Like, is the president important? Of course. But would I prefer *this* president leave Washington and go on vacation forever and not work at all? Yes.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:22 (six years ago) link
"if they exist" wow c'mon man. how many people on this board would be unaffected if their employer stopped existing for a period of time yet unknown? fine to imagine a straw man of wealthy high-skilled federal employees with deep reserves of savings but how many of those furloughed are, like, janitors and security guards and people who work in the mail room and the cafeteria and the employee parking garage? how many of them can just go without paychecks at length with no consequences, even if at the end of it a deal is brokered to give them back pay for the period?
― Righteous wax chaperone, rotating Wingdings (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:27 (six years ago) link
Yeah, that wasn’t at all clear.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:27 (six years ago) link
And the vacancies in these agencies are by and large the chairs and directorships. There are tens of thousands of federal employees every day keeping the engine running despite it all, esp at the local level.
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:29 (six years ago) link
None of this btw is mutually exclusive to a jolt of schadenfreude that it's happening to this prez at this moment
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:32 (six years ago) link
I oversee federal WIOA grants at the local level, and the direction we've been given is to come to work Monday and that our pass-through funder has 3-4 weeks in reserve. After that, things get dicey. The resources I oversee include funding for contractors like case workers and navigators. These are people that make 40-60k in an expensive city. You better fuckin believe a missed paycheck will affect them. And that's not even considering the effects on the clients they serve.
― alomar lines, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:34 (six years ago) link
That's good to learn, I didn't know so stand corrected.
So anyway then, who is holding who hostage in this scenario? GOP holding Dreamers and CHIP kids hostage for their own shit? Or Dems holding working class government employees hostage for the sake of Dreamers et al.?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:36 (six years ago) link
Longest government shutdown was ... 21 days, right?
And this just in:
Representative Patrick Meehan, a Pennsylvania Republican who has taken a leading role in fighting sexual harassment in Congress, used thousands of dollars in taxpayer money to settle his own misconduct complaint after a former aide accused him last year of making unwanted romantic overtures to her, according to several people familiar with the settlement.A married father of three, Mr. Meehan, 62, had long expressed interest in the personal life of the aide, who was decades younger and had regarded the congressman as a father figure, according to three people who worked with the office and four others with whom she discussed her tenure there.But after the woman became involved in a serious relationship with someone outside the office last year, Mr. Meehan professed his romantic desires for her — first in person, and then in a handwritten letter — and he grew hostile when she did not reciprocate, the people familiar with her time in the office said.
A married father of three, Mr. Meehan, 62, had long expressed interest in the personal life of the aide, who was decades younger and had regarded the congressman as a father figure, according to three people who worked with the office and four others with whom she discussed her tenure there.
But after the woman became involved in a serious relationship with someone outside the office last year, Mr. Meehan professed his romantic desires for her — first in person, and then in a handwritten letter — and he grew hostile when she did not reciprocate, the people familiar with her time in the office said.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:38 (six years ago) link
who is holding who hostage in this scenario?
Perhaps a better question is: whose position, if adopted as the solution to the standoff, would produce better results for the nation?
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:39 (six years ago) link
For sure. Put elsewhere, if and when this ends and there is no beneficial DACA deal you'll know the Dems lost. But I really hope they don't give up the house to get there.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:43 (six years ago) link
And I really hope they don't give up the House to stay where they currently are. But I'm hopeful.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:44 (six years ago) link
― Josh in Chicago
so, worst case scenario here is everybody decides that democrats are ruining everything for the benefit of a couple of illegals. and then what? do the democrats get to do _anything_ to counter the administration besides pontificate? make pretty speeches but the second they do something the slightest bit controversial everybody cuts bait and runs?
the bigger issue is that this is the democrats' best opportunity to reclaim some semblance of political clout. if they don't win this one, i don't see them winning anything meaningful at all ever again.
― Arnold Schoenberg Steals (rushomancy), Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:49 (six years ago) link
I agree with that. If the country indeed does not approve of this administration, then that is their leverage, even if they lack numbers. But (and I suppose this is the gamble) if they fail to parlay momentum of dissatisfaction into November wins, then it's going to be a long few years.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 19:54 (six years ago) link
Here's a great example (and further corrective to my flip ignorance) of what indirect effects a shutdown can have:
A federal government shutdown could complicate CDC's ability to know, in real time, whether flu cases are continuing to increase. Personnel like Brammer, who works in the annual influenza program, are among the 63 percent of agency employees who would be furloughed, according to the updated 2018 contingency plan from the Health and Human Services Department. Throughout CDC, more than 8,500 employees would be furloughed.State labs would continue to operate and monitor flu activity, test specimens and send that information to the CDC. “The states would still be doing their jobs,” Brammer said. But if CDC epidemiologists and others monitoring the data are not at work, that data “would not be put together on a national level.”
State labs would continue to operate and monitor flu activity, test specimens and send that information to the CDC. “The states would still be doing their jobs,” Brammer said. But if CDC epidemiologists and others monitoring the data are not at work, that data “would not be put together on a national level.”
