― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link
nb I'm only dissing cheap OAKTASTIC chardonnay so plz don't kill me winefreaks.
― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link
ROFFLE!!
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:12 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22wine-sipping+liberals%22&btnG=Search
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:41 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.wesjones.com/frank1.htm
The Gore-voting people of the Blue states, meanwhile, were dismissed with what we will call the latte libel: the suggestion that liberals are identifiable by their tastes and consumer preferences and that these tastes and preferences reveal the essential arrogance and foreignness of liberalism. And since many of the pundits who were hailing the virtues of the Red states - pundits, remember, who were conservatives and who supported George W. Bush - actually, physically lived in Blue states that went for Gore, the rules of this idiotic game allowed them to present the latte libel in the elevated language of the confession. David Brooks, who has since made a career out of projecting the liberal stereotype onto the map, took to the pages of The Atlantic to admit on behalf of everyone who lives in a Blue zone that they are all snobs, toffs, wusses, ignoramuses, and utterly out of touch with the authentic life of the people.
― Gold Teeth II (kenan), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gold Teeth II (kenan), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Anthony (Plato Guy), Thursday, 7 October 2004 18:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link
this is not a serious country any more.
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:16 (nineteen years ago) link
this is not a serious country any more.We were ever...?
― Ian Riese-Moraine. To Hell with you and your gradual evolution! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― Leon Future Coffee (Ex Leon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― g e o f f (gcannon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link
Failin, you couldn't hit it. There's nothing to hit!
― donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link
― donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Rocker For Light (on a Bad Brains kick) (Eleventy-Twelve), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― Leon Future Coffee (Ex Leon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link
"The fate of our troops isn't a game. The fate of the victims on 9/11 is not a game." But she told me several times that, as she put it in an e-mail, "most of what I say, I say to amuse myself and amuse my friends. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about anything beyond that."
― Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― shookout (shookout), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link
interesting mix of reactions from righty blogs
― kingfish, Monday, 18 April 2005 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― Star Cauliflower (Star Cauliflower), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link
Does Ann Coulter make a positive contribution to American political culture?http://cgi.pathfinder.com/cgi-bin/graph/piegraph?height=150&width=420&bg=ffffff&fg=000000&d1=78250,990000,Yes%2016.6%&d2=390025,000033,No%2082.8%&d3=2629,999966,Don
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101050425/story.html
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago) link
And the Ace of Spades decides that the Coulter cover is actually "proof of media bias" against conservatives. Why? Because Coulter didn't get a cover until now.
Ha ha ha ha.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:27 (nineteen years ago) link
And yeay, I'd "hit it", but then I have the hots for todd rundgren as well, heh.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link
I thought the same thing!
I got super-annoyed when I first saw this (Tom Delay barely gets a mention in the corner, and he actually has some REAL influence over American government!). Now my attitude's more like, "Eh. Let the baby have her bottle."
It also makes me laugh at Time since they're about two years behind on even CONSIDERING a front page story on someone like her.
― sugarpants: new and improved! (sugarpants), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 12:59 (nineteen years ago) link
She is the Paris Hilton of neocons.
(I wonder when Time is going to do their cover story on La Hilton?)
― sugarpants: new and improved! (sugarpants), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:02 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.timecanada.com/story.adp?storyid=001&part=1&area=
― spitoon, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link
Baaaaaahahahahaha!
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link
She had her moment in 2002; after that book came out, none of her following ones were even that successful. She's so passe; now it's all about, you know, reading Teh Bible, not Ann Coulter.
(I like looking back at this thread - I said Arianna could take Maureen two years ago!!)
― Vic in Alderaan (Vic), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:45 (nineteen years ago) link