Your 2020 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1394 of them)

even if it doesn't hit his pocket that directly, he's gotta still have tons of personal ties to the top of the company. plus its brand is basically what he's running on.

iatee, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:36 (five years ago) link

Tax brackets will be renamed tall, grande, and venti

Gunther Gleiben (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 17:57 (five years ago) link

if he ran for president, would he agree to sell off his investments in Starbucks, etc?

or, in the post-Trump world, does no one even bother to care about conflicts of interest

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:01 (five years ago) link

I’ve still never even pissed in a Starbucks.

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:05 (five years ago) link

We're going to shut America down for a day to solve racism!

We were never Breeting Borting (President Keyes), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:47 (five years ago) link

it's like how David Brooks and Tom Friedman spent the eight years of the Obama administration wishing that we had a cautious, consensus-minded moderate as President https://t.co/23nRWAqXqU

— Seth D. Michaels 🐕 (@sethdmichaels) January 29, 2019

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 20:11 (five years ago) link

I’ve already decided to boycott Starbucks until he drops out (or until he doesn’t manage to cost the dem candidate the election). And I’m a basic bitch who actually likes Starbucks.

Evans on Hammond (evol j), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:49 (five years ago) link

Meantime

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/tulsi-gabbard-2020-election-1134055

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 22:56 (five years ago) link

My heart, she breaks

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:34 (five years ago) link

Elizabeth Bruenig

@ebruenig
i think the notion that schultz could split the right vote emanates from the belief that right-wingers truly want a moderate, low-tax guy with a calm and principled demeanor. i don't know what more they have to do to prove to you that is not true

otm

Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:38 (five years ago) link

rip big man

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti will not run for president https://t.co/kTfhdGm7oP

— Steve Clow (@steveclowLA) January 29, 2019

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:43 (five years ago) link

LOL

Elizabeth Warren responds to Howard Schultz: "We have a billionaire who says he wants to jump into the race and the first issue he's raised is 'no new taxes on billionaires'. Let's see where that goes." https://t.co/C4KzJeCZvx

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) January 29, 2019

Plinka Trinka Banga Tink (Eliza D.), Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:43 (five years ago) link

I just got invited to an "Energy Geeks for Kamala" cocktail party in Oakland

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 29 January 2019 23:45 (five years ago) link

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/cnn-town-hall-kamala-harris-1135735

During the town hall, Harris laid out several policy objectives, including an endorsement of a “Green New Deal” to combat climate change, calling the issue an “existential threat.”

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:07 (five years ago) link

I feel bad for not watching, let alone going to the Kamala Harris CNN thing. Did anything interesting pop up? I think it took place on the other side of my neighborhood

mh, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:26 (five years ago) link

I hope Kamala Harris likes martinis. She looks like she does. If so, she has my votel

Your sweetie-pie-coo-coo I love ya (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:34 (five years ago) link

Re Garcetti: me neither

Gunther Gleiben (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 00:42 (five years ago) link

I guess you could argue with her stance but imo this was a thoughtful reply about criminal justice reform from the Harris town hall (this was the only tweet with the full clip that I could find):

Oh, Riley Fink, you tried it.

Kamala Harris takes a ‘gotcha’ question on her record as a prosecutor and just shreds it.

pic.twitter.com/dADW24j19w

— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) January 29, 2019

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:04 (five years ago) link

yeah she's gonna win

21st savagery fox (m bison), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:23 (five years ago) link

lol

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:26 (five years ago) link

Yeah I dont think this is gonna derail her

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:39 (five years ago) link

i'm glad to see her making it a point to not only say she opposes the death penalty but also explain why. haven't heard that from a politician in a long time actually

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:49 (five years ago) link

I get grossed out by the idea that one should be opposed to the death penalty because it “costs taxpayers money” rather than because it’s murder

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:50 (five years ago) link

I'm not sure that's her point

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:53 (five years ago) link

I think the point was wrongful convictions

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:56 (five years ago) link

She made both points

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:57 (five years ago) link

Wrongful convictions is a very important reason the death penalty is horrific.

But it is also wrong to execute guilty people.

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:58 (five years ago) link

yes

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:59 (five years ago) link

completely agree

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 03:59 (five years ago) link

it was a really good answer tbf

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:01 (five years ago) link

Some people listen to arguments that involve money, though. Capital punishment is less of a party/partisan issue than most other wedge issues, so if you can swing people by saying life in prison costs less than executing convicts, give it a shot.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:02 (five years ago) link

no outright waffling on M4A yet AFAICT but it does seem like her positions are still somewhat in flux xp

resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:04 (five years ago) link

Fine its appealing to assholes who love money. Still find it an offputting answer.

I’m not really a consequentialist, i’m discovering.

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:05 (five years ago) link

xp

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:05 (five years ago) link

Is there any county with single payer healthcare that bans private insurance? I don't think so, right? I can't imagine the US *ever* leading the way on that front.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:06 (five years ago) link

re: m4a, being willing to support other plans is fine, and her spokesperson reiterated her m4a support, which is the right move. the time for compromise is when the bills are actually being considered, not during the campaign

k3vin k., Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:06 (five years ago) link

Afaik, Canada bans private insurance for services that are covered by the public system (which does not currently include vision, dental care, or a lot of outpatient prescription medication).

Locked in silent monologue, in silent scream (Sund4r), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:15 (five years ago) link

Though some of us are loudly advocating for it to include all of those things. :)

resident hack (Simon H.), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:16 (five years ago) link

I mean, what does "single payer" mean if not that there is only a single payer available?

Locked in silent monologue, in silent scream (Sund4r), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:18 (five years ago) link

I would hope they do those CNN things for all the candidates. Except Tulsi and the Starbucks guy though

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:33 (five years ago) link

I'm already exhausted

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:37 (five years ago) link

aaaand let's head over to frank luntz for a focus group

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:40 (five years ago) link

oh god no

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:42 (five years ago) link

No not that. I was watching some clips of the Kamala thing. Would like to watch clips of the others in same format. Plus seems unfair if only Harris gets that sort of showcase.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:47 (five years ago) link

nate silver which candidate do the polls guarantee will win, only twenty-two short months from now?
well wolf at this point in the race we really shouldn't be looking at polls as any sort of predicti-
-let's head over to john king who has pulled up a new tab on a gigantic touchscreen

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:50 (five years ago) link

lol

Dan S, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:56 (five years ago) link

I think I'm ready to move someplace where I don't speak the language

Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:57 (five years ago) link

Plus seems unfair if only Harris gets that sort of showcase.

Tapper said at the end she was just the first who would get one of these. They're going to attempt to do them with everyone (by everyone, I assume they mean the top group and not, like, Jay Inslee).

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 04:57 (five years ago) link

i bet lincoln chafee's name recognition % is STILL below 4

Karl Malone, Wednesday, 30 January 2019 05:02 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.