Drink full: The TWIN PEAKS 2017 spoiler thread, part 2

That's such an incredible piece and that part is particularly affecting. I don't understand your objection, Sciatica.

oops

My general objection to the piece still applies but I don't feel like picking it apart.

after rewatching the last two episodes, 18 felt like the epilogue and something that would've read really well as part of a book.

Yeah it's totally an epilogue to me - it basically starts at the "curtain call"!

Despite all of the obvious caveats and my belief that nothing substantive is really going to be further resolved or explained, I can't help but be intensely curious about Frost's next book.

Simon, if you're still bouncing around itt, I've finally started listening to your podcast this week. You and your fellow contributors are great and are giving me a lot of new angles to chew over.

thanks!! we're taking a week off to mull over it all before we record the finale/wrap-up with our guest. if we can secure (redacted) and/or (redacted) to come on we might do another post-series retrospective thing.

xp It'll be as illuminating of the return's many mysteries as its predecessor was

(Also, I believe the intent is for it to cover the missing 25 years)

I'm curious about the Frost books because I'm feeling the withdrawal pains but I don't know... I tried one of his novels and it was kinda bad. And the comments on the Secret History upthread (and Lynch's distancing himself from it) make it sound like it won't really be what I want from Twin Peaks.

That said I can get into esoteric history stuff so I'm curious if anyone would recommend it just on that level.

I'm curious about it specifically because it's coming after the Return, and theoretically might explain...something?

tbh getting a bit weary from explanations (couldn't make it thru the piece above). Need probably a good 2 weeks to a month, and then just rewatch the thing and see what I think.

My hunch is that The Final Dossier will be something like Cole's recollection of the 'unofficial version' that Jeffries alluded to.

Simon you indicated way up thread you had some production dirt that you'd hold onto until the finale aired; what was it?

I have a feeling Leland/BOB was drugging Sarah all those years not to keep her in the dark about what was going on in the house but to keep Judy, the more powerful being, at bay, so that he could follow his own urges. Once he died Judy totally consumed her. Judy might have been both a "mother" and partner to BOB, which would add another disturbing layer of incest to things.

I watched fwwm just before the finale and it's pretty clear that Sarah knew something was going on. If not the depth of it, she knew and she didn't stop it.

Simon you indicated way up thread you had some production dirt that you'd hold onto until the finale aired; what was it?

lmao he's never gonna reveal this, well played Simon

YOU"RE NOT GOING TO TELL ME WHAT SHE FUCKING SAID?

Haha I saw a tweetpic that juxtaposed Audrey shouting "you're not gonna tell me what she said?!" with Laura whispering in dale's ear

I was gonna until wins gave me the idea not to just now xps

Simon has put that dirt in his pocket

lol

simon will you make the final podcast a long, detail-oriented discussion of mountaintop ecosystems?

Or replicate Jay Leno's post-Cheers finale show and just get a bunch of TP cast members hammered on-mic?

I went back to the waggish piece to try to give it a better read. I'm just not into longform pieces like that, there are too many unsupported interpretive leaps you have to just sit with while following along. Like when the author says

Cooper tells her to turn out the light in the hopes of sparing her some of the trauma, but it’s an empty gesture. He is guilt-ridden with the sins of his doppelganger.

Sure, that's a possible interpretation of that action. But it's not how I read MacLachlan's performance, which (as posters have pointed out above) is graded into Mr. C in an ambiguous way. And I find the implications of that a lot more interesting and conflicted and truer to how Dern plays in response. But then it just keeps going from there. Like the line I quoted above about Carrie Page being a less traumatized version of Laura, except for the dead body in the room. Slow down there buddy, maybe we should unpack that a little?

I like the message board format better for trying to work all this out, where we can argue with each other in real time.

That said, I think this is really good:

Why would the Fireman, portrayed as a positive figure, create (or at least target) such a martyr figure? Without knowing the exact mechanics, I suggest that Laura Palmer was meant to function as a capacitor: storing a huge accumulated charge of suffering which could then be discharged at the precise moment. Laura’s immense suffering does not make her superhuman, but it makes her uniquely capable of serving a purpose in the Trap. In the right setting, this discharge could overload the circuits of a Lodge entity and destroy it altogether. To use another apt analogy, it would be like an atomic bomb reaching critical mass. But with fissionable material as substantial as Judy, you would not want to detonate it in our universe, or else it would take most of our world with it.

It pushes against that blurring of roles through circumstance (Carrie sharing some with Shelly eg) and gets you thinking about why the distinctions that remain might be important.

