2020 Democratic presidential primary

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (14963 of them)

I started the New Yorker profile yesterday afternoon, but I jumped into the pool. Forgive me it was so delicious, so sweet, so cold.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 June 2019 16:57 (seven years ago)

so mayor pete is at the policy braintrust level of a random dude


I read this as “policy bratwurst level”

Carry on

El Tomboto, Monday, 3 June 2019 17:38 (seven years ago)

i can’t find it right now, but i’m reminded of matt’s observation regarding the west wing that even in liberals’ greatest fantasy they’ve compromised instead of won pic.twitter.com/xhEMUJ0h39

— Virgil Texas (@virgiltexas) June 3, 2019

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 15:48 (seven years ago)

I remember now-- Bartlett decides to nominate two justices--a liberal AND a conservative, because he sees the two of them arguing respectfully

Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 16:29 (seven years ago)

The Booty Judge has also made a point of stating he would not have "forced Al Franken to resign".

Fuuuuuck this dude.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 17:58 (seven years ago)

he's just losing all the points he won by having read a book

don't mock my smock or i'll clean your clock (silby), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 18:40 (seven years ago)

Wouldn’t buttigieg’s plan enshrine the two party systwm (and thus the republican party) permanently in the constitution?

Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 19:23 (seven years ago)

basically, this dude is a fuckin charlatan

be the 2 chainz you want 2 see in the world (m bison), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 19:24 (seven years ago)

Maybe it wouldn’t require a constitutional amendment—i forget where the 9 justice thing comes from

Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 19:25 (seven years ago)

It would still legitimize this artificial polarity we have now

Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 19:25 (seven years ago)

Or entrench

Trϵϵship, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 19:26 (seven years ago)

There’s no way it is coming anywhere close to happening, anyway.

Which, uh, is not a good sign for a policy proposal. If you’re proposing something that isn’t happening anyway, at least make it aspirational and a vision of the future you want, rather than an idiotic preemptive compromise!

i will never make a typo ever again (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:16 (seven years ago)

Karl

that IS the aspirational vision of the future

Arugula Raccoon (DJP), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:17 (seven years ago)

My thing is why don't you kick out the 10 hyperpartisan judges and just go with the 5 androids

Arugula Raccoon (DJP), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:18 (seven years ago)

Obama waited til he was prez b4 announcing his preemptive compromises

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:18 (seven years ago)

Because the hyperpartisan judges are needed to choose the nonpartisan judges. Every year. It’s gonna be a well-oiled machine

i will never make a typo ever again (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:19 (seven years ago)

"let's have the worst parts of hyperpartisan stasis and institutional churn, that would be a perfect system"

Arugula Raccoon (DJP), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:21 (seven years ago)

managed democracy iirc

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:22 (seven years ago)

nothing changes but there's always something to retweet

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 4 June 2019 20:23 (seven years ago)

he should restate this plan but in Norweigian, that'll sell it

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 22:02 (seven years ago)

"Jeg kom opp med ideen mens jeg så på The West Wing"

be the 2 chainz you want 2 see in the world (m bison), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 22:40 (seven years ago)

lol

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Tuesday, 4 June 2019 22:49 (seven years ago)

Wouldn’t buttigieg’s plan enshrine the two party systwm (and thus the republican party) permanently in the constitution?

If only he had been around in the 19th century, the Whigs would still be guaranteed the Supreme Court Justices they deserve.

All along there is the sound of feedback (Sund4r), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 02:41 (seven years ago)

we need 5 supreme court justices for every political ideology with its own wikipedia page

Trϵϵship, Wednesday, 5 June 2019 02:55 (seven years ago)

The West Wing is called 'Presidenten' in Norwegian, and 'Præsidentens Mænd' in Danish, which is, like, one of the most sexist retitlings in the history of television.

Frederik B, Wednesday, 5 June 2019 11:52 (seven years ago)

All the Præsidentens Mænd

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 16:11 (seven years ago)

he fucked that elephant up

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 20:05 (seven years ago)

BREAKING: Today the @DNC told the @JayInslee campaign that they will not host a climate debate.

— Jamal Raad (@jamalraad) June 5, 2019

Simon H., Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:26 (seven years ago)

don't scare the electorate with sacrifice

a Mets fan who gave up on everything in the mid '80s (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:33 (seven years ago)

how about including climate change as a question in any of the debates this year? that would be an improvement over 2016, at least. they could just include the climate question as part of the overall suite of questions. you know, a real "All of the Above" strategy for the climate question

i will never make a typo ever again (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:41 (seven years ago)

the cool candidates should just organize their own climate-specific debate, honestly. "we are here because while we disagree on some specifics, we agree with the american people and with scientists worldwide that we face perhaps the greatest crisis in our history, and we believe we owe it to the voters to talk turkey" etc. etc.

