love* in the time of plague (and by love* i mean brexit* and other dreary matters of uk politics)

Ten years is more than you get for rape.

there you go folks, Keir Starmer supporting a Mail on Sunday campaign on a manufactured issue designed to distract from the aims and focuses of the BLM movement that specifically contemptually name drops “left wingers.” i dare you to defend this party and this leadership. https://t.co/aw5bnl7U8i

— mimi🏴☭ (@ameliamcd_) June 13, 2020

Saw that 'British Prime Ministers' was trending and wow the tinfoil hats are having a field day with that one.

Boris Johnson is set to scrap plans to allow people to change their legal gender by “self-identifying” as male or female, it has been reported.

Measures drawn up under Theresa May’s government to enable transgender people to change their birth certificate without a medical diagnosis have been ditched by the prime minister’s team, according to the Sunday Times.

Instead, the paper said ministers plan to announce a ban on “gay cure” therapies, in what was described as an attempt to placate LGBTQ+ people.

At the same time, the government was said to be preparing to set out new safeguards to protect female-only spaces including refuges and public lavatories.

The details were said to be contained in a leaked paper setting out the government’s long-delayed response to a public consultation on the Gender Recognition Act.

The Sunday Times said that the paper was “basically ready” and was being slated for publication by the equalities minister, Liz Truss, at the end of July before MPs break for the summer.

A No 10 source told the PA news agency that the details of the response were yet to be finalised, and the prime minister would have the final say on the recommendations.

According to the Sunday Times, about 100,000 responses to the public consultation were received with an overwhelming majority – about 70% – in favour of allowing people to self-identify as a man or a woman.

Officials were said to believe that the results had been “skewed” by an “avalanche” of responses generated by trans rights groups, although transgender people, including non-binary people, are estimated to make up about 1% of the UK population.

Of course the results were skewed by responses by people who this legislation affects, that's literally the point of a consultation. This makes me so sick - apparently they spent two years on this and then decided to throw away the results because they didn't like them.

"equalities minister, Liz Truss"

this is a sick joke.

it was funny the first time, but come on now...

This government was never going to put through the reforms - fucking horrible all the same and puts them up there with such women-loving luminaries as Orbán and *checks notes* Trump.

By the way I was one of the 70% of responders and a link to the consultation did my WhatsApp group rounds in the days before it closed, so it’s not true by a long shot to imply that it was only activists who supported the changes. Especially as Prosecco stormfront and the rest were actively soliciting negative responses.

yeah same, pretty insulting to all of us who support Trans rights because it's basic human decency

Measures drawn up under Theresa May’s government to enable transgender people

huh

Yep, this wasn’t a major party political issue four years ago. Shows how quickly things can change with concerted effort to make them worse.

It's because they don't give a shit about trans people or self identification either way and have chosen to do this because they know because they know the ensuing argument will be much more difficult for Labour and they can then make hay with the inevitable tensions. This is Dominic Cummings on autopilot.

This btw is what happened with the 8th amendment being introduced in Ireland - there was a fascinating but depressing documentary about it a few years back about the effort to get it put into the constitution.

It helps when Andrew Marr on the national broadcaster introduces an item on this story with, "There's a culture war going on in this country".

I can't imagine how scary it must feel to be Trans in this country right now as the entire establishment closes ranks on you. terfs will try and lecture people on who has the right to speak out but fuck them. it's obvious the Tories have never put away their little list and I fear it's only going to get nastier, who knows how low this is going to sink with nothing but a brylcreemed fringe leading the charge. a huge problem is that civil society is itself dominated by the same inbred oxbridge/bbc/Tory student politics networks of wankers who will politely disagree at most but certainly do nothing to endanger government funds.

pressure does work. Last week James Purnell signed BBC Radio up to the “equality in audio pact”. It’s just a promise on paper right now but provides a ready-made stick to beat the BBC with in the future (similar to gender pay gap promises). I know it seems small but I never thought it would happen.

me in February 'he's not our boy but he seems a decent social democrat and maybe there'll be a strategy, let's wait and see', me in June 'absolutely fuck him and all who apologise for him'

— Owen Hatherley (@owenhatherley) June 14, 2020

xposts I didn't mean to imply it was "only" activists who supported the reforms, anyone decent person should be behind these - I meant more that the Government logic of "trans people tipped the scales" that views that as a bug rather than a feature is completely missing the point

very curious how starmer voters/backers (including our legendary silent six on ilx) feel about him now, whether he's turning out m/l as they hoped, or if they feel duped/disappointed/naive, and what their takeaway is if so

Maybe what Labour needs right now is a good old-fashioned by-election scare in a formerly safe metropolitan seat. Otherwise they'll conclude they can afford to keep pissing off or disappointing those voters with impunity.

