Trump, June 2017: From [Covfefe] with Love

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4708 of them)

Yeah I don't know anyone whose only beef with Trump is Russiastuff.

It's more like, hit him on all fronts with whatever ammunition comes to hand.

That he's so committed to giving people more reasons to think there's something fishy there (re Russia) is on him.

kajagoogoo's kazooist (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 2 June 2017 17:43 (seven years ago) link

CNN and MSNBC seem to be covering Russia more than is warranted, and the right has managed to equate those networks with the Democratic Party, so that may explain some of that thinking. I was flipping between the two last night while waiting for the Finals to start and there was plenty of Russia talk even though Paris really should have been the only story.

from what I've read and heard, actual Democratic candidates like Quist and Ossof seem to be wisely leaning very heavy on health care in making their case.

evol j, Friday, 2 June 2017 18:04 (seven years ago) link

obvs. Quist is past tense now.

evol j, Friday, 2 June 2017 18:04 (seven years ago) link

Brett Stephens hire was a++++++ NYT... =|

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:10 (seven years ago) link

another good one from der spiegel

http://cdn3.spiegel.de/images/image-1149622-640_panofree-qfwb-1149622.jpg

i n f i n i t y (∞), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:14 (seven years ago) link

I guess that would be a mistake if ... it were even remotely a possible thing Democrats might do? In fact there seems to be a swarm in all directions, besides Russia a constant stream of "GOP is trying to take away your health insurance" + "Trump is an incompetent idiot whose only policy goal is to be flattered" + "give money to this special election candidate" and "Trump doesn't think climate change is real" etc. and etc. I think they're doing a good job keeping a lot of balls in the air and they're doing a good job focusing on the many aspects in which Trump admin's priorities are broadly unpopular

This is all well and good but at some point they're gonna need to do better in their own platform than "15$ min wage in eight years" (lol) if they want anyone to actually show up

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:24 (seven years ago) link

or as Jon Schwarz put it last October

Democrats: "Nothing's free kids we'll never have free healthcare or free college or a living wage or hey how did Trump become president"

— Jon Schwarz (@tinyrevolution) February 20, 2016

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

make that 2/16

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:27 (seven years ago) link

they're gonna need to do better in their own platform than "15$ min wage in eight years" (lol) if they want anyone to actually show up

Why? Trump had nothing except "I'm not like those liberal pansies", and he beat 15 Republicans and a Democrat.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:30 (seven years ago) link

I mean, he did say "everything will be great for you and everyone will have well-paying jobs and be rich and everything will be free," I guess, but he was just lying, but the point can't be "Democrats should lie more," can it?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:31 (seven years ago) link

its pretty safe to say that trump's administration has shattered the belief that lying has consequences

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:32 (seven years ago) link

Have you read the Democratic Party's platform?

https://www.democrats.org/party-platform

PJD PDJ DPJ (DJP), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:33 (seven years ago) link

Has anyone?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:34 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, their "reign in Wall Street" angle is super credible.

https://www.rt.com/usa/378616-dnc-votes-corporate-lobby-money/

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:35 (seven years ago) link

I guess i'm not sure what point you're making, DJP; is the point that Dem candidates should be talking more loudly about the policy stuff in that platform? To a first approximation it looks pretty similar to what I hear them saying: rich people should pay their share, women should have rights, etc.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:36 (seven years ago) link

oh and the health care language in their platform is bullshit

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:40 (seven years ago) link

Trump had his wall with mexico, paid for by mexico. He had his muslim ban and killing the families of isis fighters. He had his bullshit promises about fabulous healthcare for everyone to replace obamacare. He had pulling out of nafta, tpp, and the paris climate accord, and naming china a currency manipulator. Trump had his list of anti-abortion supreme court nominees.

Trump's positions were crap piled on crap as high as he could reach, but they were often very specific, acted like catnip for his base, and he repeated them over and over in simple, clear language.

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:42 (seven years ago) link

Why do you think the health care language in their platform is bullshit?

PJD PDJ DPJ (DJP), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:46 (seven years ago) link

are these guys gonna amount to something or nah? http://www.peoplescoalition.us/peoples-coalition/

For all the niceties about "health care being a right", major establishment Dems like Clinton and Pelosi have actively stated that true universal health care isn't one of the party's goals and/or is never gonna happen. Universal care (as opposed to "universal access") is still, from what I can tell, a fringe goal w/in the party, though hopefully that's changing due to sheer public outrage. xp

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:53 (seven years ago) link

Your objection, then, is that health care should be free and the Democratic party does not support that? Or am I misunderstanding you?