So that aerial shot of the avenida 9 de Julio, was that stock footage or (what I prefer to believe) did they go to Buenos Aires to shoot a single establishing shot for that one scene of a black box in a plain room turning into a whatever

I disagree with about 1/3 of that piece but it's food for thought

That piece looks tldr but sciatica's post gets at my problem with a lot of readings, inc Adam's above which is a strong interpretation in many ways, which is that they seem to wilfully ignore the actual emotional texture of what we're shown

I don't think we'd get a sex scene where Dale Cooper seems like himself because Dale Cooper does not fuck

wilfully ignore the actual emotional texture of what we're shown

yeah I hate this mode of interpretation tbh. I generally work backward from what we're shown on-screen, and a big part of that is how the actors are handling a scene

like, what is emotionally going on between everyone involved, how is it being portrayed, what is the effect/mood being conveyed

I don't think we'd get a sex scene where Dale Cooper seems like himself because Dale Cooper does not fuck

otm, he's too pure

tbf the show skimmed some of the more disturbing moral implications of the show (by making leland (and now sarah)) less responsible for their actions)

― na (NA), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:46

Don't know what you mean. They're possibly both possessed and we never get to know how responsible they are.

In the description for Final Dossier it says there will be season 3 stuff. It's a short book and people have speculated it's just material from the writing of Secret History that would have been spoilers for the third season.

So much of the fascination for me with Lynch is the way you have these bizarre leaps in story logic, or elements of story logic that seem to be missing altogether, things never quite line up in this way, yet there's a pretty easily identifiable (often funny and devastating) emotional throughline that's rooted in all of the illogical aspects: the performances, the tone, colors etc. That tension between the two is so important but can be very easily be unraveled by ignoring one to focus too much on the other.

like, what is emotionally going on between everyone involved, how is it being portrayed, what is the effect/mood being conveyed

Which in lynch is usually very complicated obv! Don't wanna act like these scenes are always easy for me to read or even know how I feel about

/I don't think we'd get a sex scene where Dale Cooper seems like himself because Dale Cooper does not fuck/

otm, he's too pure

Dale had sex with annie in season 2

The most interesting part of that piece is the demon summoning sex, apparently that was in Secret History?

Two parts I didn't buy.

- Why would a huge amount of trauma destroy Judy?

- Laura really didn't look like she was doing a job, her scream seemed to be almost involuntary.

otm, he's too pure

"It had only happened once before..."

^that crack in the facade that opens into a whole other world

https://i.imgur.com/A3breF2.jpg

that crack in the facade that opens into a whole other world

otm

lol

...at butt

he makes love, off camera, and it's very sweet

交代, pronounced jiāo dài (transliterated into "jowday", which then evolved into "judy"), is Chinese meaning 'to explain'. The ultimate negative force is explanation.

People have been passing this around. I'm sceptical but it's interesting.

Other interesting things I didn't know.

http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/35549/1/laura-harring-david-lynch-mulholland-drive-interview

OK, even if it’s not Laura Palmer, other clues connect Mulholland Drive to the world of Twin Peaks. In fact, Sherilyn Fenn confirmed on Twitter that in 1990, between seasons one and two, Lynch pitched her Mulholland Drive as an Audrey Horne spinoff.

While fellow cast members Naomi Watts, Patrick Fischler, Robert Forster, Brent Briscoe and Bonnie Aarons (the terrifying hobo) are in the upcoming season of Twin Peaks, Harring’s name is noticeably absent. “My agent didn’t want me to be one of the 200 cameos,” she explains. Instead, her agent held out for a more substantial role that didn’t materialise. She’ll still be watching, though. “Whether there’s 300, 400, 500 cameos, anything David touches is cinematic. The original Twin Peaks ending, with the old man, was hysterical.”

fwiw my post was a tongue-in-cheek statement, sex is sex, but it's the viewer perception of character and what's portrayed on screen. we can kind of assume characters have sex, but actually showing the act removes some level of (innocence?) disconnect and we get into the weird baggage about how romance is portrayed both parallel and counter to sexual nature in fiction

Gordon Cole definitely fucks, though

I don't think Bonnie Aarons is in season 3 though.

I had to go back and look at the date and source of the Mulholland Drive sequel rumor- it was 7(!) years ago, and came from Harring herself.

who is she talking about with the "old man" in the S2 finale? the waiter?

bank teller

I also saw that article linked in another one that claimed Harring was offered something in TP The Return but turned it down; but I never saw confirmation of that. what was she offered?

Did Laura only remove her face in season 3 or was that in the earlier stuff too?

Harring in MD is like the textbook example of Lynch getting a perfectly modulated performance out of a pretty limited actor. She's married to like the prince of Luxembourg or something so since money isn't an issue I bet her agent has had some fun over the years with the let's shoot for the moon strategy.