Trump, June 2017: From [Covfefe] with Love

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4708 of them)

this speech is actually shaping up to be one of his most explicit and prominent expressions of xenophobism, "anti-globalism", bannonism

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:57 (seven years ago) link

I'm hoping for more than that. (xp)

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

He's basically declared trade war on Europe and China.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link

And the USA will lose that.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Watergate took a year and a half to get going

Hmmm, more like 10 months really. And the mean attention span is about a tenth of what it was then.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Paul Ryans statement is basically 'fuck obama lol'

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:01 (seven years ago) link

Pruitt's talking now.

what a fucking prick

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:01 (seven years ago) link

his nose so deep up trump's asshole, the buttcheeks making little hollow cupping noises as they clap over pruitt's ears

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:02 (seven years ago) link

He's basically declared trade war on Europe and China.

The US will get coal mines, we'll get renewables. The guy is a deal-making genius

stet, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:03 (seven years ago) link

thank you for a note of black humor, appreciated

sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:03 (seven years ago) link

does everyone else think I should stop posting too?

― Violet Jax (Violet Jynx), Thursday, June 1, 2017 2:50 PM (eleven minutes ago)

wholeheartedly

a warm bowl of soap (WilliamC), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

he took no questions

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

yea i'm not going to watch this

marcos, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

Looks like the UK picked the wrong time to hitch its wagon to the Poor Old USA.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

the mean attention span is about a tenth of what it was then

it is probably easy to believe that one can accurately estimate an entire population's average attention span when one only pays attention to three things

El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (seven years ago) link

bold prediction
scott pruitt will become a U.S. senator and he will be even more hatable than ted cruz

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:06 (seven years ago) link

savin' that for ilx first mentions but it seems so likely

Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:06 (seven years ago) link

guys the FP button under Violet Jynx's posts is in the same place as everybody else's posts

please stop confusing being mildly annoying with being hateful, etc.

I can't believe I'm posting this

El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:06 (seven years ago) link

lol @ Musk throwing a temper tantrum and leaving his "economic councils" as if that counts for shit

I'm glad he's bankrolling Solarcity and Tesla and battery storage projects and space exploration but god he is such a tool

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:09 (seven years ago) link

xp I tried that already, it didn't work

sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:10 (seven years ago) link

one can accurately estimate an entire population's average attention span when one only pays attention to mobile-electronics-obsessed zombies

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

Don't misrepresent me — I've never said or thought VJ was hateful. I just wish he'd vanish.

a warm bowl of soap (WilliamC), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:12 (seven years ago) link

^^^

sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Josh, your basis for argument seems to be that if it's not good enough to get this administration thrown out now, it's not worth bothering with.

I don't know, the GOP congress under Obama was capable enough to hold/fuck things up just for the hell of it, and Trump can with a single fart undo or at least fuck up any sign of progress ... if it's that easy to do a bad job, or just destroy for destruction's sake, then maybe none of it is worth bothering with. Like, to what end? As long as there are people stupid enough to nihilistically turn the clock back, what is the point if it's relatively easy for them to do so? Because even if the congress and White House went blue, they can't just undo the shit Trump is undoing. What's taking him months to destroy was often the product of years of effort. And even if all the investigations take him down, his replacements are just as bad for all the same reasons. And if all of these investigations don't take him down, then ... seriously, why bother? We're doomed.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:14 (seven years ago) link

Trump getting elected period remains just so innately disheartening.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:15 (seven years ago) link

i'm just gonna cast aside any degree of investment in my health and any specific plans for the future. maybe i'll start smoking cigarettes or something. why not?

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:19 (seven years ago) link

Because even if the congress and White House went blue, they can't just undo the shit Trump is undoing

be specific, because in many cases they can actually undo the shit he is doing

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:20 (seven years ago) link

and let's be really clear here - repealing the ACA, pushing through an insane tax cut, building a wall on the Mexican border, etc. - these are all things with horrible, horrible consequences and it is a good thing that they are being stopped.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:21 (seven years ago) link

Are they being stopped or just seriously slowed? You can't stop something that hasn't happened yet, and I can't tell if they've been stopped or merely stymied by the gross incompetence of this administration.

