I've had people say it's a hardening, actually ~ US presidential election 2016 part 9/11 never forget

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5233 of them)

I also believe in affordable college, but I don't believe in free college, because every expert that I have talked to says, look, how will you ever control the costs

was this not the argument for universal aka 'free' health care

j., Saturday, 1 October 2016 21:18 (seven years ago) link

You control the costs the way you would with any gov't program, the DOD has whole schools about how to manage this. So frustrating.

los blue jeans, Saturday, 1 October 2016 21:21 (seven years ago) link

isnt the basic idea that if the fed gov has monopsony power, they are price makers bc doctors/universities/whatever wont get paid unless they comply with fed policy?

6 god none the richer (m bison), Saturday, 1 October 2016 21:54 (seven years ago) link

where are the leaks of Sanders speaking with bifurcated tongue at fundraisers

The Hon. J. Piedmont Mumblethunder (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

check youtube

6 god none the richer (m bison), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

yeah, They All Lie, i know

(we can call it LIES, right)

― The Hon. J. Piedmont Mumblethunder (Dr Morbius), Saturday, October 1, 2016 2:54 PM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes, even your beloved Saint Jill Stein does it.

Cumstaun (Phil D.), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

As do you. As does everyone.

Cumstaun (Phil D.), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

not me

6 god none the richer (m bison), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

^ lie

Cumstaun (Phil D.), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

my truth will set u free

6 god none the richer (m bison), Saturday, 1 October 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

i do find hillary's "they don't even know what that means" pretty lol. it means they don't have to pay for college or the doctor. i think they follow that, poor wonkless souls tho they are. a pleasantly nostalgic reminder of occupy days of "we want financial regulation, money out of politics, serious action on climate change, some sort of accountability for the architects of the briefly collapsed kleptocracy and free college" "what do these people WANT? why won't they SAY? why are they so IRRATIONAL?"

florence foster wallace (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 1 October 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link

Question for a n00b: is affordable college something to be gained exclusively via a presidential election and congress? or any pressure on state level politics could work as well?

Van Horn Street, Saturday, 1 October 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link

I believe m bison, buffalo are noble, honest creatures

Pull your head on out your hippy haze (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 1 October 2016 23:46 (seven years ago) link

"“Here comes Big Daddy,” she said, clapping. “The Donald. Big Daddy.”"

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 2 October 2016 00:24 (seven years ago) link

All very John Waters, somehow.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 October 2016 00:27 (seven years ago) link

The most depressing thing I've read this season.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 2 October 2016 00:37 (seven years ago) link

I'm at this little car show outside a BBQ joint, and there's this one old guy walking around carrying a Trump sign in his left hand.

a full playlist of presidential sex jams (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 2 October 2016 00:42 (seven years ago) link

I also believe in affordable college, but I don't believe in free college, because every expert that I have talked to says, look, how will you ever control the costs

was this not the argument for universal aka 'free' health care

I think this is all in reference to bernie's 'free college!' which doesn't nationalize public universities or give the federal govt a real way to put pressure on the costs of college, it just says 'we'll tax wall street and use that money for college'. that isn't far from 'build a wall' in that it's a super easy to understand promise that seems like it solves an issue people care about (college is expensive, there are a lot of immigrants.) it's just also a political non-starter and not a great solution anyway.

iatee, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:08 (seven years ago) link

xxp:

Democracy is the worst form of government...

Institute for Secular Eschatology (Sanpaku), Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:19 (seven years ago) link

Xpost holy shit

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:24 (seven years ago) link

Well well.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:25 (seven years ago) link

I think this is all in reference to bernie's 'free college!' which doesn't nationalize public universities or give the federal govt a real way to put pressure on the costs of college, it just says 'we'll tax wall street and use that money for college'. that isn't far from 'build a wall' in that it's a super easy to understand promise that seems like it solves an issue people care about (college is expensive, there are a lot of immigrants.) it's just also a political non-starter and not a great solution anyway.


She didn't say "I believe in free college but Senator Sanders has no real plan to make this happen". She said

I also believe in affordable college, but I don't believe in free college, because every expert that I have talked to says, look, how will you ever control the costs.