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:02 (six years ago) link
i like to hope that shutdowns demonstrate just how many important things depend on the government, but that never seems to make any difference
― mookieproof, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:20 (six years ago) link
with regard to the political calculus - trump's action on DACA created a humanitarian crisis. hundreds of thousands of people's lives are poised to be permanently altered. even if trump doesn't actively move forward on deporting them (hmmmm) they will be cast into total uncertainty about their entire futures. if he does, relationships and friendships and families will be torn apart. anything they've worked for, great or small, will be obliterated as they're forced to move away from the place they've lived effectively their whole lives. it's infuriating that trump can set the agenda by order and force the democrats to put it all on the line to address just one of the many problems he's created, but in this case i'll say putting it on the line is "worth it" by pretty much any metric one could cobble together. do we expect the house to vote on destroying seven hundred thousand other lives between 2019 and 2021? whose? if not, then this is probably the most important thing democrats are going to get to vote on whether this "costs" them the house next year or not. what do we want them to save their energy for exactly?
― Righteous wax chaperone, rotating Wingdings (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:30 (six years ago) link
Is it worth it to get a DACA deal if they throw in all sorts of other poison pill anti-immigration stuff, including a wall?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:33 (six years ago) link
Because that's part of the impasse right?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:34 (six years ago) link
Which is bad for them, and I feel terrible for any federal employee living paycheck to paycheck (if they exist).
Hi! :)
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:41 (six years ago) link
The hard rock the democrats are up against is that the Republicans control the House the Senate, and the Presidency. The Dems have some leverage in the Senate due to the rules there, but getting concessions means making concessions, too.
The wall is expensive, but by itself it probably won't do much good or harm either way, other than its wretched symbolism and the waste of money. So, if it secures the futures of 700,000 young people and provides a path to citizenship, it would be well worth it from my perspective.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:42 (six years ago) link
I thought the Dem strategy was sposed to be OBSTRUCT
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:49 (six years ago) link
My understanding is that the wall was the least of it. There are also other immigration curbs and further Healthcare cuts that were in the house bill right?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 20:50 (six years ago) link
So an immigration deal needs to simultaneously win 1.) Schumer & Durbin's votes 2.) John Kelly & Stephen Miller's recommendation to Trump to endorse it. 3.) Paul Ryan's commitment to a House vote even if it splits the majority. Hmmm.— Susan Davis (@DaviSusan) January 20, 2018
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:06 (six years ago) link
Where's Reince Priebus when you need him
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:14 (six years ago) link
The post piece about the last couple of weeks is nuts. Apologies if already posted.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/negotiating-with-jell-o-how-trumps-shifting-positions-fueled-the-rush-to-a-shutdown/2018/01/20/81215b90-fd71-11e7-a46b-a3614530bd87_story.html
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:37 (six years ago) link
Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.), speaking to reporters Friday night about his general frustrations with the process, said that “our country was founded by geniuses, but it’s being run by idiots.”
Next Month's Title?
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:46 (six years ago) link
lol
In politics, he resembles at times an amateur jazz musician — moody and improvisational, but without the technical chops to hold a piece together.
― mookieproof, Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:48 (six years ago) link
Birth Of The Tool
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:51 (six years ago) link
Ha.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:53 (six years ago) link
Dingus Ah Um
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:54 (six years ago) link
A Taco Supreme
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:56 (six years ago) link
Tyrant Steps
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:56 (six years ago) link
So is dummy going to Florida for his fundraiser/self-celebration? It would be horrible optics to do so, which makes me think he will do it.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:57 (six years ago) link
we can only hope so
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Saturday, 20 January 2018 21:59 (six years ago) link
The wall is expensive, but by itself it probably won't do much good or harm either way, other than its wretched symbolism and the waste of money. So, if it secures the futures of 700,000 young people and provides a path to citizenship, it would be well worth it from my perspective.Building it, and then tearing it down in 2021, would be a reasonable approximation of Keynes’ “burying banknotes and then digging them up” bit from General Theory.I’m not opposed to going with that as a jobs program tbf
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 20 January 2018 22:01 (six years ago) link
Someone should refocus Trump on building a ladder to the moon.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 20 January 2018 22:03 (six years ago) link
or blowing it up
― maura, Saturday, 20 January 2018 22:29 (six years ago) link
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Csj7vMKy4EI
alternately Dingus Dingus Dingus Dingus Dingus
many xposts
― Scam jam, thank you ma’am (Sparkle Motion), Saturday, 20 January 2018 22:31 (six years ago) link
what a time to work for a government contractor (as I do)
― The Harsh Tutelage of Michael McDonald (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 20 January 2018 23:07 (six years ago) link
LIFE IS WINNING
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 20 January 2018 23:13 (six years ago) link
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII)
why so sick and ridiculous?
― Arnold Schoenberg Steals (rushomancy), Saturday, 20 January 2018 23:18 (six years ago) link
!!@SenDuckworth: "I will not be lectured about what our military needs by a five-deferment draft-dodger. And I have a message for cadet bone spurs: If you cared about our military, you'd stop baiting Kim Jong-Un into a war that could put 85,000 American troops .. in danger." pic.twitter.com/BBXVna819m— JM Rieger (@RiegerReport) January 20, 2018
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:18 (six years ago) link
oof
― Empire Burl Ives (Hadrian VIII), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:21 (six years ago) link
good on her. now she'll get her own nickname from our president.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:25 (six years ago) link
TAMMY
― mookieproof, Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:26 (six years ago) link
yesss
― maura, Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:34 (six years ago) link
"draft dodger" still has a 1971 hardhat whiff to me. I like draft dodgers.
The phrase for Yam (and so many other war-promoting coddled cowards) is "chicken hawk."
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:39 (six years ago) link
JM Rieger shd've at least properly capped "Cadet Bone Spurs"
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:40 (six years ago) link
he resembles at times an amateur jazz musician
I know the moment has passed, but... Cantaloupe Lie-land?
― godzillas in the mist (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 21 January 2018 00:44 (six years ago) link