Netflix Watch Instantly Recommendation Thread

🚨NEW LAST CHANCE U 🚨

Friends from College has some funny shit, at least. "Fun Ethan" vs. Mad Dog Rogen dance off/disaster had me chucklin.

Ozark is very watchable, through all ten eps.

I'm enjoying Ozark. Yes, it's a bit trashy but high-end trashy!

joe mande special v funny

anyone seen 'The Keepers?' Kind of a true crime creepy documentary thing. co-workers can't shut up about it.

The keepers is fantastic!

Mr Veg & I just started watching S1 of Last Chance U. Goddamn it's addictive

Like Friday Night Lights Hard Knocks. I am on board

has anyone else watched the Russian tv show Silver Spoon? (no Ricky Schroeder connection)

somehow girlboss was 50% hilarity and 50% total garbage

as a euro, or for other reasons, i think last chance u is amazing. saw the first season when it was out, now watching the second. part of it is just this whole vision of america a foreigner can't ordinarily understand, but also it's just so deeply put together, such a detailed look at this weird world. the characters are so brilliantly established. it's amazing.

i did not like girl boss at all, bailed after 1 episode.

anyone watched Bordertown? I am a sucker for Scandi crime tv.

Last chance U is so, so good

yeah i'm obsessed

i love queen of the south. i'm actually not binging and watching slowly because there aren't a zillion episodes.

Xps there were some truly lol scenes/lines (and I don't really lol at movies/tv tbh) but so much cliche and fake ness and bad acting and corniness and played-out tropes. And the show seemed confused about whether it was drama or cartoon.

finished s1 of Last Chance U, man so good.
that coach though. jeeezus. dude is like the lovechild of rex ryan and a spittoon

has anyone else watched the Russian tv show Silver Spoon? (no Ricky Schroeder connection)

― sansa riff (sarahell), Wednesday, 2 August 2017 07:39 (three days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I started but got distracted by something else, I think. Is it worth sticking with?

Silver Spoon is good enough as a crime thriller/cop show. I was describing it to a friend of mine who emigrated to the U.S. from Ukraine as a kid about 20 years ago, and he was amazed that a show critical of oligarchs and police corruption got made in Russia.

xp Veg - Bordertown was great!!! I watched it after I ran out of seasons of The Bridge (Swedish/Danish original)

ooh good to know!

And here's the kind of bullshit that will ruin streaming the way everything else gets ruined:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/disney-pull-movies-netflix-launch-streaming-service-1027793

People go to streaming as a cable alternative, streaming services splinter, major companies start to set up their own streaming services, suddenly there are a dozen overlapping streaming services and nothing comprehensive, resulting in essentially a cable package where every single channel must be paid for individually. Netflix exclusives, Amazon exclusives, Disney exclusives, HBO exclusives, Criterion exclusives, NBC exclusives ...

Yeah this sucks. Don't forget the stupid CBS service to milk Star Trek fans...

eh, yes and no

I think we're getting close to a la carte providers for television, although the content exclusive to Hulu and Amazon are in that boat. Via Sling, Playstation Vue, and that Direct TV direct thing we have what's basically streaming cable, including the ability to add/remove content either via packages or by the channel. The packages are still too large, in that they tend to have a basic, sports, movie package like cable providers but they don't have the stupid service discount negotiation garbage that cable has.

I have PS Vue and have added/remove HBO, Showtime, and Starz for a couple months at a time fairly seamlessly. And even though there's a single app (on my PS or on Apple TV) for live tv and a "dvr" function that's really just on-demand streaming, I have the apps for all of the individual channels (USA/TNT/NBC/ABC/etc) on Apple TV and can go directly to them and stream individual episodes because the sign-in info is linked to Vue and is single sign-on.

So, how I view most tv is by going to that channel's app, then selecting a show or movie or whatever. The unifying thing is they're all on the home screen and equally available.

Now, Netflix is also on that screen, and Hulu, and supposedly Amazon Video will be. The only difference is the billing is from different sources.

So long-term, either a device maker is going to give you single-billing and you manage subscriptions that way, and other providers of exclusive content will give you a plug-in app/channel thing.

The only difference between that and cable with add-on channels is I'm paying multiple people at this point because Hulu, Netflix (and some of the others, like that one that has Criterion, etc) see themselves as stand-alone and don't license via package providers.

oh yeah, and CBS is trying to be stand-alone, too. I think eventually it's going to be a value break between losing subscribers they'd get via a bundling service and the slim profit margin of running their own

Message from the King was very good. If anyone is looking for a dark crime/revenge film that is not like every other dark crime/revenge film. very compelling!

Unlike Donald Trump, Lady Bloodfight TOTALLY lives up to its title. 150% truth in advertising. 5 stars.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_Y-f2OdMis

So, how I view most tv is by going to that channel's app, then selecting a show or movie or whatever. The unifying thing is they're all on the home screen and equally available.

this is how roku works. it even has a search function where it'll show you which channels have the thing you are looking for! Technology is great! Even the forever unavailable Costa-Gavras State of Siege is available now!

Superman Punches are way too prevalent these days
also all-lady Bloodsport remake? ok i'm kinda curious

Lady Bloodfight is surprisingly touching. plus, lots of bloodfighting. i'm already anticipating the sequel.

