Social Activism in the Age of Trump: What To Do and What We Are Doing

5 Practical Principles to Guide Our Work Under Trump

There is no overstating the fear and danger currently felt by activists. It is not melodramatic for people active in today’s social movements to prepare for massive government surveillance, along with court injunctions and fines aimed at bankrupting people and organizations. Protesters fear jail and repression for using their First Amendment rights. But what organizers and activists face as political actors will pale in comparison to the danger confronted by millions of people facing mass deportation, racist and religious attacks—with activists in these targeted groups facing the greatest risk.

As Trump and his billionaire allies jostle one another in their bids to extract riches from our failed economic system, they will succeed only in making the system more unsustainable. While this situation has sent a shock of anxiety through the body politic, growing instability will allow us to take aim not just at unjust social policies but at faltering economic ones as well.

We need to act morally, courageously, and strategically in pursuit of a clear progressive vision. It is not enough to define ourselves as the resistance. We have an opportunity, under incredibly difficult circumstances, to build a movement led by people of color, immigrants, and others targeted by the radical right, while at the same time organizing people of all races, to challenge the billionaires who increasingly control the economy and politics of this country and the world. Below, we lay out five principles in which to ground that crucial organizing:

1) The rise of a racist nationalist right wing is a global phenomenon.

Across the globe, the far right is growing. Viewing the rise of Trump as a distinctly American phenomenon leads to narrow analyses and technocratic solutions, i.e., “if just more people had voted.” Viewing the situation globally requires us to develop a deeper analysis of why the current economic/political system is failing around the globe and why the right has been more successful than the left at seizing on the growing discontent as evidenced by Brexit, the rise of the Marine Le Pen in France and the radical right throughout Europe. In Brazil, the right wing and their billionaire allies have used a “soft coup” to seize political and economic power. In Puerto Rico and in US cities like Detroit and Flint, “fiscal control boards” and emergency managers are being used to disenfranchise communities of color and put the very banks and financiers who bankrupted these communities in charge. Neoliberalism is failing for increasing numbers of people around the world, and its failure has created the conditions that has allowed the right wing to increase its power by targeting immigrants and people of color. Two seemingly contradictory things are happening at once: The right wing has captured the anger over its failures and the corporations, and the super-rich who benefited from neoliberalism are now offering themselves as the solution to the crisis they created.

2) Trumpism is a symptom, not the disease.

We shouldn’t exclusively focus on Trump, as if all would be well if he disappeared and returned full-time to Trump Tower. His appointments, a mix of Wall Street hedge-fund and private-equity types like Wilbur Ross and Steven Mnuchin and billionaire hard-right privatizers Betsy DeVos, along with traditional Republicans like Elaine Chao, who serves on the Wells Fargo board, are all part of the complete corporate capture of government. The people and corporations that pulled the strings from behind the scenes are now officially in charge. Even more dangerous than his appointments are the “respectable” people and corporations, many of whom initially opposed Trump’s policies but are now lining up to feed at the trough of tax subsidies and profit from the unrestrained destruction of the environment, while eliminating the few remaining legal and civil rights and protections people have.

3) Whom are we really fighting? Unaccountable financial and corporate elites are driving inequality and undermining democracy.

Call it what you want—financialization, neoliberalism, financialized capitalism, and regular old capitalism (and yes, we need better names) are all part of the word soup we use to try to explain the failure of the current economic order and the explosion in inequality that has led to fewer people controlling more of the globe’s wealth and political power. Understanding how billionaires and the financial elites are driving inequality and how they use race and structural racism to drive a wedge among the working class needs to be baked into the DNA of our analysis and actions. For example, billionaires peddle narratives about lazy black people mooching off the government in order to convince working-class white people to lower taxes and slash the public safety net, even though working-class white people are the primary beneficiaries of many social-welfare programs such as food stamps. As part of this, we need to demystify what is going on in the economy and develop tools that make the economy and how it works understandable.

4) Organizing against racism and immigrant bashing

The right wing scapegoats people of color and immigrants in order to divide and weaken the working class. This is central to how it justifies slashing public spending, giving greater power to corporations, and getting working-class whites to support policies that harm them economically. For example, because banks successfully painted the foreclosure crisis as a predominantly racialized crisis caused by federal laws that made it easier for poor black and brown folks to get mortgages, it made it significantly harder to build public support for effective large-scale foreclosure-prevention programs, even though the majority of homeowners facing foreclosure were actually white. We need to incorporate anti-racism into our core analysis, and we must center it in our strategies, tactics, and messaging in our work with communities of color and working-class white communities. Organizing white workers into a multiracial anti-racist movement is both a challenge and a necessity.

