ForenSix Opposition - Politics in the Soon To Be Former UK in Autumn 2020

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4053 of them)

i remember arguing back during the Blair years that there really wasn't a golden age Labour Party and that even the 1945 government was a kind of historical fluke calz.

thing is, we can know all this stuff, but you never quite give up caring. i think that's *probably* good? just about? as long as you don't let the selfish melt cunts ruin you

big man on scampus (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:07 (three years ago) link

For the avoidance of doubt I'm not saying he's antisemitic but there's a self-destructive tone-deafness at play here.

― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 October 2020 14:44 (nineteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Its genuinely unfortunate but he's kind of a dimwit

anvil, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:09 (three years ago) link

Purges in the PLP and on LJ's Charlton forum alike, what dark days.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:09 (three years ago) link

A split or a new party wouldn't accomplish much, but I'd really like to see mass organised abstentions from the left, starting with the Mayor and council elections next year.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:10 (three years ago) link

ILX is within the limits of my internet comfort zone but I am absolutely astonished that anyone would want to discuss this on a football forum right now.

Matt DC, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:12 (three years ago) link

everyone's the insane far-left firebrand somewhere ;)

imago, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:14 (three years ago) link

lol fuck the greens

liberté, égalité, scampé (gyac), Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:18 (three years ago) link

I think its interesting the way in which the idea of conspiracy has been so conveniently invalidated in mainstream discourses as though it was the same as a 'conspiracy theory.' There are literally criminal charges that exist regarding conspiracy to commit certain crimes etc and things like corruption and fraud (which are clearly part of the contemporary political/business landscape) are by their nature conspiratorial. And we as outsiders can never *fully* know and are likely to speculate on this and that connection. I think this is inherently different from the thing known as 'conspiracy theories' which are real and which I'm sure we've all had some misguided family member or co-worker blather at us for hours while we try to change the subject.

Its just very interesting that conspiracy theories have become so prominently dismissed by a media/political class that is defined by its insiderishness and matiness (which can, to those outside of the backchannels of power, feel intensely conpiratorial). It seems obvious that the attempts to undermine sanders followed much the same formulas as corbyn: "unelectable"! and then, in corbyn's case, the more efficacious antisemtism allegations. (it seemed really bizarre when this first started on sanders, I imagine this will be more successful when he's out of the frame and the focus has shifted even more to omar/tlaib/etc) In the instance of sanders it was clear there was a conspiracy (the klobuchar/buttigeig announcements, seemingly *orchestrated* by obama).

But you know, there are conspiracies. People do conspire! There was clearly a large will to use the real issue of antisemitism for political gain by longstanding enemies of corbyn specifically and the left more generally. And i'm sure there was some element of people, you know, conspiring. I myself have conspired. With friends and colleagues. not to undermine the left or to bring about a new world order. smaller scale conspiracies. There was literally a widely reported plot whereby large numbers of the plp resigned from posts en masse. This is hardly chemtrails, its fairly innocuous stuff, but there was definitely plotting one the part of the right throughout this. And not by *jews* but by cynical pr men like chuka umunna. peter mandelsohn said that he was working to undermine the corbyn leadership every day.

We used to just take this stuff for granted, that this was the mean stuff, the murkier stuff in politics that maybe had to be read between the lines. all the little knives in the back. Like in that shitty program with ian richardson that people think is good. It does feel like one of the more subtle line that's been drawn is that we're no longer supposed to talk about it. sorry if this is a bit "these days if you say x you'll be put in jail" tho

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:28 (three years ago) link

sorry i guess that could have stayed in my head

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:29 (three years ago) link

No it was relevant and true

big man on scampus (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:34 (three years ago) link

A split or a new party wouldn't accomplish much, but I'd really like to see mass organised abstentions from the left, starting with the Mayor and council elections next year.

Could you explain further? At first glance it feels like this would have the same results of creating a new party but with less leverage.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 29 October 2020 15:40 (three years ago) link

An organised abstention by Labour voters -- as opposed to a private choice by individuals, some of whom were members -- that delivered heavier defeats in the North West and London councils is a way of saying that you really can't take our votes for granted. That is way if creating leverage to me.

That it won't happen shows what we know, that there is v little in the way of militancy, but we need more of that because this won't do.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:06 (three years ago) link

Lab will be garbage for Muslims too so why not organise abstentions with Muslim groups? Other BAME groups too.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:12 (three years ago) link

I figure that even if it's an organized effort media would still spin it as "well the numbers aren't really about that, voters stayed home because labour is still tarnished by the Corbyn era" - and clearly the party cares more about keeping the left down than it does about winning elections.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:14 (three years ago) link

It's not about what media do or don't say. That matters less than building an organized movement that will do things as a disciplined bloc.

As it is, a lot of good left-wing ppl are going to vote for Starmer to keep the Tories out lol because they are evil, like Donald Trump.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:21 (three years ago) link

sounds like something a party would do

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:23 (three years ago) link

i have to say, stay and abstain sounds like warped starmerism to me

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:23 (three years ago) link

like weirdly the worst of both worlds. I don't know how you can have an organised bloc based around that. surely one thing corbyn got right was to have a vision that people felt invested in, in part because it was backed up by a policy narrative (albeit one that unravelled at the last election)

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:25 (three years ago) link

More like an organised campaign. It could come from people that organise in Trade Unions. I liked that Unite were decreasing their contributions to the party, for example.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:25 (three years ago) link

hello user gyac and the lads. have been too busy lately mostly doing a nervous breakdown but wouldn't miss today for the world. lovely stuff so far

||||||||, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:26 (three years ago) link

thumbsup emoji

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:26 (three years ago) link

hope yr feeling better sadlol

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:27 (three years ago) link

^ Yes

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:29 (three years ago) link

It's not about what media do or don't say. That matters less than building an organized movement that will do things as a disciplined bloc.

