Rolling Brexit Links/UK politics in the neo-Weimar era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7365 of them)

You could already get a game for Scotland with that background... no, seriously, you could get a game for Scotland, you'll have seen Grant Hanley play?

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:24 (seven years ago) link

Jordan Rhodes as well

calzino, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:26 (seven years ago) link

He got a Scotland cap because he spent 18 months in the school system.

calzino, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:27 (seven years ago) link

Grant Hanley is Scottish through and through though. More's the pity.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:29 (seven years ago) link

2017!

mark s, Thursday, 16 February 2017 23:31 (seven years ago) link

Lex I think that view is reasonably widespread among Scottish people living in England (I mean certainly in my experience) but a lot depends on whether Scotland would be able to retain EU membership or rejoin easily and that's a minefield. Before a Yes vote was a leap of faith and now if becomes a vote for a status quo of sorts. But if the most likely outcome is an independent Scotland outside the EU then No would surely win again?

Blair, a politician with nothing to lose now appears to be launching his own anti-Brexit campaign. And the text of his speech wasn't terrible until this:

“There is, in some parts of the country, a genuine concern about numbers from Europe – real pressures on services and wages. But for many people, the core of the immigration question – and one which I fully accept is a substantial issue – is immigration from non-European countries especially when from different cultures in which assimilation and potential security threats can be an issue.

Wait I thought it was supposed to be about pressure on jobs and wages and services and now it turns out it was about Muslims all along?

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 07:51 (seven years ago) link

I doubt Sturgeon would push for a referendum if retaining EU membership wasn't in the cards.

the last few times Blair returned from the dead with a grand plan to save politics it blew over in a day so hopefully that'll happen again. God he really has no idea how loathed he is, does he.

lex pretend, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:48 (seven years ago) link

It's more than that, it's an attempt to reframe the debate into something that's actually worse. It's stupid, hypocritical, mendacious, dangerous, fascist-enabling bullshit from a guy who hung out with Gaddafi, tried to knight Assad and has done more to destabilise the Middle East than anyone who wasn't an actual dictator or terrorist.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:56 (seven years ago) link

on Scotland and EU membership in the event of secession: there are significant obstacles to this because of the precedent it would set for other EU countries, in particular Spain and its relationship with Catalonia, and to a lesser extent France and Italy. Sturgeon is likely to campaign for independence with a vision of Brexit > Scottish independence > smooth Scottish re-accession to the EU- but just because she is promoting that line doesn't mean it would play out that way. The uncertainty might therefore be an obstacle to an independence vote, much as the hand-waving about various aspects of independent Scotland did for it last time round.

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't think Sturgeon had any choice once Leave won, to hold back further would have put her under a lot of pressure from her own party.

Matt DC, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:32 (seven years ago) link

that's the problem for the SNP: they had to make a commitment to campaign for another referendum after the Brexit vote, but there's no certainty there would be a yes vote if one were held, and in the event of a "no" it's unlikely there could be another one for at least a generation.

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:39 (seven years ago) link

at least now uk voted to leave the eu spain could pretend that scotland separating from the uk partly in order to stay in the eu is different to the idea of catalonia leaving spain just in order to be separate

conrad, Friday, 17 February 2017 09:56 (seven years ago) link

Go back a bit (just catching up), I suspect that Corbyn's views on Scotland are a) The SNP look like a decent candidate for coalition, no need to piss them off and b) If they break away, then it'd be nice to have a left-leaning country next door to retire to.

in the event of a "no" it's unlikely there could be another one for at least a generation.

This is, in fairness, not the first time I've heard this.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

*Going

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 10:40 (seven years ago) link

the last few times Blair returned from the dead with a grand plan to save politics it blew over in a day so hopefully that'll happen again. God he really has no idea how loathed he is, does he.