5) Unrelenting offense—no collaboration with Trump and his allies

The stakes are higher now than ever. Get The Nation in your inbox.

a strategy of caution and defense, focusing on limiting the damage that the Trump Administration can do, is destined to fail, as is any strategy operating under the illusion that we can work with Trump and his allies on issues like infrastructure. All defense needs to be married to offense. If we are defending immigrants from ICE and deportation, we must also target the private-prison investors who profit off immigrant-detention centers. When standing up to racist attacks on people of color, immigrants. and Muslims we must make Trump’s allies, who encourage and profit from these attacks, pay a personal and financial cost. We have the potential to drive fissures and division within the corporate world by holding them responsible for the most extreme views and actions of Trump.

Let’s get started by mapping and exposing the billionaires and corporations who support and will profit off of the Trump regime

We should identify the specific billionaires, corporations, hedge funds, and other firms that have aligned themselves with Trump, and expose how they plan to profit from his policies and actions. By exposing who they are, broadcasting their vulnerabilities and the details of their business holdings and operations, we can develop a road map of where we need to organize and focus action.

Organize the workers whose jobs they control: The hedge funds, private equity firms, and other corporate titans supporting Trump directly and indirectly employ millions of workers in factories, hotels, construction, retail, and other key sectors of the economy. Nothing will better expose the faux populism of these Trumpian billionaires than organizing the workers off whom they profit. Like Trump, they will viciously fight unionization and collective action. Nothing unites workers better than focusing on the people and entities that are responsible for declining standards of living. Organizing the workers whose jobs are controlled by the billionaire elites could take many forms, from traditional union organizing campaigns to militant minorities of workers taking action, to worker center–style campaigns.
Organize and move our money: Thirty trillion dollars in worker’s capital—the deferred wages and taxes with which union-negotiated public and private pension plans are financed—are invested in hedge funds and private-equity firms. These entities charge outrageous fees, produce mediocre returns, shut down factories, outsource work, and use their profits to fund right-wing anti-worker politicians who want to eliminate pension plans. It is the right time to put pressure on pension funds—in states where unions remain strong—to divest from the radical right and invest in creating good jobs. The first step in a new trade policy that benefits workers would be to stop pension funds from investing in firms that move work abroad, devastating both urban and rural communities.
Make them and their businesses toxic: When people rally and march to oppose right-wing racist attacks, support women’s right to choose, and defend the LGBTQ community, the businesses of Trump’s allies should be targets. Make them pay a political, personal, and economic price for their actions. We should be marching on, picketing, and sitting in at the offices and retail outlets of Trump’s allies. As increasing numbers of the “respectable” business community line up to support Trump, we need to make them pay a price by making their brands toxic. The work of OUR Walmart, the Immokalee Workers, and, most recently, the successful campaign to get Target to ban the box in Minnesota are all examples of public campaigns that won victories by making a brand or product toxic.
Funding organizing and resistance while under legal assault:The corporate right wing will try in every possible way to eliminate the financial assets of the labor and progressive movement. In addition to “right to work” legislation, court injunctions limiting First Amendment activity and picketing, will be used to try to limit protest activity and use fines and litigation costs to attempt to bankrupt organizations. We can learn a lesson from Trump, who set up multiple business entities that eventually went into bankruptcy while shielding his actual assets. Labor and those that finance progressive activity need to provide unrestricted funding to nimble independent groups that can lead to large-scale disruption, civil disobedience, and engage in other activities too risky for groups with significant assets. By doing this we can insulate assets of the broader labor and progressive movement, while supporting the activity necessary to defend immigrants and others from attack. If an organization is truly independent, and the groups that prefund it exercise no control over its activities, then they are not liable for its actions. Corporate America has specialized in creating multiple entities to limit liability—we must do the same.
When faced with crushing defeat, the progressive movement is incredibly adept at drawing the wrong lessons. We need to be clear about how we got here and about the role that structural racism and the neoliberal agenda championed by both parties played in contributing to the rise of Trumpism. Furthermore, our strategies and tactics must flow from that analysis. That means that, instead of seeking partnerships with major corporations or currying favor with billionaires (including the president-elect), we must directly and aggressively confront them and bring the crisis in our communities to their doorsteps. Donald Trump’s candidacy and election have unleashed a particular strain of white nationalism that seeks to make life in America unbearable for communities of color and immigrants. The challenge before us is to make life in Trump’s America unbearable for the newly enshrined and empowered billionaire class and their allies while offering a plan of action to win the country and world we want to create.

thank you

welcome! sorry about the formatting.