An actual party would at least provide concrete evidence to these "good left-wing ppl" you speak of that there's another way while a gesture of abstention that can be spun a thousand ways would not.

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:32 (three years ago) link

sry to hear about yr nervy b user barcode, but we’re here for you!

liberté, égalité, scampé (gyac), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:34 (three years ago) link

Keir Starmer vs Page 27 of the EHRC Report pic.twitter.com/3l9vi9WD4E

— jewdⒶs // ייִדהודה (@jewdas) October 29, 2020

think this backs up what SV is saying about Starmer explicitly making out that what Corbyn said was denialism itself.

stet, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:34 (three years ago) link

Best of luck to ILX User Radiator/Zebra, hope you're doing OK.

Matt DC, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:36 (three years ago) link

^ thinking of you, lines and dots

stet, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:39 (three years ago) link

yeah, all the best to user barcode in this difficult times

you are like a scampicane, there's calm in your fries (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:44 (three years ago) link

hoping you have some Smiths scampo-based snacks to hand in this difficult time

liberté, égalité, scampé (gyac), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:48 (three years ago) link

An actual party would at least provide concrete evidence to these "good left-wing ppl" you speak of that there's another way while a gesture of abstention that can be spun a thousand ways would not.

― Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 29 October 2020 bookmarkflaglink

There is very little way under this system as it is and anything that's organised is more powerful than a mere gesture.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:49 (three years ago) link

Good to see you barold, be well

big man on scampus (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 October 2020 16:50 (three years ago) link

Suggestions on Twitter that the Corbyn statement was pre-agreed with the LOTO office.

Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Thursday, 29 October 2020 17:31 (three years ago) link

Absolutely seething that you gazumped me ffs.

Isn’t this what they did with RLB?

liberté, égalité, scampé (gyac), Thursday, 29 October 2020 17:32 (three years ago) link

I’ve heard from a reliable chain of people that comments made at JC’s press conference were the reason and statement was OKed by LOTO.

scampopo (suzy), Thursday, 29 October 2020 17:40 (three years ago) link

wait, so if i've got this right: loto was consistently called on to intervene, tom watson made moves to forcefully intervene in ways that would have broken gdpr, and those interventions to expedite the complaints process are the main finding of wrongdoing by the report.

I have to say the report is suspiciously *vaguely* worded throughout: so interference is simply described as interference throughout, often in ways that implies that interference sought to obstruct rather than expedite processes. The leaked report showed examples of attempts to expedite processes in the face of a wilfully obstructive hq team, how to overcome these problems then?

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:15 (three years ago) link

Frustratingly and it seems intentionally vague is how this whole saga has been from the start.

nashwan, Thursday, 29 October 2020 18:33 (three years ago) link

I’m told NEC members in an ongoing meeting are asking which rule was breached by Corbyn today – the specific reason for his suspension – but gen sec David Evans not saying. (Starmer not on the call.)

— Sienna Rodgers (@siennamarla) October 29, 2020

Scampo di tutti i Scampi (ShariVari), Thursday, 29 October 2020 19:04 (three years ago) link

St*rmer, how do you forensically suspend somebody from the party challenge

calzino, Thursday, 29 October 2020 20:20 (three years ago) link

Nandy came out with that old nugget "anti-Semitism is a form of racism that punches up" again on PM earlier. I don't care what she was actually trying to say and it unfortunately came out wrong etc.. She's consistently a clumsy communicator and a nasty bigot, who never seems to fail to muddy the waters and end up sounding like a dumb racist tory every time she goes off-piste.

calzino, Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:16 (three years ago) link

The Guardian has published a cartoon of a beheading, in which Jeremy Corbyn is portrayed as the martyr St John the Baptist [at the court of King Herod]

There are at least two big reasons to question the editorial judgement, in terms of the content and the timing (France) too.

— Sunder Katwala (@sundersays) October 29, 2020

Holy shit, that is... I mean who the hell OK'ed that one?

Matt DC, Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:42 (three years ago) link

for fuck’s sake

you are like a scampicane, there's calm in your fries (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:48 (three years ago) link

Liberals xp

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:49 (three years ago) link

unbelievable

big man on scampus (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:49 (three years ago) link

Looking forward to the whole company doing sensitivity training

big man on scampus (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 October 2020 21:51 (three years ago) link

it's almost like they have a very laissez faire no-standards-apply attitude when it comes to attacking an already deposed LOTO of the left.

calzino, Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:00 (three years ago) link

it's amazing some far-right headcase never murdered jez. It's always easier to attack someone who is frequently on a push iron rather than the man in the hench car who is cosplaying Death Race 2000

calzino, Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:09 (three years ago) link

the murdoch press has been literally goading anyone who might be inclined for years now so yeah surprising it hasn't happened already

plax (ico), Thursday, 29 October 2020 22:11 (three years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.