all i'm saying is there have only been bloody films since the end of the 60s, and some of them have won oscars, and that's not a bad thing.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:38 (sixteen years ago) link
I wasn't talking good and bad. The Departed is significantly bloodier than The Godfather, and much less sentimental (and much worse).
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link
So what does everyone think will actually win? If Atonement is there I'm still betting it'll win but if not it has to be No Country.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link
Atonement won't win.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link
The Academy's reminder list of eligible features:
http://www.oscars.org/80academyawards/reminder/reminder_titles.html
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link
they should nut up and give it to 'zodiac' but having been released ages ago they won't.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link
Silence of the Lambs was released in February '91, but being a hit helped.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link
If Juno keeps making dough, I wouldn't be surprised if it's chosen over the bloodier (and superior) competition.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link
Morbs, that jacked-up bloody action epic meme came from you.
― Eric H., Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link
he basically only does oscar films, which i think is lame but there we have it.
Except for that Terry Gilliam movie that no one saw.
-- milo z, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:43 (3 weeks ago) Link
Daniel-Day Lewis has never been in a Terry Gilliam movie.
― nickalicious, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link
think milo means that film DDL did with his wife, dunno why.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link
xp: I know, EH, but they're your words and nrq is misusing my idea. I was pretty much speaking of The Departed and whatever followed (ie, I haven't seen NCfOM so I'm only guessing where it fits).
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link
(and I plead not guilty to ever starting a fuggin' meme)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link
I knew he didn't work much, but I didn't realize he's only been in a grand total of 8 films since My Left Foot.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 15 January 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link
why wait til Monday to forecast?
Pic: Into the Wild, Juno, Michael Clayton, No Country, TWB Blood
Actor: Clooney, Day-Lewis, Depp, Hirsch, Mortensen
Actress: Blanchett, Christie, Cotillard, Jolie, Page
Sup. Actor: Affleck, Bardem, Hoffman, Holbrook, Wilkinson
Sup. Actress: Blanchett, Keener, Redgrave, Ryan, Swinton
Director: PTA, Coens, Gilroy, Penn, Schnabel
...and the rest, as Bill Murray usta say, who cares? I think Joe Wright and/or Knightley might survive the Atonement inertia, but oh well.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link
I doubt Blanchett will make the actress cut, even with the SAG nomination. I vote Linney.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link
The main reason I keep insisting that Atonement will be there and win is that a) I hated it and b) I predicted it two months ago. No logic, just stubbornness.
SO does everyone think Day-Lewis is a shoo-in for the win or is Depp a dark horse possibility?
I can't see Blanchett getting a lead actress nom.
xp
― Simon H., Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, I'm pretty sure Blanchett was put back in supporting.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link
no, I'm saying double nomination for Cate (Elizabeth II). they really really like Blanchett (ditto Depp and Keener).
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link
Unless of course she gets a nod for Elizabeth: The Golden Age!
xp again
― Simon H., Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link
but c'mon, that was so reviled there's no way she'll get a nod for it.
― Simon H., Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link
oh, noooooo? Reviled enough for SAG!
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link
Since the ballots were mailed before the Juno buzz I doubt Ellen Page is the choice to win, but I'm still having trouble with the star of a furren film about Edith Piaf (despite the Academy's love of biopics) and Julie Christie being the frontrunners.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link
Huh, I feel like the Juno buzz started as soon as it was released in early-to-mid December. (I saw it on Dec. 16.) Ballots weren't mailed out until Dec. 26.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link
uh, surely the "buzz" hasn't yet affected anyone's chance to win as long as they're nominated?
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link
ask the makers of Atonement.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link
jaymc: it wasn't a major hit yet.
but I don't get that analogy; Ellen Page is widely believed to be a near-cinch nomination. Presumably the direction of the buzzshit after the 22nd will determine her chances of upsetting Cotillard and Christie. (Has anyone as young as 20 won Best Actress? Counting the seconds til jaymc's answer...)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link
Marlee Matlin was 21: she's the youngest.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link
Page will turn 21 before the ceremony but will still be a few months younger than Matlin was.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link
omg
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link
And yeah, I'm with Morbs, I don't see how the date nomination ballots were sent out has anything to do Ellen Page's chances for a win.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link
xpost lol
Ellen Page is widely believed to be a near-cinch nominatio
No, guys, I'm talking about a WIN, not the nod, as I wrote here:
Since the ballots were mailed before the Juno buzz I doubt Ellen Page is the choice to win
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link
Seems like kind of an up-to-the-minute thing to me though - like Murphy apparently getting fucked over last year thanks to Norbit, which didn't come out until, what, February?
― Simon H., Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link
So what ballots are you talking about, Alfred?
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link
since the AWARD ballots aren't going out for a week or more yet, "before the Juno buzz" ain't relevant.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 17 January 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link
yeah, that part I didn't know. I should hang out with gabbneb to learn how balloting works.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 January 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link
I mean, I don't know the exact date that award ballots get sent out, but I assume they can't be sent out until it's determined who's on them.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 January 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link
This forecaster brings the goods, and joins the echo chamber of non-rockist critics of I'm Not There as "insufferably academic." Kids today!
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 January 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link
man i *wish* academia involved that much awesomeness.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 18 January 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link
Well, that bit was basically from Ed's mouth to my blog entry. I trust his take.
― Eric H., Friday, 18 January 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link
fooey!
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link
(I wondered why you were writing in the royal "we")
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, and all the "should be nominateds" are Ed's too. Though I would've shortlisted Hal Holbrook and Vanessa Redgrave too, obv.
― Eric H., Friday, 18 January 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link
boy, you HAVE stopped going to movies.
I thought Anna Paquin won BA for The Piano
-- wanko ergo sum, Friday, January 18, 2008 1:05 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark Link
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i think it was best supporting actress
-- Rubyredd, Friday, January 18, 2008 1:08 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark Link
And anyway, the youngest in that category is Tatum O'Neal for 'Paper Moon'.
-- Michael White, Friday, January 18, 2008 6:35 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
jaymc, do the math!
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link
Another reason why it's dumb that I'm banned from the Noise Board.
O'Neal (10) and Paquin (11) were both nominated and won for Best Supporting Actress.
Justin Henry (8) was nominated but didn't win for Best Supporting Actor.
As far as the Best Actress category, Ellen Page won't be the youngest nominated. That was Keisha Castle-Hughes, for Whale Rider, a couple of years ago. She was 13.
― jaymc, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link
This is amazingly comprehensive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_and_youngest_Academy_Award_winners_and_nominees
― jaymc, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link
(I mentioned Justin Henry just because he's the youngest person to be nominated for any kind of Academy Award, besides those kiddie awards they gave to Shirley Temple and Mickey Rooney in the '30s.)
― jaymc, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link
are you kids still at it?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link