Oscars 2019

I said "if it is," ftr, but I also believe that people are probably kidding themselves if they think Black Panther is going to bring the show back to Titanic ratings.

Feels like Black Panther came out three years ago.

I hadn't thought of the blockbuster impact, you're right.

All I wanted was Sade for Widows.

all the little monsters will surely tune in for ASIB

From filmexperience.net Oscar trivia post:

We believe but we don't yet have the clarification that Marina de Tavira is now the ONLY performer ever in the modern era to receive an Oscar nomination without a single notice from critics awards or precursors of any kind. Not a single one. And remember there are 40+ now. There were far fewer precursor awards in 2000 when Marcia Gay Harden stormed toward the Oscar for Pollock out of the blue significant precursor attention but she did have a smidgeon of precursor support. She was a Spirit nominee and she won one major prize: The NYFCC for Supporting Actress.

I said "if it is," ftr, but I also believe that people are probably kidding themselves if they think Black Panther is going to bring the show back to Titanic ratings.

― forrest drumpf (Eric H.), Tuesday, January 22, 2019

never wrote that!

Another out-of-nowhere nom that readers picked up on:

Tommy Lee Jones - In the Valley of Elah

Marina de Tavira nom might be an indicator of how many people have been watching Roma on Netflix just in the last month or so.

I honestly didn't even grok that Black Panther was one of the BP nominees till just now. I pretend it ends around the 75-minute mark. #teamkillmonger

anyway despite the lack of a director nom I'm putting my $$ on ASIB

Absolutely no one likes how long the broadcast is. Putting a firm cap on it (3 hours) and doing only two montages (memoriam and + rando) would probably have more people stay tuned in. Or do they make it so long for commercial dollars?

it's because they love themselves so much I think

No, even the attendees usually talk about how much they hate how long it is.

I was (kind of) joking, I definitely would be stressed out spending 3+ hours in front of cameras

as a viewer I've never minded the length of it, for people on the west coast it doesn't run so late that we have to worry about getting up for work the next day

ok looking it up I'm surprised to see on wikipedia that it's run closer to 4 hours than 3 hours the last six years in a row

I hold the opposing view that people don't care about the results as much as they care how entertaining the broadcast is. People obv. remember the results more than the presenter but if there's no one to host the show that's going to make you laugh, or possibly make you laugh, then no one will care enough to watch with much enthusiasm. Watching Chris Rock presenting in the year of *oscars so white* was a treat, for example.

Also, people talk about how it's too long but the fact that it's too long is the point of it. If it was actually too long then they could just press-release the results. It would make for terrible oscar parties though.

The fact that it's too long is what gives it the little cultural currency that it has. If it lasts two hours and doesn't have a host then it is truly fucked.

I agree, yet I still hold the 2001 telecast with Steve Martin as host was the most fleet of foot.

Steve Martin was the best. I loved his opening line: "800m people around the world are watching us, and they're all thinking the same thing: we're all gay"

ha!

Ugh I don't enjoy there being only one, maybe two awards announced after one hour in.

Absolutely no one likes how long the broadcast is

I do

So does Kyle Buchanan:
https://www.vulture.com/2018/03/my-unpopular-opinion-the-oscars-should-always-be-long.html

Another out-of-nowhere nom that readers picked up on:
Tommy Lee Jones - In the Valley of Elah

why for the love of Douglas Fairbanks would anyone remember this fucking shit

it's a sodding assbackwards trade show

“hosting the oscar is like making love to a beautiful woman, it's something I only get to do when billy crystal was out of town.”

"...Didn't inhale?"

That is precisely the point of a loooong dining table.

So @theacademy continues to baffle in decision making. This has to be the single worst executed year for the awards body, in a year that they have a great crop of nominees! #JohnBaileyResign https://t.co/30GKSv8k0u via @variety

— Clayton Davis (@AwardsCircuit) January 24, 2019

get rid of that award completely.

but this is still bad.

no, it's a fun award that (in other years) offers an opportunity to add lively variety to the telecast

also the Welch/Rawlings cowboy song parody offered some good performance options

So long as it keeps the Oscars from adding a g-d stunt category, I'm fine with them keeping best song and the other twenty-odd categories.

yes, there should be a separate Stunt Awards, so that they can be awarded retroactively to at least 1918

i'm ok with this, altho the welch song could have been fun.

let's name the 8 awards that will be given out during commercials

best song will obv be live bcz Gaga

There can be a hundred people in the room, and 99 don’t believe in you, but one does.

- from some movie I will not be seeing

it's a thing Gaga says in every. single. interview. about her Oscar possibilities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRxsX_30tjs

99/100 people didn't think Lady Gaga was believable.

but one did.

NARRATOR'S VOICE

bradley cooper looks successively more embarrassed every time she says it

Could care less about the telecast or results, but the revenues from the ceremony fund film preservation efforts. If the Academy wants to add stunts or best popular film or a zillion other categories, have at it.

the Green Book one is funny

www.theshiznit.co.uk/feature/if-2019s-oscar-nominated-movie-posters-told-the-truth.php