There is no overstating the fear and danger currently felt by activists. It is not melodramatic for people active in today’s social movements to prepare for massive government surveillance, along with court injunctions and fines aimed at bankrupting people and organizations. Protesters fear jail and repression for using their First Amendment rights. But what organizers and activists face as political actors will pale in comparison to the danger confronted by millions of people facing mass deportation, racist and religious attacks—with activists in these targeted groups facing the greatest risk.

damn it would suck if any of those things were to happen

I think the best way to promote social activism to Americans is that it'll enhance their social status/power/personal comfort somehow. In my experience Americans don't respond to arguments for empathy, understanding, care whatsoever. We're a heartless, cold-blooded, extremely selfish people with a taste for violence and sadism. So the way to handle this is to understand that American nature and work with it, as opposed to making arguments that make no sense in American culture.

Love, care, community, understanding, solidarity, those things mean nothing to Americans, really. Social status, power, material comfort, and extreme selfish gain are the primary motivators for most Americans; of course you can't say this on its face because nobody wants to admit it, but it's the truth in my travels through life.

larry can I ask what type of neighborhood you live in

Middle class suburban NYC metro

I'm just taking it from the marketing angle. Expecting the average American to make a significant personal sacrifice for the sole well-being of another person is totally insane. A lot of people in this country would rather lure in and torture the vulnerable for laughs than help other people for no gain of their own. There's a reason Trump is president, and our other option for president was a half-step away from Trump.

Until people face this shit, it's just gonna ... keep ... getting ... worse. That's how it is. Don't like to hear it, don't want to face it, then shit ain't gonna get better. The end.

our other option for president was a half-step away from Trump

okey dokey

Expecting the average American to make a significant personal sacrifice for the sole well-being of another person

This is not what activism is

xxp I think I'll just flag that post to make myself feel a bit less covered in marketing filth after reading it

It's just a current framework we're all stuck in right now. Look at the recent social justice movement we've had. It wasn't about "all men are created equal" or "content of a person's character", it was about gaining ethical and moral superiority and using it as a cudgel to beat up the deemed ethically and morally inferior. "Male tears", "white tears", etc. Trump and his crew are the lash back from that dynamic, and why that movement made no social gains whatsoever, and are now under the thumb of literal neo Nazis.

We've got this weird dominance/submission, superior/inferior, us/them dynamic going on and everyone's at each others' throats, or they're holed up in their compounds waiting things out. That's how things are, it's just the way our culture has gone.

Hillary Clinton's campaign was condescending as hell, and used people like Lena Dunham as their banner spokespeople, a woman who's an unashamed vocal racist and incestuous child predator from the cloistered upper classes. How is that any different than Trump? People saw no difference between Clinton and Trump, sat out the election, and it's easy to see why.

Whatever's going here, it runs deep, so these fires aren't going to be put out without an equal amount of deep reflection. Inside of this framework nothing's really going to get better.

OK, I thought I was as down on Dunham as anyone, but apparently not.

i don't particularly Dunham either but uhhh what?

Oh cool this argument again

it's coming back in clearance rack form

"uhhh what?" That's exactly what I'm talking about. Until "uhhh what?" turns to understanding, then we're stuck in Trump world, which has spanned much longer and and in many more dimensions than just Trump himself. This guy didn't appear out of nowhere, and what's happening now wouldn't be possible if things weren't already suited and primed for him, otherwise what he's doing wouldn't be possible without extreme conflict, like trying to bring two incompatible systems together. Beyond people grousing, that conflict, that inertia, isn't happening, it's all running smoothly as if everything works and fits together into a well-designed machine.

And we're all products of that system, each and every one of us, and it's not possible to step outside of it and change things until we make that deep self-examination. Apparently it's a joke to you all, so I don't have high hopes for things.

larry appleton's obsession with the lena dunham thing is well established on ILX iirc

Does that make what I said not exist? It's all public record right out there for anyone to read for themselves.

It's worth noting how you and others here are trying to will what I've said here into non-existence despite what it being easily confirmed as existing. If you can't face easily confirmed facts and their obvious relations to the problems you intend to fix, why even waste time or money trying to "help", it's not going to accomplish anything, and will probably do more harm than good. So you might as well just save yourselves the time and effort.