PJD PDJ DPJ (DJP), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:56 (seven years ago) link

Is Trump most useful as a reagent?
Seems to be causing a lot of reactions that might actually eventually get something more positive done.

Stevolende, Friday, 2 June 2017 18:57 (seven years ago) link

Er, yeah? xp

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 18:58 (seven years ago) link

("Free" as in paid for by the state, of course, nothing's free)

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:01 (seven years ago) link

every day i try to look for positive patterns in all this, like maybe Comey's testimony will knock him down. Or Kushner will get charged with something and flip on his father in law. Or that McKinley had a secretary named Trump and vice versa.

nomar, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:06 (seven years ago) link

Not even Nordic countries has 'true universal health care', btw.

Trump's campaign holding a 'Pittstburgh not Paris' rally. At Lafayette square. That's dumb.

Frederik B, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:07 (seven years ago) link

every day i try to look for positive patterns in all this, like maybe Comey's testimony will knock him down. Or Kushner will get charged with something and flip on his father in law. Or that McKinley had a secretary named Trump and vice versa.

― nomar,

Make arrests. Stir the shitstorm.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:09 (seven years ago) link

Stare into the tv static looking for patterns all you like. In the end, you'll only wind up getting sucked into some paranormal nethervoid in your bedroom closet.

Trockasturm Hoar The Ramming Battle Ceraton (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link

thread here

Is this the time for me to leak the gossip I know about Melania Trump or should I wait. (And I'm serious btw.)

— Monica Byrne (@monicabyrne13) June 1, 2017

tl;dr Donnie is a literal cuck

frogbs, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link

fwiw, while it is tempting to say that "health care should be free", saying so plays into the hands of opponents of single-payer because ordinary people know health care costs a lot of money and "there is no free lunch". you have to point out it will be paid for, but differently than now.

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:14 (seven years ago) link

damn the agreement that if he lost they would get divorced
wild thread

flappy bird, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:17 (seven years ago) link

i heard something else about trump from a 100% reliable source... something JUICY and EMBARRASSING... that proves once and for all that he is BAD and NOT GOOD......... this is going to be so amazing, when i reveal this info.... should i do it?????

sleepingbag, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:24 (seven years ago) link

wow look, trump is toast: woman shuts down Donald with gossip sure to derail his presidency.

nomar, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:26 (seven years ago) link

still waiting on martin short's damning intel tbh

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:26 (seven years ago) link

Gotta get in line behind Tom Arnold and Moby, the Woodward and Bernstein we all need right now.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:38 (seven years ago) link

I have JUICY GOSSIP that Trump RIMMED a BUTTHOLE, it was JUICY.

Trockasturm Hoar The Ramming Battle Ceraton (Old Lunch), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

lol woops I meant tom arnold

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:39 (seven years ago) link

Confused, why is it bad for Trump is Trump blocks Comey?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:48 (seven years ago) link

v clear precedent that that gambit will fail in court

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:50 (seven years ago) link

It held that a claim of Presidential privilege as to materials subpoenaed for use in a criminal trial cannot override the needs of the judicial process, if that claim is based, not on the ground that military or diplomatic secrets are implicated, but merely on the ground of a generalized interest in confidentiality. Nixon was ordered to deliver the subpoenaed materials to the District Court.

Nixon resigned sixteen days later, on August 9, 1974.

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:51 (seven years ago) link

trump also wont shut the fuck about his conversations with comey so he's waived that privilege already imo

officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:51 (seven years ago) link

that too. he fucking tweeted about them!

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:52 (seven years ago) link

I have a feeling even if the Justice Department shopped the case to the Court for cert that a clean majority would swat it aside

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 June 2017 19:53 (seven years ago) link

those are all reasons why he should try to do it.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:54 (seven years ago) link

what does he have to lose Beyond looking bad, whatever that even means anymore.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:55 (seven years ago) link

in the sense that I approve of anything he does that damages his power, yes

xp

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:56 (seven years ago) link

makes him look guilty, invites further (in this case, direct and legally germane) parallels to Nixon, would possibly lead to the release of yet more incriminating information, would put the scandal front and center in the headlines (again) etc etc

these are all good outcomes

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:57 (seven years ago) link

every second his administration spends on this is a second not spent on moving forward w various horrible policies and legislation. the ideal Trump presidency - for me anyway - is one that is frozen in amber for the duration of the term, paralyzed, mired in shit.

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 June 2017 19:59 (seven years ago) link

I agree with that, which is why I'd prefer a prolonged clusterfuck over an actual impeachment or resignation

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 2 June 2017 20:01 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.