Spiritual Hat Minimalism (Sund4r), Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link

Xpost Wow, and that's just based on three pages from one part of 1995's return!

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

Honestly I'm most impressed by how it happened. Wonder who sent it?

The documents consisted of three pages from what appeared to be Mr. Trump’s 1995 tax returns. The pages were mailed last month to Susanne Craig, a reporter at The Times who has written about Mr. Trump’s finances. The documents were the first page of a New York State resident income tax return, the first page of a New Jersey nonresident tax return and the first page of a Connecticut nonresident tax return. Each page bore the names and Social Security numbers of Mr. Trump and Marla Maples, his wife at the time. Only the New Jersey form had what appeared to be their signatures.

The three documents arrived by mail at The Times with a postmark indicating they had been sent from New York City. The return address claimed the envelope had been sent from Trump Tower.

On Wednesday, The Times presented the tax documents to Jack Mitnick, a lawyer and certified public accountant who handled Mr. Trump’s tax matters for more than 30 years, until 1996. Mr. Mitnick was listed as the preparer on the New Jersey tax form.

Mr. Mitnick, 80, now semiretired and living in Florida, said that while he no longer had access to Mr. Trump’s original returns, the documents appeared to be authentic copies of portions of Mr. Trump’s 1995 tax returns. Mr. Mitnick said the signature on the tax preparer line of the New Jersey tax form was his, and he readily explained an obvious anomaly in the way especially large numbers appeared on the New York tax document.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

that makes him smart

Anacostia Aerodrome (El Tomboto), Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:32 (seven years ago) link

Trump has created many enemies. Oppo research teams know when to release their troves for maximum impact.

Institute for Secular Eschatology (Sanpaku), Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:33 (seven years ago) link

Sadly this may generate some sympathy for him but what a shitty week for that squinty melon-headed shitbeak.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:38 (seven years ago) link

“I spent 50 percent of my thought process working the mike.”

brimstead, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:41 (seven years ago) link

That makes him dumb

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

re: Sanders's college plan, we've been over this before but it might be worth revisiting his own language on it:

Today, total tuition at public colleges and universities amounts to about $70 billion per year. Under the College for All Act, the federal government would cover 67% of this cost, while the states would be responsible for the remaining 33% of the cost. To qualify for federal funding, states must meet a number of requirements designed to protect students, ensure quality, and reduce ballooning costs. States will need to maintain spending on their higher education systems, on academic instruction, and on need-based financial aid. In addition, colleges and universities must reduce their reliance on low-paid adjunct faculty. States would be able to use funding to increase academic opportunities for students, hire new faculty, and provide professional development opportunities for professors. No funding under this program may be used to fund administrator salaries, merit-based financial aid, or the construction of non-academic buildings like stadiums and student centers.

Vague? Sure, but not more than most policy proposals awaiting considerable fleshing-out. So it's not like it just never occurred to him that controlling costs would have to be an essential part of the scheme. The "meet a number of requirements" language there stands in for, one imagines, dozens or hundreds of pages of legislation hashing out the hoops the schools have to jump through. Comparing it to "build a wall" seems unfair to me.

DOCTOR CAISNO, BYCREATIVELABBUS (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 2 October 2016 01:57 (seven years ago) link

Those darn Russian hackers

xp

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 2 October 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

and man, of all the things in that NYT tax scoop, this might be the best:

Because the documents sent to The Times did not include any pages from Mr. Trump’s 1995 federal tax return, it is impossible to determine how much he may have donated to charity that year. The state documents do show, though, that Mr. Trump declined the opportunity to contribute to the New Jersey Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial Fund, the New Jersey Wildlife Conservation Fund or the Children’s Trust Fund. He also declined to contribute $1 toward public financing of New Jersey’s elections for governor.

like seriously how cheap do you have to be, when you are writing off nine hundred million dollars, to skip on this stuff? like for real any normal person would just be like, "fuck it, check all of those boxes, i just won big and i'm buyin', folks!"

DOCTOR CAISNO, BYCREATIVELABBUS (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 2 October 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link

All this, and it's only October 1st.

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 2 October 2016 02:14 (seven years ago) link

The statement continued, “Mr. Trump knows the tax code far better than anyone who has ever run for President and he is the only one that knows how to fix it.”