I don't know if it just because my t/l has been shorn of all the types that think Starmer is good, but since the early days of the leadership campaign back in those heady days of pubs being open I haven't seen any low profile ordinary punters (as in not ayesha hazarika type melts for hire or moderate Labour MPs) saying positive things about Starmer. They really are the silent majority of the Labour membership, and perhaps some of them might be a bit embarrassed at the state of him - but they certainly aren't expressing it if they are!

I will fight to the death for my right to smack trump in the face with a pineapple.

having my sentence commuted as i successfully convince kier starmer QC that i am a scat fan who was pissing on thatcher's grave as a gesture of affection, to honour her memory

— Stan The Golden Boy (@tristandross) June 14, 2020

i was not his greatest fan but I did not have anywhere near calzlike animosity (I respected that he played ball on the Corbyn Shadow cabinet, I had a lingering affection for him from the mclibel film) I sometimes struggle to resolve my distrust and dislike of the EU (racist, imperialist, neoliberal) with my greater hatred for brexiteers. I hoped he might surprise his backers with a lefter than expected offering. I've been consistently shocked by how they seem to think that 2015 was their heyday.* my boyfriend who vaguely knows starmer through an ex and has always been in favour of him and thinks he's a decent guy all in all etc and refuses to engage my anti starmer naysaying all the time in the interest of not giving into total nihilistic depression (I sometimes see his point) has finally completely lost it with the defend Churchill thing. every day is a new fucking outrage though, I'm tired but I guess that's how they wear you into submission.


*maybe this is so partly because for so many of the current Labour right and their backers it was. creasey, Phillips, Hillary Benn, etc, these guys were too late for new Labour and got a short taste of being the centre of attention before momentum thugs yanked away their rightful claim to make 'difficult' decisions. think of that ed Milliband advisor who has made a huge career for herself as someone who we're supposed to trust has some clue what Labour is about and what the electorate want. maybe dinner plates that promise to curtail Trans rights or teaspoons engraved with pro-landlord sentiments. there's something so tragic about these creeps that reminds me of the most uncool people I went to school, always furiously aggrieved by their own defiant refusal to admit they'd missed the boat on everything. it's somehow linked to how embarrassing their taste in music is.

reading back thru the archives to remember when ppl wld speak fondly of starmzy I was struck this, the 8th mention of him, well before most of the praise:

keir starmer though a lawyer of some distinction and (doubtless reassuringly to the pr people) vaguely alpha in persona should not be taken for a civil libs type, any dpp is likely to be an authoritarian personality shithead and he is no different

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2012/mar/07/keir-starmer-guidelines-protester-prosecution

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/29/paul-chambers-twitter-joke-airport

― nakhchivan, Friday, May 15, 2015 7:39 PM (five years ago) bookmarkflaglink

I didn’t have particularly high hopes for him and he hasn’t exceeded them. He has done the job he was elected to do with the minimum competence required. I don’t think failing to run into every brick wall the Mail has crudely painted a tunnel on the side of will hurt him much - the real arguments are going to come when he gets around to outlining policy and gender recognition is one of the canaries in the coal mine for how much he’s willing to pivot on what would have been considered core principles previously.

leader of the opposition, not prepared to oppose properly

we have the 21st highest population in the world yet the third highest death total from the virus, Labour should be trouncing them and being "the grown-up in the room" isn't going to make a real difference when 200 people are dying every day and no accountability is being challenged

Starmzy is too clever to get drawn into this showboating media bullshit, he understands that if the Labour Party is to thrive all policy needs to be focused on the 100,000 dithering Tory cunts that actually decide electoral outcomes in the UK.

it's not so much starmer himself I'm interested in as how this instructive experience might be interpreted by his supporters

you can criticise the faults of Corbynism and its pathetically weak legacy that has seemingly dissipated into dust in the space of a few months and some of the policy compromises made by his shadow cabinet. But this cunt is beyond defending and I've got absolute 100% certainty his regime going to deliver everything that was bad about Milibandism with some further pivots to the right because he is a tory law & order cunt to the core.