― lex pretend, Friday, 17 February 2017 08:48 (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Geldof in a boat swearing at some fishermen pales beside this. These people are just blissfully unaware of what anyone else thinks of them and why anyone could possibly object to them. It reminds me of those people in the Guardian who, in a feature about the housing crisis, were going on about selling their 4 bedroom house in London, at a 60% profit, in order to move to an eight bedroom listed building in the Cotswolds, with live-in au pair, that's near a good state school.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Friday, 17 February 2017 11:52 (seven years ago) link

when Blair mounts his pulpit I don't think he's speaking to the rabble who hate him

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Friday, 17 February 2017 12:15 (seven years ago) link

needs to drop some major zingers on UKIP to make this remotely worthwhile

nashwan, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:19 (seven years ago) link

And the text of his speech wasn't terrible until this:

the Spectator has published a transcript of what I think is the speech as delivered, and it looks like this part has been rewritten a bit, but it looks like the same basic argument - he's seems to be saying that the "EU migrants put pressure on jobs and services" position is inaccurate, but implicitly endorsing Fararge and Trump's scaremongering about muslim immigrants, while arguing that leaving the EU will not actually affect the latter?

Immigration is the issue. Net immigration into the UK was roughly 335,000 in the year to June 2016. But just over half was from outside the EU. I know, in some parts of the country, there is a real concern about numbers from Europe and the pressures placed on services and wages.

However of the EU immigrants, the PM has recently admitted we would want to keep the majority, including those with a confirmed job offer and students. This leaves around 80,000 who come looking for work without a job. Of these 80,000, a third comes to London, mostly ending up working in the food processing and hospitality sectors. It is highly unlikely that they’re ‘taking’ the jobs of British born people in other parts of the country. The practical impact of Brexit on immigration is on analysis less than 12 per cent of the immigration total. And for many people, the core immigration question – and one which I fully accept is a substantial issue -is immigration from non-European countries, especially when from different cultures in which assimilation and potential security threats can be an issue.

Yet this impacted the Brexit decision. It was Donald Trump who said without the refugees from Syria, ‘you probably wouldn’t have a Brexit.’ It is no coincidence that the infamous immigration poster of Leave was a picture of Mr Farage in front of a line of Syrian people. Thus, we have moved, in few months, from a debate about what sort of Brexit, involving a balanced consideration of all the different possibilities; to the primacy of one consideration – namely controlling immigration – without any real discussion as to why and when Brexit doesn’t affect the immigration people most care about.

soref, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

it's a pity because the first bit is a more elegant, lucid refutation of the "jobs and services" argument than pretty much any made by a prominent contemporary UK politician over the last few years (honorable exceptions such as Diane Abbott aside)

soref, Friday, 17 February 2017 12:28 (seven years ago) link

Blair's conviction Islamophobia sits weirdly with his decision to destabilize Iraq tbh

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Friday, 17 February 2017 12:52 (seven years ago) link

Stephen Moss ‏@StephenMossGdn 3h3 hours ago

Blair should come out and start that new pro-EU Macron-style party now. Would decimate the Tories in the south

YouGov ‏@YouGov 2h2 hours ago

Tony Blair had a net favourability rating of -60 (14% favourable, 74% unfavourable) on our most recent survey (Nov) https://yougov.co.uk/news/2016/12/05/despite-article-50-controversy-senior-judges-viewe/

Never change, Guardian writers.

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Friday, 17 February 2017 13:29 (seven years ago) link

I wish he would fuck off back to doing PR for genocidal dictators because I've seen enough of his concerned face posturing, it doesn't help when media outlets like the beeb and the NS keep giving him the front page.

calzino, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:34 (seven years ago) link

His concerned, happy and angry faces are all the same, thanking you Botox.

jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 17 February 2017 13:36 (seven years ago) link

This is distracting from Nuttall's lies and incompetence so conveniently.

nashwan, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:56 (seven years ago) link

Nuttall reappeared didn't he? I was getting very worried

Neil S, Friday, 17 February 2017 13:57 (seven years ago) link

Walked past a news screen where the banner had, below "Blair's Speech", "Nick Clegg: I agree with every word"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 17 February 2017 14:20 (seven years ago) link

http://www.politico.eu/article/david-cameron-courted-for-top-nato-post/

Oh Christ. I mean, sweet Jesus...

I mean, could you even imagine?

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:34 (seven years ago) link

not with a bang but with a simper

Treesh-Hurt (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:35 (seven years ago) link

Flipping a coin to decide whether Putin should invade Estonia.

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:41 (seven years ago) link

Who better than a man keen on sticking to the outcomes of highly questionable referendums to sort out Crimea, though?