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 2 October 2016 02:21 (seven years ago) link

Lololol "@BarackObama who wants to raise all our taxes, only pays 20.5% on $790k salary. http://1.usa.gov/HFZJKH Do as I say not as I do."

Tweeted by...Donald Trump on 4/13/2012

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 03:34 (seven years ago) link

Vague? Sure, but not more than most policy proposals awaiting considerable fleshing-out. So it's not like it just never occurred to him that controlling costs would have to be an essential part of the scheme. The "meet a number of requirements" language there stands in for, one imagines, dozens or hundreds of pages of legislation hashing out the hoops the schools have to jump through. Comparing it to "build a wall" seems unfair to me.

you can also imagine dozens or hundreds of pages of legislation hashing out 'the wall'. some cheap token 'wall' getting built under president trump seems closer to being within the realm of possibility than sanders' college plan ever was going to be under president sanders.

iatee, Sunday, 2 October 2016 04:21 (seven years ago) link

well for one thing 'the wall' is a fake nonsense solution to nothing, so further elaboration of its details makes it worse. free college is a good idea to solve an actual problem and has been implemented in one way or another before, successfully, so further elaboration of its details is a sensible thing to work on. it's a big bold plan, sure, but sanders flogged it to build a coalition for it, and a universe that actually produced a president sanders would be different from ours in enough ways that implementing some version of the free college scheme is, if not likely, not some utterly absurd non-possibility. trump is flogging the wall to trick and manipulate people, and a universe where he became president, from what we've seen so far, might well be one where nobody gives him a damn thing legislatively, least of all 'the wall.'

i don't get the comparison, and it's not just that i like the one idea and dislike the other.

DOCTOR CAISNO, BYCREATIVELABBUS (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 2 October 2016 05:36 (seven years ago) link

tuition-free college exists in countries with higher education systems that are structured and funded in vastly different ways than they are here. and it existed in the past for some american schools when our higher education institutions looked almost nothing like what they do today. it wasn't 'implemented' as some top down policy solution for a problem, they just didn't have the problem.

I don't think sanders was constructing his platform to trick and manipulate people the same way that trump is. but anyone who did believe these things were remotely possible was being tricked and manipulated nonetheless. and he doesn't have the excuse of being naive here - dude's been in congress for decades and he knows how things work, especially today. obama also started out with the 'well in the theoretical universe where someone like me can get elected, our political institutions could work differently' plan.

iatee, Sunday, 2 October 2016 06:44 (seven years ago) link

btw Phil D, i have no saints, including youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

(say it like Pacino as Roy Cohn)

The Hon. J. Piedmont Mumblethunder (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 2 October 2016 07:17 (seven years ago) link

“You’re unsuspecting,” Trump said. “Right now, you say to your wife: ‘Let’s go to a movie after Trump.’ But you won’t do that because you’ll be so high and so excited that no movie is going to satisfy you. Okay? No movie. You know why? Honestly? Because they don’t make movies like they used to — is that right?”

jason waterfalls (gbx), Sunday, 2 October 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

Meanwhile, this reads like an incredible, and incredibly sad, short story:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/finally-someone-who-thinks-like-me/2016/10/01/c9b6f334-7f68-11e6-9070-5c4905bf40dc_story.html

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 2 October 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

And that's ok. Posted upthread btw

imago, Sunday, 2 October 2016 13:43 (seven years ago) link

Painful: Glenn Beck wildly caricaturing Malcolm X (or Glenn Beck even uttering the name Malcolm X).

clemenza, Sunday, 2 October 2016 13:44 (seven years ago) link

the spin this morning from the Trump camp is to amplify the "that makes me smart" answer he gave a while back - Giuliani calling him a "genius," Gingrich on the same lines, etc

though she denies it to the press, (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Sunday, 2 October 2016 13:50 (seven years ago) link

And his 40% will buy that but I have to imagine the low info voters are going to be turned off on a guy that capitalized on the employees he failed

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 14:05 (seven years ago) link

trump-s-long-list-tweet-shaming-taxes-n658061

Neanderthal, Sunday, 2 October 2016 14:07 (seven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.