Your 2020 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1394 of them)

Yup

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:05 (five years ago) link

After having seen most of the potentials speak recently, I am feeling Kamala Harris the most.

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:07 (five years ago) link

gosh i can't wait to see what this great and long-awaited bipartisan health care bill might look like, with all the good-faith ideas the children-loving republicans have brought to the table on this critical issue over the last few years

what a terrible position. just run on M4A for chrissakes.

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:11 (five years ago) link

Any candidate(s) on board with AOC's 70% tax plan?

pomenitul, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:13 (five years ago) link

Harris has praised the proposal and said it is worth considering iirc

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:21 (five years ago) link

Gillibrand knows which way the wind blows, and she’ll cut your throat, but I think Clintonism is in her blood and you’ll see a lot of hair splitting.

— Richard M. Nixon (@dick_nixon) January 15, 2019

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:22 (five years ago) link

This picture of the opportunistic, ice cold, shrewd bish that people are painting Gillibrand as, it must really suck to have your biggest career obstacle be that you tried to hold a man accountable for bad behaviour.

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:30 (five years ago) link

it must really suck to have your biggest career obstacle be that you tried to hold a man accountable for bad behaviour.

The worst thing any woman can ever do.

grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link

I think her biggest obstacle is that she was no liberal when appointed to the Senate, but that could just be me

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link

do ppl who aren't Franken's direct friends/colleagues even care about her involvement at all? like....still?

resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link

Yeah she is a bit too moderate for me when there are more progressive candidates. I also don't care about the "doing it for the children angle."

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link

xpost one of my friends who is super super liberal calls her Judas because of the Franken thing. i want to slap it out of him.

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:38 (five years ago) link

ugh

resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:39 (five years ago) link

i think a lot of boomer Dems and (maybe) Minnesotans are pretty pissed about Franken. or at least what i can surmise from online outrage.

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:40 (five years ago) link

Weird and bad grudge to hold imo

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:41 (five years ago) link

yeah I am...agnostic about whether he should have been pressured to resign but at this point who really cares

k3vin k., Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:44 (five years ago) link

Yeah we have bigger problems

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:45 (five years ago) link

Gillibrand would be a perfectly acceptable VP, and she's good in the Senate. She hasn't got a chance of becoming President, though.

grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:45 (five years ago) link

i think you can think franken was right to resign when he did and still think it wasn't great that he got taken down by a string of mostly anonymous accusations (which, oddly, seemed to stop as soon as he resigned)

obv blaming that on gillibrand is stupid, schumer had already told franken to resign

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:54 (five years ago) link

i think you can think franken was right to resign when he did and still think it wasn't great that he got taken down by a string of mostly anonymous accusations (which, oddly, seemed to stop as soon as he resigned)

is that really odd?

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:55 (five years ago) link

if he was right to resign when he did, why was it wrong for people to be pushing for him to resign when he did?

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:56 (five years ago) link

b/c i mean the "taking down" wasn't like he was gunned down in the streets, or put through a show trial without due process or whatever. he was called upon to resign from an elected office, and he did.

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 17:57 (five years ago) link

Getting your ass grabbed is a thing that women have long minimized. One of the women really thought long and hard about coming forward because it's usually more punishing for the woman than it is the man.

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:03 (five years ago) link

Like, do you want to be known for taking down a senator that you like for something as everyday as getting your ass grabbed?

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:05 (five years ago) link

Yeah, coming forward always leads to retribution for women, so if he has already resigned, why come forward?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:09 (five years ago) link

why was it wrong for people to be pushing for him to resign when he did?

if i remember right (stopped paying attention to this a long time ago), franken had submitted himself to the internal party or senate process, and people were just waiting to see what it found; the push to resign was to do so ahead of that determination. so if you think the process had some kind of legitimacy that a worry about optics or whatever could have abandoned, then that would be a reason.

j., Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:11 (five years ago) link

The process does not have legitimacy, lol.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:12 (five years ago) link

Sorry for sounding flippant. It's not a laughing matter.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:12 (five years ago) link

you bastard

j., Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:15 (five years ago) link

http://time.com/5042931/al-franken-accusers/

Jeff Bathos (symsymsym), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:16 (five years ago) link

I mean seriously, how many you "unintentionally" land your hand on someone's ass while taking a picture?