That looks awesome.

lol "The Kumite"

"I'm going to Hong Kong to compete in the infamous life-or-death tournament, The Sparring!"

the infamous life or death tournament that Frank W Dux invented

sorry didn't mean to derail (and actually I wanna watch the shit out of this), I just find the whole Dux story compelling in terms of what a mega-fraudster he was

yeah it's pretty hilarious!

the Dux nonsense has annoyed me for many years, but clearly I need to get over it and watch Lady Bloodfight

Atypical is my new fave show and i'm only 3/4 through the first episode. Jennifer Jason Leigh and the hilarity that is autism is a match made in heaven.

I have only watched the first episode of Atypical, and I found it to be a very emotional experience, because I know a couple people who have and had some form of autism. I hesitate to label it as such, but Sam's personality and quirks are definitely consistent with what I've experienced when socializing with them.

I browsed through some reviews and apparently, while autism comes in many varieties, a couple people with autism have written that Sam's characteristics appear to be typical for those with this neurodevelopmental disorder.

Before I watched the show, I read that they treated the show with comedic relief, and while I noticed these parts in the first episode, it was hard for me to actually laugh, rather I half-smiled and got teary-eyed.

I have totally given up on new autism spectrum themed tv drama/comedy in this golden age of ASC enlightenment. A lot of it has been absolute cack, and what I have read on Atypical so far doesn't inspire much confidence. But I'm a weirdo and a neorealism fan,and would like to see more depictions of less fashionably cute ASC people. Whose behaviour might not be entertaining or conducive to trite, exploitative crap tv.

the star is a perfect mix of sheldon cooper from big bang theory and max from parenthood. i always thought that max seemed pretty real for a one hour network drama. they were good on that show at getting at the frustration/anger/reveling in small triumphs from both the kid and parent points of view.

Any subject introduced in modern popular culture mediums (TV, film, music), mostly mainstream, will filter out any extreme examples of the individual experience, except maybe stupidity, because this causes laughter and the notion of the Audience as a voyeur or eavesdropper is still very much a natural state for many of us -- it's no wonder a site called Gawker was so popular.

Specifically, neorealism runs contrary to Hollywood-style filmmaking, where The Bigger Picture is pushed to the viewer. Subtle or nuanced characteristics are typically suggested, instead of shown. It's about showing the Archetype. In this case, like Scott Seward said, Sheldon Cooper in appearance and toned-down personality. Except Atypical's Sam loves biology instead.

You would think with the rise of streaming media or video-on-demand, there would be a push for neorealism, but, a chicken-and-egg scenario, the Audience keeps demanding The Bigger Picture experience, apparently. I suppose a lack of attention span pushes the masses to favour explosions, car chases, and easily digestible scenes, where much is left to the viewer's imagination, except the typical viewer is no longer using her imagination. There is also an emotional angle the show is going for, of course, which could be why some families who have children or relatives on the spectrum don't mind watching it. This is my case. It opens up a dialogue between us.

Calzino, I do agree with you to a certain extent, but the problem you state goes far beyond a couple shows. Unfortunately, it's industry-wide at least in the US.

Even the less trite shows have been criticized for pushing archetypal characters, Love for showing hipsters struggling with romantic relationships and living in Silverlake, and the LDS Church's reaction to Big Love, to name two examples.

I'm interested to read what the rest of you think.

one more thing about Max. maybe i'm the only one here who actually watched every season of Parenthood. on that show they actually allowed the viewer to become frustrated with the character. which i thought was kinda risky at the time. he was very definitely not always lovable. and in that sense he felt more real to me. they softened him somewhat later on - but also showed his growth and steps forward and backward - by having him bond with an aspergers-suffering adult played by ray romano.

I think, when it comes to portraying disability or neuro-atypical people, or even people of less visible minorities, older shows did have such characters but there was this writerly urge to put some of the details in but "make him a normal guy," or the Archetype. That impulse is still there, so you end up with characters that have specific mannerisms or traits that get surfaced in a light form without specifically making the plot about them, or some version of the "very special episode of" formula where everyone has to come together to address what might be a very personal thing.

I haven't watched many of the shows with characters who have symptoms on the autism spectrum, but I've mention a few times that the show You're the Worst did a reasonable job with addressing depression. One of the main characters slowly disappears. At first, it seems like the show's just focusing more on the other characters and their plot arcs, but eventually you realize she's been doing as little possible in the background. And that's where the deviation from formula seemed almost over the top: who, in real life, would spend most of their time hiding under a blanket and not making the effort to communicate? It's almost too real, and seems contrived.

I think that at that point it's hard to determine whether the viewers or creators are at fault for the formulaic conceptions of life we see and how we respond to them. It reminds me of the bait for interpretation that a handful of English teachers dangled at us during my school years: is Romeo and Juliet really a tragedy, or is it meant to be a comedy? Kids of that age falling in romantic love, they extrapolate, was not the norm for Shakespeare's time, even if people did marry younger. Or was the concept of romantic love in itself a novelty for the audience? It falls to the production and the audience to negotiate which interpretative framework they want to believe.

I also keep thinking about Cheers and how the introduction of psychologists to the cast is a red herring because every character is a light-hearted version of some sort of situation. You have the dry alcoholic sex addict, the autism spectrum guy who lives with his mom, the depressed alcoholic who can't deal with his marriage, and so on

I'm kind of disappointed in you all for not giving Happy Valley its own thread

do it!

xpost 1st season is excellent alright

yeah 'happy valley' is great

that that creepy psycho rapist is the same guy who is the hot priest in Grantchester is v upsetting for me

mh otm regarding you're the worst handling of depression.

Episode in season 2 where she follows the couple and imagines that kind of life is preferable is crushing and truthful.

Happy Valley, the TV series: "laughless fargo" in West Yorkshire