2020 Democratic presidential primary

Did we get to the fact that Warren was convinced by the Pod Save guys to do the DNA test?

All the Dem candidates as Michael Scott is the most accurate thing I have ever seen. pic.twitter.com/ZHE45KHMvR

— Will Dammann (@WillDammann) March 22, 2019

Did we get to the fact that Warren was convinced by the Pod Save guys to do the DNA test?

Where in the world did you hear that? If they ever mentioned it, it was probably a throwaway joke. They roundly said it was a boneheaded thing to do after she made a big deal about the results.

pic.twitter.com/w2h8k8zBAA

— Dollars Horton Official (@crushingbort) March 31, 2019

Doesn't scan as a joke to me.

if Elizabeth Warren can be "convinced" to do something based on a throwaway comment on a podcast then maybe she shouldn't be president after all.

pod save is a russian psyop i will not be reading replies to this post

I mean, they worked for Obama and have a rep among establishment Dems (deserved or not) as canny political operatives, so it's not a huge surprise. xp

She would be a great president. This is fucking dumb.

I don't disagree!

I don't remember that interview, though I probably listened to it at the time, but being Jon Lovett it would be pretty hard to believe Warren was convinced to do it by one sarcastic not-thought-out question.

I like PSA, and several of the other shows on Crooked, but Lovett is the comic relief—the sidekick—and if EW acted on one of his interjections, then wtf.

ironically, just from having listened to way each of them addresses issues for the past (oh god) four years, Lovett definitely seems like the furthest left of the main four PSA dudes.

These Pod Save people might want to do a Learning Annex class on their highly skilled methods of persuasion. I mean, this is fucking amazing if true. To completely rewire a highly intelligent adult's thinking like that?

i think it's good that warren isn't a "canny politician.' it makes me like her more. trump was saying she was a liar so she decided to illustrate that she was not a liar.

she was upfront that this was a distant part of her heritage that she learned of through family lore. she didn't claim tribal membership or anything like that. i respect the fact that members of the cherokee nation are uncomfortable with DNA tests and, in hindsight, warren should have sought their advice. however, i am much more uncomfortable with the fact that trump calls warren "pocahantas" like wtf

I undid my like of that Michael Scott tweet just bc dude seems like a conservative, but it was p inspired.

Warren is fine being Warren. She doesn't need to live up to being the traditional total piece of shit politician.

yeah the Office supercut def came from conservative circles. but it was pretty harmless really iirc

Also Treeship OTM. Whether Warren responded to Trump's baiting in the best possible way bothers me less than the baiting.

I'm listening to the segment in question now, and Lovett's question seems borderline sincere, but Warren's answer to him is firmly and resoundingly no. So it'd be pretty hard to pin this on him, since she told him why she's not gonna do it right to his face.

https://crooked.com/podcast/taking-gavel-paul-ryans-hand/

Starts at about the 59:30 mark.

lol that interview was from last March and she did the test in October?

Yeah, this was her campaign planning crew that talked her into this. Not some ex-Obama staffers on a podcast.

god it sucks knowing that if Warren did somehow win the nomination, there would be zero good faith effort by the right (and especially Trump) to counter her policy proposals and ideas, it would just be 24/7 non-stop POCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTAS

She might be a better bet than Bernie. I haven’t decided who I am going to vote for—by the time they’re in NY I’m assuming it will be clear which one has the best shot of winning.

There is going to be zero good faith from the right about anyone. Who cares.

True.

I can get with most of these candidates with my head if need be, but Liz Warren is the one in my <3. I wish America didn't suck so much.

The right doesn't operate in good faith with their own candidates, let alone opposition candidates. Yerac OTM.

I can get with most of these candidates with my head if need be

true but if the candidate ends up Biden or O'Rourke that puts me at risk of accidentally ticking the wrong box on my GE ballot due to uncontrollable eyerolling

tbc I like Warren a lot, I just found the Pod Save connection amusing. The fact that she's so far behind in funding and (currently) polling sucks shit.

god it sucks knowing that if Warren did somehow win the nomination, there would be zero good faith effort by the right (and especially Trump) to counter her policy proposals and ideas, it would just be 24/7 non-stop POCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTASPOCAHONTAS

― Evans on Hammond (evol j), 1. april 2019 16:00 (twenty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

But I thought purely negative campaigns can't work, and it's only possible to win by running on popular issues. So wouldn't this make Warren the most electable?

It still doesn't make the idea of subjecting the entire country to that campaign desirable or enjoyable.

I wish it weren't so, but I feel like Warren's best + most possible destiny is to be a really strong cabinet member

yeah the Office supercut def came from conservative circles. but it was pretty harmless really iirc

― Simon H., Monday, April 1, 2019 8:41 AM (three hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the original had a michael moment for trump too, but the fair-and-balanced washington free beacon seems to have omitted that particular scene.

we probably should separate the head of state/head of government roles because a lot of voters and donors seem only interested in choosing the former. https://t.co/Nu3Xk4z5Ow

— 'Weird Alex' Pareene (@pareene) April 1, 2019

Or, like, separate votes for the legislative and the executive branch.

that was my most alfred post

― k3vin k., Saturday, March 30, 2019

Butt plugs and fragrance?

Butt Plugs/Fragrance 2020
Kink We Can Believe In

another biden story just broke

https://www.courant.com/politics/hc-pol-biden-grabbed-aide-20190401-vl7chim3hrdjtcwu2tszrhozzm-story.html

shocking

can't wait to see how Kristen Gillibrand gets blamed for this.

$10 says it involves ranch dressing

I mean some people are trying to pin the Flores incident on Bernie, so I earnestly wouldn't be surprised

wondering if his window is closing or if he's just gonna try to biden his time until may and hope this blows over
nb: i no longer think this is gonna blow over; too much heat from all sides

yeah let's please hurry up and skip to the part where he sourly announces he's not running because the party has abandoned comity with Republicans and good old fashioned bipartisan governance, followed by Joe Scarborough rending his garments on air.

Sorry for Amp and Beto Hot Take: https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/586201/

Xpost yeah a quick scroll through Twitter and I see people circulating photos of Bernie with his hand on Flores’ shoulder and Flores with her hand on Biden’s shoulder
So this is going to go well

Okay, that's pretty good

Finally an office with room for a walk and talk. pic.twitter.com/SfphOsXZiY

— Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) April 2, 2019

feel the Yangmentum

\

New Harvard IOP poll of likely Democratic presidential primary voters aged 18-29:

Sanders 31%
Biden 20%
O'Rourke 10%
Harris 5%
Warren 4%
Booker 3%
Yang 2%
(everyone else: 1% or less)

— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) April 1, 2019

phew, is it hot in here or is am i just feelin the bern

Harris raises $12 million in first quarter