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:20 (five years ago) link

There are four named women in that piece, and one of them had photographic evidence. I've honestly rarely seen these stories be so clear-cut?

Frederik B, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:25 (five years ago) link

XP Ask Poppy Bush.

Infidels, Like Dylan In The Eighties (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:36 (five years ago) link

Yeah, I also didn't give him a pass because he was old. They should've wheeled him out far from arms length of any woman.

Yerac, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:38 (five years ago) link

I would bring people together to start getting things done. If you want to get health care done, you have to bring Ds and Rs to the table on the shared values of this country. We all love our children."

This position needs a lot of work before it has any resonance at all. For chrissakes, take a solid position on what you think the freaking children need that they aren't getting now and how you want to deliver it. Bipartisanship is not an end in itself and literally no one cares about it. They care about what happens, not how.

A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:40 (five years ago) link

Voters totally give lip service to bipartisanship but generally what they actually mean is “get the other party to cave”

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:44 (five years ago) link

back to back otm's

|Restore| |Restart| |Quit| (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 18:46 (five years ago) link

even in an election cycle where there isn't this much progressive energy, you would expect Dem candidates to tack to the left at least somewhat during primary season, so if Gillibrand ends up trying to stake a claim towards the center she may be dooming herself before she even gets off the ground. this is also why Biden's campaign is either going to be gratuitously phony or gratuitously tone-deaf.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 19:11 (five years ago) link

Gratuitous in some way, surely. Really hope he doesn't run. Fox News headline that popped up recently: Biden family sounds warning – Dems moving too far left. gtfo

composed of atoms just as all posters have been (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 19:28 (five years ago) link

If Gillibrand begins tacking rightward (centerward?) once she's all in, I'll be super disappointed. Partly because she's doing it, but mostly because Morbs can say "told you so."

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 16 January 2019 19:50 (five years ago) link

I could really use a candidate scorecard on these proposals

On nearly every "radical" idea the American people are with us:

72% want to expand Social Security.
70% want Medicare for All.
65% want a jobs guarantee.
64% want to legalize marijuana.
60% want tuition-free public colleges.
58% want $15 min wage.
57% want to break up big banks.

— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) January 15, 2019

resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 20:19 (five years ago) link

I could really use a candidate, Bernie or otherwise, who goes hard on the issues w/o apology all the way through

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 20:34 (five years ago) link

the=these

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 16 January 2019 20:34 (five years ago) link

lol at "tuition-free public colleges" though. (I get that "tuition" is short for "tuition fees" here, but think the construct looks unfortunate.)

anatol_merklich, Thursday, 17 January 2019 00:40 (five years ago) link

no idea what your objection is

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 January 2019 00:57 (five years ago) link

I get that "tuition" is short for "tuition fees" here

Here?

( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 17 January 2019 00:57 (five years ago) link

Well, to me "tuition" means "the act of teaching", and "tuition fees" the payment for being taught. I read "tuition-free colleges" as "colleges where no teaching is being done" when I see that.

anatol_merklich, Thursday, 17 January 2019 01:02 (five years ago) link

But yeah, I see from some online dictionaries that the fee interpretation is more or less equally common now, especially in North America.

anatol_merklich, Thursday, 17 January 2019 01:05 (five years ago) link

I would say it's more than equally common in the US, I've never actually heard it used to mean anything other than education fees

Dan S, Thursday, 17 January 2019 01:10 (five years ago) link

Fair enough! Sorry for derail.

anatol_merklich, Thursday, 17 January 2019 01:12 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.