. Everybody who was watching with red lenses thought Palin killed it, totally wiped the floor with the inept Biden. Everybody who was watching with blue lenses thought OMG, that woman is so unprepared and awful, so glad we have folksy Uncle Joe on our side.

Pretty much every debate I've ever seen and then read reactions to, I could find equal numbers of people who thought it went very well for their candidate. Trump will certainly get rave reviews from the people who already think he's awesome, ditto Clinton.

The only exceptions are the rare "oops" moment or "you're no Jack Kennedy," one of which worked and one of which didn't.

Which one is which?

the object is Trump's understanding of the universe. the wall is the actual universe. we are all paying for the wall.

I get that declaring a winner could be a matter of perception, but that's just it. I mean, Palin didn't say anything nearly as word scramble as her usual shit, though, right? And everyone expected a train wreck.