I've FP'd you already, phasers set to hard ignore

More pertinent is Erik Loomis' challenge to readers on LGM: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/12/do-something

This "Resist Hate RI" thing he went to sounds like a great idea. I wonder if there is value in creating a sort of support network for feds and affiliated scum in the DMV, people at different agencies who can let each other know what's being done and how to stand against unlawful expectations, collectively blow the whistle, etc. I will definitely feel better knowing others like me are in a network, meeting regularly and staying abreast of developments than just hoping I personally see stuff coming and have all my shit 100% together in the right place and time.

larry, either use this thread for what it's meant to be used for or take it elsewhere. There's plenty of space for cynical dread in other threads.

Seriously.

ban larry appleton

lol jk

or change dn to SINNICAL DRED (n otha thredz)

My invective was a little beer fueled before. http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/12/do-something The comments here are pretty promising. This is fertile ground to make some bigger changes to hopefully stem this virus from replicating.

That bullshit about Lena Dunham is the virus though - both in terms of its reprehensibility and its eternal nature - as long as there's someone who'd rather believe it than look it up, it'll endure.

Drink better beer!

Why do people keep making this thread unreadable?

look i know the formatting was wack

LOL @ Until "uhhh what?" turns to understanding

there's plenty of stuff you can do. there are plenty of options available. performative theorizing may be helpful for you but doesn't add much constructive to the conversation.

uhhh whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuuuuuuueeeeeeeureka!

This seems useful as a basic step-by-step guide to digital security. Better to shore up everything and lock it down now.

http://marchhare.io/March-hare-communication-security-guide.pdf

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DzOz3Y6D8g_MNXHNMJYAz1b41_cn535aU5UsN7Lj8X8/preview#heading=h.fwfuc1708kuz

http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2016/12/15/trumpism-and-expertise/

thank you

ditto!

Now a site/PDF:

https://www.indivisibleguide.com

I don't know if I'm being overly prissy about this, but I'm getting a little annoyed with the concept of phone calls to non-representative govt individuals as activism, i.e. either calling the congressperson or senator from a district/state you don't actually live in (and hence the person doesn't represent you), or calling, like, the DOJ or something, as though they have a request line on what to investigate or prosecute.

yea im not sure how effective it is, i don't really know. calling your own reps makes sense obv

some reps apparently have systems for tracking where calls/emails come from and ignore the ones from out of district. FWIW I also really hate the idea of calling some mortal enemy like Paul Ryan (unless he is in fact my own representative) to ask him to do anything. Feels like seeking the merciful protection of the czar or some shit.

Also, a thing I was thinking since I've been posting a lot about electoral politics in this thread: while I totally think everyone should vote and should at least minimally follow and participate in electoral politics, I certainly don't think they're the be all end all, and I think people who feel repulsed or not particularly drawn to it but are interested in other kinds of activism should do other kinds of activism, because that's all necessary too.

Went to 4 organizing meetings/social events/reading group things last week. Reminded me of the importance of doing so, b/c I hate the utterly defeated, demoralized, and most of all helpless tone I read either on other threads or on FB. Going outside and to a place where others are gathering who want to do something has an invigorating, therapeutic value that isn't really communicated online.

What makes it worse is the shrieky despair of very pampered Acela-corridor media/pundity-types who now feel completely at a loss and the need to spread their hyperbolic panic around thru their regular columns.

It's like there's no acknowledgement or realization that yeah, shit is pretty fucked up and horrific, but that it's been that way for others already for a long time and they still worked to get something done. Panic and helplessness are communicable, sociogenic things, and these fucks ain't helping at anything except validate everything Gore Vidal said about them being like courtiers at Versailles.

Oh man, that's such a perfect description.

Similarly their own political ineffectuality in this moment is just a continuation of their prior ineffectuality, except that before everything was fine for them so it didn't matter.

On the plus side, one of the working groups I was in focused on defense, both personal/physical/bodily defense and InfoSec. You had multiple people there who were MMA trainers who held thrice weekly self-defense classes trying to focus on at-risk populations, and a vet who wanted to teach basic street-level first aid to everyone she could. She had been an active-duty combat medic in Afghanistan.

Made me wonder about setting up a group and/or training module for the role of "street medic." Build a skill manual integrating what works that was learned from Greece, Egypt, Standing Rock, Oaxaca, Ferguson, etc along with transferable skills instilled from armed forces medical training. Localize into it every language possible.

Going outside and to a place where others are gathering who want to do something has an invigorating, therapeutic value that isn't really communicated online.

this is so true

Suffice it to say, I have very, very strong feelings about (learned) helplessness.

And it's always learned, isn't it

an invigorating, therapeutic value

You make it sound like this is a $5 massage you got in the basement of a Chinese restaurant.