Oh, and you want specific? OK. How about ... the Paris Climate Accord? Can we just rejoin? Or if some ACA replacement passes in some shape or form in the next few years ... can that just be changed? How about tax cuts, if they ever happen? Good luck getting enough momentum getting tax hikes passed, even if it's just to bring things up to old levels.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:24 (seven years ago) link

Paris Climate Accord? Can we just rejoin?

probably

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:25 (seven years ago) link

that's what I'm wondering. US can't actually withdraw until 2020, so if a Dem/non-idiot president wins, can't they just rejoin?

frogbs, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (seven years ago) link

The fuse is a little longer than most, but this is basically a genocidal act. Made out of willful ignorance and spite, by a reality show star.

Trockasturm Hoar The Ramming Battle Ceraton (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (seven years ago) link

How widespread was voter revulsion towards Nixon and understanding of what Watergate meant when it went down? Because I only really know from Perlstein tomes, but I get a sense that maybe a lot of people didn't get/care what he'd been doing wrong? Like Trump's apologists now? The only difference is they got Twitter (and he hasn't gone down yet)

Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (seven years ago) link

Why would the world wait for us to do so? Like Brexit, I assume damage is done.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (seven years ago) link

We can but who would take our word? President Pruitt can withdraw again in 2024.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Or if some ACA replacement passes in some shape or form in the next few years ... can that just be changed?

yes, if the votes in congress are there. ditto taxes (remember the battle over letting Bush's ridiculous tax cuts expire?)

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Also what does You can't stop something that hasn't happened yet mean because as a koan its kind of imparsable.

Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

Why would the world wait for us to do so? Like Brexit, I assume damage is done.

they're not going to wait. the other signatories are going to move forward.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (seven years ago) link

How widespread was voter revulsion towards Nixon and understanding of what Watergate meant when it went down? Because I only really know from Perlstein tomes, but I get a sense that maybe a lot of people didn't get/care what he'd been doing wrong? Like Trump's apologists now? The only difference is they got Twitter (and he hasn't gone down yet)

― Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), T

A Democratic Congress made a difference. So did two congressional committees and an independent prosecutor quietly accumulating such damning evidence that GOP resistance crumbled. Remember: it was Barry Goldwater who marched into the Oval Office to tell Nixon he had no support in Congress.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:28 (seven years ago) link

xpost Meaning the ACA tax cuts et al. are still on the table. They can still happen. So they haven't been stopped, as such, the way the travel ban has literally been stopped.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:28 (seven years ago) link

Also I'm pretty sure if UK got woke and repealed Brexit the EU would welcome us back like the undeserving shitheel prodigal sons we are

Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:29 (seven years ago) link

I get that, Alfred - I'm talking in terms of the electorate themselves.

Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:29 (seven years ago) link

as far as ACA and taxes, the GOP in congress really only has until the end of this summer to make that work, and it doesn't look very likely to happen. The GOP caucuses in the Senate and the House don't agree, they're stymied by the reconciliation rules, and the Dem opposition is totally united. Historically, this is not a recipe for success for massive legislative overhauls, esp w an erratic, incompetent and unpopular President on the sidelines.

by the time next year rolls around, it's going to be mid-terms and GOP numbers are gonna be in the toilet.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

A devil's advocate would argue ACA repeal is a prologue to Medicare for all. Terrible for those who get injured/sick from '19 to '22, but ultimately good.

Rejecting the Paris Accords may mean an international consensus with teeth. Universal carbon tariffs on nations who aren't meeting goals set by outside authorities. A better path, going forward.

At present, what's really at danger is American leadership of the free world. America didn't lead through fear, but shared values, and in 2016 it clearly demonstrated its internal political games trump values. That admirational/aspirational acceptance of one nation's leadership didn't come cheaply, and American voters threw it away with little thought, so some could have a tantrum.

it's just locker room treason (Sanpaku), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

the way the travel ban has literally been stopped.

it's not in the SC yet, where it will be upheld 5-4 IMO

sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:32 (seven years ago) link

re: Russia scandal - tbf the opinions of the electorate don't really matter, it's the opinions of people in Congress and the courts that matter

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:32 (seven years ago) link

Sanpaku otm

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:33 (seven years ago) link

it's not in the SC yet, where it will be upheld 5-4 IMO

idk about this, we will see

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:33 (seven years ago) link

by the time they rule the thing will have expired anyway

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:34 (seven years ago) link

That admirational/aspirational acceptance of one nation's leadership didn't come cheaply, and American voters threw it away with little thought, so some could have a tantrum.

I wouldn't get too carried away with that admirational/aspirational thing.

Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:34 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.