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Saturday, 18 February 2017 09:48 (seven years ago) link

Lol, Cameron is not going to get that NATO job, Jeremy Corbyn has more chance of being offered it. And if I'may reading between the lines of that downing st 'no comment', not even May will back him.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 18 February 2017 10:16 (seven years ago) link

I don't know. If Anders Fogh Rasmussen could do it, any idiot can.

Frederik B, Saturday, 18 February 2017 10:26 (seven years ago) link

Any idiot but maybe not a lazy slapdash superficial idiot like Cameron.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Saturday, 18 February 2017 12:40 (seven years ago) link

I'm pretty sure they're not going to give the job to a guy who already destroyed one country through sheer carelessness, no. Fun to imagine though.

Matt DC, Saturday, 18 February 2017 13:23 (seven years ago) link

U.K. cabinet ministers and a foreign statesman are “courting” David Cameron to raise his hand to be the next secretary general of NATO, according to people familiar with the situation.

The story is 'friends of man think he be good at job'.

nashwan, Saturday, 18 February 2017 14:46 (seven years ago) link

If anyone was still wondering why the Tories are such a long shot in Stoke it's because their candidate looks like a GCSE student being helped with his homework and he can't spell Brexit.

https://mobile.twitter.com/byelection/status/833737178664562688

Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 20 February 2017 21:59 (seven years ago) link

is this new? (the union flag aspect)

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/662257548515504129/rp23Mx-x_200x200.jpg

koogs, Monday, 20 February 2017 22:56 (seven years ago) link

I think they've been using that for a few years now?

soref, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:15 (seven years ago) link

it is in the shape of a one-legged hedgehog, to project dynamism

calzino, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:19 (seven years ago) link

it has. it was green in 2006, back when they wanted to take votes from the greens. has been union flag coloured since at least 2010 when ukip have been more of a threat. (according to daily mirror, i won't link to it)

koogs, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:25 (seven years ago) link

It was green because it a tree, now I don't know what it looks like, a vomiting union jack brain.

Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 20 February 2017 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, union jack tree makes no sense. Also can't see a flag used like that without thinking of the nasty kind of nationalism. Do other countries have this problem?

koogs, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 02:23 (seven years ago) link

South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, Tristan da Cunha, Pitcairn Islands, Montserrat, British Indian Ocean Territory, Anguilla, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Niue, Turks and Caicos, Bermuda, Fiji, Tuvalu, Ascension Island, St Helena, Cook Islands, Falkland Islands, British Antarctic Territory, Hawaii(!), Australia, and after some discussion New Zealand.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 07:28 (seven years ago) link

Also can't see a flag used like that without thinking of the nasty kind of nationalism.

you should probably start asking yourself a few questions when your logo can be ripped off by the BNP this easily

https://cdn8.qutee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1154132638cp1_1-300x180.png https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2011/5/12/1305223563976/The-new-British-National--007.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=b77e3dfb4d10201d6b50274b695b9fcb

Any stylistic similarity with the rough shading displayed in the Conservatives' green and blue tree symbol is entirely "unintentional", a BNP spokesman insisted.

soref, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:25 (seven years ago) link

Note that that quote's from 2011, when the Tory tree was still green, and BNP was just nicking the scratchcard aesthetic - clearly someone in Tory office thought "Hey that looks pretty good..."

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:46 (seven years ago) link

Definite Norwegian flag vibe to the Tory one.

Tim, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 09:57 (seven years ago) link

Icelandic more than Norgie, but yeah.

Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 21 February 2017 10:00 (seven years ago) link

Haha you're right, minus points for me on Nordic flag knowledge.

Tim, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 10:14 (seven years ago) link

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/hillsborough-investigators-say-paul-nuttall-12635738

Nuttall apparently gave a witness statement to police investigating the Hillsborough disaster yesterday. Hypothetically, if it did come out that he wasn't present at the stadium on the day, and he'd lied to the police about it, he'd have committed a criminal offence, yes?

soref, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 14:56 (seven years ago) link

For the first time the UKIP leader publically criticised UKIP donor Mr Banks for tweets he wrote last week in which he said he was “sick to death” of hearing about the tragedy and accused campaigners of “milking it.”

Although the flustered Bootle native appeared to initially back the comments, before he was corrected by the radio host.

Mr Nuttall said: “I condone what he said,” before asked by Mr Campbell if he meant “condemn?”

Mr Nuttall added: “Yes, sorry, I condemn what he said.”

conrad, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 15:02 (seven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.