Good morning, how are you, I'm (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 21:58 (seven years ago)

the cool candidates should just organize their own climate-specific debate, honestly

on that subject

.@JayInslee says in a statement that the DNC turned down his request for a climate debate and "if we participated in anyone else's climate debate, we will not be invited to future debates." pic.twitter.com/uT628MnoS0

— Gideon Resnick (@GideonResnick) June 5, 2019

Simon H., Wednesday, 5 June 2019 22:00 (seven years ago)

Counterpoint: I don't care so long as negotiations with debate moderators include climate change questions.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 22:03 (seven years ago)

xp wow I didn't think I could hate the DNC any more than I already did but there ya go

Ambient Police (sleeve), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 22:06 (seven years ago)

^^^

d'ILM for Murder (Hadrian VIII), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 22:09 (seven years ago)

the hell

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 5 June 2019 23:56 (seven years ago)

Warren on Chris Hayes' show tonight -- townhall.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 June 2019 00:00 (seven years ago)

she's fucking killing this.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 June 2019 00:25 (seven years ago)

good, let's put the damn stake in Biden's heart already:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/joe-biden-supports-hyde-amendment-splits-2020-dems/story?id=63506190

Ambient Police (sleeve), Thursday, 6 June 2019 00:42 (seven years ago)

Fuck Tom Perez.

Gov. Inslee is exactly right. Climate change is the biggest challenge we face. Every candidate running for president should have a serious set of policies to address it, and should be eager to defend those proposals in a debate. https://t.co/6uprXIJKa2

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) June 6, 2019

Jay Inslee Says He May Defy the DNC on a Climate Change Debate

despondently sipping tomato soup (Sanpaku), Friday, 7 June 2019 00:08 (seven years ago)

I sure hope he does.

the public eating of beans (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 7 June 2019 00:39 (seven years ago)

seconded

Ambient Police (sleeve), Friday, 7 June 2019 00:42 (seven years ago)

totally makes sense for him to do it. it helps the cause he's trying to promote. even if he were to participate in one of the main debates, he would get 1/12th of the questions. he could make all of his answers about climate change in some way, but it would be easily drowned out by the rest of the debate. a sacrilegious climate change debate would be entirely about his primary issue, and would get much more attention than it would have without the DNC's unwelcome boner.

is warren insinuating that she would also 'defy the DNC' and attend a non-sanctioned climate change debate? it seems like it, and i hope all the other leading candidates do the same. if there's critical mass perhaps the DNC will relent

i will never make a typo ever again (Karl Malone), Friday, 7 June 2019 00:48 (seven years ago)

Whew! That didn't take long.

Joseph R. Biden Jr. on Thursday reversed his support for the Hyde Amendment, a measure that prohibits most federal funding for abortion, after facing nearly two days of vigorous backlash from many in his own party.

Mr. Biden denounced the amendment in a speech before a Democratic National Committee gala in Georgia, where the Republican governor recently signed into law a far-reaching anti-abortion bill. A number of Republican-led states, mostly in the South, have passed restrictive abortion laws in recent months.

Mr. Biden cited those efforts, calling them “extreme laws,” as he explained his decision to change course on an issue that had been the latest example of Mr. Biden’s refusal to bow to Democratic Party litmus tests.

“If I believe health care is a right, as I do, I can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone’s zip code,” Mr. Biden said.

recriminations from the nitpicking woke (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 June 2019 02:25 (seven years ago)

When Joe Biden sexually harasses 14 year old girls, do you think he ever goes, "hey, they call me Grow Biden. Wanna see why?"

rapmaster_5000, Friday, 7 June 2019 03:18 (seven years ago)

no

gbx, Friday, 7 June 2019 04:13 (seven years ago)

True. That's why my vote is committed to Elizabeth Warren. She talks the talk, baby.

rapmaster_5000, Friday, 7 June 2019 04:15 (seven years ago)

Hail Jupiter. Hail Rome.

rapmaster_5000, Friday, 7 June 2019 04:21 (seven years ago)

oh god another "comedy" account

Tiltin' My Lens Photography (stevie), Friday, 7 June 2019 09:02 (seven years ago)

I haven’t figured out who they’re targeting. Hope they don’t think they’re getting Zion

Heez, Friday, 7 June 2019 12:55 (seven years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.