"any dpp is likely to be an authoritarian personality shithead and he is no different"

nakh otm as fuck!

Starmer fans aren't going to care as long as the poll ratings keep going up.

Still, ShariVari OTM - when the Mail phones up the Labour press office they aren't going to offer space for nuanced discussion of Churchill or Britain's colonial legacy. They're doing it because they want to splash 'FURY AS STARMER BACKS CHURCHILL THUGS', so defusing that is all you can really do. Loudly trumpeting Starmer's minimal 'involvement' in their 'campaign' is the next best thing they can do because it gets exactly the reaction it has today. Arguably the Mail wants a human rights lawyer in power even less than it wants a socialist - at least they can sell papers by shrieking about how terrible the socialist is.

The question really is not "what do my supporters want me to say" it's "what does my opponent want me to say right now?" Avoiding that is step one but it's the job of supporters - both enthusiastic and reluctant - to loudly signal "don't take my vote for granted". Hence my point about a by-election.

Yes it's borne of cowardice, but naivety doesn't really get you anywhere either. Jon Stone - who I think is excellent - was saying on Twitter that endlessly avoiding culture war traps leads successfully avoids the trap but also means they control the argument and leads to right wing hegemony. Which is right, but in all substantive terms we've had right wing hegemony since December anyway (and actually for 30 years grim lol).

good luck to him forensically trying to step over the culture war, but there is only so long you can maintain that until you end up applauding someone getting 10 years for having a dump on Enoch Powell's grave.

Enoch Powell isn't in his grave iirc

They'll get him with one of these eventually but they're holding off the big ammo for when Labour has a poll lead. Question is whether anyone will care because that'll be the point where the government has already burned down the house and killed your parents and shat everywhere.

xp

CCHQ should use his re-animated talking corpse in a propaganda vid to encourage people to go back into shopping centres, pubs, restaurants etc

I'm surprised anyone is surprised about starmer- haven't followed the party so I missed that brief period when he was talked up as a potentially credible corbyn-lite figure (which would have been bad enough)

as someone who never joined it disturbs me how the leftists who choose to stick with labour seem to find it way too easy to fall behind the leader and assume good faith which clearly isn't there. if people are getting off the train now I support it

Honestly he's either gradually succeeding by the yardstick that his supporters set out right at the start or he's letting people down in exactly the way he was always going to but either way I doubt there are many people who are disappointed in him per se, just because this is the course he was obviously going to take from the very start and anyone who expected otherwise is an idiot.

Not throwing shade on anyone here obviously but things that Owen Hatherley tweet are very much 'what did you think was going to happen?'

When you are highish profile lefty commentariat you have to put on a pretence of giving him a fair chance rather than calling him a cunt since January like mere message board fulez like me.

I think when Hatherley/left twitter express disgust at Starmer that is working through grief @ the way Corbyn ended rather than not knowing what Starmer was about.

Yes that makes sense.

I think that grief process started when that first YouGov poll showed his commanding lead over RLB, the denial stage.

while I have never been a fan I am still somewhat surprised at just how relentlessly starmer has pushed right and authoritarian, I imagined more cautious blandness. there's quite a discrepancy between his reaction to recent protests and racism and that ridiculous campaign video he produced

RLB being all constructive and friendly while Starmer's team doing sexist and dogwhistle attacks on here, they should have gone for his jugular then.

On her I meant

It probably wouldn't have been enough but better than doing such a bland campaign

not that I buy into the idea of some Real starmz that can be intuited by carefully reversing all the triangulation, or glimpsed in moments when he lets his carefully managed optics-shield down, it's just striking how immediately & starkly different LOTO starmz is from Leadership Campaign starmz & regardless of how obvious (hmmm) it was that this would happen, the labour membership are have either dropped basically all their beliefs in response to the last election, or they are some mix of disappointed/duped/naive

ofc I'm really just talking abt ppl who backed corbyn and then starmer

If he ran against RLB again tomorrow, do you think the outcome would be different?